Poll: Bongbong Marcos Vs Leni Robredo

[haroots2]

Andy Bautista, humanda ka na magpaliwanag. The Corona impeachment trial is still fresh and they got him because of a defective SALN. Based on the evidence presented by his wife, his SALN and his cash in banks and properties don't match.

 

Kung ako kay Bautista, mag resign na alng ako and enjoy my private life with the money. Mag Espa na lang ako araw araw.

[haroots2]

Kung ako kay Bautista, kumanta muna siya bago siya husgahan.

 

It may be self incriminating for him unless he ask for immuity

[haroots2]

I find it stupid that Andy Bautista is concentrating too much on the extortion and infidelity angle. How could he say his wife is extorting from him if she is entitled to half of what he has? Her infidelity is none of the public's business so it's a non-issue. The issue here is the unexplained wealth of Andy Bautista and his wife holds all the significant cards. Pusoy na pusoy si Andy Bautista.

 

The wife can get half of what is legally his and not the unexplained wealth if its still unproven.

[bet2]

worse case scenario, if Andy B. is proven guilty of election tampering, are we going to have a snap election?

[jopoc]

kung sasabihin na nandaya si Leni

dapat din sabahin na posibleng nandaya din si digong

 

 

remember iisang Comelec, PCOS and Smartmatice lang ang ginamit sa pagpapanalo sa kanila.

[haroots2]

kung sasabihin na nandaya si Leni

dapat din sabahin na posibleng nandaya din si digong

 

 

remember iisang Comelec, PCOS and Smartmatice lang ang ginamit sa pagpapanalo sa kanila.

 

Baka nga dumagdag pa nga boto di Digong at mabawasan si Mar kung imbestgahan and mag recount.

 

If the lead of Leni wasn't too narrow there may not be any protest sat all.

[2WarningPoints]

Marcos was cheated last election... that's clear

[camiar]

kung sasabihin na nandaya si Leni

dapat din sabahin na posibleng nandaya din si digong

 

 

remember iisang Comelec, PCOS and Smartmatice lang ang ginamit sa pagpapanalo sa kanila.

 

May mga nagsasabi na kung walang dayaan, baka 20 million ang boto kay Duterte at hindi 16 million lang.

[red60]

We have an interesting development Marcos family will return ill-gotten wealth (Gold and Cash). This is according to Duterte ewan ko lang kung magkatotoo.

[rooster69ph]

I've heard on the radio (dzBB) na ang mga gold na daw na un ay kinuha ng mga Marcos for "safekeeping" para sa ating pabagsak na economy that time. Nice.... play of words para hindi sila magmukhang magnanakaw... with the statement ni digong na gagamitin ang ibabalik na ginto para sa magiging deficit ng budget.. it makes me think na mukhang nararamdaman na nila na hindi kakayanin ng current tax collection ang proposed budget nila.

 

Kung titignan mo, naghahanda na eh.. Comelec Chair may impeachment case.. SC CJ may impeachment case din.. Sino pa kaya... lawyers ni leni.. malamang kakasuhan din for disbarment.. aabangan ko ito..

 

You "donate" things you own and "return" what is not rightfully yours....ganun lang ka simple yun. Add to that yun sinabing the Marcoses will return part of their unexplained wealth.

 

At sinong nagbigay pahintulot na sila ang mag "safekeep" ng mga kinuha nila? Aba'y kay tagal nang hinihingi yan na ibalik di ba panay ang deny nila na may kinuha sila sabay ngayon may ibabalik sila?

 

Alam na this ...

[rooster69ph]

Bbm magsosoli na raw kayo ng mga pagaaring di naman sa inyo. Bakit ngayon lang? Kasama ba yan sa plano para sa pagbabalik sa 2022

[red60]

Pansin ko lang tahimik mga Marcos loyalist ah. Asan na yung mga nagsasabi na walang ninakaw yung mga Marcos? Gawa gawa lang daw yung kaso laban sa kanila (kahit pinapasoli na ng US, Swiss court sa Phil Gov).

