Jump to content

Smart, Globe Or Sun?


Ano ang Cellphone Line Mo?  

627 members have voted

  1. 1. Ano ang Cellphone Line Mo?

    • Smart
      170
    • Globe
      320
    • Sun
      93


Recommended Posts

malabo pa rin ang sun hanggang ngayon. sana they could upgrade their services.

 

 

I agree with you dre! :thumbsupsmiley:

 

Just got a text from Sun- You are now 90% of ek ek. Please pay your bill before cut-off date to avid inconveniece of getting cut-off or something to that effect. Called their Customer Service. they were very cordial. I asked my billings. It wasn't due yet and I'm an automatic credit from my credit card.

 

Told them I want them to cut-off my services para I can hold them for breach! <_<

 

Wish Smart Customer Service didn't lose my application last year! :grr:

Link to comment
akira sing-ganda mo? hehe... haven't tried smart though that P10.00 unlimited thing is very interesting..  Globe had problems lately pero sandali lang naman.. I think they're doing all the marketing mistakes nowadays.. smart is doing all the right thing.. SOLID GLOBE pa rin muna..

 

Globe's 10 centavos by the second is indeed a very attractive package. If they cut the text messaging charges they'll be attractive enough for their former subscribers to come back.

 

Now Smart has to counter that- 10 centavoc per second. Their unlimited text between smart subscribers should be fixed not by the day.

Link to comment
Globe's 10 centavos by the second is indeed a very attractive package.  If they cut the text messaging charges they'll be attractive enough for their former subscribers to come back.

 

Now Smart has to counter that- 10 centavoc per second.  Their unlimited text between smart subscribers should be fixed not by the day.

 

look at what globe & smart is doing now with their promos... ang reason nila dati noong naglabas ng circular ang NTC on the "per-second or pulse" billing na mahihirapan sila to implement at baguhin yung system nila... eh bakit ngayon dahil sa pressure from sun cellular... ginawa nila ngayon... :angry: :angry: :angry:

 

plain & simple reason... gusto nila protektuhan ang kanilang malaking kita... :thumbsdownsmiley: :thumbsdownsmiley: :thumbsdownsmiley:

 

kaya mga dudes... kahit ayaw nyo sa sun cellular... magpasalamat tayo dahil sa ginawa nila... na-pressure ang ibang telcos to re-assess their tariff rates... :):):)

Edited by binoyski71
Link to comment
look at what globe & smart is doing now with their promos... ang reason nila dati noong naglabas ng circular ang NTC on the "per-second or pulse" billing na mahihirapan sila to implement at baguhin yung system nila... eh bakit ngayon dahil sa pressure from sun cellular... ginawa nila ngayon...  :angry:  :angry:  :angry:

 

plain & simple reason... gusto nila protektuhan ang kanilang malaking kita...  :thumbsdownsmiley:  :thumbsdownsmiley:  :thumbsdownsmiley:

 

kaya mga dudes... kahit ayaw nyo sa sun cellular... magpasalamat tayo dahil sa ginawa nila... na-pressure ang ibang telcos to re-assess their tariff rates... :):):)

 

 

I agree with you completely! :thumbsupsmiley:

Link to comment
You must also consider the capacities within the network.  Sometimes, as in the case of SUN, as an example, no matter how  large the interconnection pipes are, if the internal network is congested (due to unlimited calling), calls from other networks cannot be completed.  Similarly, calls from a SUN subscriber to another network cannot be completed by the interconnected carrier if SUN cannot route calls to the interconnect facilities. 

 

Moreover, the peak hours are factored in the implemented "channels" between the networks.  There is no allocated X number of channels for interconnection.  Interconnection channels is direct and point to point.  Once calls are routed to these channels, it is clearly sent to the other carrier for completion to the subscriber.

 

It is quite absurd in at this point in time that carriers are intentionally dropping calls as this is also a source of revenue for them.  This might be the arguement in the late 90s as the incumbernt is making it hard for the new carriers build their subscriber base.

