rocco69

A study opf R.A 9165 (Dangerous Drugs Act of 2002) will show that it punishes the person who will "sell, trade, administer, dispense, deliver, give away to another, distribute dispatch in transit or transport any dangerous drug". on the other hand, the user can be convicted only for possession or use of dangerous drugs. yung alleged texts kung saan a persons tries to buy, if true, would probably constitute an attempt to sell or trade wherein the seller or trader could be punishable under the law. in short, siya pa ang sasabit pag ginawa niya yan.

remember also, mahirap patunayan nga galing sa yo ang text (andaling magpalit ng SIM ngayon). pag napatunayan man niya, kung ang mga sagot niya sa text ay magpapatunay na pusher siya, siya pa ang madadale, dahil di naman yan use or posession, na siyang krimen na maaring malabag ng isang user.

kasuhan mo na ng BP 22 para mahimashimasan ang ka-opisina mong yan

I loaned my ex-officemate a large amount of money. He issued a post-dated check as payment but when the check matured he kept asking for time to fund the check. After two months passed, I said I will deposit the check even if it bounces. He became hostile and threatened to accuse me of trying to buy drugs from him. He said he will print previous texts I sent him and edit them to make it appear as if I tried to buy drugs from him.

 

Can he use these edited printouts of text messages to accuse me? Or more importantly, will any court accept these as evidence against me? Thank you in advance.

kung ang lupa ay public land, i.e., lupa na pag-aari ng gobyerno = 0. Bawal ang korporasyon na maging may-ari ng public land (Section 3, Art. XII, Constitution).

kung ang lupa ay private, kahit ilang hektarya pa ang bilhin niya, pwede.

yung nga lang, kung ito ay private AGRICULTURAL land, maari itong kunin ng gobyerno para ipa land reform. Sa ilalim ng land reform, maaaring magtira ang landowner ng hanggang 5 hektarya. itong limang hektarya ay hindi na pwedeng i-land reform, i.e. hindi pwedeng kunin ng gobyerno para ipamigay sa mga magsasaka. (Section 6, RA 6657, as amended by RA 9700).

kung ang lupa ay private land classified as INDUSTRIAL, COMMERCIAL, RESIDENTIAL, etc., siyempre, di na ito covered ng land reform, kaya pwede siyang magbibili ng kahit ilan.

kung ang korporasyon ay bangko, sa ilalim ng Sec. 51 ng RA 8754, pwede siyang maging may-ari ng lupa para gamitin sa operasyon nito, pero hanggang 50% lang ng halaga ng kanyang capital accounts ang maaaring maging investments ng bangko sa lupa.

magandang araw sa mga natatanging ginoo.

tanong ko lng po kung gaano kalaking lupa and pwedeng bilihin ng isang corporation sa knayang pangalan.

may nakapagsabi po kc sakin na hanggang 5 hectares lng. may katotohanan po ba eto?

san po sa batas kaya mahahanap ang ganitong usapin? salamat po ng marami.

kapag walang ibang depekto ang kasal mo, i.e. nasa edad kayo, may lisensya, may seremonyas, etc. etc., at gusto mong ipa-walang bisa ang kasal mo (for a variety of reasons, most of which boils down to either not being able to stand each other anymore, or because you have somebody else already), ang maari mo na lang magamit ay "psychological incapacity" either ng asawa mo o ng pareho sa inyo.

kukuha ka o abugado mo ang kukuha ng expert para patunayan ito. ang expert ay isang psychiatrist o psychologist at magsasagawa siya ng mga personality test para malaman kung may psychological disorder nga ang isa sa inyo (siyempre, dahil binabayran mo yung psychiatrist, lalabas talaga na may diperensya ang isa sa inyo). ang resulta ng mga test na ito ang ihaharap ninyo ng abugado mo sa husgado para ipawalang bisa ang kasal mo

I got confuse here... "The usual ground is psychological incapacity".

 

How do we determine this?

iligal ang "late registration" kung rehistrado na ang bata. isang beses lang dapat ma-rehistro ang isang tao. ito ay magiging falsification of public documents.