[daphne loves derby]

1-0

 

SC junks Marcos' motion questioning integrity of 2016 polls

https://www.rappler.com/nation/181182-sc-upholds-integrity-automated-election-system-2016?utm_source=facebook&utm_medium=social&utm_campaign=nation

 

 

SC RULING. The SC junks former senator Bongbong Marcos' motion questioning the integrity of the 2016 automated polls. File photo by Jasmin Dulay

MANILA, Philippines (UPDATED) – The Supreme Court (SC) has upheld the integrity of the automated election system, which former senator Ferdinand “Bongbong” Marcos Jr questioned in his electoral protest against Vice President Leni Robredo.

The SC, sitting as the Presidential Electoral Tribunal (PET), junked Marcos’ first cause of action for the electoral protest.

The SC decision was dated August 29, but Robredo lawyers Romulo Macalintal and Maria Bernadette Sardillo released a copy of the document on Tuesday, September 5.

“Even if protestant succeeds in proving his first cause of action, this will not mean that he has already won the position of Vice President as this can only be determined by a manual recount of all votes in all precincts,” read the decision.

“And if this is a relief protestant has clearly stated he is not praying for, then, allowing the first cause of action to continue would be an exercise in futility and would have no practical effect,” it added.

Defeated vice presidential bet Marcos had accused Robredo’s Liberal Party of electronic cheating following the surge the latter’s votes during the unofficial canvassing, and the unauthorized script change in the system. (READ: TIMELINE: Marcos-Robredo election case)

Since Marcos questioned the credibility of the whole elections, the PET included the Commission on Elections as a party to the case.

The same August 29 decision ruled that ballot boxes will only be retrieved in the 3 provinces Marcos identified where initial recounting of votes will be held to determine if his protest has merit. These are Camarines Sur, Iloilo, and Negros Oriental. (READ: SC forms teams for revision of ballots in Marcos-Robredo election case)

Marcos originally wanted ballot boxes to be retrieved in 22 provinces and 5 highly-urbanized cities for the vote recount.

The decryption and printing of ballot images will only be conducted in the 3 provinces as well.

The PET also deferred action on Marcos’ request to conduct a technical and forensic examination of all ballots from the provinces of Basilan, Maguindanao, and Lanao del Sur. These are the provinces where he wants votes nullified due to alleged election fraud. (READ: 2016 Bongbong vs Leni poll protest: What ARMM 'election fingerprints' say)

Macalintal welcomed the latest PET ruling, saying it proves that Marcos’ protest “has no basis” and he is “only fishing for evidence.”

“We are very, very happy with the results of this resolution of the PET, because from this resolution of the tribunal, it only shows that indeed, the protest of Mr Marcos has no basis. It is only based on some speculations and conclusions,” said Macalintal.

‘We look forward for an early dismissal of the case of Mr Marcos,” he added.

Edited September 5, 2017 by daphne loves derby

[rooster69ph]

Kaya ba biglang willing na magsauli ng nakaw na yaman dahil sa hindi pinaboran ng sc ang pagkuwestiyon sa integridad ng halalan. Ayun compromise agreement na lang para papogi.

 

Wala atang silbi un paulit-ulit na binabanggit na 20,000 indices. Hahaha...kaya pala di ma-explain pag tinatanong

Edited September 5, 2017 by rooster69ph

[rooster69ph]

this is interesting ... dami daw evidence na ipapakita para magpapatibay sa kaso niya tapos sa oras ng labasan na ng ebudensiya ayun sa huli he waived the presentation. ano yan parang poker panay bluff but when someone calls then you fold.

 

“It was Marcos who first asked the PET to first resolve the issue of defective election system and his vaunted claim that he would be presenting voluminous documents and evidence to prove his case,” Macalintal pointed out.

Almost one year after the first preliminary hearing, Macalintal said Marcos agreed to dismiss the issue on regularity of the automated election system and waived the presentation of his alleged voluminous evidence.

 

 

Read more: https://newsinfo.inquirer.net/964380/bongbong-to-blame-for-delay-in-poll-protest-robredo-camp#ixzz55bwJI7ih

Follow us: @inquirerdotnet on Twitter | inquirerdotnet on Facebook

 

anyway, and the countdown to the pautot continues ...

 

1 wk and 3 days ... 1 wk and 3 days