rocco69

Hindi abugado ang solusyon sa lahat ng problema.

Sa problema ng kaibigan mo, hindi siya dapat nag-iisip agad ng annulment. sa tutoo lang, base sa kwento mo, walang ebidensya na katanggap-tanggap sa korte na nambababae si lalaki.

ang pinakamaganda talaga diyan, mag-usap sila ng masinsinan tungkol sa relasyon nila. kung ayaw ni lalaki, pilitin nya na mag-mariage counselling sila.

kapag umabot lang sa punto na masasabi niya na WALA NA TALAGANG PAG-ASA na sila'y magsama siya dapat lumapit sa abugado. As of now, going to a lawyer only jeopardizes the chances of the parties reconciling with each other.

good day sir. i would like to ask something about marriage matters.

 

i have a friend and she's married for 10 years. her marriage was ok until her husband came home for vacation last year and met a young lady in a culinary training. her husband has been acting differently since then til he went aboard. the young lady applied to be a sea farer as well but was supposed to board a different ship, instead she was assigned to the same ship as the hubby when the hubby's work mate has to leave for emergency. it was a no brainer for the wife that her hubby was responsible for the lady to board the same ship coz her hubby has the authority to request whom to board. the hubby never told the wife about it and she has to learn it from someone else. sources at the ship said the lady and the hubby are close. the wife also found an email which is sort of a signal for two people to meet at wee hours of the morning. when her husband finally came home again for vacation, she waited for him to tell her about the young lady but it never materialized. so she had to take the initiative and asked bout it and also the secret email message but unfortunately, the hubby didn't explain a thing. in short, he just chose to shut up, change topic, lie about certain quesions or just deny it without giving an explanation. he doesnt bother reassures her wife nor comfort her doubt and fears but just say "wala akong babae" or "di ako nambabae". the wife is so fed up already with the hubby treating her like nobody and would very much like to leave his hubby but wants the hubby to support their 2 children's education. the wife suggested annullment to the hubby but he's not open to the idea. so now, the wife plans to draft a contract asking for a specific amount as "sustento" and let the guy signed it then notarized it. will this be honor in court should a problem arises? can she just draft the contract by herself/themselves or is it better to have a lawyer do it? any other way to do this?

its merely a proposal. you don't have to accept it.

nakapagtataka kasi, it seems that the burden of having the title transferred in the name of the buyer is being placed on you, the seller (either that or they are getting the money to buy the property from a bank loan, with a mortgage being constituted on the property as security for the loan - na di naman pupwede kung di pa sila ang may-ari ng property). kung OK lang sa inyo ito, then you can probably ask the company to execute a Memorandum of Agreement where they specifically acknowledge that ownership of the property has already been transferred to them via a "Deed of Absolute Sale" but that they have actually only paid P500K and the balance will be paid upon transfer of the title in the name of the buyer.

personally and professionally, i do not like this kind of agreement since na-transfer na nga ang ownership sa iba pero di pa kayo fully paid. i would much rather you enter into a "Contract to Sell" where you promise to execute a Deed of Absolute Sale upon full payment of the purchase price. this way, ownership is not transferred until you are fully paid (although, di nga uubra ang ganito kung galing sa bangko ang perang ipambabayad nila sa inyo).

in the alternative, baka pwede rin ang Deed of Conditional Sale, whereby ownership will be transferred only upon full payment (although the same hindrance as mentioned above will also be present).

i will, of course, defer to the real meisters of land deals here (paging DrPepper or TheSmilingBandit) as to other alternatives, as they are more knowledgeable on these type of matters.

Would appreciate your advice on this - a company is interested in acquiring our property in Gen Santos and has proposed to pay P500K cash and the balance covered by a bank guarantee on the balance when we present (to the bank) the title of the property already transferred to the name of the buyer (the bank's client). How can I protect our interests in this transaction, considering I have to execute an absolute deed of sale to transfer the title to the buyers name but have received only P500K in cash? The bank guarantee proforma is letter of assurance of payment of the balance only upon transfer of title to the buyer (the bank's client).

