rocco69

Hi!

I have a 2 year old daughter and she's in the custody of her mother which is my ex-girlfriend a "high-end psp". I regularly visit her with sustento. My concern is that is there a possibility that i can get the custody of the child even she's just 2 years old now? My worry is i don't want my daughter to grow up with that kind of environment. What's your 2 cents? Thanks in advance

nope. since you call the mother your ex-girlfriend, that implies that you are not married to each other, which would make your daughter illegitimate.

under the law, custody of an illegitimate child is with the mother.

more, assuming you could ask for custody [which is a bit of a stretch, given that illegitimate children are mandated to stay with the mother] there has to be a compelling reason to deprive the mother of custody, being a PSP is not one of them if the child is of an age where she cannot yet comprehend the nature of her mother's occupation. At two years of age, the child will clearly have no comprehension yet of her mother's work. Furthermore, what proof can you present that she is a PSP, you would need definite proof of this [which, as stated earlier, would work only if the child is a lot older, not at the present].

mga boss...

 

will be coming home from Dubai sa friday...

booked tickets and will be traveling with kids for a quick getaway to hongkong for three days.

ex wife wants to know all details with a hint of joining us or else she won't allow the kids to join me.

 

is that even possible?

can she offload us on the airport?

 

what papers should I bring as proof to the immigration...

 

pasensya na first time traveller na kasama mga anak...

 

salamat!

Kung wala namang custody dispute sa inyong dalawa (walang kasuhan kung sino ang me karapatan sa bata), me karapatan ka bilang ama na ipasyal ang mga anak mo.

On the assumption na legitimate children mo ang mga bata (kasal kayo ng ex-wife mo, at nakalagay na kayo ang magulang ng bata sa birth certificate), maibibiyahe mo dapat ang mga ito. Magdala ng ebidensya na sila ay anak mo (basically, bring NSO-issued copies of their certificates of live birth [kung saan nakalagay na ikaw ang ama], as well as proof of your identity [iD etc, dala mo naman passport mo, proof din yun]

Holiday sa Tuesday, may pasok sa Monday, kaya lang nag half day ang employee. Is he still entitled to holiday pay? Thanks.

depende sa klase ng pa-half day niya. Kung absent without leave yung half day niya, absent siya, kaya walang holiday pay. Kung half day with pay dahil gumamit siya ng leave niya, entitled siya.

Thank you ulit po sa pagsagot nio. Nakakuha ako ng 2 charge slip sa 1 merchant. Un 1 may signature at yun 1 wala kc below 2k, no need for signature.Malayo at magkaiba signature namin. Pinakita sakin un cctv pero diko pede i-record. Kitang kita na may gumamit ibang tao. Pano ko po ito i-contest sa bangko na ang sabi nila ay nagamit nga credit card ko kaya dapat ko bayarin kasi hindi ko naireport ng lost or stolen card siya. Sinabi ko sa kanila na ipakita nila mismo sakin ang ebidensya na ako mismo ang gumamit ng card.

Kung matigas ulo ng bangko, ala ka magagawa. magmamatigasan na lang kayo niyan.

Tanong lang po...

May credit card ako 1 year ko din sya nagamit,

bago mag expire, clear ang credit card ko. as far as i know, kailangan ko syang ipa renew para magamit ulit but with the corresponing amount kaya hindi ko nalang ni renew.

after a few months may dumating na bill huge amount nagmula sa renewal payment.

Nagtanong ako sa bangko sabi nila hindi raw nila sakop ung credit card other agency daw un, they just using their bank name lang.

dumating sa punto na pinadalhan na ako ng legal counsel ng letter to pay the bill and i tell them the truth behind that bill.

Should i settle that bill to clear my account name?

Nakalagay ba sa kontrata mo na compulsory na magrenew ka? Kung oo, kailangan mo bayaran. Pero kung hindi nakalagay na compulsory ang renewal, bakit ka magbabayad? Kaya nga hindi ka na nagrenew ay dahil hindi ka na interesado sa card. Magreklamo sa Bangko Sentral ng Pilipinas sa ganyang pamamalakad ng credit card company, at para sila naman ang ma-penahan sa maling gawain na yan!

