We Are Awesome Thread

[haroots2]

Siya naman nagbigay ng time frame na six months di ba? Inamin na niya hindi niya nagawa. Buhay pa naman siya tulad nun isang nangakong magpapasagasa sa train.

 

May changes ba? Parehong di tumupad sa pangako di ba?

 

Halatang selective news lang ang tinitignan mo. Ano ang pagkakaiba? MAy naumpisahan ba dun sa project para hindi siya mappasagasa sa train? Itong war on drugs ang layo na ng narating simula nung nagumpisa ito. And its still working on progress, dirediretsong gumagalaw at gumagana ang campaign. Ang layo ng comparison diba sa walng nangyari at sa kasalukuyang may nangyayari na.

[haroots2]

http://www.bworldonline.com/DataViz/images/front1big_111716.jpg

 

Mukhang si Rooster lang dito at ilang minority ang hindi satisfied with War on drugs. Gusto kasi laging perfect.

Edited November 18, 2016 by haroots2

[rooster69ph]

http://www.bworldonline.com/DataViz/images/front1big_111716.jpg

 

Mukhang si Rooster lang dito at ilang minority ang hindi satisfied with War on drugs. Gusto kasi laging perfect.

Mahina ka talagang makaintindi...

 

Ang tinututulan ba ay war on drugs per se or un unlawful and/or illegal acts disguised under war on drugs?

 

Tutal inaamin mo naman na may ejk o pinapatay talaga yun mga pusher at user. So kung gayon wag nilang sabihin na napatay dahil nanlaban instead sabihin nila pinatay nila kasi pusher at addict para wag na tularan.

Edited November 18, 2016 by rooster69ph

[rooster69ph]

Ikaw nga nag uumpisa pa lang panay tirada na. Lalong walang mangyayari sa bansa kung lahat ganyan.

E sablay eh...

 

alangan manahimik.

[haroots2]

Mahina ka talagang makaintindi...

 

Ang tinututulan ba ay war on drugs per se or un unlawful and/or illegal acts disguised under war on drugs?

 

Tutal inaamin mo naman na may ejk o pinapatay talaga yun mga pusher at user. So kung gayon wag nilang sabihin na napatay dahil nanlaban instead sabihin nila pinatay nila kasi pusher at addict para wag na tularan.

 

You missed my point again of my post as usual, nag post ako ng satisfactory rating at napakataas ng rating niya sa campaign sa illegal drugs. Ano akala mo sa mga sumagot niyan walang alam sa balita na maraming namamatay na pusher? Bakit pa rin sila well satisfied? At basahin mo rin yung survey na napakataas rin ng rating niya sa PROTECTING HUMAN RIGHTS. Alam mo kung bakit? Clue -connect yan sa war on drugs.

Edited November 19, 2016 by haroots2

[rooster69ph]

You missed my point again of my post as usual, nag post ako ng satisfactory rating at napakataas ng rating niya sa campaign sa illegal drugs. Ano akala mo sa mga sumagot niyan walang alam sa balita na maraming namamatay na pusher? Bakit pa rin sila well satisfied? At basahin mo rin yung survey na napakataas rin ng rating niya sa PROTECTING HUMAN RIGHTS. Alam mo kung bakit? Clue -connect yan sa war on drugs.

Kokomentbka na hindi ko maappreciate ang war on drugs diba...kaya kita sinagot kung un war on drugs per se ba ang nirereklamo ko o un illegal na pinaggagawa nila sa ngalan ng war on drugs. In short sabi mo nga may ejk ... So aminin nila na under their war on drugs pinapatay talaga nila ang mga pusher at user hindi un pinatay tapos sasabihin nanlaban para maghugas kamay.

 

Btw look also at PNoy's rating early on, comparable din ang rating diba? Talagang walang pinagkaiba noh?

