Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Kung meron man, nasagot mo na. No, I don't think you have. Your excuses are getting lamer by the post. :lol:

 

Do you even understand the idiom? Moronic sarcasm won't do you any good. It will only make you look dumb.

 

Why should I backread when I already quoted the earliest post in which you quoted a post of mine?

 

yan ang mahirap sayo... ayaw mag backread haha. like i said, nasagot na yan bago mo pa itanong. di mo talaga mababasa yan kung ayaw mo balikan. tapos sasabihin mo nagpapalusot pero obvious naman na ikaw yun. lol

 

idiom... ok. pero specify no naman kung ano yung pinaguusapan natin para magkalinawan. kaso ayaw mo naman. :)

 

sa lahat ng tanong or request ko, sinagot mo lang hindi ka nag backread. sige, sabi mo eh. wala naman problema sa akin ipagpatuloy mo lang palusot mo. huling huli ka na. :)

Edited by perfectstranger
Link to comment

Excuses, excuses. Like I said, if you really had an intelligent rebuttal to my post, it would have been rebutted a couple of days back but until now, all I hear are cheap excuses. :lol:

 

You really should follow your own suggestion of backreading. :lol:

 

Speak for yourself. Like I said, I only back read until that post in which you alluded to my post. I couldn't care less what you posted before that. Pwned. :lol:

hindi e. sinabi ko na rin sayo na meron previous post kaya alam mo na dapat kung ano ang dapat mong gawin. binigyan na nga ng clues para alam mo kung ano ang hahanapin kaso ayaw mag backread. sige, palusot pa... ipagpatuloy mo lang. :)

 

pwned mo mukha mo. gusto mo pa baliktarin huling huli ka na. lol

Link to comment

Speak for yourself. You've been yakking nonsense since we started exchanging. The fact of the matter is you never controverted what I said except for posting nonsense. I am entertained by your lame excuses. Palusot? It seems you have mastered that art. Haha! Pwned na naman. :lol:

sabi mo eh. lol

huwag ka magalala, matutuwa din ako sayo haha. kahit ikaw lang yata naniniwala sa pinagsasabi mo. kawawa ka naman, pilit pa rin ipasa sa iba pero huling huli na. :)

Link to comment

I don"t know if "part" is the right word. The article presented earlier use "allies" which is more palatable given as you said there is lack of documentary evedence to prove indeed they are part of the cpp

 

Nagmamatigas pa rin kahit ikaw lang ang hindi nakakaalam. Ang ayos na ngang pagkasabi ni Joma sa video and inexpalin pa ulit ng isang poster dito.

Link to comment

 

Nagmamatigas pa rin kahit ikaw lang ang hindi nakakaalam. Ang ayos na ngang pagkasabi ni Joma sa video and inexpalin pa ulit ng isang poster dito.

Wow almost a wk na ito binuhay pa para lang makahirit.

 

 

Malinaw sa article na pinKita mo allied ang ginamit .... bilang description sa relasyon sa cpp. siguro naman kaya mo na tingnan ang ibig sabihin niyan sa dictionary.

 

Ang basehan mo sabi ni joma. Did kmu confirm? Yes or no?

 

Sabagay ur one gullible person...parang un ilang kapulisan sa tokhang. Sabi kasi ni kap pusher at common knowledge kaya ayun naniwala at tinira agad. Ayun mistaken identity pala. Lolz

Link to comment

Kesa naman sa mga sumbongerts dini. Lolz.

 

hindi kami sumbungero, ginagawa namin yun para manatili ang integridad ng thread na to na bumababa ang level dahil sa katulad mong sira ulo.

Ikaw nga tong nagsumbong pa sa kapwa poster di ba? :D

 

iyakin lang ang pota.

 

kung ayaw mo ma ban at ma report sa mods, ayusin mo post mo, libre naman mag post eh wag lang puro trolling at walang kwentang statements nilalagay mo. Wag mo kasi araw arawin kahit libre. :lol: :lol: :lol:

Link to comment

im just answering some part of your question hehehe

 

depende nga sa Clause ng inyong PDR agreement kung ang PDR agreement mo ay may Clause na tulad ng sinabi ng atty ibig sabihin nun owner ka dahil may rights of approval kana...

 

ito yung Clause kaya nasita ng SEC si Rappler... kung wlang ganitong Clause which is ginagawa ni ABS at GMA sa knilang foreign PDR holders ayun abswelto itong dalawang media company..

 

remember 100% Filipino owned dpat so khit 0.01% ay bawal may Foreign entities

were you able to answer? NO! you just repeated what i already said/explained and yet di ninyo pa rin maintindihan ang problema/issue ng kasong ito ...naexplain na nga ng lawyer hindi ninyo pa rin maintindihan. ang tinatanong ko ay simple lang does a pdr constitute ownership? so nagkaroon ba ng kahit 0.1% na foreign ownership? the answer is no. when you include any clause that gives investors rights only owners have then it is no longer a pdr. that is the reason why the sec voided the pdr issued by rappler.

 

pinagpipilitan ninyo kasi dahil sa clause na yan eh foreign owned na si rappler. SEC mismo nagsabi at ang ginamit niyang term is deemed as an equities derivative. a derivatives is another form of financial instrument totally differentbfrom a pdr. in other words sa mata ni SEC hindi isang pdr ang kanyang na issue dun sa foreigner kundi isang derivatives disguised as a pdr kuno to be able to circumvent the foreign ownership limit. . a pdr does not constitute ownership so in the first place pag naglagay ka na ng. clause which is only reserved for owners then hindi na pdr yan...void na yan from the start. pag sinabing void meaning it is deemed to have never existed or not legally binding bec illegal. in short legally speaking kung may kasunduan sila at hindi naman siya pwedeng tawaging pdr eh ano yun kasunduan nila? diyan pumapasok yun sabi ni sec na deemed as equities derivatives yun instrument that was issued. yan pwede na yun pinagpipilitan ninyo na may change in ownership.