1. Hindi ba lumalabag din sa Anti-Wiretapping Law yung ginagawa ng mga media (e.g. XXX)?

I'd say lumalabag sila. Sa ilalim ng Anti-Wiretapping Law, kailangan authorized ng lahat ng partido ang pagre-record. kapag walang authorization ng lahat ng partido, violation ng batas.

2. Paano kung sa bahay mo mismo ni-record ang nangyari, hindi mo ba pwede i-record/gamiting ebidensya yun? (Via cellphone or surveillance cam, kung meron sa bahay.)

ganun pa rin, kailangan me pahintulot ng lahat. tingnan mo yung kaso ng GSIS laban kay Cheche Lazaro.

Ok 'tong thread na 'to ah. Marami ako natututunan.

 

While browsing, though, I've read your post quoted above, Sir rocco69. Out of curiosity lang... Kung labag sa Anti-Wiretapping Law yung pagre-record;

1. Hindi ba lumalabag din sa Anti-Wiretapping Law yung ginagawa ng mga media (e.g. XXX)?

2. Paano kung sa bahay mo mismo ni-record ang nangyari, hindi mo ba pwede i-record/gamiting ebidensya yun? (Via cellphone or surveillance cam, kung meron sa bahay.)

 

Again, out of curiosity lang. Kasi gawain kong mag-record ng conversation kapag meron akong mga complaints. Para kung worst-case scenario na magkademandahan, may ebidensya ako. So far, wala pa namang umaabot sa ganoon.

you have two options - either a civil case for support; or criminal cases for child abuse (failure to support one's child could fall into "other forms of child abuse, punished under Republic Act 7610) or violation of the Anti-Violence Against Women and Children [Republic Act 9262]).

In both instances, I'd say you need to have a formal demand letter sent [and received] by your ex, so you have proof that he has refused to pay for support.

You will also need to prove that, indeed, the child is a child of your ex (this can be done in the course of the proceedings, by asking the Court for the conduct of a DNA test).

As you yourself have intimated, you need to talk to a lawyer about these matters. Ask your family and friends about a lawyer they can recommend to handle this matter. When they do recommend a lawyer' you can ask the following questions (culled from www.lawyers-bc.com), to ensure that you get competent legal assistance. Remember, if you are not comfortable with the lawyer, you can always decline his services:

About the Lawyer

1. How long have you been practising law?

2. What is your experience in this practice area?

3. Have you handled any cases like mine? What was the outcome?

About Your Case

4. What are the possible outcomes of my case, and the chances of success?

5. What are the procedures involved in my case, and a rough time schedule for the different steps?

7. Approximately how long will it take to finalise?

8. What complications can arise in my case, and can they result in additional fees?

About Legal Fees

9. Do you have a written retainer letter or agreement?

10. How will you charge me for this case?

11. Will your rates change while you are handling my case? If so, how much notice will you give me?

12. Will any junior lawyers or legal assistants be working on my case?

13. What kind of disbursements will there be?

14. Assuming that there are no complications, what is the range of the possible fees, disbursements, and taxes? Can you give me a firm quote for fees and/or disbursements?

15. When will you bill me?

About the Work on Your Case

16. How will you keep me informed about what is happening on my case?

17. Will you send me copies of letters that you receive and send out?

18. Will you return my phone calls the same day?

19. Do you use email or fax to communicate with me?

20. Who else in the office will be working on my case? Can I call them if I can't get hold of you?

Thanks Sir Rocco69. How do I start, where do I start and I'm at a loss as to how to go about it. I tried to settle things amicably pero puro empty words lang binibigay sakin dahil nga ang katwiran nung ex ko, hindi naman naka-pangalan sa kanya ang bata at wala sa poder nila. Tapos maayos na usapan lang daw ang pwede since walang record of his name anywhere indicating that he is indeed the father. I have never received anything from him for our daughter. But I want to start collecting what's rightfully due to my child.

 

I do not know how much it will cost me to get a lawyer and I do not know which laywer to approach. Ayoko pong mabiktima ng pretenders. Do you have recos I can talk to? Sir what I mean is if there is a laywer in the gravepine that has provided the best service for scenarios such as mine na hindi mashadong exorbitant ang fee. Thanks so much and I appreciate your time.

Unang-una, this should not be in a separate thread, but should have been posted in the "Annulment 101" thread (paging the Admin.)

