rocco69

pwedeng ipa-correct ang maling entry sa birth certificate sa Civil Registrar lang kung ang mali ay "typographical error".

Typographic errors refer to misspellings or those which are visible to the eye or obvious to the understanding.

Yung mali sa religion, in your case, Islam instead of Christian, ay hindi masasabing "typographical error" lang — kaya kailangan itong dumaan sa husgado; i.e. kailangan niyang maghain ng petition sa korte para ipabago ang birth certificate niya.

ano ang steps required: STEP ONE - maghanda ng pera pambayad sa abugado. STEP TWO: kumuha ng abugado... STEP THREE ONWARD: yung abugado na ang bahala dun.

my gf's religion in her nso birth cert is "islam", however, she was baptized as a christian. what are the steps required to have her religion in her birth cert changed ?

thanks in advance.

ang right of way ay lupa. ang pribadong lupa, pwedeng mapa-tituluhan. ang tanungin mo, ano ang ginamit na papeles para mapatituluhan yung lupa, ito ba ay deed of sale, o donation, o inheritance. makikita ito dun sa register of deeds (RD) ng lugar nyo. i-research mo dun sa RD (tingnan mo yung bagong titulo, at yung titulong pinanggalingan nito, at kung anong dokumento ang ginamit para makansela yung lumang titulo) para malaman mo kung me karapatan nga ba siyang gawin yun.

isa pa pong tanong related diyan sa usaping right of way......ang isa po bang right of way ay pwede patituluhan? kasi yung right of way na ginagamit na namin ng matagal ay pinatituluhan ng hindi nalalaman ng mga taong gumagamit nung isa naming kapaganak...legal po ba yun?

ang right-of-way ay daanan, hindi paradahan. mas lalong wala silang karapatan na humingi niyan, kung yan ang dahilan nila.

para sa batas, see Articles 649 to 651 of the Civil Code.

anyway, kung hindi kayo papayag, yan naman ay kailangang dumaan sa barangay. doon na kayo maglabo-labo he he he.

Baka para may mapag park-an sila ng sasakyan. Although ang naririnig ko lang naman talagang gustong magpa tapyas ng bahay namin or humingi ng additional na meters for right of way ay yung Asawa ng Tito ko.

 

May batas po ba tayo dito na pwede naming i bring up? Salamat po ng marami sa libreng consultation

 

Hindi naman po sa gusto kong magyabang, pero kasi, nag re reyna-reynahan sya dito, sya na lang lagi nasusunod. Madaldal kasi yun at bungangera, eh ang erpat ko eh tahimik lang kasi nga sya yung bunso at sa kanya yung bahay kaya tahimik lang sya. Pero ako kasi, hindi ako makapayag ng ginaganito na lang kami at kina kaya kaya.

 

RANT:

 

Isa pa palang point po na gusto kong i bring up sir, bago daw mamatay si Inang (Lola ko) tinipon po daw nya lahat ng anak at nagbilin na "Walang gagalaw sa bahay nya, kung ano ang sakop ng matandang bahay, yun ang sakop ng lupa."

 

Ang problema lang eh hindi na gumawa ng kasulatan ang erpat ko, kasi shempre nakakahiya naman daw kung ipapamukha pa nya sa mga kapatid nya na kelangan pa ng ganun, mutual understanding ba. At yun ang kinakatampo ng Erpat ko sa Tito ko, kasi hindi sya pumapalag sa Asawa nya.

 

More power!

right of way is based on need. ano ba ang paggagamitan ng additional 2 meters? if it is not a valid reason, they have no right to get additional width.

also, binabayaran ang right of way - tatapyasan niya, she has to pay for it

tsaka, right of way has to be established at a point least prejudicial to the estate giving it. kung kailangang tapyasan ang mismong bahay nyo, di yan "least prejudicial", lumalabas nga extremely prejudicial yan.

offhand, i'd say she has no right to get an additional 2 meters (off-hand lang, ha. without knowledge of all the circumstances, di tayo nagga-garantiya na tama talaga ang ating sagot)

Sirs, ask lang po may karapatan bang tapyasin ng "Asawa ng Tito" ko yung bahay namin pag ang dahilan nito ay right of way? 4ft ata kasi yung dinadaanan nila at gusto nilang luwagan yung daan.

 

Bali eto po ang scenario

 

2 Pamilya sila sa looban, yung isa gustong tapyasin yung gilid matandang bahay (bahay ng lola at lolo ko na tinitirhan na namin ngayon) para lumuwag pa yung dinadaanan nila na more or less 2 meters.