MAARI NA PO NGAYONG GAMITIN NG ISANG ANAK SA LABAS ANG APELYIDO NG KANYANG AMA (RA No. 9255) - HINDI NYO NA KAILANGANG MAGPA-LATE REGISTRATION PARA MAILIPAT ANG APELYIDO DUN SA AMA!!!

Pumunta kayo (parehong magulang, magdala ng patunay sa inyong pagkakakilanlan, i.e. magdala ng ID) sa Civil Registrar kung saan naka-rehistro ang bata. Ikwento nyo ang gusto nyong mangyari dun at magtanong kung ano ang kailangang gawin para mailipat na sa apelyido ng ama yung bata (actually, pagagawin lang yung ama ng Affidavit to Use Surname of the Father, tapos ibibigay ito sa Civil Registrar, kasama amg kaukulang kabayaran - wala nang libre ngayon).

ask lng po

 

ive gven birth 2 my daughter and registered her under my surname.nw ung tatay gus2 ilipat s lastname nya but we’re not married.wat i want 2 knw,is it legal n iffile nmin sxa ng l8 registration kung san q pnanganak bb q.

1) Would there be problems if the elder sister will apply for passport using her real identity? The records will say that she already has a passport.

Yes, there will be problems (not really for her, for her younger sister). siyempre, dahil lalabas na may gumamit na ng pangalan niya sa passport, kailangan muna niyang patunayan na siya nga talaga yung taong yun. medyo madali naman ito dahil yun naman talaga ang totoo. afterwards, makakakuha na siya ng passport. ang problema, yung kapatid naman niya ang sasabit.

pag-apply nung tao ng passport, lalabas na may passport na na-issue sa pangalan niya (pero iba ang mukha ng nag-apply para dito). dalawa ang options niya:

OPTION 1 - sabihin na hindi niya kilala kung sino yun (medyo kaduda-duda rin ito dahil kalimitan, ang gumagamit ng ibang pangalan para sa passport application ay kamag-anak din nung taong ginamit ang pangalan, mas me problema pag magkamukha sila ng kapatid niya).

pag sinabi nyang di niya kilala, siyempre magkukunwari siyang galit siya sa tao na yun - mapipilitan siya ngayong magharap ng demanda laban sa tao na yun (or at the very least, gumawa ng sworn statement na gagamitin naman ng DFA sa paghabla sa tao na yun)

OPTION 2 - aminin na kapatid niya ang gumamit. ganun din ang resulta - mapipilitan siyang gagumawa ng sworn statement na gagamitin naman ng DFA sa paghabla sa kapatid nya

criminal offense ang pagkuha ng passport gamit ang pangalan ng iba (see Section 19 and [c], RA No. 8239). kakasuhan ang gumawa nito ng DFA ng violation ng batas (ang problema pa, kung ang address na ginamit niya sa application ay talagang address ninyo, madaling ma-trace yang kapatid mo).

2) Can her younger sister apply for a passport under her real identity?

Yes, kung di pa nagkaka-alaman tungkol sa ginawa niyang katarantaduhan.

pag nagka-alaman na, at alam na siya ang gumawa, sabi sa Section 8(a3) ng RA 8239 na ang sinong lumabag sa batas na yun ay maaaring ma-deny ng pasport application (altho sa palagay ko naman, bago ito mag-apply kailangan na ma-convict muna siya). Alalahanin din niya - pag siya ay nag-apply, binibigyan niya ang DFA ng datos na maaaring gamitin laban sa kanya, i.e. kung nagka-alaman na na may anomalya sa passport na ginamit niya, dapat na siyang magtago, bakit siya pa mismo ang pupunta dun sa mga taong naghahanap na sa kanya?

anyway, kung di naman mag-aapply yung kapatid niya, hindi ito lalabas (yun nga lang, di makakakuha ng passport yung kapatid niya)

MORAL LESSON: Wag mag-gawa ng iligal, lalo na sa passport, mabigat ang parusa ng batas laban sa mga pumepeke nito.

