rocco69

sabi mo nagpakasal kayo sa tabi-tabi, tapos sinabi mo rin na nag-check ka na sa NSO kung legal yung kasal nyo (kung saan nadiskubre mo na kasal na siya sa iba - [sabi mo kasal pa pala sya sa una - ang ibig mo bang sabihin ay kasal na siya sa iba nung magpakasal kayo sa tabi-tabi?]), pero di mo naman sinabi kung ano ang resulta ng imbestigasyon mo sa NSO ukol sa kasal nyo. ano ba ang findings mo re: yung kasal nyo?

Question. I had a GF last year 2000. dumating sa point na we want to get married. ang siste, kasal lang sa tabi tabi! then we broke up after 2 years. I had i checked sa NSO if its legal. then I found out na kasal pa pala sya sa una! diko alam yun! now gusto ko ma void yung kasal kasalan na yun coz somebody told me na pag may mangyare sken, sa kanya pa dn bagsak ng anu man meron ako na properties. hayz.. help pls.

Sino ang unang namatay, ang tiyuhin mo o ang lolo at lola mo?

Pangalawa, may anak ba ang tiyuhin mo at ang asawa niya?

gud day po.

may tanong po ako tungkol pa pamana. bago kasi sumakabilang-bUhay ang tiyuhin ko, sumakabilang-bAhay na ang asawa nya. ilang taon matapos mamatay ang tiyuhin ko ay tuluyan ng nag asawa ang asawa nya. walang anak ang tiyuhin ko.

tanong ko po. may share pa po ba ang asawa nya sa mga mamanahin na lupa ng magulang ko dahil ang isang land title ay nakapangalan sa magulang ko, sa tiyuhin ko at sa iba pa nilang mga kapatid?

 

isa pa po. sa isang namang land title, pangalan pa na lolo at lola ko ang nakasulat. pwedi kayang paghati-hatian na lang ng mga apo ang lupa na walang ibibigay sa naiwang asawa ng tiyuhin ko na sa ngayon ay may asawa na rin?

 

TIA

ang masasabi ko lang - makiusap sa bangko. lahat kasi yan, nakalagay naman sa kontrata na pinirmahan mo (o sinang-ayunan mo) ng kinuha mo yung credit card.

pag di mo nabayaran yan, lolobo ng lolobo yung utang mo. tapos, kapag di mo binayaran, ipapasa nila sa collection agency yang utang mo, aaraw-arawin (at minsan kahit gabi) kang kukulitin ng mga yan sa sulat, pananakot at tawag, pati mga kaibigan mo, kukulitin din.

atty. pano ipa-cancel or ipahold ang credit card? sa Bank ang discretion in favor sa kanila, pano naman yung discretion namin card holder? may mga insendente na nadelay yung pera, nadi dumating ng oras yung pera, at sa 4 months na di pagbabayad, lumubo yung interest at principal? pano kaya ang pwedeng sabihin sa bank?

ano ang magiging problema kung yon lang ang babayaran??? ang magiging problema - hindi mo ma-fu-fully paid yung utang mo. ayun sa kasunduan mo sa credit card company, kapag hindi mo nabayaran ng buo on the due date yung purchases mo, pwede sila magpataw ng interes.

tapos, ayun din sa batas, kapag nagbabayad ka, mapupunta muna ito sa interes bago i-cha-charge sa principal. Sabi ng Art. 1253 ng Civil Code:

Art. 1253. If the debt produces interest, payment of the principal shall not be deemed to have been made until the interests have been covered.

Klarong-klaro, hindi mo pwedeng piliin na bayaran lang muna ang purchases mo, dahil ayon sa batas, interes muna ang binabayaran bago yung principal.

to all legal po jan, tanong ko lang po, may magiging problema po ba kung PRINCIPAL amount lang ang babayaran sa credit card? ang iko-compute ko lang yung mga purchase lang po at di isasama yung mga surcharge & finance charge na kino-compute nila? salamat po?

 

ano ang magiging problema kung yon lang ang babayaran???

Are you sure?