 

RANT:

Di ko alam, inggitera kasi yun, porke yung bahay namin ang pinaka malaki (eh ano magagawa namin pinamana ng lolo/lola ko yung bahay na ito sa Erpat ko bunso kasi)

Yup, they can't force you to be a member.

However, Section 5 says that you still have to pay the necessary fees and charges in order to enjoy basic community services and facilities. And your problem is that the homeowner's association will consider you as enjoying community services and facilities (and will charge you for it), even if you don't actually live there. when you sell your lot, the buyer will be unable to put up a structure on the property without getting a clearance from the association (which will not give one unless all arrears are paid).

my advice... pay up (or let your buyer pay up when he buys the lot).

if you think the fees are too high, run for office next time the association holds elections.

thanks a lot....next question..what do you advice? i read Rep. Act 9904....accdg to Section 22 A they can not force me to join the association....tama ba ang intindi ko...i wish i have taken up law....thanks again

they can't force you to pay. pero, they can impose penalties for your refusal to pay. See Republic Act 9904.

to the attorneys of MTC i have a question....i have an empty lot in a subdivision...the homeowners' association is recently formed and they decided on a monthly fee which i think is too high...they say this will be use to pay security guards, garbage etc which is understandable..however, they want empty lot owners to pay the same rate....can they force me to pay or if i do not pay what can they do....my lot is fully paid already (it is just an investment for the future, i already have a house in another place)...thanks guys/gals

Divided by three pa rin, walang epekto ang pagiging Amerikano ng isa (while bawal ang foreigner magmay-ari ng lupa sa Pilipinas, exception ang lupang minana mula sa magulang)

Question lang po...

 

If there are 3 siblings and one those went to the US and became a citizen for around 30 years, so the other 2 remained here. Their parents already died and no will was done. Does the 3 divide the property equally? Does the the US citizen still have the rights for the share, being a citizen of another country or does the other 2 have the rights to the property and have it divided equally among them? TIA....

Sa presumption of death, kailangan mong maghain c hukuman ng petisyon para ipadeklara ang iyong nawawalang asawa na siya ay "ipinapalagay na patay".

Kailangan mong patunayan c hukuman na may malakas kang paniniwala na patay na ang nawawala mong asawa. Sa madaling salita, kung naghiwalay lang kayo ng asawa mo at hindi ito nawawala, walang kang basehan para maghain c korte ng ganitong petisyon.

www.cda.gov.ph

mgandang araw po mga attys.

pwede po ba ako humingi ng kopya ng constitution and by-laws ng isang cooperative? or website or link kung saan po makadownload ng forms. maraming salamat po.more power to MTC.

Ang ibig sabihin: Pinaghatian na ng mga tagapagmana ang properties na iniwan ng namatay, kasama ang lupa na yn. Kung may tagapagmana na di pinartihan, o di kaya'y may mga utang ang namatay na di pa bayad, may 2 years cla (yung naisantabing tagapagmana o yung unpaid creditor) para maghabol c mga ari-arian nung namatay, kasama c maaari nilang habulin ay ang lupang yan

illegitimate ang bata dahil di kayo kasal. pero kahit illegitimate, pwede na ilagay sa apelyido mo ang bata. ayon sa bagong batas (RA 9255), pag pumapayag ang ama ng bata, pwede na itong ipa-apelyido sa kanya kahit illegitimate ito.

NEED ADVISE,, NAGKAANAK KAME NG KALIVE IN KO NGAUN,, DI KAME KASAL,, DI PA AKO ANNUL SA LAST MARRIAGE,, NGAUN KAILANGAN NA GAWIN UNG BIRTH CERTIFICATE NG BABY,, GUSTO KO SANA IPANGALAN SA AKIN UNG SURNAME,, PDE BA TO,, AYAW KO MAGING ILIGITIMATE UNG BABY,, PANO BA MAGANDANG PARAAN DITO,, IPALAGAY KO MUNA BA SA APELYIDO NG MOTHER NYA ,, UN BA ANG DA BEST,, THANKS IN ADVANCE,,,

One spouse cannot sell the property of the absolute community or conjugal partnership without getting the written consent of the other (if he/she cannot get the written consent of the other, he/she can go to court and get judicial authorization to do so).

If a married person sells absolute community property or conjugal partnership property without the written consent of the other spouse, the sale is VOID (see Art. 96, 124, Family Code).

