We Are Awesome Thread

[dungeonbaby]

OK lang sa kanya na masupalpal.

 

The more you engage him, the more posts he can make on the same topic.

 

More posts, more pay.

 

Their intent is to keep other readers of this thread constantly reminded of their chosen topic. For now, it's Imee's alleged lying about her education.

 

Repeat the propaganda over and over and people will eventually perceive it as truth.

 

Don't you notice, they don't even bother to respond to legitimate issues about what laws and policies the Senators should focus on?

 

Having backread 13 pages of the Senate Election thread, have to agree with you on this. I was looking for informed posts and a healthy exchange of opinions dealing with platforms and track records on laws passed. The agri issue you brought up is important. So are the WPS and the Mindanao issues. Instead there was way too much noise on the same rehashed issues. Each page of the thread runs almost identically to the one before it. Gets real tiring real fast. Can we consider someone a troll and ignore them if they can't even post their choices for senate?

[rooster69ph]

Now, if if after this, it still quotes my posts, obsession na tawag diyan.

hilarious ...

 

ang totoo niyan ang gusto mong sabihin lang e tantanan ka na dahil hirap na hirap ka nang patunayan ang posisyon mo.

 

1. wala kang maipakitang katibayan na nagtapos si imee

 

2. despite your allegations of gossips and hearsays you cannot prove it

 

3. UPD is just there, you can validate it if you wanna be proven correct and yet what

 

 

Having backread 13 pages of the Senate Election thread, have to agree with you on this. I was looking for informed posts and a healthy exchange of opinions dealing with platforms and track records on laws passed. The agri issue you brought up is important. So are the WPS and the Mindanao issues. Instead there was way too much noise on the same rehashed issues.

 

kung sa tingin ninyo maganda yan plataporma at gayun din naman para sa akin ano dapat pagtalunan diyan?

 

pero matanong kita...hindi ba issue sa iyo ang poliikong lumalapit sa iyo para humingi ng iyong tiwala pero alam mong sinungaling? parang ganito lang yan kung isa kang babae mahirap ang estado sa buhay at sinusuyo ng isang lalaki. sabi ni lalake mahal kita at kaya kitang iahon sa kahirapan kasi may nga negosyo ako na successful lahat. nangako rin ito na habang buhay siya magiging tapat sa iyo. pero isang araw nakita mong nasa mall na nakikipaglampuchingan sa isang babae.

 

tanong...must she not consider yun pagsisinungaling nito when deciding and only focus yun magandang magagwa nito na maiahon siya sa kahirapan sa pagdesisyon kung tatanggapin niya ito at pagkatiwalaan ang kanyang pagibig.

Edited February 28, 2019 by rooster69ph

[will robie]

hilarious ...

 

ang totoo niyan ang gusto mong sabihin lang e tantanan ka na dahil hirap na hirap ka nang patunayan ang posisyon mo.

 

1. wala kang maipakitang katibayan na nagtapos si imee

 

2. despite your allegations of gossips and hearsays you cannot prove it

 

3. UPD is just there, you can validate it if you wanna be proven correct and yet what

 

1. Projection only highlights your desperation. Pwned as usual. Obsession nga. Haha!

 

2. No, I am not alleging that you are posting cheap gossip. It's an established fact. Hahaha!

 

3. Again, the burden of proof lies with the accuser. Once a joke, always a joke. This post reeks of desperation in trying to resurrect a dead issue. We can go on doing this. You are simply prolonging your embarrassment.

 

Can we consider someone a troll and ignore them if they can't even post their choices for senate?

Yes Edited February 28, 2019 by will robie

[camiar]

 

Having backread 13 pages of the Senate Election thread, have to agree with you on this. I was looking for informed posts and a healthy exchange of opinions dealing with platforms and track records on laws passed. The agri issue you brought up is important. So are the WPS and the Mindanao issues. Instead there was way too much noise on the same rehashed issues. Each page of the thread runs almost identically to the one before it. Gets real tiring real fast. Can we consider someone a troll and ignore them if they can't even post their choices for senate?

Aahhh! Your post is like cool gentle rain on a parched land.

 

Mr. W.B. continuously bangs his head against the wall on irrelevant issues so long as the discussions are diverted away from real issues like good governance and performance track records.

 

No surprise though. That's how the likes of him earn their living.

Edited March 1, 2019 by camiar

[rooster69ph]

yeah...character and integrity are non issue most specially if one’s manok has none of it

[camiar]

Let's talk about real issues.

 

Who among the Senatorial candidates (other than JPE) has ever made a statement about his stand on the West Philippine Sea issue? Joint Exploration for Oil and Gas in the WPS?

 

Please post them in the Senate 2019 thread so we can compare.

[dungeonbaby]

kung sa tingin ninyo maganda yan plataporma at gayun din naman para sa akin ano dapat pagtalunan diyan?

