We Are Awesome Thread

[filibustero]

Not a Pro-Marcos. Pero sana yung mga nagnakaw sa bayan (Yolanda Funds, PDAF, DAP) eh sana ilibing na sa LNMB... ng buhay.

 

Sino sino ba itong mga ito?

[BnF95]

Yellowtards, Dutertards, what's the difference? Let's face facts people, regardless of which 'political party' or family, almost all the politicians here in the Flippines is just in it to steal their share of the pie.

[cbotc]

PNoy, the spoiled, rich kid who ran the country like an adolescent having fun with his brakada.

Digong, the bad ass kid who rans the country like and adolescent having fun cussing and bullying

 

[daphne loves derby]

may bagong isyu ke madam

 

#wilkinswaterchallenge

 

 

Oi mga Leni Fanatics, sino ba talaga nagpadala ng Wilkins Bottled Water sa Surigao? Coca-Cola FEMSA Philippines is also claiming na sila.

So Office of the Vice President of the Philippines kayo po ba? Partnership with Coca-Cola? Or what?

- Sass Rogando Sasot

Edited February 14, 2017 by daphne loves derby

[daphne loves derby]

SC denies Robredo's appeal to junk Marcos protest

http://www.rappler.com/nation/161629-sc-denies-robredo-appeal-junk-marcos-protest?utm_content=buffer44928&utm_medium=social&utm_source=facebook.com&utm_campaign=buffer

 

MANILA, Philippines – The Supreme Court (SC), acting as the Presidential Electoral Tribunal (PET), has denied Vice President Leni Robredo's counter protest to dismiss the election case filed against her by former senator Ferdinand Marcos Jr.

In a resolution dated January 24, 2017, the PET ruled on the Robredo camp's arguments that:

• the Court has no jurisdiction over the issue on the execution of the Certificates of Canvass, which should have been raised before Congress, sitting as the National Board of Canvassers
• the protest is insufficient in form and substance because it failed to specify the "acts or omissions complained of showing the electoral frauds, anomalies and irregularities."

The SC cited rule 13 of the 2010 PET rules that "the Tribunal shall be the sole judge of all contests relating to the election, returns, and qualifications of the President or Vice President of the Philippines."

"The phrase 'election returns and qualifications' refers to all matters affecting the validity og the contestee's title, which includes questions ont he validity, authenticity and correctness of the COCs," it stressed.

It also said that the sufficiency of Marcos' protest "is already beyond dispute" when they issued the summons for Robredo to respond to the case.

Despite finding form and substance in the protest, the SC noted thet there has nothing yet proven with regards to the truthfulness of Marcos' allegations.

On time

The High Court also said that Robredo filed her response on time when it denied the Marcos camp's motion to strike out the opposing camp's comment to the case.

SC records show that Robredo actually received a copy of the summons on August 3, giving her until August 15 to file her response. A respondent of the case is given 10 days fromt he receipt of the summons to issue a comment.

"Considering that August 13, 2016 was a Saturday, the filing of the Verified Answer and Counter Protest on August 15, 2016, was timely because that was the next working day," said the SC.

Moving forward

The Marcos camp welcomed the resolution of the High Court.

“We are hoping that with this resolution, there will be an end to all these delays and we can finally move forward. There is a need to ferret out the truth as to what really transpired during the vice presidential race last May,” lawyer Victor Rodriguez, a spokesman for Marcos, said.

They earlier urged SC to proceed with the election protest when it filed a petition to conduct a preliminary conference last January 26.

Robredo's camp has yet to issue a comment on the resolution.

Marcos filed the case against Robredo in June 29 last year, accusing her and the Liberal Party of orchestrating massive cheating in the elections. The son and namesake of the late dictator Ferdinand Marcos lost to Robredo in the elections by a slim margin of 263,473 votes. – Rappler.com

Edited February 16, 2017 by daphne loves derby

[juan t]

More power to Trillianes. For those of you who think na namumulitika lang siya or nag papapansin think about this: Why would Trillanes makeup a story that could easily be disproven? Eh di napahiya lang siya pag pinakita ni Digong yung accounts niya. And it's no coincidence na bigla namang hindi maka sign ng bank waiver si Digong na during the presidential campaign siya pa nag hahamon na mag sign lahat. Oh, tapos nung una, dini-deny pa niya na may mga accounts siya tapos may nag deposit ng P500 at na confirm that the account exists kaya napilitan si Digong umamin.

