Jump to content
  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.

Duterte's Presidency : Expectations, Controversies, Rants, Etc.


Recommended Posts

Who says we aren't letting him? We put up with Penoy's incompetence for 6 years, and know this too will pass. Unless he goes all out tyrannical and extends his term, that is.

 

But I'm going to go on record that this one is the most dangerous president we'd had thus far. If not directly, then by the way he influences his followers.

Link to comment

Ikaw, ano ba ang posisyon mo sa issue?

 

IMPOV dont cancel the contract, cguro better inform MIASCOR to change all personnel who handles the passengers luggage's kawawa naman tlaga yung mga nadamay sa kalokohan ng iba,,,,

 

pero madaming naging ganitong kaso wala nman ginagawa ang MIASCOR... kinunsinte nila kc..

 

after nyo ng masayang Christmas Party wala pang 3 buwan ng 2018 wla na kyong trabaho... saklap!

Link to comment

d mo tlaga gets na if your PDR agreements have that clause you have control to the company in any form ur a part owner,,,

 

yung attach pix mo ay hindi naging basehan why RAPPLER got sack by SEC... its the PDR conditions na binigay kay Omidyar ewan ko ba tlaga!

 

SEC argued that an Omidyar Network PDR provision which states Rappler Holdings need to seek approval of 2/3 of PDR holders on corporate matters is a violation to Foreign Equity Restriction of the Philippine Constitution.Foreign Equity Restriction states that "ownership and management of mass media shall be limited to citizens of the Philippines, or to corporations, cooperatives or associations, wholly-owned and managed by such citizens."

 

nbasa mo ba? its the provision (clause) on the PDR

 

if seeking approval from someone who holds a PDR doesn't constitutes ownership abay ewan ko ba talga hindi mo maunawaan!

 

 

at isa pa inconsistent dyosku ITS MY POINT OF VIEW dun sa kaso ng MIASCOR if you got a problem with that its your problem not mine hahaha

sec ruling na yan pinakita ko sa iyo on how they interpret it. ... pinagpipilitan mo pa yun iyo...lolz

 

maliwanag pa sa sikat ng araw na sinabi ni sec na despite the issuuance of the pdr technically speaking rappler is still filipino owned but with the said clause they yielded control which is bawal. kaya nga ang sinasabi nila hindi hoy nagissue ka ng pdr na may clause kaya may foreign ownership ka kundi while walang change in ownership sa pag issue ng pdr may clause ka naman na nagbibigay kontrol sa foreign investors kaya ang nilabag is un 100 percent management wherein ang sabi kasi sa batas dapat pilipino lang ang ownership and management.

 

magkaiba ang ownership at control ... for example sa common shareholders thet have both. for non voting pref shareholders the have ownership but no control. ang pdr even with the clause there is no change in ownership STRICTLY SPEKING sabi na yan ng SEC. BUT THHE CLAUSE GAVE THEM CONTROL.

 

in short what sec is saying is while stockholders on paper ninyo despite the issuance of pdr is still hundred percent filipino yun control hindi as such nilabag nila yun batas sa foreign ownership limit

Edited by rooster69ph
Link to comment

unfortunately for you ... oo, base sa ruling hindi yun galing media na edited para sa simpletons. malaking KGGHAN ba? pa appoint ka as SEC chair para maisaayos mo ito .... tutal mas nagmamagaling ka sa explanation ng SEC . lolz

 

 

========

 

 

well they promise change right? its now coming!

 

 

the economy has been moving forward for the past years as evidenced by a fast growing middle class unfortunately this administration seems bent on reversing the situation

 

Philippines improves ranking in WEF’s Inclusive Development Index

By Czeriza Valencia (The Philippine Star) | Updated January 26, 2018 - 12:00am
“Most citizens evaluate their respective countries’ economic progress not by published GDP growth statistics but by changes in their households’ standard of living – a multidimensional phenomenon that encompasses income, employment opportunity, economic security, and quality of life,” the report said.
Edited by daphne loves derby
Link to comment

“He said Carandang also violated Section 3-K of RA 3019 in relation to Section 2 Rule 5 of OMB Administrative Order No. 7 “for divulging valuable information of confidential character acquired by his office or by him on account of his official position to unauthorized persons or releasing such information in advance for its authorized release date“

 

based on the charges it’s easy to read between the lines ...

 

kung wala o peke yun accounts paano magiging valuable info yun?

 

does anyone here thinks the president will file charges had Carandang said that the ombudsman is conducting investigation on the accounts of the president and his family and they are not able to find any accounts that can prove his alleged wealth.

Link to comment

Duterte admin in a nutshell: everyone should follow the rule of law. Unless if the law goes against the admin. If so, then the admin should break the law. Then admin will change the law so that what admin was doing appears to be legal. Make it so that admin’s mindless minions think that admin is the epitome of being lawful.

 

Joke’s on us.

Link to comment

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
×
  • Create New...