 

pero matanong kita...hindi ba issue sa iyo ang poliikong lumalapit sa iyo para humingi ng iyong tiwala pero alam mong sinungaling? parang ganito lang yan kung isa kang babae mahirap ang estado sa buhay at sinusuyo ng isang lalaki. sabi ni lalake mahal kita at kaya kitang iahon sa kahirapan kasi may nga negosyo ako na successful lahat. nangako rin ito na habang buhay siya magiging tapat sa iyo. pero isang araw nakita mong nasa mall na nakikipaglampuchingan sa isang babae.

 

tanong...must she not consider yun pagsisinungaling nito when deciding and only focus yun magandang magagwa nito na maiahon siya sa kahirapan sa pagdesisyon kung tatanggapin niya ito at pagkatiwalaan ang kanyang pagibig.

 

If the ultimate objective is to be raised out of poverty, I don't see why love matters. But your example is flawed. First, that suitor is free to use his time, energy, and money on anyone he wants to; it's his time, energy, and money after all. By the way, there are ways to use that suitor's resources without putting yourself out, as a lot of women throughout history know. Now a politician wooing you for a vote is not like your example at all because of the simple, basic fact that, guess what, tax money does not belong to the politician, it belongs to the people. So there's that.

 

Your example also fails to take into account the point of so many posts I've read here stating, explicitly and implicitly, that one must look at candidates' actions - voting records, track records in governance, private sector accomplishments, etc. - which say more about a candidate than pedigree or FB campaign pages. I don't like the Marcoses. I don't like commies and terrorist-lovers either, and I hate slick pork barrel sycophants and liars who pretend to be fighting for whatever new issue is popular. Given those parameters, there'd be no one left to vote for. Pa'no na? Iyak?

 

When someone asks for a discussion of issues, it is in no way equivalent to saying we should take a candidate at their weak word. One would think that was elementary reasoning but I have to keep reminding myself that we are a nation that averages 86 in IQ. If people want to continue with redundant ad hominem posts I wish they would at least try to be funny or entertaining. Request lang naman, huwag magpa-pressure, baka may ceiling din ang kakayahan.

 

But here's the point, again: how many times do you need to see the same point made over and over before it gets b o r i n g. There are so many more things to learn, so many other candidates to talk about. Unless, of course, your only objective here is to be a troll.

[rooster69ph]

[quote name="dungeonbaby" post="13841935" timestamp="1551544483

 

 

do not complicate things ...na kesyo tax money at hindi personal money etc etc etc. yun sinabi kong mayaman si suitor is mainly to picture na may kakayanan talaga yun suitor na iahon sa kahirapan si girl just as your politiko would have promise these voters.

 

ang akin agree ako na dapat pagusapan ang plataporma at issues...pero it should go hand and hand with character and integrity. tama ba na as long as may ginawa o may kakayanan gawin ang isang tao sa senado eh sige isantabi muna natin ang issue ng character at integrity. so ganun ba yon kung nangangailangan ng patubig at ibinigay ito ok lang na may 30% kickback si politiko? tutal nakapagdeliver naman.

 

to say that mauubusan ka ng kandidato if you look at the parameters and baka isa na lang matira. again nasa paninindigan yan, hindi required na bumuo ka ng 12 kandidatong iboboto mo. if it happens na isa lang ang sa tingin mong qualified then so be it. then again para magkalinawan lang i am not saying na given you choose based on the set parameters eh fool proof yan.

 

there are many first time candidates who are just as eager to serve na siguro walang bahid sa character at integrity and yet are these even considered first or even considered at all.

 

again parang pagibig lang yan ... kung sa simulat sapul pa lang eh alam mo na may history si lalaki at malamang sa hindi paiiyakin ka lang sa huli, papatulan mo pa ba kasi ayaw mo lang ma zero ang lovelife mo. sa tingin ko mas maganda na yun sinuri mo at naniwalang walang bahid ng dungis ang inaalay na pagmamahal ni lalake at tinanggap mo ito.

Edited March 2, 2019 by rooster69ph

[camiar]

^^^ I know you cannot handle complicated things.

 

Social media political influencers (a.k.a. paid trolls), can post only short, simple (mababaw), yes-or-no, black-and-white, no-grey-area, statements because the majority of their target audience do not have the time nor patience to dig deeper into the issues.

 

Too bad that in this forum, you underestimated your audience. Silent readers and active posters here are not the passive thinkers of the general population. Nag-iisip ang mga participants dito. You will get challenged every step of the way

 

I can't help but be amused on your attempt to lecture on DB using that lame "manliligaw" analogy that entirely missed the point.

 

Napa face palm ako dun.

Edited March 3, 2019 by camiar

[dungeonbaby]

I can't help but be amused on your attempt to lecture on DB using that lame "manliligaw" analogy that entirely missed the point.

 

Napa face palm ako dun.

 

Lol. I tried to reason but. Well.

Moving on, posted a vid on the Senate thread. Also read the Phil Star article on Grace Poe's possible parents. Stories sound plausible, but they do have a tinge of the telenovela in them. The Danding angle makes sense, though.