[Bolj]

More power to Trillianes. For those of you who think na namumulitika lang siya or nag papapansin think about this: Why would Trillanes makeup a story that could easily be disproven? Eh di napahiya lang siya pag pinakita ni Digong yung accounts niya. And it's no coincidence na bigla namang hindi maka sign ng bank waiver si Digong na during the presidential campaign siya pa nag hahamon na mag sign lahat. Oh, tapos nung una, dini-deny pa niya na may mga accounts siya tapos may nag deposit ng P500 at na confirm that the account exists kaya napilitan si Digong umamin.

Halatang wla kang Business law sa college. Read read din kasi minsan para d ka ma magmukang ignorante. Ang bastos na presidente natin abogado yan... Hindi lang abogado ang d maka gets nang ng pronouncements nya. At kung rason mo mo d ka abogado at wla kang alam sa philippine constitution, you are free to post your comments pero you are free to be called ignorant also.

[Bolj]

That may be true but I do not go with the herd mentality. I look at the circumstance. I cannot imagine why Trillanes would make up a story if he knew that Digong could easily disprove it. Trillanes has info on bank accounts and transaction records to the very cent - you cant make that s@%t up.

Uhm sir? Maam, anybody can make that kind of sh8t. Good thing MDS is dead if not, she be dying from your post.

 

No time the account has there been P211 million whether singly, collectively or cumulatively. Ask a lawyer friend tol para mahimasmasan ka

Edited February 18, 2017 by Bolj

[juan t]

Are there anymore accounts? Or are you speculating like Trillanes?

 

Trillanes is nothing more than a manipulated puppet for hire. Walang sariling prinsipyo yan. Kahit kapwa nya mistah sa PMA may asar sa kanya, as in, kung me pagkakataon lang, gigilitan sya dahil sa mga kahihiyang ginagawa nya.

 

Yung mga amo ni Trillanes, nauubusan na ng issue laban kay Digong. Biruin mo, i-rehash na naman yung bank transactions.

 

 

Speculating? You think Trillanes is speculating? He mentioned bank account numbers, names on those accounts, and transaction figures... you think he made that up? Just like the account which Digong denied at first. Sabi niya wala siyang account na ganun. Tapos may reporter na nagdeposit ng P500 dun sa said account and verified that it was Dutertes. After that napilitan ng umanin si Duts. Ang galing naman maka chamba ng numero ni Trillanes kung hinaka-haka lang niya yung numbers ng account na yun.

 

And yes, to answer your question, there are several accounts in question.

[Bolj]

D mo parin gets hahah nvm nalang, cge pre more power to you. And good luck sa mga "facts" mo.

[Edmund Dantes]

 

 

That may be true but I do not go with the herd mentality. I look at the circumstance. I cannot imagine why Trillanes would make up a story if he knew that Digong could easily disprove it. Trillanes has info on bank accounts and transaction records to the very cent - you cant make that s@%t up.

 

Ahahahaha

 

Ang pinakita nya lang ay isang spreadsheet na handouts typed by his staff. Anong transaction record? pakita sya ng official na document. Like a deposit slip perhaps na me 120M na nagdeposti dun. Photocopy man lang ng passbook etc. At iharap nya si Joseph De Mesa! Kung matibay ebidensya nya, eh di go ahead! Wala naman immunity si Sara o si Paolo.

 

YES YOU CAN MAKE UP s@%t LIKE THAT! A handout showing a lot of numbers, na hindi naman malinaw kung ano pinagbasehan.

 

Alam mo simple lang naman paliwanag kung bakit paniwalang paniwala madami kay Trillanes.

 

Kasi nga GWAPO! Tikas action star! Magaling magsalita! I wont be surprised if some of those idiots na sobrang nahumaling kay Trillanes nung oakwood days nya, ini-imagine pa sya na tumatakbo sa beach habang ang suot lang ay brief trunks with animal prints ahahahahahahahahahhahahaahahahaha!