Note that in the absence of proof one way or the other, property acquired DURING the marriage is presumed to belong to the absolute community/conjugal partnership. So, it is important to know when the property was acquired. If it was acquired while they were already married, its presumed to be absolute community/conjugal partnership property (See Art. 93, 116, Family Code).

Note also that if the property relations of the spouses is absolute community of property (which happens 99.9% of the time) all property owned BEFORE the marriage is also absolute community property (See Art. 91, Family Code).

Moral lesson: Kapag kasal ang seller, it is ALWAYS THE BETTER PRACTICE to get the consent of the other spouse, by having the other spouse sign the Deed of Absolute Sale at the end under the portion "With my marital consent", otherwise you run the risk of having the sale declared void when the other spouse suddenly questions why the property was sold without his/her consent.

P.S. Marital consent is, of course, not necessary if the property is exclusive but the burden of proving that it is exclusive falls on the buyer if it is proven that the property was acquired during the marriage (which could be hard if the seller does not cooperate)

DIFFERENT ISSUE:

It is difficult, if not impossible, to state an opinion on this issue when the documents involved are not presented. As of the present, we do not know what are the documents being used in the case.

However, note that if there are two titles over the same property, both of which have not been cancelled, the older one will prevail. If the mother title was never cancelled, it remains valid, as against another title issued on the basis of another more recent title. Again, without all the facts, we cannot whether this is the doctrine applicable in the Visayas Avenue/Sanville case.

thanks!! i have a followup question. so if the owner declared that he or she is married during the time of happy relationship and soon after, the couple will be separated, is the husband or wife of the owner can run after the property? like what you said the owner can sign the DOAS without the consent of the husband or wife. unlike when both spouses signed the contract it is clear that both of them did agree to sell the property. please enlighten me. thanks in advance!

 

 

__________________________________________

 

Different Issue

 

to all the attorneys. what can you say about the issue of torres group who are assuming that they are the real owners of the 24 hec land in QC? if they have the original title, then what is the purpose of the title which the LRA has given to the present lot owners? i presume that those owners did some verification first from the RD before they build their buildings and homes. what if they have a certified true copy of those titles? which among the "real" title will be honored the mother title or the subdivided title?

 

thanks!

Dahil nagpakasal si lalaki nung unang beses sa ilalim ng Kodigo Sibil, siya at ang asawa niya ay nasasaklaw nito. Kahit nagpalit na siya ng relihiyon, dahil hindi naman nagpalit ng relihiyon ang asawa niya, hindi siya pwedeng magpakasal uli dahil ipinagbabawal ito sa ilalim ng Kodigo Sibil (mabuti sana kung silang dalawa ng una niyang asawa ang nag-convert sa Islam, hindi na sila masasaklaw ng Kodigo Sibil at ang Muslim Code of Personal Laws na ang iiral sa pagsasama nila. Kung ganun sana, maaari na siyang mag-asawa ng hanggang apat - kung kaya niyang sustentuhan lahat ng ito). Dahilan dito, walang bisa ang pangalawa niyang kasal, ito ay bigamous (ang bigamy ay ang pagpapakasal ulit sa panahong ikaw ay kasal na at habang mabisa pa ang unang kasal na ito).

Ngunit, subalit, datapwat... kahit ito ay bigamous marriage, dahil nga may bisa lang ang batas natin sa Pilipinas, dahil siya naman ay nagpakasal ng pangalawang beses SA ABROAD, hindi siya maaaring masuplong sa krimeng bigamya, dahil ang batas natin sa bigamya ay maaaring ipatupad lamang dito sa Pilipinas (may krimeng nangyari, yun nga lang, di maparusahan). Sa madaling salita, guilty siya sa bigamy, pero di siya pwedeng ipakulong dahilan dito pag umuwi siya sa Pilipinas.

Pero, kung pagbalik niya dito sa Pilipinas ay ipagpapatuloy niya at ng kanyang kasalukuyang kinakasama (kinakasama lang, dahil wala namang bisa ang kasal nila) ang kanilang pagsasama, maaari siyang ireklamo at isuplong ng asawa niya sa krimeng concubinage (dahil dito nila ginagawa ang krimen na yan - muli, di siya masusuplong sa pagsasama nila abroad, dahil dun naman ginawa ang krimen)

malufet, on 15 August 2011 - 07:49 PM, said:

 

Sir,

 

I had this friend of mine OFW in middle east. He is married in the Phils. He is a christian catholic. Then he met this kababayan na married din sa pinas. She is also a christian catholic. They lived togother in middle east as husband and wife. They wanted to convert in islam pra maging legal ang pagsasama nila. Are they still liable for a crime of bigamy or concubinage under philippine laws if they will convert to islam?