Anyway, here goes.

1. illegal ba tlaga ang kasal nila?

Hindi ko alam kung anong ground ang pinagbabasehan nung friend mo na nagsabi sa Mom mo na VOID ang kasal niya.

Dahil kung sa EDAD din lang, nung early 1980's Civil Code ang umiiral. Sa ilalim ng Civil Code, ang minimum na edad para sa pagpakasal ay 16 para sa lalaki at 14 PARA SA BABAE. basta ba may pahintulot ang magulang.

Sa madaling salita, kahit 15 ANYOS lang ang nanay mo nun, maari siyang magpakasal kung may pahintulot ang magulang niya sa kanyang pagpapakasal (at sinabi mo nga na merong consent), at mabisa ang kasal niya.

2. need pa [ba] ng annulment para lang makapag pakasal na ulit ang isa sa kanila?

Yes. As stated earlier, the age of your mother is not a defect at all, kaya kasal pa rin sila sa isa't-isa, ergo, di sila pwedeng magpakasal sa iba.

kailangan nilang maghanap ng ibang ground para mapawalang-bisa ang kasal nila (kung gusto nilang magpakasal sa iba), probably "psychological incapacity" of either or both of them.

heres the scenario my parents were married during the early 1980's my mom was only 15 back then...

 

right now they are separated....got this friend who actually told my mom that her marriage with my father is VOID??

 

pa clear lang? pano yung right ng mga anak? and aside from that way back then may parent's consent naman? illegal ba tlaga ang kasal nila? o need pa ng annulment para lang makapag pakasal na ulit ang isa sa kanila...

 

enlighten me plss..thanks

1. I didn't voluntarily resign.

Depende sa wordings ng Quit-Claim. From your narration, lumalabas na wala kang ginawang resignation letter.

Kung di ka naman contractual or project employee, or di pa nag-eexpire yung contract mo, without a resignation, lumalabas na na-terminate ka.

However, if the Quitclaim makes it appear that you voluntarily relinquished your position, parang nag-resign ka. Kung ganun ang wordings niya, at dahil pumirma ka, you RELUCTANTLY resigned. Whether reluctant or not, it will still be considered a RESIGNATION.

On the other hand, even if the wordings do not say that you resigned, dahil Quitclaim ito, parang ni-relinquish mo na rin ang anumang karapatan mo sa pwesto mo.

2. Is it rightful to demand for a separation pay? I never resigned, so I should get it, right?

Quitclaim nga eh. That means, you gave up all your rights to whatever amounts are still owed you, and you admit that your final pay constitutes full payment of all your claims (to include whatever right you had to separation pay).

However, you do have the option of contesting your termination. You can go to the NLRC (sa PPSTA Bldg. Banawe, near cor. Quezon Ave) and file a complaint saying that you were illegally terminated (siyempre, sasabihin ng kabila na nag-resign ka, exhibiting your Quitclaim as proof). Depende na kung sino ang paniniwalaan ng Labor Arbiter.

3. If they say that the cause of my separation from the company was "performance" issues, is it considered illegal termination if they didn't even serve me any corrective actions or memos as per the company policy?

Yes, it would be considered illegal dismissal if they say that you were terminated because of "performance issues" without any proof of such issues. Kaya lang, dahil may pinirmahan kang Quitclaim, kung ako ang management, di ko sasabihin na performance issues, paninigasan ko na na you resigned (ano pa ang gamit nung Quitclaim, although without a resignation letter, medyo mahirap yung ganun).

 

 

Saers,

 

I badly need your help.

 

I just received my final pay from the company, and they asked me to sign the quitclaim to get the money... However I have several concerns about it...

 

 

1. I didn't voluntarily resign. I was asked to leave the company because we didn't have a floating status. They even asked me to sign a document that I was to be out of the company 1/13/2011, but when I got the final pay, that document was not included in the papers, not even a copy of my clearance form was included.

 

2. Is it rightful to demand for a separation pay? I never resigned, so I should get it, right?

 

3. If they say that the cause of my separation from the company was "performance" issues, is it considered illegal termination if they didn't even serve me any corrective actions or memos as per the company policy?

