jopoc Posted March 22, 2016 Share Posted March 22, 2016 damn. parang parehas na kayo ng level of humor ni Mar Roxas. Masama yan. Tagal mo na atang di nagpapa spakol eh kailangan ba maging stiff, by the book, at maging totally literal ditto sa forum? alam ko na din agad na may halong dagdag at panggago post na to pero natawa na lang ako. siryoso ka koyah? May thread na political jokes... dun kayo bagay.... seryosong usapan dito... kaya nagkakagulo kasi seryosong usapan tapos babanat ng kalokohan... nilagay ni sweetheart mo na yung ang Transcript, may link pa... so i presumed na tama.. yun pala pang political jokes thread pala. ginagaya nyo na ang manok nyo... tingin sa usapang bayan, lokohan. Quote Link to comment
daphne loves derby Posted March 22, 2016 Share Posted March 22, 2016 (edited) sure ka bang yan ang transcript? parang marami dyan ang singit lang.... nag iimbento ka ba ng sariling transcript? chillax. you should subscribe to the professional heckler blog. pikon ka din ba kagaya ni Binay? magdadala ng notes sa debate para daw maipaliwanag yung accusation sa kanya? Eh andami niang time nung hearing sa senado di niya ginawa, mas gusto niya sa debate na konting oras lang ang nakaraan? huwaw! sino ngayon ang PATAWA? Edited March 22, 2016 by daphne loves derby Quote Link to comment
FleurDeLune Posted March 22, 2016 Author Share Posted March 22, 2016 You can report to me any potential (or should I say suspicious) post and/or poster that / who would be needed more attention in this thread. Sayang naman kung ide-delete lang natin. Bigyan na lang natin ng exposure pa. Quote Link to comment
jopoc Posted March 22, 2016 Share Posted March 22, 2016 chillax. you should subscribe to the professional heckler blog. pikon ka din ba kagaya ni Binay? magdadala ng notes sa debate para daw maipaliwanag yung accusation sa kanya? Eh andami niang time nung hearing sa senado di niya ginawa, mas gusto niya sa debate na konting oras lang ang nakaraan? huwaw! sino ngayon ang PATAWA? sa senado ang nag "iimbestiga" sa kanya mga kalaban nya.... hindi fair ground yun... hindi tulad ng debate na pantay pantay ang standings nilang apat big deal pa rin ba yang delay na yan... obvious naman na kasalanan ni luchie yun at hindi ni binay... aminado na si luchie.... bakit si binay pa rin sinisisi? besides, natuloy naman ang debate and it went well.... well, if you want to be a clown, go ahead... but do it in the right place... no reason for me para mapikon.... in fact, i'd be happy to see duterte win if si Grace man lang.... pero siyempre, binay first choice ko.... Quote Link to comment
sandy51 Posted March 22, 2016 Share Posted March 22, 2016 Liked the transcript from Daphne. Too bad, someone didn't get the humor 1 Quote Link to comment
daphne loves derby Posted March 22, 2016 Share Posted March 22, 2016 (edited) sa senado ang nag "iimbestiga" sa kanya mga kalaban nya.... hindi fair ground yun... hindi tulad ng debate na pantay pantay ang standings nilang apat big deal pa rin ba yang delay na yan... obvious naman na kasalanan ni luchie yun at hindi ni binay... aminado na si luchie.... bakit si binay pa rin sinisisi? besides, natuloy naman ang debate and it went well.... well, if you want to be a clown, go ahead... but do it in the right place... no reason for me para mapikon.... in fact, i'd be happy to see duterte win if si Grace man lang.... pero siyempre, binay first choice ko.... actually I am not against the IDEA of him bringing notes. The one I cant understand are the "reasons" for bringing the notes and what kind of notes are there. The senate hearing is nationally televised, makikita mo SANA kung UNFAIR nga ba talaga ang magiging treatment sa kanya. But I doubt it dahil VP pa din sya and he commands high respect. Pero since hindi nangyari, puro assumption na lang yang unfair thing na yan. Who