 

said before the x number of channels to allocated would depend on inter carrier traffic, location, subscriber base of telcos. and the number of channels are computed base on the average traffic not at the highest....that is why we have peak and off peak....interconnection yes is direct point ot point up to a a certain point...and channels are not one is to one inter telco........ and telcos does not drop call...it simple can push thru due to limited doors(channels) .. yes it is a source of revenue, but bottom line which will you sacrifice...a few centavo that you can earn (though its still in the millions) per call coming from another telco or a bigger margin from a larger base of your own subscriber? aburd...sad to say it is not.... its simply " who has the bigger pie simple has the power" ..... reality is simply different from what should be!! hehehehe... as to sun...yes internal there internal network are congested from time to time.... one, because of their unlimited text and call, though they would want to expand, its still CAPEX w/c they have limited as to this point, revenues are not as expected...though then again they did increase subscriber base....Absurd you say,

hmmm hehehe... get the other 2/3 of your facts..... what you pointed out is just 1/3 of the whole picture....sad yes!!! as pointed out by another post...its business, money.... simple math.... as of end of 2005 there are now 30 million subscribers, smart has what 65%, globe 30%, sun 5% conservatively... for every 1 peso call within there own network...you earn 100%...inter carrier you earn 30%..... we are still not factoring in the volume of traffic...... would it be absurd if you give priority to your own subs...hehehe...

sir, there are a lot of things we still dont understand regarding the business....and how it is run.....making life harder for competitor is simply business....a reality.... :)

Link to comment
look at what globe & smart is doing now with their promos... ang reason nila dati noong naglabas ng circular ang NTC on the "per-second or pulse" billing na mahihirapan sila to implement at baguhin yung system nila... eh bakit ngayon dahil sa pressure from sun cellular... ginawa nila ngayon...  :angry:  :angry:  :angry:

 

plain & simple reason... gusto nila protektuhan ang kanilang malaking kita...  :thumbsdownsmiley:  :thumbsdownsmiley:  :thumbsdownsmiley:

 

kaya mga dudes... kahit ayaw nyo sa sun cellular... magpasalamat tayo dahil sa ginawa nila... na-pressure ang ibang telcos to re-assess their tariff rates... :):):)

 

Philtel its landline business has been using pulse rate since the 90's in there provincial areas...implementation of pulse is not really difficult...its a business dicision.... islacom prior being bought by globe also use the system....but as i said it was a business decision...at the time consumer was angry because they felt its much expensive..telebabads...hehehe...pldt has its current service, the prepaid landline...its pulse also.... bottom line ARE MARGINS..REVENUE... Domination... Sun gambled, its paying off in the subscriber base area..... competition are reacting...good for us subscribers....ummmmm some location yes..in others well thats another story...hehehehe....

 

So guys, enjoy the price war and promo campaigns....if you think they have all this promos and freebees because they care for their subscribers...well thing again.....remember cash drawers..... it must be full.....heheheehehehe....

Link to comment
said before the x number of channels to allocated would depend on inter carrier traffic, location, subscriber base of telcos. and the number of channels are computed base on the average traffic not at the highest....that is why we have peak and off peak....interconnection yes is direct point ot point up to a a certain point...and channels are not one is to one inter telco........ and telcos does not drop call...it simple can push thru due to limited doors(channels) .. yes it is a source of revenue, but bottom line which will you sacrifice...a few centavo that you can earn (though its still in the millions) per call coming from another telco or a bigger margin from a larger base of your own subscriber? aburd...sad to say it is not.... its simply " who has the bigger pie simple has the power" ..... reality is simply different from what should be!! hehehehe... as to sun...yes internal there internal network are congested from time to time.... one, because of their unlimited text and call, though they would want to expand, its still CAPEX w/c they have limited as to this point, revenues are not as expected...though then again they did increase subscriber base....Absurd you say,

hmmm hehehe... get the other 2/3 of your facts..... what you pointed out is just 1/3 of the whole picture....sad yes!!! as pointed out by another post...its business, money....  simple math.... as of end of 2005 there are now 30 million subscribers, smart has what 65%, globe 30%, sun 5% conservatively... for every 1 peso call within there own network...you earn 100%...inter carrier you earn 30%..... we are still not factoring in the volume of traffic...... would it be absurd if you give priority to  your own subs...hehehe...

sir,  there are a lot of things we still dont understand regarding the business....and how it is run.....making life harder for competitor is simply business....a reality....  :)

 

1. Channels are computed based on peak hour. Not on average. Peak and off peak rates before are made to induce more traffic (intra and inter) in lean hours. This is retail play to maximize investment in the network.