Kausapin ang DSWD kung ano ang gagawin para makalaya ang bata. Isipin mo rin, tama ba na basta na lang palalayain ang bata. Nahulihan ng marijuana, maaaring trip-trip lang nung bata, pero maaari din namang may problema yan (o di-kaya'y ang pamilya). Mas makabubuti sa bata kung pag-aralan nyo muna kung bakit may marijuana siyang dala-dala, at paano masisiguro na di na siya gagawa ulit nito. May mga trained professionals sa DSWD na nakakaalam nito, kaya talagang tama lang na sumangguni kayo sa DSWD.

Nahulihan ng 1 stick marijuana, 17 yo, nasa dswd ngayon. Ano gagawin para maka laya?

Do I have the right to demand for support since she is still his daughter?

Yes.

Dear Sirs,

 

I have a year old daughter with my ex. My daughter is under my name and my ex is not registered as the father on her birth certificate. However, he admits that the child is his. He has not given any financial support for her by far. Do I have the right to demand for support since she is still his daughter? I am willing to undergo DNA testing provided that if the child turn out to be his, he should shoulder all the expenses plus moral damages. My financial intention is really high since he has taken away so much from me, financially, emotionally, physically and spiritually. I also intend to make him remember that he has a daughter since his reasoning is that I can take care of our child since we are no longer together. Please help.

 

Distraught Mother.

nasa inyo yan. ang kontrata ay hindi pilitan. kung papayag kayo, OK lang. kung hindi naman kayo papayag, hindi uubra yung gusto nila (dahil di nga kayo pwedeng pilitin sa hindi nyo gusto).

ask ko lang po tungkol sa rental ng place. meroon po nagre-rent saamin na expired na ang contract, since january of this year. tapos itong renter o tenant gusto sa august na lang daw gumawa ng bagong contract kasi magpapalit daw sila ng mode of business from restaurant to internet cafe. papayag na lang po ba kami na magbayad na lang sila ng kanilang buwanan na upa hanggang sa july o dapat po ba guumawa rin ng kasulatan? salamat po.

pwede na ang sarili mong testimonya. ito ay magiging usapin kung sino ang mas kapani-paniwala sa inyomg dalawa.

hindi OK na isetup mo siya at irerecord mo. ito ay violation ng Anti-Wiretapping Law (Republic Act 4200). kalalabasan niyan, imbes na ikaw ang may kaso, ikaw pa ang pwedeng kasuhan.

lalabas na hindi valid evidence yan laban sa kanya, pero magiging ebidensya ito na nilabag mo ang Anti-Wiretapping Law.

yun ang problema sir walang testigo, ako ang testigo, ok lang kaya na isetup ko siya na magsalita at irecord yung pananakot niya na hindi nya alam

 

magigi bang valid evidence yun kasi nga on purpose ko na inirecord yung pananakot?????

thanks sa reply sir!!!

pwede.

kahit walang recording, basta me testigo ka, pwede bilang ebidensya

good day

 

tanong ko lang po kung pwede kasuhan ang isang tao na palagi na lang ako pinagbabantaan na papatayin minsan pati family ko sinasabi saakin na

"magkakamatayan tayong lahat" nakakawisit na kasi paran may sira yata ang ulo, pwede kaya siyang kasuhan? kailangan ko ba ng evidence such as a voice recording ng pananakot niya??

sabi sa Section 77 ng PD 1529:

Section 77. Cancellation of lis pendens. Before final judgment, a notice of lis pendens may be canceled upon order of the court, after proper showing that the notice is for the purpose of molesting the adverse party, or that it is not necessary to protect the rights of the party who caused it to be registered. It may also be canceled by the Register of Deeds upon verified petition of the party who caused the registration thereof.