[haroots2]

Kokomentbka na hindi ko maappreciate ang war on drugs diba...kaya kita sinagot kung un war on drugs per se ba ang nirereklamo ko o un illegal na pinaggagawa nila sa ngalan ng war on drugs. In short sabi mo nga may ejk ... So aminin nila na under their war on drugs pinapatay talaga nila ang mga pusher at user hindi un pinatay tapos sasabihin nanlaban para maghugas kamay.

 

Btw look also at PNoy's rating early on, comparable din ang rating diba? Talagang walang pinagkaiba noh?

 

Hindi mo talaga maintindihan ang survey talaga inexplain ko na nga. And I guess hindi mo rin na gets bakit mataas ang protecting human rights satisfactory rating ni DU30. Ganyan talaga kapag ayaw umamin.

 

Comparable? Tingin mo ganyan kataas ang rating or naging presidente kaya siya kung hindi namatay si Cory? Masaya ka na dun na ginamit lang yung nanay niya para sa political career.

Edited November 19, 2016 by haroots2

[rooster69ph]

So tell anong exact katanungan ba sa sinurvey...Tinanong ba sa survey happy ba sila na pumapatay ang gobyerno ng pusher at user? ... Oo o hindi?

 

Kahit naman ako tanungin if i am happy with the campaign agaist drug i will answer in the affirmative. Pag tinanong are you in favor that the gov't is into ejk obviously no ang sagot ko.

 

O naintindihan mo na?

[spadon]

 

Only SWS gave that ‘excellent’ rating

IT WAS not the people themselves but only the Social Weather Stations that gave the administration’s anti-narcotics campaign an “excellent” rating based on a two-month-old survey conducted during the 100-day honeymoon of the Duterte regime.

The 1,200 respondents merely gave the anti-drugs war a net rating of 78 percent, which the SWS translated to “excellent.” The same respondents gave the administration a 66 percent net satisfaction rating, and the SWS said that meant “very good.”

We are quite worried that broadcasting an “excellent” rating for the anti-narcotics war based on a supposed nationwide poll might give the world the misimpression that Filipinos are cheering the summary execution of suspected drug dealers and users.

It would have been honest if only the percentages were reported and the public was left to decide if the numbers meant “excellent,” “very good,” “fair,” or whatever. An “excellent” to the SWS may just be “good” to the random person, but the number 78 is 78 to most everyone.

Read the article in full:http://www.philstar.com/opinion/2016/11/20/1645549/marcos-should-lie-peace-ilocos

 

[Ryuji_tanaka]

Ganito, para di ma-butthurt yung mga Yellow Minions, ilibing na rin natin si Abnoy sa Libingan ng mga Bayani!

[Edmund Dantes]

Ang mga dilaw ay nasa kalye ngayon at sinasariwa diwa ng edsa.... ohuhuhuhuhuhuhuhuhuuuuuuuu

 

Suggestion lang po, bakit di nyo samahan ng hunger strike. Di ba yun ginawa ng idol nyong si Ninoy. Parang rave party lang kasi at kulang pa sa drama eh. Dapat sabihin nyo, hindi kayo kakain hangang hindi hukayin bangkay ni Marcos. Mas magandang pangakit yun ng simpatya. Kayo na lang ata naluluha luha pa pag tinutugtug handog ng Pilipino sa mundo.

 

Tutal lolokohin nyo rin lang mga sarili nyo, aba lubusin nyo na. Walang gamitan ng dextrose ha.

 

Tama yan, lokohin nyo mga sarili nyo kasi na ang pinaglalaban nyo ay para nga sa bayan. Pero magtagumpay man kayo, hindi naman bayan makikinabang kundi ang mga Aquino. Di pa kayo kasi nagtanda sa dalawang EDSA na yan. Buhay lang naman ng mga Aquino namayagpag, at kayo nganga lang ahahahaaaaaaaaaay

[camiar]

Ganito, para di ma-butthurt yung mga Yellow Minions, ilibing na rin natin si Abnoy sa Libingan ng mga Bayani!

Huwag naman...

 

Buhay pa yung hayop... este, tao.