 

Your answer will be a big help not only for my friend but also to other OFW's out there who have the same story..

 

thanks.

 

 

 

 

 

 

Sir can you clarify yung sinagot ni Sen. Escudero tungkol sa kanyang column sa isang newspaper?Naguguluhan po kc ako.

 

Dear Sen. Chiz,

 

Ang sulat pong ito ay para sa matalik kong kaibigan na nais niyang malinawagan ang magiging resulta tungkol sa pagpapakasal sa ikalawang pagkakataon sa Islam. Siya ay may asawa at anak.

 

Kasalukuyan siyang nagwo-work sa abroad at sa tagal ng panahon sa pagkawalay sa kanyang misis at pamilya ay may naka­tagpo siyang babae. Siya rin ay may asawa at anak at bilang na rin ng taon na sila ay hiwalay ng kanyang asawa at walang suporta. Sila ay nagmahalan hanggang nagdesisyon siyang magpa-convert sa Muslim o Islam para mapakasalan niya ang babae.

 

Nais niyang malaman kung magpapakasal ba sila sa Islam? Dito sa abroad wala ba silang magiging problema? Kailangan pa bang magpa-convert sa Muslim ang babae para puwede silang makasal sa Islam? Converted na kasi ang lalake pero ang babae ay hindi pa.

 

Sabi kasi sa kanya ng iba niyang friend ay once na na-convert na siya sa Muslim pwede na silang magpakasal. Sa kanyang nobya naman ba ay pwede rin ba siyang magpakasal sa Muslim kahit 14 years nang hiwalay sa kanyang asawa na walang communication at suporta? Maraming salamat po.

 

Romulado

 

Dear Romualdo,

 

Kahit pa ang iyong kaibigan ay hiwalay sa asawa niya nang may ilang taon na, nananatili pa rin naman siyang kasal at va­lid ang kasal nila ng kanyang asawa.

 

Maaari lamang siyang pakasal muli kung mayroon na siyang decree of annulment na nagpapawalang bisa sa una niyang kasal ayon sa mga basehan ng annulment sa batas ng ating bansa.

 

Hindi binibigyan ang isang tao ng karapatan na magpakasal muli sa iba dahil lamang sa paglipat niya sa relihiyong Islam. Biga­mous ang marriage niya sakaling ituloy niya ang pagpapakasal sa Islam.

 

Sumasaiyo,

Senator Francis ‘Chiz’ Escudero

good day sir rocco69, i have some questions. let's say a girl is married at nalaman ng husband niya na may BF siya. 1) ano pwedeng gawin ng husband sa girl legally? 2) can the hubby just take their children away without any due process? 3) can the husband stop sending money from abroad even without due process? 5) what can the girl do?

 

thanks.

1) ano pwedeng gawin ng husband sa girl legally? iwanan, hiwalayan, depende kung ano ang gusto niya (bawal ang saktan ang girl, except kung caught in the act)

2) can the hubby just take their children away without any due process? yes, kung gusto ba niya eh, at di papalag si girl. pero kung pumalag si girl, di niya makukuha ng basta-basta

3) can the husband stop sending money from abroad even without due process? yes, sino ba ang pipigil sa kanya kung ayaw niyang magpadala (alalahanin mo, nasa abroad siya, walang kapangyarihan ang hukuman sa abroad)

4) what can the girl do? kung tutoo, either iwanan ang BF niya at humingi ng tawad sa asawa (which is the proper thing to do, depende sa asawa kung patatawarin niya ito), or ipagpatuloy niya ang kanyang relasyon sa kanyang BF, at bahala si Mr. sa buhay niya (sino ba tayo para magbawal sa girl, eh matanda na yan at may sariling isip na, alam na niya kung ano ang tama at mali)

kung hindi tutoo, kausapin ang asawa niya at magpaliwanag. kung ayaw maniwala ni Mr., wala tayong magagawa, usapan ng mag-asawa na yan

Pareho lang po ba yung Residential Certificate at Cedula (Community tax certificate)?

wala nang residential certificate, community tax certificate na lang.

alalahanin mo rin na di na tinatanggap ang Community Tax Certificate sa pagpapanotaryo ng dokumento. Ipinagbawal na ito ng Supreme Court (mula pa nung 2004), na nagsabi na ang kailangang iprisinta sa notaryo pag nagpapanotaryo ay isang ID na government agency ang nag-issue, tulad ng Driver's License, Passport, Voter's ID, Seaman's Book, Postal ID, etc.). Siyempre, ito rin dapat ang nakabanggit dun sa acknowledgement ng notaryo.

sirs, i lost my passport and i dont know the passport number. what should i do to get a new one?