Mga sir, pwede po patulong. May empleyado ako na mag-resign, pero wala binigay na resignation letter. May utang pa P4000.00 sa amin. Ngayon, nagtext sa wife ko, naghihigi ng backpay, ang alam ko sa batas, pag-voluntary resignation wala backpay. Nahaharrass na wife ko. Saan kaya pwede magreklamo. Kasi sa NLRC, palaging panig sa employee. Ilan na yung employee namin na awol tapos sila pa nanalo sa kaso sa NLRC. Sana po matulungan nyo kami maliliit na negosyante. Maraming salamat po

saan pwede magreklamo. Wala, employer ka eh.

Ilan na palang empleyado nyo ang nag-AWOL, tapos nagsampa ng kaso sa NLRC, kung saan lagi kayong TALO, DI KA PA NATUTUTO!!!

Kapag nag-resign o nag-AWOL na walang resignation letter o pa-abiso, sumulat ka agad sa empleyado sa last known address niya (either personal ninyong ihatid at IPA-RECEIVEang sulat sa address niya o kung yun ay sobrang abala, thru registered mail with return card [magsama ng testigo para kung ayaw ireceive, iwanan ninyo ng kopya ng sulat tapos ilagay sa receiving copy ninyo ng "Refused to receive"). Yung sulat ay humihiling na sila ay magpaliwanag sa loob ng LIMANG ARAW (di pupwedeng bumababa sa limang araw ang palugit) kung bakit hindi sila tatanggalin dahil sa hindi pagpasok sa trabaho ng walang abiso.

Kapag sumagot at inaamin niya na siya ay nagresign na, AYOS ang problema mo, may ebidensya ka na na nagresign siya. Sulatan mo na tinatanggap niyo ang resignation niya. Dahil nagresign siya, no separation pay!

Kapag sumagot at nagde-deny na siya ay magreresign, bakit di siya pumapasok? Kung di katanggap tanggap ang paliwanag niya, sulatan mo ulit at sabihin na di katanggap tanggap ang paliwanag niya at siya ay tinatanggal ninyo for insubordination at excessive absences. Ayos na rin ang problema niyo! Dahil kasalanan niya, wala ring separation pay!

Kung di na sumagot, sulatan ulit na dahil wala siyang paliwanag, ipinapalagay ng kumpanya na siya ay AWOL at tinatanggal na rin sa trabaho dahil sa insubordination at excessive absences. Ayos ulit ang problema niyo! Wala na namang separation pay dahil kasalanan niya!

GANYAN DAPAT! MATUTO! [Alalahanin mo, sa pagtatanggal ng empleyado, laging DALAWANG SULAT, ang una humihingi ng paliwanag sa loob ng limang araw, at yung pangalawa, nagtatanggal na sa empleyado dahil di katanggap tanggap o walang katuturan ang paliwanag. o di-kaya-y walang paliwanag sa loob ng ibinigay na limang araw]

P.S. Iba ang backpay sa separation pay. Ang backpay ay para sa PINAGTRABAHUAN MO NA PERO DI KA PA NABABAYARAN. Kahit magresign ang isang empleyado, may karapatan pa rin siya sa backpay niya, pingtrabahuan na niya yun eh. Separation pay ang di siya entitled (ang separation pay ay tulong sa empleyado na tinanggal sa trabaho sa dahilan na di naman niya kasalanan, e.g. retrenchment, redundancy, labor-saving device etc.) kung siya ay nagresign at kagustuhan niya ang humiwalay sa kumpanya. Kung talagang nagtrabaho siya pero di pa bayad, may karapatan siyang humingi ng backpay. Kung may utang sa inyo, ikaltas mo sa backpay niya (siguraduhin mo lang na may matibay kang ebidensya na may utang siya sa inyo). Kung sobra ang utang sa backpay, wala na siyang matatanggap, LUGI PA KAYO!

Thank you po sa advice. Nakausap ko na po ang bangko and its under investigation. At dahil may 1 month na at wala pa silang decision, ako na mismo ang pumunta sa mga merchants at humingi ng mga charge slip at cctv footage.