I've handled the transfer of a Bliss unit (Bagong Lipunan Pag-asa or Pag-asa Bliss located at the back of SM North) and the unit was covered by a Condominium Certificate of Title (CTC). If one unit had a CTC, that implies all other units there are also covered by CTCs, in which case, the same procedure for sale of lots covered by an ordinary Torrens Title would apply.

i'm brokering a sale of a Bliss unit. as you know, ownership here is rights only so no cap gains, tax etc.

 

my 1st time to offer a property with just transfer of rights ownership.

 

for those who are experienced in this kind of deal, can you share the pros and cons of owning a bliss unit with rights as your only form of ownership? TIA

i think you mean "provisional dismissal."

A "provisional dismissal" is a dismissal of a criminal complaint filed in court which is temporary and conditional. This is allowed under Section 8, Rule 117 of the 2000 Rules of Criminal Procedure.

A criminal complaint which has already been filed in court is usually "provisionally dismissed" when the private complainant has failed to appear for several hearings scheduled by the Court. On the assumption that the private complainant is no longer interested in prosecuting the case (given his failure to appear, the Fiscal would most probably be unable to prove the guilt of the accused, as he would have no witnesses to present), the Court dismisses the case provisionally.

In a provisional dismissal, the complainant, upon learning of the dismissal, can file a motion to revive the case (of course, upon presentation of good reasons why he did not appear during the previous hearings), within one year (for offenses punishable by imprisonment of at most six years), or within two years (for offenses punishable by imprisonment of more than six years).

Since the case may be revived upon motion of the complainant, the dismissal is termed as "provisional" or merely temporary.

After the lapse of the one-year, or two-year period, as the case may be, the accused may then file a motion for permanent dismissal of the case.

May I know what Provisionary Dismissal mean?

 

What steps to make after the above decision by court?

kahit ang barangay,pwede mag-issue ng protection order pag may dumulog dun at humingi ng tulong laban sa pananakit sa kanila, pero yugn stalking, sa korte lang ito, kaya mangangailangan sila ng attorney (kasi sa pag-file kailangan atty ang gumawa)

i see. thank you very much for the info. can she or the child seek help from an attorney for this or should a case be filed first?

kung ang mga tiyahin lang ang me gusto, legally, wala silang karapatan na palayasin si C. kaya lang, ikaw na rin ang nagsabi na di mapigilan nung matanda, when push comes to shove (i.e. magmatigas si C na di siya aalis kung hindi yung matanda yung magpapa-alis sa kanya), i would say mapipilit ng mga tiyahin na pumayag yung matanda sa gusto nila.

yung D po mga aunts lang ni C and ayaw naman nung Lola(the real owner ng lot) ni C na umalis sila ng bahay the prob is wala ng kapasidad yung matanda para pigilan ang mga anak nya dahil matanda na...

As a general rule, no child below seven years shall be separated from the mother, UNLESS THERE ARE COMPELLING REASONS for it. Ikaw na rin ang sumagot sa tanong mo. Sabi mo "i have heard also the wife has a history of psychiatric visits and is mentally unstable." Definitely, he can use this to portray the mother as unfit to care of the child.

Likewise, you also stated "does it help that they have not yet annulled and the wife is already seeing another man?" Again, if you can prove this through evidence and then show through a child psychologist that this is harming the child, then that would prove that the mother is unfit to care of the child.

The man can file an action to get custody of the child. He should consult a lawyer however so that his evidence is rock-solid, since without evidence, the child would be adjudged to the mother, being below 7.

If he can, he could also get physical possession of the child, then let the mother be the one to file the action to get back the child. He can then present his evidence there but in the meantime, he already has custody of the child. Diskarte na ito ng abugado na makukuha niya

hi mtc peeps!

 

I would like to inquire about my friends brother in law and son.

 

my friend has a sister who has 2 sons. one is from a previous bf and the second son is the legitimate son of my friends brother in law. now, my friends sister wants an annulment but the brother in law does not want it. my friends sister is already seeing this other guy and is living in a condo that the guy owns. now, brother in law got angry and sent annulment papers to my friends sister including a request that the legitimate son stay with the brother in law. now, what are the chances of the brother in law getting his son?