At any time after final judgment in favor of the defendant, or other disposition of the action such as to terminate finally all rights of the plaintiff in and to the land and/or buildings involved, in any case in which a memorandum or notice of lis pendens has been registered as provided in the preceding section, the notice of lis pendens shall be deemed canceled upon the registration of a certificate of the clerk of court in which the action or proceeding was pending stating the manner of disposal thereof.

dahil 1940 pa yung lis pendens, mas malamang sa hindi, na-decide na yung kaso na basehan nung lis pendens.

pumunta ka sa court kung saan na-file yung kaso, tapos kumuha ka ng copy ng decision dun. depende sa decision kung pwede mo nang ipa-cancel yung notice of lis pendens.

assuming na hindi ka na makakuha ng copy nung decision (dahil 1940s pa nga yung kaso at baka wala nang record yung korte nung kaso), baka kailangan mong pumunta sa National Archives para maghanap ng kopya.

assuming na wala ka talagang makitang kopya nung decision, sa aking palagay, mangangailangan kang maghain ng kaso sa hukuman para ipa-kansela yung notice of lis pendens, gtagamitin mong basehan, prescription at laches.

my friend's property has a lispendens dating back circa 1940s. the lispendens in the property is P1000 plus.

 

my question is:

 

1. how do you remove the lispendens?

2. do you have to prove that the claimant is already deceased? from my friend's story, he has lost contact with the claimant.

 

appreciate advice in legal steps to remove the lispendens in the tct. thanks.

kung magkakasundo ang lahat ng heredero ng lola mo (asawa niya kung buhay pa; lahat na nabubuhay niyang anak; kung may patay na siyang anak, lahat ng anak nun), gagawa sila ng "Extrajudicial Settlement of Estate" kung saan yung ari-arian ng lola mo na minana nila ay ibinibigay nila dun sa isang anak. ipapadyaryo ito (yung maliit na "Legal Notice" na nababasa mo paminsan0-minsan sa tabloid), at ayun, siya na ang may-ari.

kung gusto ng anak na malipat sa kanya ang tax declaration, punta siya sa Munisipyo at kunin ang requirements dun sa pagpapalipat (kailangang bayaran ang mga buwis tulad ng transfer tax, amilyar, at estate tax naman sa BIR).

kung gusto naman niyang magkatitulo na ang lupa, sumangguni na sa abugado kung pwede ang lupa mapatituluhan (at ang prosesong ito ay dadaan sa husgado muna)

good day mga sir. ask ko po sana regarding the property of my late lola.

The property is not titled and only under tax dec. my lola died na in 2008.

How do we transfer it to one of her sons? what office of the government are we going to process the transfer?is there a need to pay for estate tax, notwithstanding that it is not titled?

maraming maraming salamat po

rates are, as a general rule, pareho lang (kung magkano ay depende sa maraming factor, kaya paiba-iba ito, depende sa kausap mo).

pareho din lang ang proceedings (burden of proof is still with the petitioner, i.e. kailangang patunayan ng naghain na talagang may basehan para ipa-walang-bisa ang kasal)

Boss Rocco .... thanks so much, you're such a big help.

Does the cost of filing a "declaration of nullity" much cheaper than "annulment"

How about the proceeding is it much easier than annulment?

1. ano na pananagutan ng husband sa wife.

dahil ang Estado lamang ang may karapatan na magsabi na walang-bisa ang isang kasal, hangga't walang deklarasyon mula sa hukuman na walang-bisa ang kasal nila, sa mata ng batas, mag-asawa pa rin sila. pero dahil nga may-asawa na pala before si babae, pwedeng umayaw si husband na magsuporta ke babae.

2. kelangan pa rin ni husband ipawalang bisa yung kasal nila ng wife nya thru annulment ba para kung gusto nya mag asawa ulit.

yes, dahil ang Estado lamang ang may karapatan na magsabi na walang-bisa ang isang kasal.

3. Pwede ba gawing ground ng husband yung first marriage ng wife to file annulment

yes (although, technically, hindi ito tinatawag na "annulment", kundi "declaration of nullity"), at hindi rin yung first marriage ni wife per se, kundi yung 1st marriage AND the failure to obtain a declaration of nullity of the 1st marriage prior to contracting the marriage between husband and wife

Rocco thanks for clarification ...

One last thing ... so if it is invalid (husband and wife marriage) ...ano na pananagutan ng husband sa wife. kelangan pa rin ni husband ipawalang bisa yung kasal nila ng wife nya thru annulment ba para kung gusto nya mag asawa ulit. Pwede ba gawing ground ng husband yung first marriage ng wife to file annulment.

Thanks in advance ...