Lets say un gumamit ng card ko ay kakilala ko, pede ko ba siya ipaaresto agad dahil may ebidensya nako o dapat mag pa blotter muna ako sa pulis? Anu processo dapat kopo gawin?

ang paggamit ng credit card ng ibang tao ng walang pahintulot ay paglabag sa Section 9(n) ng Republic Act 8484. pwede mo na itong ipa-blotter sa pulis, para maisampa na ang karampatang reklamo sa piskalya (hindi mo siya pwedeng ipa-aresto dahil hindi na siya caught in the act). Magtanong ka na rin sa pulis kung paano mapapabilis ang pagsampa nila ng kaso sa piskalya (bigyan mo na ng pamgmeryenda para maliksi). pagkatapos mo i-reklamo sa pulisya, sumulat ka na rin sa bangko tungkol sa pagsampa mo ng reklamo laban sa taong yun, isama mo sa sulat ang mga ebidensya mo, SABAY HILING NA LINISIN NA NILA ANG PANGALAN AT ACCOUNT MO DAHIL IBANG TAO NGA ANG MAY KAGAGAWAN.

Magandang hapon mga boss. Mag consult lang po.

Yung date kong boss na Japanese nag tayo ng restaurant at nakiusap sa aken at iba pang kaibigan na maging "dummy" incorporators.

Gusto na po namen mag resign bilang incorporators dahil ibinenta na ng date kong boss ang restaurant dahil nalulugi.

At present, may ipapalit na po ang bagong may ari na bagong incorporators pero ang proseso ay tatagal ng ilang buwan.

Ano po ba maganda namen gawen para maprotektahan namen ang mga sarile namen kung may maghahabol? Salamat po.

kung kayo ay incorporator, ibig sabihin corporation ang may-ari ng restaurant. kung ibenenta na ang restaurant, dapat ang shares of stock ninyo sa corporation ay nabenta na rin (or, at the very least, majority ng shares of stock).

hindi kayo pwede magresign bilang incorporator, dahil forever na yan (ang incorporator ay ang mga may-ari ng sapi [stockholder] ng kumpanya nung binuo ang korporasyon. Pwede kayong tumigil bilang may-ari ng sapi [stockholder] sa pamamagitan ng pagbenta o pag-donate sa ibang tao ng mga sapi na nakapangalan sa inyo.

kung naitayo na ang korporasyon, imposible ang sinasabi mo na may ipapalit na incorporator ang nakabili sa restaurant (dahil paano mo papalitan ang mga may-ari ng sapi nung itinayo ang korporasyon at ito ay nakalipas na). ang pwede nilang gawin ay PALITAN ang mga may-ari ng sapi, at hindi ito magtatagal ng buwan! dahil gagawa ka lang ng Deed of Assignment kung saan inililipat at isinasalin mo sa iba yung mga sapi na nakapangalan sa iyo. wala pang isang araw ay magagawa na yan.

ano ang pwede niyong gawin para pangalagaan/ipagtanggol ang inyong mga sarili? Kailangang may mga hawak na kayong Deed of Assignment kung saan isinasalin at inililipat na niyo sa iba ang mga sapi na nakapangalan sa inyo. Para may katibayan kayo na wala na kayong koneksyon sa restaurant/negosyo/korporasyon na yan DAHIL NGA IBENENTA NA NINYO ANG partisipasyon, karapatan, at pagmamay-ari ninyo sa restaurant sa ibang tao.

Question po,

May credit card ako pero never ko ginamit. Its been with me for more than a year and never been used. 1 day, I got a text from the credit card company that there was a fraudulent use on the card so it was declined. Then the statement came with a huge bill which were not mine. Can the credit card company bill me for it?

Yes, they can bill you for it. Kung gusto nilang gawin yun, wala kang magagawa.

Ang dapat na tanong mo ay: PWEDE KA BA BA NILANG PAGBAYARIN SA CARD NA HINDI MO NAMAN GINAMIT?

Siyempre, hindi!!! Kung hindi mo ginamit, bakit ikaw ang magbabayad. Wala silang karapatang sumingil para sa gastusing di mo naman kagagawan.

Kaya lang, dahil nasa pangalan mo, kailangan mong ayusin yan sa kumpanya (para malinis ang record mo sa credit card companies) para, sa hinaharap, kung ikaw ay mangungutang sa bangko o mag-aapply ng credit card, mabibigyan ka agad. Makipag-ugnayan ka sa credit card company at sabihin/patunayan mo sa kanila na hindi mo nga nagamit kailan man yung card na yan, at ang mga naka-charge dun ay hindi mo kagagawan.