knows, maybe that can work to Binay's advantage kung umattend sya kasi baka naawa pa ang tao sa kanya. anyways, moving on... PS: I am not being a clown, call it an "ice breaker" against a heating thread. Madam Fleur may actually like the idea of it. Hindi ko kasalanan kung lumabas na katawa tawa si Binay sa post ni Professional Heckler, hindi lang naman sya halos lahat sila. And in some ways, it still have content relating to that thread. Im just sharing for EVERYONE to see. (So far, ikaw pa lang ang nag react NEGATIVELY) Edited March 22, 2016 by daphne loves derby Quote Link to comment
jopoc Posted March 22, 2016 Share Posted March 22, 2016 actually I am not against the IDEA of him bringing notes. The one I cant understand are the "reasons" for bringing the notes and what kind of notes are there. The senate hearing is nationally televised, makikita mo SANA kung UNFAIR nga ba talaga ang magiging treatment sa kanya. But I doubt it dahil VP pa din sya and he commands high respect. Pero since hindi nangyari, puro assumption na lang yang unfair thing na yan. Who knows, maybe that can work to Binay's advantage kung umattend sya kasi baka naawa pa ang tao sa kanya. anyways, moving on... PS: I am not being a clown, call it an "ice breaker" against a heating thread. Madam Fleur may actually like the idea of it. Hindi ko kasalanan kung lumabas na katawa tawa si Binay sa post ni Professional Heckler, hindi lang naman sya halos lahat sila. And in some ways, it still have content relating to that thread. Im just sharing for EVERYONE to see. (So far, ikaw pa lang ang nag react NEGATIVELY) the negative reaction came kasi dun sa link mo, which is inquirer... i thought na serious ka and niloloko mo lang yung usapan natin... had you linked it to professional heckler, i would have understood... or at least, you said it was a joke.... anyway, water under the bridge.... same thing as the note issue... tapos na yun.... ayaw lang palampasin based on wrong facts (as if binay ang may kasalanan kahit inamin ni luchie pagkakamali) Quote Link to comment
rooster69ph Posted March 22, 2016 Share Posted March 22, 2016 (edited) Hindi nag-iiba ang ihip ng hangin para sa mga pamilyang Poe-Sonora-Marcos. Si Susan Roces ay nananatiling maka Marcos simula't sapul hanggang ngayon.Paano magiging kasuklam-suklam at kasumpa-sumpa para kay Grace Poe ang mga taong kinalakhan nya? Kahit dinagdagan mo ng "hahaha", lumilitaw pa rin na mali ang sinabi mo para lang laitin ang mga Marcos. Does it follow if Susan remains a Marcos supporter Grace is also? Si Susan ba at si Grace iisa ang takbo ng pagiisip? In short pinalalabas mong sunud-sunuran lang ni Susan si Grace. Maka-Marcos ba kamo ang mga Poe? Eh bakit hindi na lang sila ni BBM ang nagtandem? Kung talagang maka-Marcos yan at yun sinasabi mo na hanggang ngayon nanatiling sumusuporta sa Marcos hindi ba Poe-Marcos ang ticket na kinakampanya niya. It would have been an alliance of convenience so to speak ... ang "Poe" ay may hatak sa masa samantalang ang "Marcos" ay may makinarya/pera. so sa anong dahilan at ayaw ni GP magpaDNA sila ni BBM para tapos na ang problema niya? Edited March 22, 2016 by rooster69ph Quote Link to comment
rooster69ph Posted March 23, 2016 Share Posted March 23, 2016 That book contains records that are facts which don't have to be proven in court. Facts naman pala ... hindi imbento. at least malinaw. Quote Link to comment
kanto-terrorist Posted March 23, 2016 Share Posted March 23, 2016 it could have been more dramatic kung nakapirmahan na ng AMLC/waiver document in front of live TV, kung pinayagan lang, atleast on that portion, ang pag bitbit ng dokumento ni Binay. The public was denied of having that moment. Quote Link to comment