Hi peeps,

 

Would like to ask your help on this matter:

 

A friend of mine has a younger sister who wants to go to Japan as an entertainer, but due to the fact that she is underage during the time of application, she used her elder sister's document in order to get a passport. She was able to get the passport, with her elder's sister identity. However, she was not able to go to Japan due to some reason. Now, her elder sister wants to get a passport using her real identity. Well, of course she does not want to sue her younger sister for using her identity.

 

Questions:

1) Would there be problems if the elder sister will apply for passport using her real identity? The records will say that she already has a passport.

2) Can her younger sister apply for a passport under her real identity? The passport that bears her elder sister's name is still unexpired.

 

Please help me on what to do or who to talk to. Thanks!

start applying for a new one NOW! If you're in Metro Manila, go to epassport.com.ph

If you're not in Metro Manila, go NOW to a regional consular office (see list at http://dfa.gov.ph/main/index.php/about-the-dfa/rp-embassies-consulates-a-rcos/regional-consular-offices)

i lost my passport..

whats the quickest way to get another one...?

 

 

thanks in advance

kung nakalagay sa kontrata na non-refundable yun, dahil wala pang dalawang taon na siya ay nagbabayad, in fact, downpayment pa nga lang (kasi kung 2 years na, RA No. 6552 sana ang applicable), hindi na mababawi yun. kung wala namang nakalagay sa kontrata na forfeited yung downpayment, mababawi niya yun.

kung ang dahilan ng pag-atras ng dad mo ay dahil may violation sa terms ng kontrata ang developer (dapat medyo mabigat na violation, kung minor lang, di rin pwede), pwede rin niyang bawiin (see 1191, Civil Code).

dear lawyers,

 

uhhmm.. ganito kasi, nagpareserve kami ng condo unit. tapos yung dad ko nag advance na ng downpayment more than 100k.

tapos biglang ayaw na ituloy ng dad ko yung condo unit. ang tanong ko po, kung hindi na po ba talaga marerefund yun?

kahit hindi buo??

maghanda ng pera, tapos, maghanap ng abugado.

P.S. malamang sa hinde, hindi ka makakapagfile ng adultery case laban sa asawa mo dahil dun sa pinirmahan mong agreement 9 years ago.

sa ilalim ng batas, ang maaari lamang magsampa ng adultery ay ang "napinsalang asawa".

kapag may parte dun sa agreement na pinirmahan mo na nagsasabi na pumapayag ka na ang bawat isa sa inyo ay maaaring magkaroon ng bagong partner, ito patunay na pumayag ka na makisama siya sa ibang lalake, kung kaya't walang pinsala sa yo ang pakikisama niya sa iba.

Hi to all!

 

my wife and i been separated for over 9 years, just a year after my wife gave birth to our daughter we decide to live separately for the very reason of irreconcilable compatibility. My wife's lawyer ask me to sign a certain agreement and agreed to live separately.

 

We still have communication, because i am supporting my daughter.

 

Last year my wife having an affair to another guy and got pregnant, recently she give birth.

 

I decide to file an anullment. what should i do?

 

thanks

No. The DFA is only concerned with your first name, middle name and surname as they appear in your birth certificate. A passport has to follow the official name of the applicant, which is the name (first, middle, and surname) that appears in your birth certificate. All the other entries in your birth certificate are basically irrelevant to your passport application. However, this might cause problems for some other applications (SSS, GSIS, etc.). you can have this corrected by applying for correction of entry with the Civil Registrar of the place where your birth was registered.

I noticed something wrong with my birth certificate. My mother's maiden last name was incorrectly encoded and it appears as the same as my father's middle name. So the result is that my middle name does not match my mother's maiden last name in my birth certificate. Will this pose as a problem if I apply for a passport?

For Adultery case, do you really need to show a video or pictures of actual sexual intercourse to prove they are guilty? No. direct proof of sexual intercourse is not necessary, circumstantial evidence showing that the parties accused have had sex together is sufficient.