Thanks in advance sa magigiting nating lawyer dito sa MTC na sasagot;

 

Here is the scenario:

 

I got married when I was 19 yo without the knowledge of my parents. The marriage was arranged by my wife without any documents required from my side. We went to Municipal office and just signed a marriage contract in the presence of two adults who act as our parents.

 

In addition, I notice that time that the marriage license is from Cavite where we are not a resident. My father's first name in the marriage application is not his real name (Johhny instead of Juan).

 

After 4 years, I applied for a passport and one the requirement is a birth certificate. When I went to our province to get a copy of my birth certificate, I learned that I was not registered and thereby applied for late registration.

 

My question: Is there possibility that my marriage is null and void considering that I am not yet registered during the marriage, no legal documents submitted and some incorrect information in the marriage contract.

 

Just in case, can anyone recommend an expert lawyer for annulment who charge minimal or standard fee.

Your marriage WAS annullable for lack of consent of parents. Notice, however, that you can contest marriages where one party was below 21 and did not have the consent of his parents WITHIN FIVE YEARS AFTER TURNING TWENTY-ONE. Ayun sa kwento mo, at least 4 years has already elapsed from the time you were 19. Mas malamang sa hindi, lampas 26 years old ka ngayon, kaya PASO na ang kaso mo! [see Art. 47, Family Code]

Pangalawa, kailangan na hindi na nagsama yung tao na walang pahintulot ng kanyang magulang sa pinakasalan niya ng siya ay mag-21 (dahil kapag nakisama ka pa rin sa asawa mo ng mag-21 ka, nalunasan o nawala ang depekto ng iyong kasal [see Art. 45[1], Family Code]). Sa kwento mo, again, mas malamang sa hindi, nagsama pa rin kayo kahit lampas 21 ka na (dahil wala ka namang nababanggit na hiwalay na kayo), kung kaya't PASO PA RIN ANG KASO MO! (whether or not lumipas na ang limang taon o hindi)

Yung wala kang birth certificate ng ikasal ka, yung mali-mali yung info sa application at marriage license (at kahit sa marriage certificate) AY HINDI BASEHAN para ipawalang-bisa ang kasal mo.

Ngunit, subalit, datapwa't...

Dahil pinalabas na taga-Cavite kayo, para dun makakuha ng Marriage License, may posibilidad [alalahanin mo, ang posibilidad na ito ay kasing-liit ng butas ng karayom, at ito ay SUNTOK SA BUWAN!] na peke ang lisensya sa kasal ninyo.

1. Kunin ang Certificate of Marriage mo.

2. TIngnan mo sa bandang ibaba, sa ibaba ng pirma ninyong mag-asawa, sa ilalim ng bahaging "I further certify that"

yung Marriage License No. at kung saang lugar ito na-issue.

3. Puntahan ang Civil registrar ng lugar na iyon.

4. Magtanong dun kung meron ngang ganung Marriage License No., at kung kanino ito naka-issue (mas maganda, in writing ang letter request, para sasagutin nila in writing din, at may ebidensya ka agad ng sagot).

5. Kung merong ganung marriage license at sa inyo nga naka-issue, MALAS MO! Mukhang psychological incapacity na lang ang basehan ng pagpapawalang-bisa sa kasal mo.

6. Kung merong ganung marriage license PERO hindi sa inyo naka-issue, OR walang ganung marriage license, MASWERTE KA! Walang bisa ang kasal mo kahit gaano pa katagal ang lumipas na panahon. Napakadaling ipawalang bisa ang kasal mo niyan, MAS MAKAKAMURA KA PA!

Good luck!

Hi. Ano po mangyayari kung fullpaid na ang lot with complete deed of sale except di pa naililipat sa name ko ang title tapos namatay ang owner? Makukuha ko pa ba ang title? Tia

nasaan ang owner's duplicate copy of title? YAN ANG KAILANGANG MAKUHA MO! [hinihingi ito ng Register of Deeds para mailipat sa pangalan mo ang title]. Kung wala pa sa iyo, hingin mo dun sa tagapagmana ng seller mo at fully paid ka na pala.