 

know what a pdr really is first. basahin ninyo ang sec ruling na 20++ pages at dun nakadetalye on how they decided on the case. hindi ninyo makikita o mababasa yan sa press releases kasi masalimuot i-explain at intindihin.

 

again hindi ako kumokontra sa desisyon ng sec kasi may punto naman siya. it is really now up to the court to decide if yun pinapakitang waiver on the said clause is an acceptable cure to make the pdr valid.

Edited by rooster69ph
Link to comment

Who says we aren't letting him? We put up with Penoy's incompetence for 6 years, and know this too will pass. Unless he goes all out tyrannical and extends his term, that is.

 

But I'm going to go on record that this one is the most dangerous president we'd had thus far. If not directly, then by the way he influences his followers.

 

Baka may ma butt hurt niyan dito mawalan ka ng feeling magaling na kakampi.

 

 

 

Dun sa nagrereklamo kung bakit hindi pa nareresolba ang plate mess by this admin

 

http://cnnphilippines.com/news/2018/01/23/supreme-court-release-license-plates.html

Link to comment

hindi nagets if you need to get a 2/3 approval of all PDR holders thats not constitute ownership hahaha... ewan ko sa iyo!

 

your line of reasoning is based on how experts try to explain it to simpletons. à

 

have you actually read the sec ruling and how it was explained? malinaw na sinabi ni sec na strictly speaking pinoy pa rin ang nagmamayari ng kumpanya...

 

 

IMPOV dont cancel the contract, cguro better inform MIASCOR to change all personnel who handles the passengers luggage's kawawa naman tlaga yung mga nadamay sa kalokohan ng iba,,,,

 

pero madaming naging ganitong kaso wala nman ginagawa ang MIASCOR... kinunsinte nila kc..

 

after nyo ng masayang Christmas Party wala pang 3 buwan ng 2018 wla na kyong trabaho... saklap!

i share the same view except tinging ko inconsistent ka. agree ako kawaa yun mga taong madadamay lalu nat walang kasalanan. pero for you sibakin ang lahat ng naghahandle ng luggage? hindi ba dapat imbestigahan at yun may sala lang ang sibakin.

post-42325-0-59624800-1516801099_thumb.jpeg

Edited by rooster69ph
Link to comment

 

 

d mo tlaga gets na if your PDR agreements have that clause you have control to the company in any form ur a part owner,,,

 

yung attach pix mo ay hindi naging basehan why RAPPLER got sack by SEC... its the PDR conditions na binigay kay Omidyar ewan ko ba tlaga!

 

SEC argued that an Omidyar Network PDR provision – which states Rappler Holdings need to seek approval of 2/3 of PDR holders on corporate matters – is a violation to Foreign Equity Restriction of the Philippine Constitution.Foreign Equity Restriction states that "ownership and management of mass media shall be limited to citizens of the Philippines, or to corporations, cooperatives or associations, wholly-owned and managed by such citizens."

 

nbasa mo ba? its the provision (clause) on the PDR

 

if seeking approval from someone who holds a PDR doesn't constitutes ownership abay ewan ko ba talga hindi mo maunawaan!

 

 

at isa pa inconsistent dyosku ITS MY POINT OF VIEW dun sa kaso ng MIASCOR if you got a problem with that its your problem not mine hahaha

Edited by darksoulriver
  • Like (+1) 1
Link to comment

 

Dun sa nagrereklamo kung bakit hindi pa nareresolba ang plate mess by this admin

 

http://cnnphilippines.com/news/2018/01/23/supreme-court-release-license-plates.html

dun naman sa mga panay reklamo sa nakaraang admin ...pero panay halik sa pwet ng kadedepensa sa kasalukuyang admin.

 

tanong ko lang kung hindi maresolba ang problema until now na nakaroon na ng favorable ruling dahil sa nakabinbin na kaso how do you expect na naresolba din ito ng nakaraang admin given the circumstance?

Well duterte isnt very smart also. I think hes just as incompetent as his predecessor, so theres that.

definitely someones gonna say ouch, my butt really hurts ... lolz! Edited by rooster69ph
Link to comment

unfortunately for you ... oo, base sa ruling hindi yun galing media na edited para sa simpletons. malaking KGGHAN ba? pa appoint ka as SEC chair para maisaayos mo ito .... tutal mas nagmamagaling ka sa explanation ng SEC . lolz

 

 

========

 

 

the economy has been moving forward for the past years as evidenced by a fast growing middle class unfortunately this administration seems bent on reversing the situation

well they promise change right? its now coming! Edited by rooster69ph
Link to comment

Dear Digong,

 

Another ignorant hater has come out of the wood-works, posting stupid things on a wrong thread. And btw digong kindly tell that mocha of yours to follow lenis mouth, wait leni also lies even on international media...so nvm.

 

 

You do realize that when it comes to lying, this president takes the cake don't you? Or wait.. Is it just because we non-DDS just don't know how to interpret him correctly? Or that we don't know when he is joking or when he is serious?

Link to comment

Dear digong,

 

See one of your ignorant hater doesn't seem to know how to read and follow simple rules, yet all i see is QQ from this ignorant hater about you being a rule breaker. Funny...digong i think he is like you, you run your mouth just as he runs his without considering the consequences.

Link to comment

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
×
  • Create New...