will robie

Ano ako uto uto, sagutin mo muna tanong ko bago ka magtanong dyan

Marunong ka naman siguro magbasa. Basahin mo sinagot ko sayo. Sayo motherhood statement na walang kwenta.

If you need an explanation on why MJ is better than Bird better stop watching basketball or you have no knowledge in the first place,

 

MJ is the GOAT, no explanations needed

 

RES IPSA LOQUITUR

Haha! Is this the best explanation you can muster? Haha! A pathetic motherhood statement. Here are the facts:

 

MJ never won a playoff game against Bird.

 

Bird had the better of MJ in their regular season head to head matchups.

Ikaw nagpapaexplain kung bakit better si MJ kay Bird tapos ako walang alam sa basketball, LMAO

Elaborate why Jordan is better than Bird. Kaya mo ba? Bilisan mo na, troll.

Haha galing mong mambaliktad ah ikaw pinageexplain ko tapos ako ngayon pinapasimulan mo, ikaw puro satsat ni hindi mo nga masagot tanong ko tapos ako pa papasimulan mo, di mo ko malilinlang ng mga emoji mo BOI

Haha! Barado pa din si troll. Hindi mo pala kayang pangatawanan why Jordan is better than Bird. Bilis na, totoy. I will rebut what you say. Simulan mo yung OT na post. You were the one who started it when you quoted my post and when challenged, uurong ka din pala. Haha! Loser.

So you're basically saying that Bird is better than MJ, you're more stupid than I thought

This was your trolling reply to my original post. Why didn't you just elaborate why I am wrong? Kasi wala ka talagang alam sa basketball kaya hangang ad hominem ka na lang.

Did I question if it's true or not, I'm questioning on why you think Bird is better than MJ, you insinuate something like that then you can't back it up

 

"Lechoke" "Troll" "Splendid" "Putatively"

Napaka cringy mo na poster, siguro pumapalakpak ka sa sinehan after matapos ng movie

Are you that obtuse? Start the OT post that Jordan is better than Bird, then I will indulge you. Bilis na. Puro ka satsat. It seems you're spooked now that I challenged you to tell me why Jordan is better than Bird.

Di naman kelangan ng mga ganung terms, pero wala akong magagawa Chiz Escudero ka eh, kung ano ano na sinabi mo wala pa din dahilan bakit better si Bird kay MJ

Projecting ka na naman, troll? The last time I checked, this is the Larry Bird vs. Lechoke James thread. I mean you really should understand the topic instead of trolling the thread. Umpisahan mo yung OT post why Jordan is better than Bird. Papagbigyan kita.

Ano na naman sasabihin mo, na di yun sinabi mo, na sinabi mo di lang nanalo si MJ sa playoffs, na di ko naintindihan post mo, nakakabobo ka palang kausap

Isn't it a fact that MJ never won a game against Bird in the playoffs? I mentioned Jordan's name in passing tapos butthurt ka kaya nagpost ka ng ad hominem kasi hindi mo matanggap isang katotohanan?

Paikot ikot na lang, manahimik ka na lang brad, ikaw madaming sinasabi, may putatively ka pang nalalaman

Bakit inggit ka na may nalalaman akong ganun? Ikaw na lang manahimik. Quote ka ng quote ng post ko, hindi mo pala naintindihan.

WOW ulam!, ulit na naman, di ko na naman daw naintindihan, may bago ka ba dyan bro?

 

Alam mo din palang stupid eh sana nanahimik ka na lang di yung kung ano ano pa sinabi mo

Yes, you putatively did not understand my original post that you quoted. My statement is not stupid. Kung ano-ano na sinasabi ko? Haha! You just said my statement was stupid and when I rebutted it with "if my post was a stupid statement, as you said, then you're more stupid for asking the reasoning behind that.", sasabihin mong alam kong stupid. Read and understand my rebuttal before commenting.

Sana kahit sinabi mo si Bird mas maikli shorts kesa kay MJ mas ok pa yun instead of hiding behind "troll" excuse

Do you understand the word "implied"? Satsat ka ng satsat, hindi mo naman nagets yung sinasabi ko.