Note the worst case scenario: someone pretends to be the owner, sells the property to somebody else, GIVES THE BUYER THE DUPLICATE OWNER'S COPY. The buyer can now go to the Register of Deeds, submit his Deed of Sale [note that the Register of Deeds would not know the signature of the real owner, hence will accept the Deed of Sale at face value] together with the Duplicate Owner's Copy, AND THEN GET A NEW TITLE IN HIS NAME. THEN YOU'RE SCREWED! [if the buyer had no knowledge that the seller was not the real owner, and he transfers the property to somebody else, they get a better right to the property than you]

I repeat, GET YOUR HANDS ON THE DUPLICATE OWNER'S COPY ASAP!

In the alternative [if you can't get hold of the duplicate owner's copy, file an Adverse Claim with the Register of Deeds so that the fact that you already bought the property can be annotated/written on the title, resulting in any new buyer not getting any right better than yours.

Hi, I have a friend who was terminated because of accused report of bullying by a colleague. The problem is hindi na siya pinayagan depensahan yung sarili niya after that and deretso terminated. Pupuwede ba yun?

Hindi tama yun. Dapat ay binigyan siya ng Notice to Explain muna, at panahon para ma isubmit ang explanation niya.

Dahil walang due process, pwede siya magreklamo sa pinakamalapit na NLRC Office. Kahit may ground o tutoo ang reklamo laban sa kanta, dahil di nasunod ang tamang proseso, pwede siyang nagreklamo, at may kaukulang parusa na fine na ipapataw sa kumpanya (kung tama ang pag-alala ko, 30T ang maari niyang ma-claim as penalty)

Hi, I have a friend who was terminated because of accused report of bullying by a colleague. The problem is hindi na siya pinayagan depensahan yung sarili niya after that and deretso terminated. Pupuwede ba yun?

Hindi tama yun. Dapat ay binigyan siya ng Notice to Explain muna, at panahon para ma isubmit ang explanation niya.

Dahil walang due process, pwede siya magreklamo sa pinakamalapit na NLRC Office. Kahit may ground o tutoo ang reklamo laban sa kanta, dahil di nasunod ang tamang proseso, pwede siyang nagreklamo, at may kaukulang parusa na fine na ipapataw sa kumpanya (kung tama ang pag-alala ko, 30T ang maari niyang ma-claim as penalty)

Ah yes po ejectment case. pero the decision still applies to the ownership? Pinakaconcern ko is kung may bisa ung decision without the writ of execution.

yes. your problem really is that the decision is binding only on the parties in the case. as to others, you still have to present your proof of ownership (which will probably be the same evidence used in the prior case)

May squatter pano po yan need pa ba writ of execution?

Ang squatter ay hindi kasama dun sa kaso, kaya hindi siya bound ng decision na yun.

Kailangan sampahan ng sariling kaso, for ejectment, yung squatter

 

 

 

thanks po sa reply.

 

1) rtc decision 2000

2) CA dismissal without reviewing the case kasi di nagsubmit ng briefs ung mga appelants. 2002

3) since naglapse na ung 5 years,

4) RTC decision was only saying who the rightful owners of the lot and some payments to the owners.

5) pued pa ba or needed pa ba ung writ of execution or self-execution na ung decision for the ownership issue excluding the collection of damages?

 

do we need the revival or the CA decision should be enough? sorry clear ko lang kasi di ko alam kung need ng revival or no need.

dahil lampas 10 years na, kahit revival di na pwede. pasalamat kayo at ang decision sinasabi lang who the rightful owner is. di na yun kailangan ng writ of execution kung kayo ang nakapwesto sa lugar

Thnx again

Regarding sa revival of judgement.

There is this case kasi the case was decided by rtc. The decision consisted of who the rightful owner is of a disputed lot. After which the decision was appealed to CA. But CA dismissed it. Since appelants did not submit their briefs. So CA entered judgement after dismissal. My questions are: 1) is the decision final? Meaning may finality ba o wala. 2)requred ba ung writ of execution or not? Pinuntahan namin ung rtc asking them to issue cert of finality. sabi ung CA na daw ung finality kasi mas mataas sila. Pero since dismissed parang di final? What do u think po thnx.