[haroots2]

I heard that the sore losers aka yellowtards will, again, have a rally tomorrow. I hope they bring in their big guns, namely, the seemingly unbeatable duo of RoRo and Aquino.

 

Umulan sana bukas. Yung malakas. Me tamaan din sana ng kidlat.

[rooster69ph]

 

Umulan sana bukas. Yung malakas. Me tamaan din sana ng kidlat.

 

hahaha ang lalim ng hugot ... bitter lang ang peg.

Edited November 29, 2016 by rooster69ph

[Kapitan Awesome]

I heard that the sore losers aka yellowtards will, again, have a rally tomorrow. I hope they bring in their big guns, namely, the seemingly unbeatable duo of RoRo and Aquino.

Not a Pro-Marcos. Pero sana yung mga nagnakaw sa bayan (Yolanda Funds, PDAF, DAP) eh sana ilibing na sa LNMB... ng buhay.

[filibustero]

Not a Pro-Marcos. Pero sana yung mga nagnakaw sa bayan (Yolanda Funds, PDAF, DAP) eh sana ilibing na sa LNMB... ng buhay.

 

Sino sino ba itong mga ito?

[BnF95]

Yellowtards, Dutertards, what's the difference? Let's face facts people, regardless of which 'political party' or family, almost all the politicians here in the Flippines is just in it to steal their share of the pie.

[cbotc]

PNoy, the spoiled, rich kid who ran the country like an adolescent having fun with his brakada.

Digong, the bad ass kid who rans the country like and adolescent having fun cussing and bullying

 

[daphne loves derby]

may bagong isyu ke madam

 

#wilkinswaterchallenge

 

 

Oi mga Leni Fanatics, sino ba talaga nagpadala ng Wilkins Bottled Water sa Surigao? Coca-Cola FEMSA Philippines is also claiming na sila.

So Office of the Vice President of the Philippines kayo po ba? Partnership with Coca-Cola? Or what?

- Sass Rogando Sasot

Edited February 14, 2017 by daphne loves derby

[daphne loves derby]

SC denies Robredo's appeal to junk Marcos protest

http://www.rappler.com/nation/161629-sc-denies-robredo-appeal-junk-marcos-protest?utm_content=buffer44928&utm_medium=social&utm_source=facebook.com&utm_campaign=buffer

 

MANILA, Philippines – The Supreme Court (SC), acting as the Presidential Electoral Tribunal (PET), has denied Vice President Leni Robredo's counter protest to dismiss the election case filed against her by former senator Ferdinand Marcos Jr.

In a resolution dated January 24, 2017, the PET ruled on the Robredo camp's arguments that:

• the Court has no jurisdiction over the issue on the execution of the Certificates of Canvass, which should have been raised before Congress, sitting as the National Board of Canvassers
• the protest is insufficient in form and substance because it failed to specify the "acts or omissions complained of showing the electoral frauds, anomalies and irregularities."

The SC cited rule 13 of the 2010 PET rules that "the Tribunal shall be the sole judge of all contests relating to the election, returns, and qualifications of the President or Vice President of the Philippines."

"The phrase 'election returns and qualifications' refers to all matters affecting the validity og the contestee's title, which includes questions ont he validity, authenticity and correctness of the COCs," it stressed.

It also said that the sufficiency of Marcos' protest "is already beyond dispute" when they issued the summons for Robredo to respond to the case.

Despite finding form and substance in the protest, the SC noted thet there has nothing yet proven with regards to the truthfulness of Marcos' allegations.

On time

The High Court also said that Robredo filed her response on time when it denied the Marcos camp's motion to strike out the opposing camp's comment to the case.

SC records show that Robredo actually received a copy of the summons on August 3, giving her until August 15 to file her response. A respondent of the case is given 10 days fromt he receipt of the summons to issue a comment.

"Considering that August 13, 2016 was a Saturday, the filing of the Verified Answer and Counter Protest on August 15, 2016, was timely because that was the next working day," said the SC.