I quoted it because I was asking for your reasoning behind that stupid statement, ngayon kung di mo idedefend sarili mo and just call everyone trolls or doesn't "understand" your statement eh manahimik ka na lang kasi paulit ulit na lang sinasabi mo, why would I be affected by a stupid post, so lahat ng nagququote ng post affected din, tanga din logic mo

 

Let me guess rereply ka ulit tapos troll ulit ako or you don't owe me an explanation, redundant and predictable 7 posts ago same argument ka pa din

So if my post was a stupid statement, as you said, then you're more stupid for asking the reasoning behind that.

Let me guess rereply ka ulit tapos troll ulit ako or you don't owe me an explanation, redundant and predictable 7 posts ago same argument ka pa din

Correct!

Aminin mo na lang wala kang masagot sa tanong ko or better yet shut up na lang, it looks like you're the one affected, ilang sagutan na tayo yet you haven't stated one fact on why Bird is better than MJ, save some face, STFU na lang, kahit emoji wag ka ng magreply

How am I affected when you are the one who has been quoting my posts first? Haha! Again, the last time I checked, I am not obliged to answer trolls' questions. Haha! Pikon-talo na ba, troll?

Ikaw di makaintindi ng tanong, wala akong pakialam kung di natalo ni MJ syota mo sa playoffs, the way you constructed your statement you're saying Bird was better than MJ, ayan siguro for the 3rd time naiintindin mo na what I'm trying to say, hirap makipagusap sa mga feeling matalino mas madali pang makipagusap sa mga aminadong bobo

The last time I checked I am not obliged to answer questions, much less stupid questions from a troll when what I implied was clear as day, moron.

Next time if you're going to make a stupid statement like that better have a good argument di yung nagtatago ka behind sa reasoning na trolls lahat ng nakikipagargue sayo or di naintindihan post mo, it's clear as day what you're trying to say pero you're defending it literally what I'm after is what you're trying to say, you're the one who looked stupid trying to argue around one point opposed to what I'm asking, saka wag ka ng magreply troll pala ako eh saka I'm sure wala na naman kwenta reply mo, "I didn't understand your post", "I'm a troll", "I'm affected by your posts", rinse and repeat.

The next time you quote my posts which really affected you, make sure you understand what I posted instead of asking a stupid question. I implied something which you didn't understand, dumbass.

Why should I explain to a troll like you? Unless, of course, you didn't understand what I posted which is the case. Walang kwenta because a dumb troll who didn't understand what I said said so?

1. You said MJ never beat Larry in the playoffs

2. You said "Lechoke" is better off being compared to MJ

So you basically said that Bird is better than MJ

Have the balls to own up to your statement, di yung nagtatago ka sa palusot na trolls or hindi nakakaintindi ng statement mo, ano yun ikaw pinakamatalino dito lahat di ka naiintindihan, or wala ka sa ulirat pag nagpopost baka pinagjajakulan mo si Larry Bird saka Brad Stevens habang nagpopost ka kaya di mo namamalayan mga sinasabi mo

I was stating a fact that MJ never beat Larry in the playoffs. That is a fact. So? Do you want me to admit something, troll?

The fact that Bird is better than MJ?, that's the most moronic fanboy statement I've ever read, and the fact that I'm calling you out on that stupid opinion of yours makes me a troll, make some better excuses for your arguments idiot, hindi yung lahat ng di sumasang ayon sayo troll, makes you look pathetic

Haha! You are the idiot. You apparently did not understand my post. Haha!

 

Try harder, troll.

So you're basically saying that Bird is better than MJ, you're more stupid than I thought

I was stating a fact, moron.

 

This is the problem with trolls who have a comprehension problem and who don't understand what they're replying to.

I wonder kung ung mga thera na nakakabasa neto ay naghahanap ng serious relationships sa mga customers nila. Siguro minsan di rin nila maiwasan just like some GMs, pero meron kaya na deliberately pumipili ng ka-relationship sa mga regulars? Hmmmm

I think therapists are not immune to the charms of a customer. Especially if the customer treats her like a lady. However, I think, therapists also ask themselves questions like: Is he serious with me? Will he introduce me to his friends or his parents? Will he fight for me?

