Butsoy Posted February 3, 2003 Author Share Posted February 3, 2003 Pañero's Y Pañeras: wag kayong mahiya ha.. di ko ari (not referring to my thing down there.. hehehehe) and thread na to.. para sa atin lahat to so use it as you wanna use it (wag lang yung ari ko ang gamitin nyo... hehehe eheste.. kung lady ang gagamit ng ari ko napag uusapan yan... hahahaha) Butsoy Quote Link to comment
Butsoy Posted February 3, 2003 Author Share Posted February 3, 2003 Meron kayang canon lawyer dito? May tanong lang ako regarding certain procedures and protocols ng simbahang katoliko... nag tatanung si Hyacinth kong may Canon lawyer dito... Kong wala.. I suggest punta ka sa Archdiocese of MAnila... sa sa Arroceros... may roon sila dun... Butsoy Quote Link to comment
civilcode Posted February 3, 2003 Share Posted February 3, 2003 huhu sagot ko po Quote Link to comment
Butsoy Posted February 3, 2003 Author Share Posted February 3, 2003 Sir, Saan ba maganda web site sa legal, hirap na me sa case ko, wala me maganda defense, kawawa naman client ko. (legal-aid, wala po ako sweldo dito tulad ni sagisag pro buno!) legal opinion po ninyo mga MTC lawyer! Facts: tatang(aka) is a tenant farmer from 1940s working in land of ni landlord (aka), His fellow farmer, filed an agri case and they won in free farmer, later the landlord give them money serve as separation pay. Pero si tatang di niya tinangap in exchanges ng trabaho kasi daw pera ay madaling mawala. landlord accept the offer give him job as caretaker (1979) and later became guard (1994). Tatang is already 77 (now) yrs old weak and old, 2001 he fail to receive his compensation. landlord denied that tatang is their employee. I already establish that their was an employee-employer relationship, using the 4 test. Now, am encountring the following issue, what money claim that I should ask the court. backwages, retirement benefits and others. For computation of claim, retirement paano computation (mula 1979 hanggang 1991 kasi 65yrs na siya cumplosary retirement) or (mula 1979 hanggang ngayon na 77yrs na siya) which is which???? Is it advisable na magstart ako sa computation hanggang 1940 na tenant worker siya o mula 1979 na naging caretaker siya. To my opion dapat start ng 1979 hanggang 1991(65yrs) lang dahil, noon 1940 hanggang 1979 eh nabayaran na sila ni landlord kaya lang si tatang ay di tinangap yon bayad kaya waive na yon right na yon or either prescribe na yon right ni tatang. or magkakaroon ng double compensation. Paano ko ito masettle may offer si landlord kaya lang may string na attach at napakababa ng offer. ano pang claim ang maclaim ko para kay tatang? legal opinion po natin mga MTC lawyers. P.s. magiging MTC lawyer din ako malapit na. na hahanap di ako ng work maski taga zerox ng scra Civilcode: mukhang complicated kaso mo ah... anyway tanung ko.... may written contract ba na your client became an employee after being a Tenant? the bottom line is what is more favorable to your client.. at defensible... yun ang i pursue mo.. the more benefits your client gets the better... and the sooner he gets it.. the best... adopt a legal strategy... madami pa kasing tanung dapat na itatanung sayo para mabigyan ka ng advise how to do it.. kaya lang mas maganda may supervising attorney ka para may mag aalaga sayo... Butsoy Quote Link to comment
Guest templar Posted February 3, 2003 Share Posted February 3, 2003 Wow, dami pala abogado dito sa MTC! Di lang magagaling....mga manyak pa! I'm also a lawyer into corporate/securities/finance practice.... Tuloy na ba yung Feb 12, Starbucks-Podium, 7 pm.? If so, I'll just look for manyak-looking guys in barong.... Quote Link to comment
Huxley Posted February 3, 2003 Share Posted February 3, 2003 OK Feb 12 - Starbucks podium- tapos sa Sibil at 11:30 pm? Quote Link to comment
Roubaix Posted February 3, 2003 Share Posted February 3, 2003 I am in for the Feb. 12 Starbucks-Podium 7pm. I wonder how many we will be? Panyeros, you can PM me your numbers. I work in the Ortigas Center. Quote Link to comment
Guest Posted February 3, 2003 Share Posted February 3, 2003 I had this problem with my IE. Every time na iopen ko yung ie it always goes to this particular home page. Kahit i set ko sa About Blank yung default page it keeps coming back. And Everytime may isang pop out window na lumalabas. Any body can give a help on this.... yung Xupiter homepage ba yung lumalabas? o random ad sites? kung Xupiter, Its a toolbar plugin sa IE...and I read its veeery annoying and hard to remove (for now at least), because it reinstalls itself if you don't delete all its files and registry settings. kung random ad sites lang, should be much easier to detect. just check your add/remove program lists, clear cache/cookies, or even try to disable scripting for a while to check. hope this helps....If its Xupiter- its one annoying plug-in to IE browser. You won't be able to remove this in the Add/Remove command in the Control Panel. You have to use brute force in deleting its folder in the Program Files folder. However, you won't be able to delete XTUpdate.dll file. Just leave it that way. Also remove it from the toolbar by unchecking it in the Views>Toolbars Menu in IE. This is what I did with my PC and it never bothered me again. Just be attentive enough every time you surf the net coz every once in a while some bots/malicious softwares would try to prompt you to install something that you don't need and want. Hope this helps. Quote Link to comment
Juan_N_Only Posted February 3, 2003 Share Posted February 3, 2003 May custody rights ba ang unwed father sa anak nya specially kung wlang problema sa mother's character that can be use to discredit her of custody except thats shes using the kid as a weapon. Quote Link to comment
Dekampanilla Posted February 4, 2003 Share Posted February 4, 2003 Let me know if the Feb 12 EB is pushing through. Panyerong Roubiax, I'll PM my cell no. Wala bang MTC girl na lawyer din? Quote Link to comment
Roubaix Posted February 4, 2003 Share Posted February 4, 2003 "May custody rights ba ang unwed father sa anak nya specially kung wlang problema sa mother's character that can be use to discredit her of custody except thats shes using the kid as a weapon." As long as the father is recognized in the birth certificate, then a biological father has visitation rights at the least. For custody, there has to be a full blown hearing at the Family Courts in the local RTC. But according to Art. 213 of the Family Code, no child under 7 shall be separated from the mother unless the court finds compelling reasons to order otherwise. Quote Link to comment
cyberpinoy Posted February 5, 2003 Share Posted February 5, 2003 Anybody from UST law? Quote Link to comment
Butsoy Posted February 5, 2003 Author Share Posted February 5, 2003 Anybody from UST law? Tiga Ustelaw ka ba Cyber? what year ka dun? may mga kaibigan ako dun ah... Butsoy Quote Link to comment
Guest EvilAsh Posted February 5, 2003 Share Posted February 5, 2003 Guys, I've created a thread for the MTC lawyer's EB here. Confirm naman kayo or post doon. Quote Link to comment
cypher Posted February 5, 2003 Share Posted February 5, 2003 i think statutory rape applies to girls 12 below otherwise the case is seductionon the case of simple and qualified, it depends on the actcorruption doesn' necessarily involve sexual actsthat is if remember it right.have to brush up on my juris Quote Link to comment
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.