Jump to content
  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.

Free Legal Advice


Butsoy

Recommended Posts

  • MODERATOR
Sure, I agree with the basic premise that it is not the law school but the student that truly matters in the end. However, ALL THINGS BEING EQUAL, its just but logical that a certain student X would be better off in an above average law school than in a below average one.

 

 

Like most of us have said: It's in the student. We read the same books, anyway.

Consequently, it's the Practice that defines the lawyer.

 

And No Dissing off of schools, please. This is a free legal help desk thread.

 

THanks.

Link to comment
Ito bang spare HD never been used or nagamit na minsan?  Baka kasi formatted yung new HD sa NTFS eh kaya di makita ng FDISK ng Win98 Boot Disk mo.  Also check mo rin yung jumper settings ng new HD.

DFFR lang system ko pagdating sa Windows Installation. Debug>FDISK>FORMAT>Reinstall OS.

 

brand new sya, as in, ndi p nabubuksan ung protective plastic nya. jumper setting was set to "Master or Single drive". pwede kaya sya format using windows installer CD? :unsure:

Link to comment

Just for the sake of clarity, let us go through what you said that RA 9262 does not apply to married women.

 

First, under Art. 170 of the family Code, the legitimacy of the child cannot be impugned collaterally because only a direct suit within the applicable prescriptive period and brought only by the father or his heirs can impugn the legitimate status of a child. Well and good.

 

Second, because of the above, a married mother cannot file a case under RA 9262 against someone who impregnated her who is not her husband because it would collaterally impugn the legitimacy of child. Again, well and good.

 

However, let's throw a little wrinkle into that very neat theory.

 

Can't the mother, on behalf of her child, file a case to claim the illegitimate filiation of her child as given under Art. 173 of the Family Code with an attendant claim for support? And subsequently, file a case of violation of R.A. 9262? Because the former is a prejudicial question to the latter, the criminal case would have to be suspended.

 

There is nothing in R.A. 9262 that says it is inapplicable to married women. Ubi lex non distinguit nec nos distinguere debemos. The law does not distinguish, neither should we. In fact, the law says that it must be given a liberal construction to protect the women and their children.

 

 

 

mind if i give my opinion on this matter.

for me, i think 9262 does not cover married women. why? the FAMILY CODE is clear, ANAK NG LEGITIMATE HUSBAND YAN. and to force support sa guy, it would make the child illegitimate, something jurisprudence is firm against, meaning, no flipflopping dyan.

 

so i belive, that if the woman is married, and her case does not fall under the exceptional cases in the Family Code, she has no recourse against the man who impregnated her. save for cases of DNA and other evidence that the court "may" accept to impugn legitimacy of the child.

 

peace pare.

Link to comment

hi guys! i don't know if this is the right thread, this is sorta kinda related to law, so im gonna ask anyway:

 

what agency/institution/gocc is there for delinquent young men? im referring to teens who haven't commited a crime yet, but they will most likely do so if no action is taken. what steps can the affected family take? is there some place for them? private institutions are so darn expensive.

 

your replies will be much appreciated, thank you :mtc:

Link to comment

hi guys! i dunno if this off topic or not.. my problem is related to birth certificate of my gf, her last name is parungo, but on the documents of nso and local civil registrar is paruñgo. I know for a fact that this is not covered by RA 9048. Anyone can help? What we should do? thanks in advance..

Link to comment
hi guys! i dunno if this off topic or not.. my problem is related to birth certificate of my gf, her last name is parungo, but on the documents of nso and local civil registrar is paruñgo. I know for a fact that this is not covered by RA 9048. Anyone can help? What we should do? thanks in advance..

 

administrative correction of entry. punta ka NSO, alam na nila gagwin jan.

Link to comment
hi guys! i don't know if this is the right thread, this is sorta kinda related to law, so im gonna ask anyway:

 

what agency/institution/gocc is there for delinquent young men? im referring to teens who haven't commited a crime yet, but they will most likely do so if no action is taken. what steps can the affected family take? is there some place for them? private institutions are so darn expensive.

 

your replies will be much appreciated, thank you :mtc:

 

I would think that this would be the Department of Welfare and Social Services' turf.

Link to comment

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
×
  • Create New...