Napansin ko may ibang GMs na parang nag eenjoy masaktan, or may pagka masochist. Ewan ko lang pero yan din napansin ko sa sarili ko nung nahulog damdamin ko sa isang taga industriya. Parang iba pakiramdam pag may pinagseselosan ka na iba ibang GMs, Magkaka LQ, tapos papakalmahin ka nya at ipaparamdam sayo na ikaw lang ang "mahal" nya. Haha, all lies of course but I didn't seem to care. I was after the thrill of the ride. I knew my candle was burning on both ends but I didn't care. It was a doubtful relationship pero I was being stubborn. In the end wala din nangyare pero I had a good ride (2 years) and I was relieved to be free of her grasp.

As for me, even if I get attracted to a therapist, I always ask myself if I can introduce her to my kin or if I can accept what she had done. My answer is no that is why I don't get carried away. I also find it hard to believe when they tell you stuff like they do this particular es only to you.

funny thing about DDS ... they post about inflation figures, collection performance of the BIR etc etc etc .

 

But it seems to me that the recently released growth figure was deliberately not posted.

Since you said it, why not show it?

madam auring at its best

Because a troll with a lot of alternicks said so?

 

Kamusta naman yung mga alternicks mong si liar, peithe, celts at rondo_freak?

 

yan ang kanilang stats sa ika-3 season nila. parang lamang si kobe ah. so mali hula mo na magiging kobe like si brown. role player stats yan hindi star player

 

pero anyway. balik tayo sa original na punto. wala ako problema kung tawagin mo kong madam auring, ganon ka rin eh. haha

 

basta ako dapat palitan nila ang coach. hindi yung players problema. mas gaganda sitwasyon ng celtics pag mas mentally tough na coach ang ilalagay.

 

ang isang bagay na agree tayo gusto natin na mag succeed celtics. pero ang pinagkaiba natin. ako marunong tumanggap ng mali at batikos. ikaw naman puro depensa lahat kahit na may mga mali ka rin.

Guessing? Because a troll with a plethora of alternicks said so? Haha! This post shows your ignorance. Jaylen Brown is on a talent-heavy team. Since you wanna try to discredit me, tell me who the players of the Lakers were in Kobe's third season. As far as I know, the Lakers did not have that much talent in that team. Glen Rice's game was waning. He was pretty much a role player with the Lakers. Bryant had plenty of room to develop due to a lack of star power (except Shaq) with the Lakers. If Jaylen Brown were given plenty of room to develop, he'd be a 20++ppg scorer and an all-star. He's still on his third year and he will still have time to develop. The next time you make an ignorant post aimed at debunking what I said, make sure you know your NBA. It is apparent you are too ignorant of the topic being discussed.

 

si will naman kailangan niya tanggapin din na mali mga sinasabi niya. yung mga sinabi mo dati babalik sayo eh. ngayon na expose na yung coach, kailangan mo aminin na mali ka. pareho lang tayong nanghuhula. ganon din ginagawa mo. pero ako naman, never ko binigyan ng masyadong papuri yung pinagmamalaki mong coach kasi wala pa siya napapatunayan. dito nagkakaiba ang great coach sa isang good coach.

I don't give a rat's ass what you think of my opinion. I still think that Brad is better than Rivers. You base your shallow analysis on one series against he Bucks. I base mine on years of watching the Cs play. Haha! No contest.

doon ko nakita na hindi marunong si stevens sa mga ganitong issue. example lang, ilagay mo si pop dito sa celtics kaya niyang dalhin itong team na to sa finals. pwede rin manalo

 

si doc rivers magaling na coach. malayo siya kay stevens. kailangan palitan nila ang coach na yan.

 

Simpleton analysis after simpleton analysis. How sure are you that Pop can bring this current Cs team to the Finals?

 

Since you don't know anything about basketball, I will just laugh at your second statement.

 

nasa coach yun eh. kung may issue sila rozier, tatum, brown etc... sa playing minutes nasa coach yon para ayusin at bigyan sila ng role sa team. masyado maraming player sa team iniisip nila na dapat sila yung mas maraming pagkakataon na sila ang gumawa ng puntos. kaya nga may star player at role player para magkaroon ng success

Haha! An incoherent analysis from a simpleton who does not know anything of how the Cs play ball.