 

Come to think of it, bakit ba iboboto itong gagong ito pagkasenador? Di naman abugado! At kung naging kamukha yan ni Empoy wala naman makikinig dyan. Some people are stupid like that. Eto nga wala naman pinakita kahit isang ebidensya paniwalang paniwala pa din kayo.

 

I remember dito sa MTC lakas namin tumawa at pagtripan si Trillanes lalong lalo na mga apologist nya dito nung isang teargas lang lumabas na sa manila pen ahahahahahhahahahahahahhaha. Talagang supot!

 

Lt. Sopot Grade Antonio Trillanes IV tawag ko dyan noon eh.

[juan t]

"He who accuses must show proof"

 

That is true if you are in a court of law trying to get a conviction, but this is not a court of law. We are citizens of the Philippines and we should demand for transparency from our leaders. May pa FOI pa kayong nalalaman, ngunit pag may controversy, mag dedefend pa kayo sa mga nagtatago behind bank secrecy laws. Puro kayo nag aabogado para kay DU30... why dont you ask for transparency instead? Ano ba naman yung mag s-sign siya ng bank waiver eh tutal siya nga nag hahamon dati nun. Wala siyang ill-gotten wealth right? So open the bank accounts para matahimik na itong si bugok na Trillanes.

[Edmund Dantes]

"He who accuses must show proof"

 

That is true if you are in a court of law trying to get a conviction, but this is not a court of law. We are citizens of the Philippines and we should demand for transparency from our leaders. May pa FOI pa kayong nalalaman, ngunit pag may controversy, mag dedefend pa kayo sa mga nagtatago behind bank secrecy laws. Puro kayo nag aabogado para kay DU30... why dont you ask for transparency instead? Ano ba naman yung mag s-sign siya ng bank waiver eh tutal siya nga nag hahamon dati nun. Wala siyang ill-gotten wealth right? So open the bank accounts para matahimik na itong si bugok na Trillanes.

 

 

Im sorry but to tell you frankly this is the lamest argument I have read all day. As a matter of fact it is naive and stupid.

 

So ayaw mo ng court of law? Eh ano gusto mo? Court of public opinion na lang? Parang the buzz na lang ganun? Kahit sino pwede na lang pachismisan?

 

And no it does not only apply in the court of law. IT IS AN EXPECTED NORM IN A CIVILIZED SOCIETY! Bakit ba tinuturo mula pagkabata na masama magbintang at magparatang ng basta basta? Bakit ba hindi karespe-respeto isang chismosa? parang pokpok na nga din tingin sa ganyan di ba? So kung ikaw paratangan ka na di tuli at hamunin ka pakita junjun mo, gagawin mo naman nga? Haaaaay.

 

Yes we want transparency, but transparency works both ways. Mali ba na hingian ng matinong pruweba yun nagaakusa? Sige nga! Did you even pause to think ano ba mga basehan ng akusasyon na ito? Nakakita ka na ba ng kahit isang resibo o deposit slip? Ni minsan ba tinanong mo kung bakit ni hibla ng buhok ni Joseph De Mesa hindi pa natin nakikita? Ano? dahil ang pogi pogi parang lalakeng bold star nung 90s kapani-paniwala na agad?

[Edmund Dantes]

Yeah but I'm not asking for a conviction. I'm asking for transparency.

 

Transparency? Eh bakit hindi mo hinihingian ng ebidensya si Trillanes? Bakit ka naman agad sumakay sa mga gimmik nya!

 

Ano nga?! Pakisagot!

 

Dahil ba pogi at mala gardo versosa at leandro baldemor ang tikas kaya mabilis kang napapaniwala?

[haroots2]

Yeah but I'm not asking for a conviction. I'm asking for transparency.

 

Paano kung sinabi ko na may evidence ako na lahat ng LP na nakaupo from Local to national level may tagong yaman kaya dapat pumirma sila ng waiver para makita ng media lahat ng bank records nila. Woulld they all do it? Would you agree they should do it?

There is a reason kaya may immunity ang presidente. Would you know? If not Ill answer it later.

Edited February 20, 2017 by haroots2