Duterte's Presidency : Expectations, Controversies, Rants, Etc.

[rooster69ph]

WTF na Survey na yan hahaha

 

 

 

 

What else to expect after "rounding" palusot was busted.

 

So paano ... facepalm pa more na lang ako.

[daphne loves derby]

ipinipilit pa rin ang mababaw na argumento.

 

eh ano naman kung may rounding off issue? ang binibigyang pansin dapat dyan ay yung resulta ng survery, mapa 99.9% or 101% man yan, the message and the result will not change that there is still HIGH TRUST RATINGS for the President until now.

 

wala na kasing maibatong iba para ma i debunk yung REAL ISSUE kaya maliit na detalye eh pinapalaki na, may masabi lang.

 

pure hater talaga..

 

Edited January 17, 2018 by daphne loves derby

[camiar]

 

 

yun orig data net trust is 76 kasi 82 - 13 - 6 napansin na total niyan is 101. ang sabi ni haroots rounding issue ayun nga at nagbigay ng example pa nga at tama naman yun explanation.

 

now yun chart sabi net trust is now 75. kasi naman 83 - 7 na daw. tama naman ulit ang mathematical computation ang tanong kung yun una nag round up na to 82 and 6 supposedly as explained ni haroots, paano naman sasabihin na kaya from 76 naging 75 ang net trust eh dahil sa rounding na naman? so yun una nag round up then bigla nag round up muli? di kinaya yan pati ni exel pramis kaya pati yun exel sumuko sa kakacompute paano naderive yun na rounded up na to 82 ay naging 83 naman due to rounding again.

 

may rules ang rounding ... kung sabi nga kaya naging 82 dahil pwede kasing 81.7 yan talaga then bakit naging 83. same goes with the 6 dissatisfaction na naging 7. sabi ninyo rounding so may bagong systema na ba ng rounding? you can roundup again after already rounding it up? ie. 81.7 rounded to 82 then rounded again to 83 ... yan ang sinasabi ninyo right?

 

kaya nga tinatanong ko iisa lang ba yan dalawa kasi hindi maaring iba ang data kahit sabihin pang nag rounding yan. it may be 1% but ang sinasabi ng mga nakapansin may mali. math is a science ... 81.7 can be rounded to 82 but never 83 sa magagaling sa math unless yun nagsasabi at nagjujustify nito ay mas magaling at nakaimbesto ng bagong rules sa rounding. o siguro nga absent ako at mahina sa math.

 

btw mas malaki problema mo ngayon dun sa sinasabi mong corrected data sa chart coz now it becomes 83 - 13 - 7 or a total of 103 from 101. the total % should always be 100%. now sa “corrected” it becomes 103%

 

so after analyzing all the justifications ....ayun napafacepalm talaga ako.

 

Pinahaba pa.

 

The difference between 81.7, 82, and 83 has no significance if the margin of error is +/- 5%.

 

Much ado about nothing.

 

Kelangan lang talagang mag post ng topic distraction para kumita.

[rooster69ph]

Tama it has no significance....but the original poster's observation is valid. Pinatulan ninyo and tried to argue/justify that it is simply a rounding issue.

 

In fact Yun mga hirit ninyo as if ang gagaling ninyo sa math at ang bobo ng kausap ninyo. Now kung kailan soplang yan argument ninyo saka kayo hihirit na immaterial/distaction un post

 

Enough said ...next time remember may option na seen zone nyo na lang.

Edited January 17, 2018 by rooster69ph

[perfectstranger]

if the total is wrong and numbers are inconsistent, then that's a credibility issue. it makes one question the validity of the whole information. some may go as far as saying the data is fabricated/manipulated. at least that's how it is in the real world.

 

ok, might be really a simple discrepancy caused by rounding off numbers. if that's the case, readers have every right to doubt and question the validity of what's presented. if something so simple is prone to error, it makes them wonder what other flaws/mistakes are there.

 

I'm saying this coming from the point of view of a working professional of more than 10 years. if someone uses rounding off as an excuse at work, none of my bosses from all 4 companies i worked for would find it acceptable. sa grade school tsaka high school lang yan lulusot. and maybe some mediocre college or university.

[rooster69ph]

@perfectstranger ... you are talking of “credibility”. well just like water and oil, credibility and tards/dds don’t mix.