 

 

the son is turning 6 yrs old and is not taken cared of the way the father and the fathers family could. from what i have heard the mother is basically a woman who likes to sleep around and is just hanging on to this new guy because he is richer than the husband. she also has no job and just floats on cash outs from her parents and titas and whoever she could get money from. the husband/ father of their son supports them however for the mother it is not enough for the lifestyle she wants. she even still up to now drives the husbands car even if she is seeing this other guy.

 

now my question is how do i help the father and the son? from what i have heard the son is showing signs of bad attitude and brainwashing by the mother. they do not eat right and the sons are just left with relatives of the yaya whenever the mom wants to go and party and doesnt even spend christmas and holidays with the kids. i pity these kids so much that even just being a friend makes me want to help them. but i can only help the second son because the first son has never known his real father. what help can i give the father so that he may have his son with him?

 

can the husband ask the court to subject the wife to psychiatric testing? from what i have heard also the wife has a history of psychiatric visits and is mentally unstable. can he explore that angle? does it help that they have not yet annulled and the wife is already seeing another man?

. Do [sic] the company i am previously connected is [sic] obliged to pay me for the non payment on time of my salary and other benefits?

You'd have to first prove that there was a delay, i.e., your monetary claims had already been processed but they intentionally refused to pay it on time, not that they were still processing the paperwork with regards to your claim. Note that only about two months have elapsed since your resignation, which cannot be said to be an unreasonable length of time to process your money claims. In other words, pwedeng may liability kung mapapatunayan mo na may delay on their part, pero mahihirapan ka to prove this. In my opinion, it's not worth the hassle. Just get your money and paint the town red!

2. Am I not entitled for the pro-rated 13th month?

YES. Clause 6 of the Revised Guidelines on 13th Month Pay provides:

6. 13th Month Pay of Resigned or Separated Employee.

An employee who has resigned or whose services were terminated at any time before the time for payment of the 13th month pay is entitled to this monetary benefit in proportion to the length of time he worked during the year, reckoned from the time he started working during the calendar year up to the time of his resignation or termination from the service. Thus, if he worked only from January up to September his proportionate 13th month pay should be equivalent of 1/12 his total basic salary he earned during that period.

The payment of the 13th month pay may be demanded by the employee upon the cessation of employer-employee relationship. This is consistent with the principle of equity that as the employer can require the employee to clear himself of all liabilities and property accountability, so can the employee demand the payment of all benefits due him upon the termination of the relationship.

Good day sir/madame,

 

hope someone from this thread could help me with my problem with regards to my previous employer. the effectivity of my resignation was last april 16, 2010, but to date I have not received my compensation and terminal pay. before i left the company I am cleared of my duties and responsibilities as an accounting clerk. I have been connected with that company for 4 years and 7 months.

 

Lately, my previous officemate informed me that they have already prepared my terminal pay, (salary, over time pay and vacation leave credits converted to cash) but no 13th month pay. they said that I am not entitled for even if pro rated.

 

My question is

1. Do the company i am previously connected is obliged to pay me for the non payment on time of my salary and other benefits?

2. Am I not entitled for the pro-rated 13th month?

 

thanks for answering.

1. may right ba yung D na palayasin si C or B sa bahay na tinitirahan nila??

YES. Bilang may-ari, may karapatan si D na piliin kung sino ang titira (o hindi dapat tumira) sa lupa niya.

2. what if makisama na si B sa ibang lalaki pwede bang mag stay si C sa bahay na yun?

Dahil YES ang sagot sa Question Number 1, naturalmente, pwede ring palayasin si C sa bahay na yan.

Note that if C is still a minor, she is entitled to support from her father A, to include her needs for shelter, but this cannot be used to justify staying in the house since the house does not belong to A.

heres the scenario:

A-----husband

B------wife

C------first daughter

D---inlaws

 

 

A and B got separated kasi palagi nanbabae si A, they got a final decision na hiwalay na since si A may family na while si B na involved na din sa ibang lalaki...

yung bahay na tinitirahan ni B and C, ay pag aari ng family ni A since buhay pa yung matanda nde pa nahahati yung mga ari arian....

may right ba yung D na palayasin si C or B sa bahay na tinitirahan nila??(since hindi pa ito titulado dahil buhay pa yung lola ni C)or what if makisama na si B sa ibang lalaki pwede bang mag stay si C sa bahay na yun? or technically si A ang dapat magpalayas kay C since sya yung anak ng may ari....(legitimate daughter si C and legitimate wife si

Yes, RA9262 provides for these kind of protection orders. note however that these can be applied for only by women and children

is there a legal way to protect yourself from "stalkers?" in the US, they have those restraining orders, right? do we have those here in our country, too?