What if you only have chat or email exchanges and intimate pictures to prove their affair, would that be enough? No. you have to have a witness saying that he saw the two sleep together, or that the two were living together as husband and wife. the intimate pictures and chat and email messages will corroborate the testimony of the witness.

For Adultery case, do you really need to show a video or pictures of actual sexual intercourse to prove they are guilty? What if you only have chat or email exchanges and intimate pictures to prove their affair, would that be enough?

1.) was the statement of the Hello Store Crew valid as a proof that Miss B was the one who bought the units even if the Crew only saw the picture?

kung ito ay affidavit/sinumpaang salaysay, maaari itong magamit na ebidensya (altho, kung criminal case ang isasampa, nire-require nila na magpakita yung tao at sumumpa mismo sa harap ng fiscal). kahit picture lang ang nakita, pwede na, basta sinumpaang salaysay, lalo kung sa harap ng fiscal. kung pirmado lang, alang kwenta yun dahil kahit sinong herodes pwedeng pumirma (anong ebidensya na crew nga yung pumirma?)

2.) can Miss B, ask the Store to review the CCTV camera records on the night of the crime to check who entered and left the store?

yes. pwede siyang mag-request sa store. kahit naman sino, pwede mag-request. ang tanong, pagbibigyan ba siya.

what if the store refuse?

mangangailangan siya ng court order kung di siya pagbibigyan ng store sa request niya.

what if the store says that the CCTV does not make any recording?

yari siya. di naman niya pwedeng pilitin ang kumpanyang maglabas ng recording kung walang ganun talaga.

3.) since PNR does not have any CCTV cameras installed on their stations and the tickets were always collected at the destination station, how can Miss B use the PNR ride as an evidence though she was alone when she boarded the train?

alibi yan, madaling sabihin. mahirap paniwalaan lalo't wala siyang ebidensya na nakasakay nga siya dun nung oras na yun.

4.) can the bag be used as evidence to collect finger prints to check if Miss B ever touched the bag?

pwede. pero sa tagal ng pangyayari, malabong maging ebidensya na hindi niya ginalaw yung bag.

5.) was it right to detain an employee accused for stealing a personal belonging by its own company?

hindi. kung walang reklamong kriminal, hindi dapat dine-detain yung empleyado. bawal yan.

6.) what other move can Miss B take other than seek legal help to clear her name?

makiusap/makipag-areglo sa nagrereklamo.

kung gusto niya ng kakaibang move... kuha siya ng manghuhula na magsasabi/magpapatunay na hindi siya ang nagnakaw (kung naniniwala yung nagrereklamo sa manghuhula... bwa ha ha ha)

Ultimately, dahil wala namang nakakita nung pagkuha ng credit card, ang tanging ebidensya na nagli-link sa kanya sa krimen ay yung statement ng store crew na siya ang gumamit nung card. without the store crew, walang kaso. kapag nagsampa ng kaso laban sa kanya, kailangang humarap yung crew sa piskalya para ituro siya. kapag walang ganun, walang kaso.

ihingi ko lang po ng opinion tong scenario na ito:

 

 

a credit card was stolen and was used to buy 2 units of mobile phones in an Hello Telecom Store in a Mall. The owner of the card, Miss A , accused her colleague Miss B who sits beside her for stealing the card and immediately filed a blotter in two different stations, 1st, near the office and 2nd, near the Mall.

 

Miss B, the accused, said that she "never ever" touched the bag or any personal property of Miss A.

 

The office that Miss A and B occupies has no CCTV Camera installed.

 

The credit card was used at the span of 1830H to 1900H (the actual time was not pinpointed) but the accused claimed that at that specific time, she was alone and on her way home riding a PNR train and she boarded the train at 1835H.

 

The owner of the card Miss A, went to the store where the phones were bought using the card and shown the crew of the store a picture of Miss B and the crew of the store said the girl on the picture was the one who bought the said two units, and signed a document pinpointing Miss B as the person who bought the units using the card but not checking the CCTV camera records nor asking for the personal appearance of Miss B to verify the actual identity.