1. you mean hindi valid yung kasal nung husband and wife kahit kung titingnan eh hindi naman din valid yung kasal nung wife sa una dahil married na yung other guy ...

yes, dahil nga kung ikaw ay kasal na (kahit pa talagang walang-bisa ito - dahil ang Estado lamang ang may karapatan na magsabi na walng-bisa ang isang kasal), hindi ka maaaring basta-basta magpakasal ulit. kailangang may deklarasyon mula sa hukuman na walang-bisa ang nauna mong kasal bago ka magpakasal ulit.

entonces, hindi talaga valid yung kasal ng wife and husband.

2. kung mapawalang bisa ng wife yung unang kasal nya (mapatangal sa NSO record) ... does it mean valid na yung kasal nila ng husband nya?

hindi pa rin. dahil nga nung panahon na magpakasal si husband and wife, walang deklarasyon mula sa hukuman na walang-bisa ang naunang kasal ni wife, ang kanyang pangalawang kasal ay walang-bisa din. kailangan nilang magpakasal ulit after mapawalang-bisa yung unang kasal ni wife.

rocco .... you mean hindi valid yung kasal nung husband and wife kahit kung titingnan eh hindi naman din valid yung kasal nung wife sa una dahil married na yung other guy ...

 

Sorry medyo makulit tanong ko ... so hindi talaga valid yung kasal ng wife and husband?

 

One more thing ... kung mapawalang bisa ng wife yung unang kasal nya (mapatangal sa NSO record) ... does it mean valid na yung kasal nila ng husband nya?

dahil menor-de-edad pa lang ang anak nila, pwede niya itong kasuhan ng child abuse (other forms of child abuse ang di pagbibigay sustento sa menor-de-edad na anak).

ito rin ay bumabagsak sa violence against women and children, na isa ring krimen.

papuntahin mo ang pamangkin mo sa Women's and Childrens Desk sa police station para matulungan siya doon na magsampa ng karampatang kasong kriminal laban sa magaling niyang asawa. dahil kasong kriminal, di na niya kailangan ng abugado pag ito ay nasampa sa korte, fiscal ang abugado niya.

dahil ito ay may kulong, siguradong magmamakaawa ang magaling niyang asawa, at magbibigay ng tamang sustento. wag siyang papayag except kasunduan na aaprubahan ng korte (ipapadaan yan sa mediation kung saan ipagkakasundo sila, yun ay inaaprubahan ng korte), para may ngipin ang kasunduan, hindi yung sila sila lang ang magkakasundo.

I don't know if this is the right thread

 

mga bro

 

kasi may problema ang pamangkin ko na babae

 

ganito yun.

 

 

kasal sila at may 1 anak na mag 4 yrs/ old na

 

ang mister ng pamangkin ko ay nagkaroon ng kulasisi na ka opismeyt niya

 

sasabihin ko na kung saan nag-work ang lalake at kulasisi sa FEU IT dept.

 

para malaman baka kilala niyo kasi para malaman niyo ang kalawanghiyaan ng lalake

 

ang pamangkin ko ay di siya nag-work.

 

ngayon nahuli ng pamangkin ko ang mister niya ay may iba ngang ka-relasyon

 

ngayon ay hiwalay na sila ng pamangkin ko.

 

nag-usap sila tungkol na lang na sustentuhan na lang ang anak nila

 

bale ang napag usapan ay bibigyan ng Php8k kada sahod ang anak nila.

 

pero unang bigay pa lang ay Php3k lsng sng bigay at sabi ng lalake ay kung ano

lang ang kaya niyang bigay yun ang ang mabibigay niya.

 

ang kinakatakot ko ay mag-abroad na ang lalake at hindi na mabigyan ng suporta ang bata.

 

at mawlan ng sustento ang bata at wala naman work ang pamangkin ko

 

kanino po ba ako pwede lumapit para matulungan ko ang pamangkin ko

 

or mabigyan man lang ng hold-order ang lalake para di makapag-abroad

 

baka mayron kayong kilala na abugado na matulungan ang pamangkin ko

 

walang-wla talaga ang pamangkin ko

 

 

sana po ay may makatulong sa pamangkin ko

 

thnx

 

god bless

hindi pa rin. in 1996, effective na ang Family Code. sabi nga, kahit pa walang bisa ang kasal mo, kailangan mo pa rin ng deklarasyon ng hukuman tungkol dito. sa madaling salita, kahit walang bisa ang ang kasal nung babae sa unang lalaki dahil may asawa na ito), kailangan niyang pumunta muna sa korte para ipadeklarang walang bisa ang kasal niya bago siya magpakasal muli. pag basta lang siyang nagpakasal, wala ring bisa ang kasalang yun.