Apply with the DFA via http://e-passport.com.ph. Alam ng DFA yang passport number mo, kahit pa nawala mo yan.

Bring NSO certified birth certificate, any valid gov't ID (Driver's license, Voter's ID, etc.), notarized affidavit of explanation, police report (if passport is still valid)

the title alone is not sufficient.

your lolo has to have another document which transfers to him (your lolo) the ownership of the land covered by the title; for example a Deed of Sale, Deed of Donation, etc., signed by a person with authority to do so.

in your case, the property is titled in the name of the Republic. what authority did ex general have in giving the title to the lolo? only persons authorized by the Republic can transfer the title to a 3rd person. in your case, it's going to be hard to prove a valid transfer of ownership from the Republic to your lolo.

good evening! i dont know if this is the right place to inquire about a case. yung lolo ko kasi was given 2 titles ng isang ex general ng marcos regime years ago. itinago nya hanggan sa nakalimutan na na may title pala sya na hawak consisting of few hectares. ngayon yun uncle ko na anak ni lolo was cleaning the closet until he found the titles. he asked my lolo and dun na nga nya na kwento na bigay ng ex general. naka pangalan nga pala sya sa Republic of the Philippines

 

my question is may chance ba na mailipat yung title sa pangalan ng lolo ko or uncle ko? kailangan yata dumaan sa DAR? anong government agency sya pwede i lapit? walang ibang document kung hindi yung orig na TCT na pa certify na din at lumabas na totoo sya.

 

TIA

cancel? as in, no more vacation? or is it just postponement to another time?

if cancellation of vacation leave (as in, starting today, employees will no longer be entitled to vacation leave), the same would be illegal and contrary to law, as Art. 100 of the Labor Code prohibits the elimination or diminution of benefits already being enjoyed by employees.

if, on the other hand, management is requiring you to work on the days that you had already planned for your vacation (but is saying that you can take a vacation on some other date), it depends on the reason why. Cancellation would be allowed for emergencies and exceptional conditions at work, which require your presence (e.g. you are being made to work to prevent serious loss of perishable goods; in case of urgent work to be performed on machineries to avoid serious loss to the employer; etc). Of course, you would have to be paid extra for working on these days (additional 30% of regular wages, plus reimbursement for other damages that you suffer, e.g. forfeited tickets.

However, if there is no valid reason for cancellation of your vacation leave, the cancellation would be illegal.

is it right to cancel our vacation leave, in which we already plotted the said leaves 3 mos on advance?

As stated earlier, kung tutoong na-dismiss na yung kaso ng friend mo for failure to prosecute the same, at walang nakalagay na "without prejudice" to re-filing the case ang dismissal, di na siya maihahain uli; unless you can prove that the case was dismissed due to the gross negligence of the previous lawyer at di dapat ito isisi sa kaibigan mo (which, honestly speaking, is going to be a bit difficult because your friend is going to need a lawyer to prove that his previous lawyer was negligent, and most lawyers are unwilling to do that to a colleague).

if the dismissal really is true, the best thing to do would be to file a Motion for Reconsideration of the dismissal (within 15 days from receipt of the Order of Dismissal), para di kailangang maghain ng bagong kaso.

thanks sir

 

in case po na wala yung clause na "without prejudice". since d naman po kasalanan ng friend ko.

can we still have a case?

 

thanks po

1. if I quit, will I still be entitled to a separation pay?

No. You RESIGNED. Resignation = no separation pay. Ergo, wait until they terminate you. Termination for authorized cause = separation pay (except for closure due to business losses)

2. If they offer me a new position, which I turn down, will I still be entitled to a separation pay?

Re-assignment of an employee to a new position (if there is no reduction in pay and other benefits) is a management prerogative. Refusal to comply would be insubordination, which justifies the termination of an employee. Insubordination = just grounds for removal = no separation pay.

Thank you for this. Very helpful.