 

Miss B, was detained in the office where she is working due to the accusations and was not allowed to leave the office for some unknown reason until her mother came to the said office to claim her daughter.

 

questions:

 

1.) was the statement of the Hello Store Crew valid as a proof that Miss B was the one who bought the units even if the Crew only saw the picture?

 

2.) can Miss B, ask the Store to review the CCTV camera records on the night of the crime to check who entered and left the store? what if the store refuse? what if the store says that the CCTV does not make any recording?

 

3.) since PNR does not have any CCTV cameras installed on their stations and the tickets were always collected at the destination station, how can Miss B use the PNR ride as an evidence though she was alone when she boarded the train?

 

4.) can the bag be used as evidence to collect finger prints to check if Miss B ever touched the bag?

 

5.) was it right to detain an employee accused for stealing a personal belonging by its own company?

 

6.) what other move can Miss B take other than seek legal help to clear her name?

 

 

i would appreciate your replies to this inquiry... (this really happened)

1. In buying property such as this, what exactly are we supposed to pay for? you pay for the land, plus whatever other advantages it gives you

2. bakit doble ang presyo ng lote? yun ang ang gusto nilang i-presyo sa lote

3. Pwede po ba yun? pwede yun. in fact, kahit triple, o sampung beses na mas mahal sa presyo ng katabing lote, pwede. nasa kagustuhan ng seller yun. ang tanong, me bibili ba sa presyong gusto nila. wala namang pumipilit sa inyo na bilhin ang loteng yan. ngayon, sabi nyo ang market price sa lugar na yan ay P5k per sqm. kung gusto ng kapatid mo na magpakatanga at bibilhin nya ang lote sa 10k per sqm., go. pero, kung gagamitin nya ang utak nya, maghahanap na lang siya sa lugar na yan ng magbebenta ng lote at P5k per sqm, tutal wala namang special sa loteng inaalok sa inyo.

Sirs,

 

Meron pong lote na binebenta sa kapatid ko. In an area where the lots sell for 5k per sqm, the lot offer is 100sqm at 1M. Sabi ko sa kanya, doble ang turing ng lote. And nung binisita ko yung property wala naman pong special doon.

 

Question po: In buying property such as this, what exactly are we supposed to pay for? At bakit dobel ang presyo ng lote? Pwede po ba yun?

 

Advise lang po sana.

 

TIA!

depende. ang test lagi ay ang "test of reasonableness."

kung reasonably required ng trabaho mo sa company yang training na ibinibigay sa iyo, at reasonable din naman yung time na nakatali ka sa company, maaari kang ma-charge for insubordination.

pero, kung di naman necessary yung training sa trabaho mo (ex. kung for convenience lang)di ka nila mare-require na matali sa corporation; or kung sobrang haba naman yung time na nakatali ka sa company, di ka nila pwedeng pilitin na mag-attend ng training na yan.

greetings, dear GM-lawyer-masters!

 

can my company bind me with a contract to stay with them

for a certain amount of time in exchange for training which

they made me attend?

 

if i refuse such training, can i be charged with insubordination?

 

tia! http://lh6.ggpht.com/_3Lud_9_uocs/TLoRTreBiWI/AAAAAAAAB8w/JzCdZbdX6AE/studyingKucco.gif

if the land is titled in your name (mahirap kasi pag rights lang ang meron kayo), start writing demand letters to the people living on the lot, demanding that they leave w/in 15 days from receipt of the letter. if they refuse to leave after receiving the letters, pwede ka nang magsampa ng forcible entry cases against these people.

likewise, if you have sufficient proof against the policeman, file a criminal and administrative complaint against him with the Office of the Ombudsman (wag sa NAPOLCOM, PLEB, IAS, etc. at nalalakad nila yan) for renting out your property without your knowledge and consent, pretending to be the owner of the lot.

good day everyone!