Moridins thanks for the info ... want to clarify further, let says the 1st Marriage of the girl to the other guy (who is already legally married) was year 1996 and the second marriage is to the husband is 1998. So does the wife and husband marriage is valid?

oo. Habang naglilitis, kapag nalaman yung tunay na katauhan nung taong kinilala muna bilang "John Doe", babaguhin yung reklamo para ipakita ito (Section 7, Rule 110, 2000 Rules of Criminal Procedure).

Sir, sa demanda ba, isinasama rin yung John DOe?

 

Thanks

yup. a so-called "name transfer" will be allowed only if the person in whose name the title will be transferred is the new owner. sa madaling salita, hindi pwede yung sasabihin nyo na "trip" nyo lang ilipat yung titulo, napapalitan lang ang nakarehistrong pangalan at naililipat sa iba kapag meron nang bagong may-ari nito - in short, para mailipat, kailangan nyong palabasin na ikaw na ang bagong may-ari ng condo, usually sa pamamagitan ng Deed of Sale o Deed of Donation. kapag deed of sale, may babayaran kayong capital gains tax. kung deed of donation - donor's tax naman. meron pang bayarin na documentary stamp tax. ang munisipyo, naniningil din ng transfer tax para sa pribilehiyong mailipat ang titulo sa pangalan ng iba.

bakasakaling makalusot sa taxes (suntok sa buwan) kung palalabasin nyo na hindi siya sale o donation kundi recognition lamang ng existing na ownership mo, i.e. palalabasin nyo na hindi ang kapatid mo kundi ikaw talaga ang tunay na may-ari ng condo simula't sapul; at kinikilala lamang ng kapatid mo ang tunay na ownership mo. dito, ang gagawin nyo ay hindi deed of sale o deed of donation but an acknowledgment of your ownership (pero medyo mahigpit na paliwanagan ito sa BIR, at baka sakit sa ulo lang)

we have a condo under my brother's name, and my mom wants to transfer it to my name. do i need to pay some taxes even though its just name transfer?

Q#1 : is there a legal way para maobliga sya na magbigay ng sustento for our kid?

kasuhan mo ng child abuse (see Sec. 10a in relation to Sec. 3b[3], Republic Act 7610) at violation ng Sec.5e ng Republic Act 9262. tingnan mo at makikiusap yan pag nakasuhan na.

Q#2 : or pwede po ba sya maalisan ng karapatan sa bata kasi tinakbuhan nya naman responsibilidad nya?

pwede, abandonment ito, isa sa mga ground para tanggalin ng parental authority ang isamg magulang

Q#3 : totoo rin po ba na pag napatunayan nila na may iba na akong boyfriend e pwede nila kunin yung custody nung bata saakin?

dahil hindi naman kayo kasal, ang bata ay illegitimate. kapag illegitimate ang bata, ito ay nasa ilalim ng authority ng nanay. ang karapatan lang ng ama ay visitation rights. in short, hindi nila makukuha ang custody ng bata mula sa iyo (unless maipapakita nila na makakasama sa bata ang patuloy na pagtira nito sa poder ng nanay). dahil di naman kayo kasal, may karapatan kang makipag-relasyon sa iba, kung kaya't hindi ito magagamit na dahilan upang kunin ang bata mula sa iyo.

good PM po..

 

i need advice po regarding sa daughter ko.. me and her dad are not married, pero she carries the surname of her dad. pero ngayon hiwalay na kami. yung dad nya nagtatago, and doesnt want to give sustento to our daughter. my daughter is 1year old.

 

Q#1 : is there a legal way para maobliga sya na magbigay ng sustento for our kid?

Q#2 : or pwede po ba sya maalisan ng karapatan sa bata kasi tinakbuhan nya naman responsibilidad nya?