 

2. I am not sure what you mean by one is to one, but channels are bi-directional. And if the channels are full, due to poor forecasting or unexpected traffic increase, the calls which cannot pass are dropped. Hence we get a congestion tone.

 

3. Larger base means larger inbound calls. This is where the money is at. Where do you think Smart makes its money? Not from the their subs, but calls from their other networks. Of course networks will prioritize thier own subscribers to keep them in the network. This is to increase probability of inbound calls. Do you really think that outbound calls have large margins?

 

4. In your comp*tation of a one peso calls, how do you breakdown the 100%? Is it still bigger than the 30% of an inbound calls? Be sure to take to account the following; network cost, marketing cost, billing cost and collection cost. Percentages are relative. BTW, payments between telcos are not percentage based.

 

Telecommunications is a complicated business, it is a business wherein your competitor is also a necessary partner.

Link to comment
1.  Channels are computed based on peak hour.  Not on average.  Peak and off peak rates before are made to induce more traffic (intra and  inter) in lean hours.  This is retail play to maximize investment in the network.

 

2.  I am not sure what you mean by one is to one, but channels are bi-directional.  And if the channels are full, due to poor forecasting or unexpected traffic increase, the calls which cannot pass are dropped.  Hence we get a congestion tone.

 

3.  Larger base means larger inbound calls.  This is where the money is at. Where do you think Smart makes its money? Not from the their subs, but calls from their other networks.  Of course networks will prioritize thier own subscribers to keep them in the network.  This is to increase probability of inbound calls.  Do you really think that outbound calls have large margins?

 

4. In your comp*tation of a one peso calls, how do you breakdown the 100%? Is it still bigger than the 30% of an inbound calls?  Be sure to take to account the following; network cost, marketing cost, billing cost and collection cost.  Percentages are relative.  BTW, payments between telcos are not percentage based.

 

Telecommunications is a complicated business, it is a business wherein your competitor is also a necessary partner.

 

if you say so bro...

 

just like religion and politics...the business of of telecoms are always a source of debatable issues....

 

:)

Link to comment
1.  Channels are computed based on peak hour.  Not on average.  Peak and off peak rates before are made to induce more traffic (intra and  inter) in lean hours.  This is retail play to maximize investment in the network.

 

2.  I am not sure what you mean by one is to one, but channels are bi-directional.  And if the channels are full, due to poor forecasting or unexpected traffic increase, the calls which cannot pass are dropped.  Hence we get a congestion tone.

 

3.  Larger base means larger inbound calls.  This is where the money is at. Where do you think Smart makes its money? Not from the their subs, but calls from their other networks.  Of course networks will prioritize thier own subscribers to keep them in the network.  This is to increase probability of inbound calls.  Do you really think that outbound calls have large margins?

 

4. In your comp*tation of a one peso calls, how do you breakdown the 100%? Is it still bigger than the 30% of an inbound calls?  Be sure to take to account the following; network cost, marketing cost, billing cost and collection cost.  Percentages are relative.  BTW, payments between telcos are not percentage based.

 

Telecommunications is a complicated business, it is a business wherein your competitor is also a necessary partner.

 

btw, I know its not on telco intercarrier toll are not percentage, just pointing out approximately how much revenue share a telco gets from inter carrier call.....and I do Hope that what your pointing out is a reality.....

hehehehe..... true also channels are bi directional...if it use for bi directional...hehehehe..but as I said...

if you say so...well and good...

 

peace bro!!!!

Link to comment
Telecommunications is a complicated business, it is a business wherein your competitor is also a necessary partner.

 

pahhhh....competitor as partner........... sounds good....... compitition as partners....... guess thats the reason major telcos for landline service.... have bought or bought into smaller and or provincial telcos... heehehehe

just thinking aloud..... :D

Link to comment
  • 3 weeks later...
look minumura mo ba ako? rspect others opinion pls kabago bago ko dito ganyn ka :(

 

the way i see it... hindi ka naman minumura ni clitlicker sa kanyang post ms_anonymus08... ang gusto lang nya sigurong sabihin ay kung hindi ka naka-platinum postpaid subscription sa globe eh ang trato nila sayo ay "sh*t"... :rolleyes: :rolleyes: :rolleyes:

Edited by binoyski71
Link to comment

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
×
  • Create New...