 

we have a lot north of metro manila. the lot was vacant and it had a caretaker before. my dad visited it after around a year and saw that the caretaker was no longer there and that people have started living on our lot. it turns out that a policeman has started to let people live on our lot for a rental fee. what are the safest procedures we can do about this? any legal methods of reclaiming our property?

hindi mo na maipapawalang-bisa yung kasal mo kung ang pagbabasehan mo ay ang kawalan ng consent ng magulang mo ng ikaw ay magpakasal.

oo nga at ito ay ground upang ipawalang-bisa ang isang kasal, pero ito ay dapat isampa sa loob ng limang taon mula ng ikaw ay naging 21. ayun na rin sa kwento mo, 20 years old ka nung 1999, ibig sabihin naging 21 ka nung 2000. Hanggang 2005 ka lang pwedeng magsampa ng kaso para sa ground na ito. dahil 2010 na, paso na ang kaso.

pero ikaw na rin ang nagsabi na fixer ang naglakad ng papeles mo. tingnan mo ang iyong marriage certificate - sa dulo nito ay may bahagi na nagsasabing "Marriage License". tingnan mo kung anong numero ng lisensya at kung saang lugar ito na-issue. puntahan mo ang Civil Registrar ng lugar na nag-issue ng marriage license at magtanong ka dun kung meron ngang ganung marriage license (may mga fixer kasi nung 90's na gumagamit ng fake na marriage license). pag sinabi ng Civil Registrar dun na walang marriage license na na-issue sa pangalan mo at nung asawa mo, maswerte ka, at walang-bisa ang kasal mo mula sa simula - punta na sa abugado para maihain agad ang kaso. pero alalahanin mo na ito ay suntok sa buwan, kapag may ganun ngang marriage license, ang option mo na lang ay ipa-walang bisa ang kasal mo sa ilalim ng Art. 36 ng Family Code - na "psychologically incapacitated" ang asawa mo.

good luck.

Sir, What would be the probability or chances of my marriage to be null and void kung ganito po ang nangyari.

1) Nagpakasal po kmi sa Manila City Hall pero hindi dumaan sa tamang proseso. May fixer po kc pero may nagkasal sa amin doon.

2) Wla po yung parents ko and kailangan nila ng written parents consent because Im only 20 years old(male) and my wife is 25. Dpo alam sa amin to. So ginawa po nila dinaya na lang po yung written parents consent na ako po ang nag sign.

3) Nagtaka rin po ako dhil sabi nung employee don na sa Caloocan City Hall daw namin makukuha marriage contract kc mahigpit daw po don sa MCH at that time. Sa manila ako nagpakasal pero sa caloocan ang marriage contract ko.

4) 1999 pa po kami kasal and valid po ang kasal kc naka registered po sa NSO.

 

I want to know the chances kc po sayang naman po yung magagastos ko kung wla naman pong mangyayari...

 

Thanks in advance...

sabi nga ni redblack, legal separation only allows you to live separately from your spouse, but the marriage bond is not severed. sa madaling salita, kasal pa rin kayo sa isa't-isa - mabisa pa rin ang kasal nyo, yun nga lang, pwede na kayong di magsama.

kung humihingi ka ng legal separation, ito ay pag-amin na walang diperensya ang kasal nyo, na ito ay mabisa - kaya nga, imbes na hingiin mo na ipawalang-bisa ito, ang hinihingi mo na lang ay payagan ka ng hukuman na hindi na makisama sa asawa mo.

best advise - yung sabi ni redblack, mag-ipon ka na lang para mai-raise mo yung amount na kailangan para sa kaso na "declaration of nullity" ng kasal mo.

care to expound on this statement sir??? and what's your best advise??

 

our lawyer, in my assesment is not too bright (hence, the cheap rates she offers us) so i am compelled not to ask some opinions regarding this...

 

thanks so much in advance sir....