Medyo di klaro sa kwento mo, pero lumalabas na anak lang ng misis mo yung bata.

sa madaling salita, hindi ikaw ang ama nung bata.

Kung ganito nga ang sitwasyon, maaari mo lang mailipat ang apelyido ng bata sa pamamagitan ng adoption.

Kailangan mong magsampa ng petisyon sa korte para i-adopt yung bata. ang mahirap dito, kung kilala nyo ang ama nung bata, kakailangan nyo ang pahintulot ng ama sa adoption (unless inabandona na niya ang bata simula't sapul).

ibig sabihin din nito, kailangan nyuong kumuha ng abugado para dito. in other words, gagastos ka talaga. ang qualifications para payagan kang mag-adopt ay ang sumusunod:

1) Filipino citizen of legal age,

2) in possession of full civil capacity and legal rights,

3) of good moral character,

4) has not been convicted of any crime involving moral turpitude;

5) emotionally and psychologically capable of caring for children, and

6) who is in a position to support and care for his children in keeping with the means of the family

Kung sakali naman na ikaw ang ama, madali lang ito. magsusubmit ka lang ng Affidavit of Legitimation plus ang inyong marriage certificate sa Civil Registrar kung saan ito nakarehistro.

Good morning po sa lahat. Sana po may makapaturo sa akin legal steps para maitransfer ko apelyido ng anak ng misis ko sa akin.

 

May anak po kasi misis ko na registered sa apelyido niya nung dalaga sya.

This year lang kami nagpakasal at plano namin na isunod sya sa apelyido ko.

 

Ano po kaya mga steps na dapat gawin?

Legitimation ang tawag dito (assuming na walang balakid sa pagpapakasal ninyo nung ipinanganak ang mga anak ninyo). Kakailanganin ninyo ang Affidavit of legitimation (may standard form para dito ang Civil Registrar), NSO certified true copy ng birth certificate ng anak ninyo, NSO certified true copy ng marriage certificate ninyo, at NSO Certificate of No marriage (CENOMAR) para sa inyong dalawa (bilang patotoo na wala ngang balakid sa pagpapakasal ninyo sa isa't-isa nung ipinanganak ang mga anak ninyo). Isubmit lahat ng ito sa civil registrar kung saan nakarehistro ang mga anak ninyo.

Hi Guys,

 

My wife and I met about ten years ago and had our first daughter 6 years ago. After about a year, whe had a son. Di pa kami kasal nun and my wife and I had an understanding that before the kids use my last name, dapat kasal muna kami - I understood naman and so I agreed.

 

Now, we got married just this year and we want to proceed with the legalization. Ano mga steps kailangan naming gawin?

 

Thanks in advance!

Sa ilalim ng Sec. 234( ng Local Government Code:

"Charitable institutions, churches, parsonages or convents appurtenant thereto, mosques, non-profit or religious cemeteries and all lands, buildings, and improvements actually, directly, and exclusively used for religious, charitable or educational purposes" are exempt from real property taxes.

kaya lang, sabi ng Korte Suprema sa Lung Center of the Phils. v. QC (GR No. 144104, June 29, 2004) para maka-avail sa tax exemption kailangan ang nag-aaplay para sa exemption ay:

(a) it is a charitable institution; and

( its real properties are ACTUALLY, DIRECTLY and EXCLUSIVELY used for charitable purposes.

kaya lumalabas ang owner ng lote kung pinapaupahan niya ang lupa niya sa educational institution, ay hindi exempted from paying real estate taxes sa ilalim ng Local Government Code, dahil para sa kanya, hindi naman for educational purpose ang lupa kundi for income (pinapa-upahan niya di ba).