 

Just a few more follow-up questions: Given that the management has decided to restructure and has made my position redundant, if I quit, will I still be entitled to a separation pay? Or do I have to wait for them to come up with a formal announcement? If they offer me a new position, which I don't like (since its not part of the original agreement we had when I took on the position or will not give me career fulfillment), if I turn it down, will I still be entitled to a separation pay?

1. pano po malalaman kung still ongoing yung case.

pumunta sa korte kung saan nakasampa ang kaso at magtanong dun tungkol sa status ng kaso (at kung tutoo nga na may kasabay na case na same surname)

2. me kaso po na pwede isampa dun sa lawyer for negligence in case dismissed nga yung case.

meron (kung tutoong na-dismiss yung kaso dahil hindi nag-attend yung lawyer [ibig din sabihin nun, nagsinungaling si atty na may kasabay daw na case])

3. when is the soonest na pwede magfile uli ng annulment case.

depende sa pag-dismiss ng korte kung pwede pang i-refile ang kaso. Ayun sa Section 3, Rule 17, kapag na-dismiss ang kaso dahil sa kasalanan ng naghain nito (in this case, kasalanan ng naghain dahil hindi niya pinupursige ang kaso), ito ay decision on the merits, kaya di na pwedeng buhayin pa (unless sasabihin ng korte sa order of dismissal na ito ay "without prejudice" - ibig sabihin nito, pwede pang i-refile). in short, kailangang tingnan nyo ang dismissal kung ito ay "without prejudice". kung walang ganung portion, di na mihahain ulit ang kaso.

Hi sirs,

 

a friend of mine filed an annulment almost two years ago. panay delaying tactics yung lawyer nya sa court.

then last feb 28 supposedly iprepresent nung lawyer yung psychiatrist as first witness. then after 1 week

nakatangap sya ng letter na sinasabi na dismissed yung case dahil hindi umattend yung lawyer. he called

his lawyer and ang sabi ni lawyer is pano ngyari yun eh umattend sila. so lawyer called daw the court

and sinabi na nagkamali lang daw kasi me kasabay that day na case na same surname. magfifile na lang daw si

lawyer ng manifest to reopen the case.

 

question po:

1. pano po malalaman kung still ongoing yung case.

2. me kaso po na pwede isampa dun sa lawyer for neglience in case dismissed nga yung case.

3. when is the soonest na pwede magfile uli ng annulment case.

 

thanks. i hope you can help us.

haaay!

alin ang mas mataas, resolution o batas?

kung alin ang mas mataas, yun ang mananaig.

mga attorneys ng MTC,ask ko lang po,sana masagot agad..ang isang resolution ba,,regarding special assesment and check off ng Federation at inadopt ng Union ay mananaig ba sa itinatakda ng batas ng paggawa? pwede bang ishort cut sa pamamagitan ng isang resolution na pinilit na ngayon ipasa, ang magiging check off,atty fee,special assesment sa susunod na CBA 3 tatlong buhat ngayon 2014-2015? sana matugunan po ninyo,

my comment: espekulasyon lahat ng tanong mo. intayin muna natin yang divorce bill na maging batas (na ala namang kasiguraduhan)

sir rocco, pittman et al

 

i have this on off relationship for 7 years already with my ex gf. my ex gf is actually separated from her husband physically but still married legally for over 10 years already. due to financial constraints, she can't file an annulment. e wala ring initiative from her husband to file so status quo - both living apart but the child is with the mother. husband by the way is already living with another woman and has a child from the woman he's living in with.

 

my question actually pertains to the divorce bill currently being filed or being debated on in congress. assuming the divorce bill has been passed and becomes legal in the PH. mas madali ba at mura mag file ng divorce? i heard na even sa annulment to appease the damasos in the country, baka hindi na lang ipasa ang divorce but the grounds for annulment will be easier.

 

your inputs, comments, thoughts, advice shall be appreciated. thnx!

i see. the case you want to file is called one for visitation rights over your children

i mean x-wife kasi we are not seeing or have any communication with each other for 2yrs++. we are not separted or annuled yet. my problem is ayaw ipahiram or ipakita yung kids ko thanks

x-wife? may decision na ba declaring your marriage as null and void? if there is, there should also be a portion there as to who gets custody of the child and what your rights are. assuming you have been granted visitation rights, all you need to do is ask the court that rendered the decision to execute the judgment (motion for writ of execution) or a motion for indirect contempt for defiance of the court's order

sir rocco ask lang anong tawag sa case na yung x-wife ko pati biyenan ko ayaw pa hiram yung bata? im planning on filing a case against them because i know bawal yung ganyan thanks