 

kailangan muna na sumulat kayo sa kanila na pinapalayas nyo na sila. ang unang sulat kasi ay sinisingil lang sila. bago ka makapagsampa sa korte ng ejectment, kailangan may sulat na pinapalayas mo ang tenant.

baka kailangan din na dumaan muna ito sa barangay (altho maaaring di na ito dumaan dun dahil nasa US naman ang may-ari)

mangangailangan nga lang ang tatay mo ng SPA mula sa Lola mo na nagbibigay sa kanya ng kapangyarihan upang magsampa ng kaso laban sa mga tenant (kung wala pa kayo nito, dahil nasa America na ang lola mo, kailangan ang SPA ay notaryado sa consulate ng Pilipinas sa America - yung may pulang ribbon at gintong selyo).

at kung mga anak ng lola nyo, o di-kaya'y apo, ang nakatira, kailangan din may alegasyon sa reklamong isasampa sa korte, na sinubukan nyong magkasundo pero ito ay di nagtagumpay (Art. 151, Family Code).

para siguradong di mabubulilyaso ang pagpapalayas nyo sa mga di nagbabayad, kumunsulta na sa abugado.

Note: dahil mababa ang renta, baka bumabagsak din ito sa ilalim ng RA9653 (altho dahil isang taon ng hindi nagbabayad, pwede talaga silang palayasin, pero mas maigi talaga na lumapit na kayo sa abugado, dahil sigurado na magbabanta ang mga yan na irereklamo sa BIR dahil walang resibo, di nagbabayad ng buwis etc. etc.)

Sirs,

 

kami po ay nasa family compound na yung lola ko ang may-ari. pero pumunta na sila sa states. iniwan po sa tatay ko ang pamamahala ng compound. meron pong 5 apartment sa likod at yung main house sa harap po ng compound. mga kamag-anak po ang nakatira sa mga apartment. meron pong renta sila, though dahil kamag-anak, mura lang ang upa. lately, nadiskubre namin na halos 1 year na palang di nagbabayad ang dalawang apartment dahil katwiran nila kay lola sila magbabayad.

 

sumulat na po ang lola ko sa kanila at sa tatay ko na sinisingil na sila. pero ayaw pa rin nila.

 

ang tanong po: pwede na po ba namin paalisin (read: palayasin) ang mga di nagbabayad na kamag-anak?

 

tia!

alalahanin mo din na ang paghahain ng petition for legal separation ay isang pag-amin na mabisa ang kasal mo (otherwise, hindi lang legal separation ang isinampa mo, kundi nullity of marriage na). dahil dito, baka hindi ka na payagan, later on, na maghain ng action for nullity of marriage (dahil nga inamin mo beforehand na valid ang kasal mo).

yeah bro, i know this, actually, i am postponing my legal separation because in the near future, i would be applying for an annulment, i am sure my wife would agree on it and soon, hopefully it would be over..

 

thanks for the advise regarding the matter on COLLUSION....

 

worker A works for company X and is seconded to company Y.

based on this statement alone, worker A has no option to be retrenched

i have a question ...

 

worker A works for company X and is seconded to company Y. company Y is closing shop and company X wants all remaining (< 5) employees to be transferred to company X other units. company Y has, 2 years ago, retrenched all other employees (abt 50) and these remaining (<5) are just there as a transition team.

 

does worker A have an option to be retrenched and opt not to be transferred to company X?

Under Section 8 of RA8972, "in addition to leave privileges under existing laws, parental leave of not more than seven (7) working days every year shall be granted to any solo parent employee who has rendered service of at least one (1) year."

under Section 21 of the Implementing Rules and Regulations, emergency leaves cannot be charged to the solo parent leave. however, the leave is not cumulative, nor is it convertible to cash. Ergo, solo parent's leave is really only 7 days every year.

that could fall under estafa - "defrauding another by false pretenses", in this case "by using fictitious name", prior or simultaneously to the fraud (see Art. 315[2a], Revised Penal Code). if the use of the name was the primary reason why you gave the money (siyempre, sasabihin mo sa piskalya na ganun nga, di ka sana magbibigay ng pera kung alam mo na siya pala yun), that would constitute estafa.

Pwede po ba kasuhan ang isang tao, na nanghihingi sa iyo ng pera using a different identity? May nanloko kasi sa kin ginamit niya name ng friend niya.