rooster69ph Posted March 23, 2016 Share Posted March 23, 2016 it could have been more dramatic kung nakapirmahan na ng AMLC/waiver document in front of live TV, kung pinayagan lang, atleast on that portion, ang pag bitbit ng dokumento ni Binay. The public was denied of having that moment. Huwag na at useless na rin. Pakitang tao na lang niya yan. Classic epal moves ... Kasi under law (AMLA) the AMLC has the power to ask the banks to disclose the identity of the owner of the accounts as well as the transactions thereof to investigate. Therefore irrelevant na ang pagsign ng waiver ni Binay now that the AMLC has already come out with the report on him. Quote Link to comment
rooster69ph Posted March 23, 2016 Share Posted March 23, 2016 Another dumb reply. Read my whole post and understand it before posting. You only focused on one word. One word does not make a sentence. This post of yours proves that you have a comprehension problem. On the contrary the whole sentence was taken into consideration but just need to highlight the word "FACT". I totally agree with what you said ... According to you: "that book contains records that are FACTS which don't have to be proven in court" ... So if that book says MARCOS IS CORRUPT then it follows that it is "a FACT which don't have to be proven in court." Therefore .to say MARCOS is CORRUPT is a FACT. Basic logic lang yan .. unless you don't know what you're talking about. Now if you are telling me that it is not a FACT, then obviously the problem is not with my comprehension but rather your don't know what you're talking about. Sad to say projection won't lead you anywhere. Quote Link to comment
kanto-terrorist Posted March 23, 2016 Share Posted March 23, 2016 (edited) May thread na political jokes... dun kayo bagay.... seryosong usapan dito... kaya nagkakagulo kasi seryosong usapan tapos babanat ng kalokohan... nilagay ni sweetheart mo na yung ang Transcript, may link pa... so i presumed na tama.. yun pala pang political jokes thread pala. ginagaya nyo na ang manok nyo... tingin sa usapang bayan, lokohan. Ano ba ang lokohan sa yo? Ang politikong firm and proper pero kaliwat kanang panggagago sa bayan? Yun ang totoong political joke, gaya ng kandidato mo at mga mga taong supporter ng mga trapo. Si duterte, nagngangarat sa mga gagong sumusuway sa batas. pero kadalasan mga trapong gusto nyo, ningangaratan tayong mga nagbabayad ng tax. Edited March 23, 2016 by kanto-terrorist Quote Link to comment
rooster69ph Posted March 23, 2016 Share Posted March 23, 2016 So you also believe a book which just contained conjecture about Marcos. If you do, then you are gullible because it has not been proven in court, hence, what the book says is not a fact but an opinion. Hahaha ... haba ng sinabi nonsense naman Sige show me anything that can prove that they have to or are required to prove in court whatever they claim. Its not about what I believe ...its about what you said and your position now. Sino ba ang may sabi ng ganito "That book contains records that are facts which don't have to be proven in court. " You're not even coherent. Saying that Marcos is corrupt is an opinion, not a fact because it has not been proven in court. Compose your thoughts. You're getting lost. No, saying that Marcos is corrupt is an opinion. So tell me, how am I projecting? Excuse me sasabihin mo ngayon opinion??? ...its you who said that That book contains records that are facts ...so kung that is in the books paano naging opinion base sa unang sinabi mo? Sino ngayon ang hindi coherent? Spin pa more Quote Link to comment
rooster69ph Posted March 23, 2016 Share Posted March 23, 2016 (edited) Paikot pa more...di na kita papatulan. Am done with you on this. Its quite obvious who is affected and have a lot of explaining este wiggling to do. I obviously can't help another hopeless. Edited March 23, 2016 by rooster69ph Quote Link to comment
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.