[will robie]

 

 

Lol. I tried to reason but. Well.

Moving on, posted a vid on the Senate thread. Also read the Phil Star article on Grace Poe's possible parents. Stories sound plausible, but they do have a tinge of the telenovela in them. The Danding angle makes sense, though.

 

Hahaha! Now, you know why I said it does not belong here. There are 3 others but I am pretty sure you know who they are.

[dungeonbaby]

Hahaha! Now, you know why I said it does not belong here. There are 3 others but I am pretty sure you know who they are.

 

When I sniff out bs I tend to bypass. I don't have the time. Who do you mean, ilaglag mo na.

 

Hey so good old Jopoc's still around; why is he so grumpy all the time? Hi Jopoc

[will robie]

 

When I sniff out bs I tend to bypass. I don't have the time. Who do you mean, ilaglag mo na.

 

Hey so good old Jopoc's still around; why is he so grumpy all the time? Hi Jopoc

There is one who isn't posting anymore for reasons only known to it. There are two more who make comic-relief posts. Clue: both of them have a letter T in their nicks.

Edited March 3, 2019 by will robie

[rooster69ph]

uy nagkampihan yun tatlong itlog na mga bugok yun manok

 

chiong, gadon, marcos, villar OMG

 

lakas lakasan mo pag face palm baka magising ka sa pagkahibang mo

Edited March 3, 2019 by rooster69ph

[camiar]

^^^ As usual, an inane post.

[camiar]

Are you asking me?

 

The news and social media are full of analysis and recommendations on how to solve the problem.

 

I suggest you read carefully the news, internet discussions, and what I posted and figure out the possible solutions. Then contribute to an intelligent discussion in this forum.

Edited March 18, 2019 by camiar

[tk421]

Actually he's joking. Do not read the mainstream news (especially the dilawan news... which is 98% of mainstream media).

 

Get your news from hidden sources like he does. You'll get a more accurate situational analysis from these ghost sources, if he's to be believed.

 

Then let us know your analysis here.

[tk421]

It Doesnt Matter if Ecuador Can Afford This Dam. China Still Gets Paid.

 

A giant dam was supposed to help lift Ecuador out of poverty. Instead, its part of a national scandal, and a future tethered to China.

 

https://www.nytimes.com/2018/12/24/world/americas/ecuador-china-dam.html

[will robie]

Actually he's joking. Do not read the mainstream news (especially the dilawan news... which is 98% of mainstream media).

 

Get your news from hidden sources like he does. You'll get a more accurate situational analysis from these ghost sources, if he's to be believed.

 

Then let us know your analysis here.

Another nonsensical ad hominem post that does not really contribute to what is being discussed. Don't belabor your being a dumbass.

[camiar]

What's this new viral thing daw regarding Jim "Lukatme" Paredes?

 

Ang bagong bansag daw sa kanya ngayon ay Jim "Mang Kanor" Paredes.

 

Can someone share the vids?

[tk421]

Oh... you're interested in watching an old man wanking off? You have such interesting fetish... but you're free to like whatever you want.

[camiar]

^^^ OLD MAN WANKING OFF?!! OMG!! Grabeeeeh!!!

 

 

 

Hindi ko pa alam. May nag banggit lang sa akin na me kagaguhan na naman daw ginawa si Jim Paredes.

 

Di ko pa nakikita kung anong video ginawa nya.

 

Ikaw, mukhang nakita mo na.

 

Nag enjoy ka ba sa ginawa ng idol mo?

 

Tsk. Tsk. Tsk.

 

Projecting much si Ms. TK.

 

Self righteous na naman as usual.

Edited April 2, 2019 by camiar

[camiar]

By the way,

 

Jim "Mang Kanor" Paredes is the most ardent endorser of Mar Roxas and the Otso Diretso.

 

Dikit sila sobra!!!

 

Edited April 2, 2019 by camiar

[camiar]

Tinanggal na raw sa internet yung mga video.

 

Pero me lalabas pa rin dyan.

 

Ito lang yung still capture nung video nya na nakikipag video sex daw.

 

Kelan ba to ginawa? Di ba 70 years old na sya? yukk!

 

Edited April 2, 2019 by camiar

[tk421]

I call BS on you that youre pretending not to know about it before posting here. You, who always prides himself as knowing everything beforehand? BS i say, BeeEs. It was all over the damned news. Either youre pretendi g not to know about it or youre clueless to everything around you.

 

 

And Mar/Jim could be sex partners for all we care.

 

Jim Paredes was the Mocha Uson of the egghead president. With the sex video, I guess the comparison pretty much evens out. LOL.

 

And no, we didnt have to search nor have to look for the video or its screen cap unlike you.

But yeah... you have unusual fetish.

 

You could also look for old men wanking off videos in pornhub if youre looking for more.

Edited April 2, 2019 by tk421