If the husband cohabits with his mistress in some other place (not the conjugal dwelling, that is, the home of the husband and wife), the Supreme Court, as early as 1922, has stated, in Peo. v. Pitoc that "the term 'cohabit' means to dwell together, in the manner of husband and wife, for some period of time, as distinguished from occasional, transient interviews for unlawful intercourse. Hence, the offense is not a single act of adultery; it is cohabiting in a state of adultery which may be a week, a month, a year or longer."

Thus, there is no definite period of time, so long as it is a continuous act of living together, rather than just occasional meetings for sex. in fact, per Peo. v. Pitoc, a week of living together as husband and wife by the accused and his mistress would be sufficient.

How long does the husband have to be living with the mistress in their house before they (or atleast the husband) can be charged with concubinage?

Comments on Art. 1191 say that "rescission will not be permitted for a slight or casual breach of the contract, but only for such breaches as are so substantial and fundamental as to defeat the object of the parties in making the agreement." violation of notice as regards the exercise of visitorial rights would fall under this rule, being a slight breach of the contract only, relating only to an incidental matter regarding the leased premises, not the very object of the contract.

just a question...

 

in a contract of lease, where the owner has visitorial rights over the property pending notice to lessor and yet visits or sends his agent to the property without previous notice, is this violation enough to rescind the contract?

 

i mean, there should be notice given to holder of the property that a visit would be conducted, but the owner persists on coming over without any notice. is this sufficient right for the renter to rescind the contract?

 

will await your comments.

 

thanks

 

OJH

1. does my father lose his right to the land just because he did not come up with any money to pay the required taxes for many years?

No. Your uncle does not become the sole owner of the property just because he was the one paying taxes. all that he has is a right to be reimbursed for the share of the taxes that should have been paid by your father (see Art. 488, Civil Code).

2. what happens when my father and uncle pass away too without being able to transfer the land under their names. How do we, as the grandchildren sort the ownership of this land?

you'll have to partition the property among yourselves, 1/2 of the property going to your uncle's heirs (plus the right to be reimbursed for 1/2 of the amount of taxes he has paid), the other half to your father's heirs. notably, you'll have to likewise settle the estate of your grandfather, since the property originally came from him. all of these will require the payment of estate taxes (plus the penalties and interest that have accrued) due on the estate of your deceased grandfather, as well as the estate taxes due on the estate if your father and uncle. also, transfer tax, documentary stamp taxes, etc.

it would be better to have the property transferred to your father and uncle's name NOW while they are still alive to avoid complications later on (as well as to stop the running of BIR penalty charges and interest). if the grandfather died without a will, they can now extrajudicially settle the estate of their father.

good day to all. we have a land that was owned by my grandfather. he was not able to transfer the ownership to his 2 children, one of which is my father, until he died. the original title was being kept by my uncle, one of the 2 children until the current day, who took it to himself to pay the taxes even when my grandfather was still alive. does my father lose his right to the land just because he did not come up with any money to pay the required taxes for many years? what happens when my father and uncle pass away too without being able to transfer the land under their names. How do we, as the grandchildren sort the ownership of this land?...i'd appreciate your expert advice....many thanks!

assuming that the closure of the Makati branch is really because they have lost an account and have no other option but to move to Clark (in fact, even if they had not lost an account, a decision DONE IN GOOD FAITH to move to Clark would still be a valid exercise of management's prerogatives), your GF would be entitled to 1 month salary or 1/2 month's salary per year of service, whichever is higher (see Art. 283, Labor Code).

Hello, I would appreciate legal advise on a Labor related matter.

 

My girlfriend's call center has lost an important account in their Makati site. The only option left for them is to move to Clark, Pampanga which is not a viable option for her. If she doesn't move to Clark, she won't have anything to do in Makati and the company will be forced to terminate her employment. My question is: Is it mandated by law to provide severance/redundancy pay or is it company prerogative? In this case, if she stays and waits until her employment is terminated by the company, will she get anything? Is there a specific formulated amount for severance/redundancy pay?

 

I hope someone will help me regarding this matter. Thank you in advance.