1) is the decision final? Meaning may finality ba o wala.

Kung dinsimiss yung case, the Decision dismissing the case also becomes final.

2) Required ba yung writ of execution or not? Kung me gagawin pa sa Decision ng RTC, kailangan ng writ of execution para maipatupad ito. Sa RTC ka hihingi ng writ of execution.

Ang RTC naman, bago nila aksyunan nag motion mo, ay hihingi ng ebidensya na final na yung decision. At yung "entry of judgment" ng CA ang ebidensya mo na yun. Ito ang magsasabi na final na ang decision ng CA

Thnx

Kakatanong ko lang pala sa barangay na wala nang nagsasaka dun kasi commercial space na dun pero dun pa din nakatira ung magsasaka at ibang mga business na gingagawa. Pued po ba kumuha ng certification na wala nang agricultural dun? Mula sa actual pero sa assessor naka agri pa ung category? Kaya wala nang bisa dapat ung agri leasehold contract

Another question kapag revival of judgment sa same branch po ba gaganapin ung kaso o panibagong branch po?

1. Pued po ba kumuha ng certification na wala nang agricultural dun? Mula sa actual pero sa assessor naka agri pa ung category? Kaya wala nang bisa dapat ung agri leasehold contract

hindi ang actual na gamit sa property ang nagdedetermine ng classification niya, kundi ang classification ng munisipyo.

kung sa zoning ng munisipyo ay agricultural pa rin siya, agricultural pa rin kahit wala nang nagsasaka dun.

NGUNIT, SUBALIT, DATAPWAT... Ayun sa Sec. 36 ng RA 3844:

Section 36. Possession of Landholding; Exceptions - Notwithstanding any agreement as to the period or future surrender, of the land, an agricultural lessee shall continue in the enjoyment and possession of his landholding except when his dispossession has been authorized by the Court in a judgment that is final and executory if after due hearing it is shown that:

(1) The agricultural lessor-owner or a member of his immediate family will personally cultivate the landholding or will convert the landholding, if suitably located, into residential, factory, hospital or school site or other useful non-agricultural purposes: Provided; That the agricultural lessee shall be entitled to disturbance compensation equivalent to five years rental on his landholding in addition to his rights under Sections twenty-five and thirty-four, except when the land owned and leased by the agricultural lessor, is not more than five hectares, in which case instead of disturbance compensation the lessee may be entitled to an advanced notice of at least one agricultural year before ejectment proceedings are filed against him: Provided, further, That should the landholder not cultivate the land himself for three years or fail to substantially carry out such conversion within one year after the dispossession of the tenant, it shall be presumed that he acted in bad faith and the tenant shall have the right to demand possession of the land and recover damages for any loss incurred by him because of said dispossessions.

(2) The agricultural lessee failed to substantially comply with any of the terms and conditions of the contract or any of the provisions of this Code unless his failure is caused by fortuitous event or force majeure;

(3) The agricultural lessee planted crops or used the landholding for a purpose other than what had been previously agreed upon;

(4) The agricultural lessee failed to adopt proven farm practices as determined under paragraph 3 of Section twenty-nine;

(5) The land or other substantial permanent improvement thereon is substantially damaged or destroyed or has unreasonably deteriorated through the fault or negligence of the agricultural lessee;

(6) The agricultural lessee does not pay the lease rental when it falls due: Provided, That if the non-payment of the rental shall be due to crop failure to the extent of seventy-five per centum as a result of a fortuitous event, the non-payment shall not be a ground for dispossession, although the obligation to pay the rental due that particular crop is not thereby extinguished; or

(7) The lessee employed a sub-lessee on his landholding in violation of the terms of paragraph 2 of Section twenty-seven.

Baka naman may violation si lessee na bumabagsak sa Sec. 36. Pupwede siyang kasuhan ng ejectment pag ganun.

2. kapag revival of judgment sa same branch po ba gaganapin ung kaso o panibagong branch po?

depende kung personal action o real action yung nire-revive. Pag personal action (daños etc.) kung saan nakatira yung partido. Pag real action (titulo o pag-aari ng lupa ang usapin) sa hukuman kung nasaan yung lupa. Kung kaya't kung maraming branch ng RTC sa lugar kung nasaan yung lupa, hindi siya automatic na sa same branch babagsak. Ira-raffle din siya.