Good day, Would questions about Real Estate Tax be suitable here?

 

Because I wanted to ask anyone knowledgeable if there are exemptions granted on real estate tax payments to owners of lots which are being used by educational institutions.

 

Hope somebody can help. Thanks!

depende. kung magka-iba ang nature ng kaso pwede, pero kung pareho lang, hindi pu-pwede. pwedeng ipa-dismiss yung pangalawang kaso pag ganun. e.g. kung ang kinakaharap nyo sa kasalukuyan ay ejectment case, tapos ejectment din ang isasampa sa inyo ng nakabili, di pwede yun, madidismiss ang isa sa mga kasong yan. kung ang isang kaso naman ay ejectment samantalang ang isa ay iba, halimbawa annulment of title, maaaring tumakbo ng sabay ang dalawang ito.

gud day po.

pinapaalis po kami sa tinitirhan namin pero habang nasa court pa ang kaso, may isang bumili raw ng lupang tinitirhan namin at ngayon gumagawa na ng mga hakbang para makapag file ng kaso para mapa alis kami. pwedi po bang dalawa ang haharapin naming kaso?

1. Ano po ba ang mangyayari kung sakaling hindi na nila ipagpatuloy ang pagbabayad sa credit card?

magkakaroon sila ng hindi bayad na utang sa credit card company.

2. Mahahabol pa ba sila ng credit card company?

Kung hindi alam ng credit card company kung nasaan sila, hindi sila mahahabol. Kahit pa alam ng credit card company kung nasaan sila, kung wala naman itong representative sa lugar kung nasaan sila, mahihirapan itong maghabol. Plus, baka mas mahal pa ang bayad sa abugado dun sa abroad kesa sa utang na sinisingil.

Kung may ari-arian na maiiwan dito sa Pilipinas ang kapatid mo (na nakapangalan sa kanya tulad ng lupa, sasakyan, o shares of stock) maaaring habulin ito ng credit card company. Kung wala, no problem.

Alalahanin mo lang na magkakaroon ng bad credit record ang kapatid mo. kapag bumalik ang kapatid mo dito sa Pilipinas at mangailangan siyang umutang sa bangko o ibang credit institution, lalabas ang record niyang ito at mas malamang sa hindi, hindi siya makakautang hanga't di niya naaareglo ito.

3. Sisingilin ba ng credit card company ang kapatid o magulang na maiiwan dito?

ang utang ng kapatid mo ay hindi utang ng magulang o ng kapatid, kaya walang karapatan ang credit card company na maningil sa mga ito.

Ang kapatid ko po ay magma-migrate na kasama ang buong pamilya sa isang buwan. May mga utang sila sa credit card. Ano po ba ang mangyayari kung sakaling hindi na nila ipagpatuloy ang pagbabayad sa credit card? Hindi nila ipapaalam sa credit card company ang address nila abroad. Mahahabol pa ba sila ng credit card company? Sisingilin ba ng credit card company ang kapatid o magulang na maiiwan dito?

Kung ordinary asset yan, ibig sabihin negosyo niya ang magbenta ng lupa. hindi na yan magtatanong dito at siguradong alam na niya ang pasikot-sikot sa real estate business. anyway, mukhang capital asset lang ito dahil lola niya ang gustong magtransfer ng property.

This is assuming that the property is a capital asset. If the property is an ordinary asset, it would be more complicated.

wala silang ganung power

tanong lang po....nagsubscribe ako sa smartbro for 1 year...tapos sa hindi inaasahan yung computer shop ko sa bulacan ay nadamage sa ondoy last sept 2009....then, sumulat ako sa smartbro for cancelation of my subscription kaso ang sabi hindi raw pwede...ngayon...nagsend sa akin letter ang attorney legal firm nila asking me to pay 11,878 for 1year...so hindi ko naman nagamit...3 mos lang

 

sabi sa akin ng friends ko...pabayaan ko lang raw. same lang eto sa credit card ....wala naman nakukulong....so ang concerned ko lang...baka ifile nila sa nbi clearance or police clearance yung kaso ko....at hindi ako makapag-abroad ulit....makakagawa ba nila eto? may powers ba sila gawin yun?