Q#3 : totoo rin po ba na pag napatunayan nila na may iba na akong boyfriend e pwede nila kunin yung custody nung bata saakin?

 

thanks in advance po.

dahil sa City Hall lang kayo ikinasal, maaaring sa fixer lang ito. Rarely, may fixer na fake na license ang ginagamit.

tingnan mo ang Certificate of Marriage mo, sa dulo nun (bandang kaliwa) nakalagay ang marriage license no. at Civil Registrar na nag-issue nung license.

puntahan mo ang Civil Registrar na yun at magtanong dun tungkol sa marriage license mo. Kung meron, talagang psychological incap. na lang ang pag-asa mo. kung wala, o di-kaya'y sa ibang tao naka-issue, maswertye ka at mas madaling mapawalang-bisa ang kasal mo. Either way, mangangailangan ka ng serbisyo ng abugado para maihain ang petisyon mo para maideklarang walang-bisa kasal mo.

Pano ko po machecheck? San po pwede?

maraming salamat po

check mo yung lisensyang ginamit sa kasal nyo, kung merong lisensya, ang pag-asa mo na lang ay ipawalang bisa ang kasal mo sa pamamagitan ng Art 36 ng Family Code (psychological incapacity). medyo malaki ang kakailanganin mong pera para dito.

Good pm guys! Sana matulungan niyo po ako sa kaso ko, eto po story:

Naging kami po ng 1 1/2 years then nun makikipaghiwalay na ko, nalaman ko po buntis siya..

Naawa naman po ako sa magiging anak ko at pinanagutan ko at nalaman na ng magulang niya, sabi po namin pag graduate na po magpapakasal, pero gusto ng

magulang niya ikasal na, so nasunod ang parents niya.. 20 years old na ako at 19 naman po siya nun..

Sa cityhall lang po kame kinasal, so last feb po ay nagkalabuan na kami.. Pero di pa po kami nagsamasa isang bahay, pag weekend lang po siya sumasama sa bahay namin

at kung may mga matagal ba vacation sa school..

23 na po ako ngayon.. Mula feb ay di na sila nagstay samin pag week end..

Ang problema din po kasi ay pinagbabawalan po ako lumabas kasama ang kaibigan ko at nanay niya ang nasusunod kung saan kami magpapasko..

Ngayon naman tuwing sasabihin ko na ipapasyal ko ang bata ay sinasabi niya sa nanay niya magpaalam..anu po ba ang chance ko mavoid ang kasal namin? Annulment?

 

Salamat po ng marami!

kung tutoong nakasal sa unang stepmom mo ang erpat mo, maaari siyang makasuhan ng bigamy ng pangalawang stepmom mo.

ay sorry..

sabi ng erpat ko nun kasal daw sila nung 1st stepmom ko..

tapos nung ikakasal sila ng 2nd stepmom ko, sabi nya hindi daw legal? pero kinasal sila nun sa judge/atty. pa.

ewan ko kung pano nangyari..

kaya nakasal sya dun sa 2nd stepmom ko na eto yung asawa nya ngayon.

 

wala na po yung mom ko. dedbol na..

kanino ba kasal yang erpat mo? kasal ba sila ng stepmom mo?

dati niyang asawa ang babalikan niya, pinakasalan ba niya ang dati niyang asawa? kung oo, ano ang nangyari sa kasal niyang ito?

mas nakakalito, sabi mo ex-stepmom mo rin yun. sino ang mom mo? kasal ba sila ng erpat mo? ano ang nangyari at hindi mom mo kundi iba ang kinakasama ng erpat mo?

good day mga lawyers!

 

di ko alam pano ko uumpisahan, ganito kasi, si erpat saka stepmom ko maghihiwalay na kasi daw si erpat binalikan nya dati nyang asawa,

ngayon si stepmom ko magffile daw ng case against kay erpat. basta na lang iniwan ni erpat si stepmom, naawa ako sa stepmom ko, parang tanga kasi si erpat eh.. my question is ano po bang pwedeng mangyari kay erpat? nga pala hindi lang pala si erpat ang kakasuhan pati yung ex-stepmom ko.

 

thanks mga lawyers!

merry xmas sa inyo!

 

-astorre