Thnx sa reply. Ffup question

Regarding sa succession. If the succession was not reported po? Tuloy pa din po? Both lessee ams lessor was not updated kasi for over 30 years.

sino ba ang nagsaka sa lupa nung mamatay yung original lessee? Kung tagapagmana niya, lumalabas tuloy pa rin yung lease.

kung ibang tao ang nagsaka, nagprescribe na yung karapatan nung tagapagmana ng original lessee na maghabol sa lease, at 30 years na ang lumipas.

question po regarding Agricultural Leasehold Contract.

1) May expiration po ba ito?wala kasi nakalagay sa contract

 

2) what if the parties involved are all dead? succession is automatic ba on both sides? without any updating of the contracts to reflect the present heirs?

 

3) wala po notarization and no signature on the side of MARO. pero nasa MARO. is this considered registered?

Republic Act 3844 ang sasagot sa mga katanungan mo. Ayon sa Kataas-taasang Hukuman:

For agricultural leasehold, the governing law is R.A. No. 3844,which, except for Section 35 thereof, was not specifically repealed by the passage of the Comprehensive Agrarian Reform Law of 1988 (R.A. No. 6657), but was intended to have suppletory effect to the latter law.

1) May expiration po ba ito? Wala kasi nakalagay sa contract.

Section 7. Tenure of Agricultural Leasehold Relation - The agricultural leasehold relation once established shall confer upon the agricultural lessee the right to continue working on the landholding until such leasehold relation is extinguished. The agricultural lessee shall be entitled to security of tenure on his landholding and cannot be ejected therefrom unless authorized by the Court for causes herein provided.

Section 8. Extinguishment of Agricultural Leasehold Relation - The agricultural leasehold relation established under this Code shall be extinguished by:

(1) Abandonment of the landholding without the knowledge of the agricultural lessor;

(2) Voluntary surrender of the landholding by the agricultural lessee, written notice of which shall be served three months in advance; or

(3) Absence of the persons under Section nine to succeed to the lessee, in the event of death or permanent incapacity of the lessee.

Ibig sabihin, ito lang ang batayan para mawalan ng bisa ang leasehold contract. Kahit walang nakalagay sa kontrata, ang batas ay kasama sa kontrata, kung kaya't hanga't hindi nangyayari ang alin sa nakasaad sa Section 8, TULOY SI AGRICULTURAL LEASE!

2) what if the parties involved are all dead? succession is automatic ba on both sides? without any updating of the contracts to reflect the present heirs?

Kung patay na ang original na parties sa kontrata, Section 9 naman ang iiral.

Section 9. Agricultural Leasehold Relation Not Extinguished by Death or Incapacity of the Parties - In case of death or permanent incapacity of the agricultural lessee to work his landholding, the leasehold shall continue between the agricultural lessor and the person who can cultivate the landholding personally, chosen by the agricultural lessor within one month from such death or permanent incapacity, from among the following: (a) the surviving spouse; ( the eldest direct descendant by consanguinity; or © the next eldest descendant or descendants in the order of their age: Provided, That in case the death or permanent incapacity of the agricultural lessee occurs during the agricultural year, such choice shall be exercised at the end of that agricultural year: Provided, further, That in the event the agricultural lessor fails to exercise his choice within the periods herein provided, the priority shall be in accordance with the order herein established.

In case of death or permanent incapacity of the agricultural lessor, the leasehold shall bind his legal heirs.

3) wala po notarization and no signature on the side of MARO. pero nasa MARO. is this considered registered?

Magtanong sa MARO whether they consider it as registered. Whether YES or NO, that answers your question

hi po

just want to ask about titles

can 1 title have 2 tax declaration numbers?

example

1 big lot under one title

have two tax declarations and under each tax declaration have sub lots?

it's possible. Local Government doesn't care about titles, all it cares about is getting revenues.

Need to consult a lawyer, yung budget meal and marami na experience sa annulment case.

 

Here's the story, married ako and meron kaming anak na babae. In short, nagkarelasyon ako sa iba at nagkaroon ako ng 2 anak na lalake, almost 3 years na kami di nagsasama ng dati kong asawa.

