Eddy Syet Posted November 6, 2015 Share Posted November 6, 2015 Since when did support of leaders of other nations of your presidency become legal? Boom! Hindi ko muna sasagutin yan. Bibigyan muna kita ng pagkakataon na pagnilay-nilayin yan. Pagkatapos mong pag-isipan yan... sagutin mo naman yung tanong ko sa taas. Quote Link to comment
Eddy Syet Posted November 6, 2015 Share Posted November 6, 2015 I answered that as a reply to your nonsensical post. Since when did your opinion become a fact? Since when did being sensical become synonymous with the word fact? Quote Link to comment
Eddy Syet Posted November 6, 2015 Share Posted November 6, 2015 Another convoluted post. I will make this succinct. Marcos won the 1986 elections and the only way Aquino could legitimize her presidency was by nullifying the result. Bakit nga naman niya hindi nanullify? Talo siya diba? Sige, simplehan natin. Paikot-ikot tayo eh. February 1986 - Batasang Pambansa declared Marcos the winner of the 1986 electionsMarch 1986 - The same Batasang Pambansa nullified Marcos' win and declared Cory as the rightful President. So... may bisa yung declaration nung February at walang bisa yung March declaration? Quote Link to comment
Eddy Syet Posted November 6, 2015 Share Posted November 6, 2015 Huh? You read it right. Kasi kung si Marcos ang nanalo at si Cory Aquino ang naupong presidente ng Pilipinas - what does that tell you about the legality of Aquino's presidency? Kumbaga sa basketball, sigaw ka nang sigaw na Toyota ang champions pero yung mga players at coaches ng Crispa ang nagtataas ng tropeyo, nagse-celebrate, at may parada. Quote Link to comment
Eddy Syet Posted November 6, 2015 Share Posted November 6, 2015 Of course, the BP of the revolutionary government of Aquino would nullify Marcos' win since she lost that election. Common sense. In the same way, the BP of Marcos' government would declare him the winner since he was their candidate. Common sense. By the way, what can you say about the BP's line-up that I posted? Hindi ba tama na dominated sya ng KBL members? Quote Link to comment
Eddy Syet Posted November 6, 2015 Share Posted November 6, 2015 Huh? You're getting incoherent by the post. Read what I posted again. Nope. I know what I said. You read that right. No typo or any mistakes there. If you can't comprehend it that's ok. Quote Link to comment
Eddy Syet Posted November 6, 2015 Share Posted November 6, 2015 That Marcos was the de jure president and that Aquino was the de facto president. That is your opinion. Not a fact. Quote Link to comment
Eddy Syet Posted November 6, 2015 Share Posted November 6, 2015 Like I said, the line-up is immaterial since Marcos was the legitimate winner of the 1986 elections. Really? You did? The way I see it, you don't even understand your own post. It is immaterial to you because to admit that Batasang Pambansa is dominated by Marcos loyalists is like admitting that Marcos manipulated the results of the 1986 elections. As for my post, like I said, if you don't get it then you don't. According to you Yup. Unless you can prove otherwise. Quote Link to comment
Eddy Syet Posted November 6, 2015 Share Posted November 6, 2015 Just because it was dominated by the KBL doesn't mean that they manipulated the results of the elections. The Comelec and the Namfrel had Marcos winning. Don't blame the BP for Marcos winning. NAMFREL had Aquino winning. I'm not blaming the Batasang Pambansa. Actually, I've been pointing out that this same Batasang Pambansa nullified their declaration about Marcos winning the elections. Oh and did you know that when they nullified their declaration of Marcos winning the 1986 elections - it was still dominated by KBL members? Ang galing ano? I don't need to prove it since it is already a fact. Opinion, my friend. Your opinion. Quote Link to comment
Eddy Syet Posted November 6, 2015 Share Posted November 6, 2015 Namfrel had Aquino winning? Really? Haha! Bad fiction. I mean really bad fiction. Yung NAMFREL lang ang fiction for you? Eh yung pag-legitimize ng BP sa presidency ni Cory? Wala kang reaction kasi FACT sya. Quote Link to comment
rooster69ph Posted November 24, 2015 Share Posted November 24, 2015 puro satsat ... wala naman pruwebang maipakita to refute kundi "i won't give credence because I know" E I know also and I've seen that ang daming province na walang patubig nun panahon niya ... Basta kasi sabi niya FACT kahit na LIE ...wala talagang kwenta Quote Link to comment
FleurDeLune Posted November 26, 2015 Author Share Posted November 26, 2015 nyeh! hindi naman halata na pro-duterte ka. hehe Ang hirap kaya ng trabaho ko, bawal maging BIAS. Quote Link to comment
Ryuji_tanaka Posted November 26, 2015 Share Posted November 26, 2015 Ang hirap kaya ng trabaho ko, bawal maging BIAS. O sige, to make it easier, Bi na lang daw. We are awesome! Worst traffic, worst airport, longest commute time, one of the most corrupt in Asia. Heck, our agriculture program is so successful, nagtatanim na ng bala sa NAIA at ito ay iniimbak sa NBP. All under President Abnoy "Mongoloid" Aquino. Yan ang legacy ng mga Aquino! 1 Quote Link to comment
rooster69ph Posted November 28, 2015 Share Posted November 28, 2015 For anyone who loves to go astray, this is your playground (thread). Forum rules still apply. Expect your post to be edited/deleted. Anyone can earn an infraction. P.S. This is not a Fight thread. This thread should be renamed "The Fight Club: Peace Section."Nakitang sinabi na ng moderator/thread starter na this is not a fight thread tapos irename daw ng the fight club. Lumalabas na naman ang "katalinuhan" nitong taong ito. Hahahaha Quote Link to comment
FleurDeLune Posted November 28, 2015 Author Share Posted November 28, 2015 Ok kids, welcome to our playground. Quote Link to comment
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.