 

kahit anong halo ang gawin mo, hihiwalay at hihiwalay ang credibility sa kanila tulad ng paghiwalay ng langis sa tubig. lolz

[perfectstranger]

ang mahirap kasi sa iba political bias agad iniisip. why not take a step back and evaluate the comments/criticisms on the basis of method or presentation of the materials and information that was provided? masyadong defensive pero wala naman logic. sometimes even common sense wala din.

 

note: di ko nilalahat, pero madaming ganyan. both political sides meron pero mukhang mas madami sa mga dds supporters.

[camiar]

to the Mod:

 

Can the above posts regarding the percentage errors be considered thread hijacking? Masyadong humahaba ang thread, wala namang substance ang napapag-usapan. Natatabunan yung legitimate na issues.

[daphne loves derby]

Bro mauna na ko. Sinumbong ako ng mga yan sa moderators pinapaban ako bec of trolling. Dont be deceived. Pag tama ang gobyerno suportahan natin. Pag palpak, dapat lang na icriticize.

 

Parang Rappler lang. Pag critical sa gobyerno, pepersonalin. Mauna na ko mga parekoy. I will be banned anytime. Ciao!

 

sus nagsumbong ka pa at nag call a friend.

Dont tell me rooster mas maniniwala ka sa mga idiotic at trolling post nito?

 

 

 

ang argumento dito is kahit may percentage error dun sa LEGIT SSS survey, it does not diminish the fact na mataas pa rin ang trust ratings. YUN ANG ISSUE, wag mag focus sa percentage error na VERY COMMON sa mga surveys EJK man yan o TRUST RATINGS.

 

mag focus sa discussion about the HIGH TRUST RATINGS (debunk it or not if you may) and not on a certain % error na non sense.

[darksoulriver]

What else to expect after "rounding" palusot was busted.

 

So paano ... facepalm pa more na lang ako.

 

bust my A$$ the one who's already admit no knowledge on PPP hahaha not on me! asa pa more!

 

to those who really believe on survey hahahaha na lng!

 

 

give credits hindi puro kayo mga negatibong hipokrito!

Edited January 18, 2018 by darksoulriver

[rooster69ph]

 

sus nagsumbong ka pa at nag call a friend.

Dont tell me rooster mas maniniwala ka sa mga idiotic at trolling post nito?

 

 

 

ang argumento dito is kahit may percentage error dun sa LEGIT SSS survey, it does not diminish the fact na mataas pa rin ang trust ratings. YUN ANG ISSUE, wag mag focus sa percentage error na VERY COMMON sa mga surveys EJK man yan o TRUST RATINGS.

 

mag focus sa discussion about the HIGH TRUST RATINGS (debunk it or not if you may) and not on a certain % error na non sense.

Para sa akin ganito lang yan ....

 

Based on the survey mataas ang trust rating ni digong. Tama

 

Pero may napansin na inconsistent yun pinapakitang datos sa table at dun sa chart. Is this a valid observation? I think so. Is it material to the result? Most likely not (unless fabricated)

 

So treat the issues separately...tapos ang usapan.

[haroots2]

Para sa akin ganito lang yan ....

 

Based on the survey mataas ang trust rating ni digong. Tama

 

Pero may napansin na inconsistent yun pinapakitang datos sa table at dun sa chart. Is this a valid observation? I think so. Is it material to the result? Most likely not (unless fabricated)

 

So treat the issues separately...tapos ang usapan.

 

E di mag file ka na complaint sa SWS kung hindi ka mapakali sa sinasabi mong discrepancies.

[rooster69ph]

Di ako mapakale? Tumira ka na naman ano? Di mo nakita tinanong ako at sinagot ko lang.

 

Why should i bother complaining to sws? In the first place was it them who posted it here? Problema yan ng isang gullible tard na sobrang na excite mag post. The person who posted is to be held accountable to give clarifications on whatever he posted.

Edited January 19, 2018 by rooster69ph

[rooster69ph]

This is not the Change that we are expecting.

 

Even for the 16million gullible voters.

 

Admit it or not.

Maybe if change ain't happening then why not try to change the perception of the non believer instead.

[rooster69ph]

Well lodi promise change ...

 

Its just that may sinabi ba siya lahat ng changes will only be for the better?

 

Ang biruan nga sa politikong pinoy ... pinangakuan ka na nga umasa ka pang tutuparin.