 

Question:

 

1. Sino ba dapat magfile ng annulment ako o yung ex-wife ko?

2. Kung ako ang magfile ng annulment, ano ang grounds ko para mapa walang bisa ang kasal? ang alam ko adultery is not grounds for annulment?

3. Ang alam ko may acceptance fee ang mga lawyer which is a hug amount. Let's say 100k, pwede ba yung parang installment, like 50k muna then monthly payment ung kulang?

1. Sino ba dapat magfile ng annulment ako o yung ex-wife ko?

Kung sino ang me pera sa inyong dalawa, magastos ang annulment (Correction... hangga't hindi napapawalang-bisa kasal mo, hindi mo yan ex-wife, WIFE mo pa rin yan, hiwalay nga lang kayo)

2. Kung ako ang magfile ng annulment, ano ang grounds ko para mapa walang bisa ang kasal? ang alam ko adultery is not grounds for annulment?

mas malamang sa hindi, psychological incapacity ang basehan mo, either ikaw ang meron, o siya ang meron, o pareho kayong me psychological incapacity (kaya nga, immaterial kung sino ang magfa-file, di kailangan sa annulment na wala kang kasalanan o diperensya para magfile. ang importante, me pambayad ka sa abugado)

kung wala kayong lisensya ng ikinasal kayo, maari rin itong ground (mas malamang sa hindi, me lisensya kayo, kaya suntok sa buwan ito)

3. Ang alam ko may acceptance fee ang mga lawyer which is a huge amount. Let's say 100k, pwede ba yung parang installment, like 50k muna then monthly payment ung kulang?

"Let's say 100k" is a bit on the low side... in fact, its extremely on the low side. depende sa abugado, may pumapayag sa installment.

Hi Sir Rocco69, the private road originated from 1 land split into 3 and in order for one of the land to gain access to the main road the private road was included in dividing the land. so the land title for the road is on our names and we pay tax for it. it's like right of way or something. and we are planning to build dorms and commercial space in those lands. will this be considered realty development?

if you don't need HLURB accreditation/permission, then no restriction on the road.

Good day,

 

I just want to ask if the government or DPWH has any say on Private roads.

Must we the owners of the Private road follow certain rules on how wide it should be?

I've read something in the DPWH saying that a pavement width should have a minimum of 6.70 meters.

The problem we have is that the road is 6.3 meters and if we will put walkways on each side do we need to surrender part of our land for that or can we just take it from the road. we are thinking of getting 0.6 meters on each side of the road making it 5.1 meters for the road. Base on how wide a Toyota Land Cruiser(1.885meters), it is still enough for 2 lanes.

 

btw. the private road is still undeveloped.

There is no problem if we give portion of the land to provide the walkways/sidewalks but if we can avoid it since it is a private road, the better.

 

Thank you

if it is a private road, not for a subdivision or realty development, the DPWH would have no say as to the width, as the same is not subject to its regulatory power.

The Civil Code itself says:

Art. 437. The owner of a parcel of land is the owner of its surface and of everything under it, and he can construct thereon any works or make any plantations and excavations which he may deem proper, without detriment to servitudes and subject to special laws and ordinances. He cannot complain of the reasonable requirements of aerial navigation.

However, if the same is for a subdivision or realty development, the same would be subject to govt regulation, hence there would be limitations as to road width.

Tanong lang po.

May nabili po kaming lupa covered by tax dec by virtue of extrajudicial settlement partition at simultaneous sale. Gusto namin na magkaroon ng titulo. Now kung hindi po nagbayad ng estate tax ang mga heirs ng lupa liable ba kami sa estate tax considering na di pa titulado ito?

liable ba kami sa estate tax considering na di pa titulado ito?

Hindi kayo ang liable. yung heirs.

whether titled or not, the heirs are still liable for estate taxes. kitang-kita kasi sa documents ninyo na galing sa mana yung property (extrajudicial settlement and partition with simultaneous sale, di ba). kung straight sale lang mula sa heirs, baka sakaling makalusot pa na bentahan lang talaga.

as it is, the sellers having acquired the property through inheritance, they are liable for estate taxes.