Moving forward

The Marcos camp welcomed the resolution of the High Court.

“We are hoping that with this resolution, there will be an end to all these delays and we can finally move forward. There is a need to ferret out the truth as to what really transpired during the vice presidential race last May,” lawyer Victor Rodriguez, a spokesman for Marcos, said.

They earlier urged SC to proceed with the election protest when it filed a petition to conduct a preliminary conference last January 26.

Robredo's camp has yet to issue a comment on the resolution.

Marcos filed the case against Robredo in June 29 last year, accusing her and the Liberal Party of orchestrating massive cheating in the elections. The son and namesake of the late dictator Ferdinand Marcos lost to Robredo in the elections by a slim margin of 263,473 votes. – Rappler.com

Edited February 16, 2017 by daphne loves derby

[juan t]

More power to Trillianes. For those of you who think na namumulitika lang siya or nag papapansin think about this: Why would Trillanes makeup a story that could easily be disproven? Eh di napahiya lang siya pag pinakita ni Digong yung accounts niya. And it's no coincidence na bigla namang hindi maka sign ng bank waiver si Digong na during the presidential campaign siya pa nag hahamon na mag sign lahat. Oh, tapos nung una, dini-deny pa niya na may mga accounts siya tapos may nag deposit ng P500 at na confirm that the account exists kaya napilitan si Digong umamin.

[Bolj]

More power to Trillianes. For those of you who think na namumulitika lang siya or nag papapansin think about this: Why would Trillanes makeup a story that could easily be disproven? Eh di napahiya lang siya pag pinakita ni Digong yung accounts niya. And it's no coincidence na bigla namang hindi maka sign ng bank waiver si Digong na during the presidential campaign siya pa nag hahamon na mag sign lahat. Oh, tapos nung una, dini-deny pa niya na may mga accounts siya tapos may nag deposit ng P500 at na confirm that the account exists kaya napilitan si Digong umamin.

Halatang wla kang Business law sa college. Read read din kasi minsan para d ka ma magmukang ignorante. Ang bastos na presidente natin abogado yan... Hindi lang abogado ang d maka gets nang ng pronouncements nya. At kung rason mo mo d ka abogado at wla kang alam sa philippine constitution, you are free to post your comments pero you are free to be called ignorant also.

[Bolj]

That may be true but I do not go with the herd mentality. I look at the circumstance. I cannot imagine why Trillanes would make up a story if he knew that Digong could easily disprove it. Trillanes has info on bank accounts and transaction records to the very cent - you cant make that s@%t up.

Uhm sir? Maam, anybody can make that kind of sh8t. Good thing MDS is dead if not, she be dying from your post.

 

No time the account has there been P211 million whether singly, collectively or cumulatively. Ask a lawyer friend tol para mahimasmasan ka

Edited February 18, 2017 by Bolj

[juan t]

Are there anymore accounts? Or are you speculating like Trillanes?

 

Trillanes is nothing more than a manipulated puppet for hire. Walang sariling prinsipyo yan. Kahit kapwa nya mistah sa PMA may asar sa kanya, as in, kung me pagkakataon lang, gigilitan sya dahil sa mga kahihiyang ginagawa nya.

 

Yung mga amo ni Trillanes, nauubusan na ng issue laban kay Digong. Biruin mo, i-rehash na naman yung bank transactions.

 

 

Speculating? You think Trillanes is speculating? He mentioned bank account numbers, names on those accounts, and transaction figures... you think he made that up? Just like the account which Digong denied at first. Sabi niya wala siyang account na ganun. Tapos may reporter na nagdeposit ng P500 dun sa said account and verified that it was Dutertes. After that napilitan ng umanin si Duts. Ang galing naman maka chamba ng numero ni Trillanes kung hinaka-haka lang niya yung numbers ng account na yun.

 

And yes, to answer your question, there are several accounts in question.

[Bolj]

D mo parin gets hahah nvm nalang, cge pre more power to you. And good luck sa mga "facts" mo.