 

 

Please Help..

siya pala ang me gusto eh. basta ba pumayag siya sa amount na ino-offer nyo, OK na yun, just follow the advice of smiling bandit as to the written agreement.

thanks for the reply sir. but the kasama is the one pushing for the sale of the property cause they dont want to till the land anymore since this is not an irrigated land and with the worsening drought year after year, the copy yield is decreasing by the year. so they found a buyer of the land and is pushing for it. now, we have already informed them the amount we are going to give them. but i want to know if they have the right to ask for an amount more than what we are willing to give.. thanks again

ikaw na rin ang nagsabi na ang hinihingi ng Australian government ay divorce decree or custody order. ayaw mong kumuha ng divorce decree (actually "judgment of declaration of nullity" o "decree of annulment" dahil wala namang divorce sa Pilipinas) kaya limitado ka sa custody order. para makakuha nito, kailangan mong magfile ng custody case (which is actually nonsensical dahil ang timeframe ng custody case ay halos pareho lang ng annulment case).

Hihingi po sana ako ng advice, I am separated na po sa aking wife for 4 years now. Iniwan niya kami nung ang aking anak na babae ay 3 years old pa lang. Nag livein yung wife ko ata yung BF niya at nagkaroon sila ng anak. Then I went abroad an nagapply ako as immigrant sa Australia. Now I'm into visa processing stage and isa sa mga requirement ay divorce decree or custody order. Hindi pa po ako nakakapag file ng annulment kasi mahal at wala na po akong time pero gusto kong isama ang anak ko sa migration since di ko na din siya pwedeng iwan sa wife ko kasi meron na siyang ibang pamilya. Anong documents or ano ang pwede kong ifile para madala ko ang anak ko sa Australia na hindi naman mag coconsume ng mahabang panahon kasi kung annulment I will take years bago ma grant. By the way ang anak ko po ay seven years old na ngayon.

the existing law actually says that she cannot remove the "kasama". Under RA 3844, the leasehold relation is not extinguished by sale of the land. if the "kasama" agrees to move out in exchange for money, no problem. but if the "kasama" refuses to leave the land he is tilling, the law says he has a right to do so. note that even if the land is only 3 has., it is still covered by the law and the "kasama" is still protected.

so, lumalabas na kahit pa gustong bayaran ng mom mo yung kasama, kung ayaw niya, di nyo siya mapipilit. there is no prescribed sharing kasi nga di naman pwedeng paalisin yung tenant if you want to sell the property. bahala kayo paano nyo makukumbinsi yung "kasama" na umalis. anyway, you can still sell the land but the new owner will inherit the "kasama."

another legal advice from legal eagles here:

 

my mom is selling her 3 hectares agricultural land in bulacan. she has a "kasama" who cultivates the land and my mom gets 20% share from the harvest as lease payment of the land. Now, my question is, what is the prescribed sharing my mom will have to shell out for the kasama. Is she allowed to decide on how much she wanted to share to the kasama or is there an existing law that requires her to pay a certain amount or percentage of the selling price?

 

is it correct to use the formula that the average cavans per harvest year times 5 years times the prevailing price should be the amount that goes to the kasama?

 

Thanks

can the wife file a complaint to prevent the law student from taking the bar? YES

Does she also have to include her husband in the complaint? is the husband taking the bar? if not, no need to include.

If a female law student had an affair with a married man and they had a child, can the wife file a complaint to prevent the law student from taking the bar or does the wife have to wait for the student to be a lawyer before she files the complaint? Does she also have to include her husband in the complaint even if they've already made peace with each other?

kung ganun, lumalabas na ordinary employee siya at applicable sa kanya yung 2-year continuous service. me laban kayo, but you have to wait for the result of the CDA mediation

no specified provision in the by-laws/ article of cooperation

what i meant was that baka kasi sa articles of cooperation o by-laws ay officer siya ng cooperative, hindi lang basta-bastang employee. which could mean that the 2-year continuous service you mentioned is not applicable to her, dahil yun ay para sa ordinaryong employee lang

appointed nga po but after two years wala na binigay na notice of appointment sa kanya.. (pls see the first paragraph)