Poll: Bongbong Marcos Vs Leni Robredo

[rooster69ph]

alamin mo muna meaning ng fact ...kung factual nga yan hindi opinion then we talk. until then you are just blabbing nonsense.

 

recount stage pa lang nga assuming ka madadale si leni sa evidence and you wanna claim it as fact? hahaha

 

First of all, the PET is still in the recount stage and not in the presentation of evidence stage. Halatang wala kang alam sa nangyayari. Don't post if you are clueless on what is happening. Hihirit basta lang may reply kahit sablay.

 

So? I really don't see your point in repeating what I said.

 

Edited April 21, 2018 by rooster69ph

[will robie]

alamin mo muna meaning ng fact ...kung factual nga yan hindi opinion then we talk. until then you are just blabbing nonsense.

 

recount stage pa lang nga assuming ka nadadale si leni sa evidence. hahaha

 

Another trolling and nonsensical post which proves that you are just replying to troll. I don't need to assume. Anyone who knows what is happening in the recount knows that the plethora of evidence is more than enough to kick out your fake vice president. Apparently, you're clueless. Well, that's always been the case.

 

I can't help but laugh at how you're getting mortified on two threads.

Edited April 21, 2018 by will robie

[camiar]

^^^ di nya alam yung "mortified".

 

simplihan mo lang. Hirap na hirap na, eh.

[will robie]

^^^ di nya alam yung "mortified".

 

simplihan mo lang. Hirap na hirap na, eh.

Maybe I should use a simpler term "humiliated" perhaps?

Edited April 21, 2018 by will robie

[camiar]

Hindi ko nga alam bakit quote ng quote sa mga post ko yan tapos hindi pala naintindihan yung mga post ko.

Dun sa isang thread, nagmamarunong sa inflation rate, clueless naman kung paano ina-analyze ang impact ng changes sa Consumer Price Index vs. Purchasing Power.

 

Mukhang high school lang itong batang ito eh. Ang daming hindi pa naiintindihan. Sablay pa sa logical reasoning. Is he old enough to be allowed in this mature forum?

[uchi]

Brainwashed loyalists in their natural habitat.. "the internet" ha ha where they get "facts" again... the internet.

[will robie]

Let's see here. Wrong combo of words. How can one be a brainwashed loyalist? You can't possibly be a brainwashed loyalist since you have also been loyal to Marcos, hence, the word "loyalist". You can say brainwashed Marcos converts but never "brainwashed loyalist". Sablay na sablay ang newbie troll. Malamang dilawantard ito.

Edited April 21, 2018 by will robie

[will robie]

Dun sa isang thread, nagmamarunong sa inflation rate, clueless naman kung paano ina-analyze ang impact ng changes sa Consumer Price Index vs. Purchasing Power.

 

Mukhang high school lang itong batang ito eh. Ang daming hindi pa naiintindihan. Sablay pa sa logical reasoning. Is he old enough to be allowed in this mature forum?

Dito naman, hindi magrasp ang sinasabi ko na fact na treading on thin ice si Robredo kasi madaming ebidensiya laban sa kanya tapos hihirit ng kung natanggap ng PET ang evidence. The thing is the protest is in the recount stage and the presentation of evidence will come after the recount stage. His questions only solidifies my conclusion that he is clueless on what is happening in the recount.

 

Poor comprehension and poor logical reasoning seem to be the norm when he quotes posts and tries to argue.

Edited April 21, 2018 by will robie

[Bolj]

Let's see here. Wrong combo of words. How can one be a brainwashed loyalist? You can't possibly be a brainwashed loyalist since you have also been loyal to Marcos, hence, the word "loyalist". You can say brainwashed Marcos converts but never "brainwashed loyalist". Sablay na sablay ang newbie troll. Malamang dilawantard ito.

 

they rather want you to keep reading grade 3 textbooks though, on how they indoctrinate young children about Ninoy. Nasa poem form pa yan ha.

[will robie]

they rather want you to keep reading grade 3 textbooks though, on how they indoctrinate young children about Ninoy. Nasa poem form pa yan ha.

That is brain washing.

[will robie]

 

 

Source: Attorney Glenn Chong FB page

[will robie]

Leni Robredo cheated her way to the vice presidency and in this ongoing manual recount and judicial revision, she is attempting to cheat the Filipino people again by trying to change the rules in the middle of the game.-Attorney Vic Rodriguez-BBM's legal counsel in the recount

Edited April 22, 2018 by will robie

[will robie]

 

https://news.mb.com.ph/2018/04/17/we-may-have-new-vp-as-robredos-lead-over-marcos-narrows/

I don't doubt it that the real vice president will take his rightful place from the fake vice president. Panic time for the Robredo camp.

Edited April 22, 2018 by will robie

[darksoulriver]

BBM has a lot of evidence regarding the cheating of the Robredo camp. It would be downright stupid to think that the BBM camp was behind the wetting of the ballot boxes. BBM wants to get it done and over with so that he would be proclaimed the vice president, a position he won legitimately if not for the cheating of the yellowtards. It just does not make sense that the BBM camp is the one wetting the ballot boxes when he is the one initiating the protest and he has a lot of damning evidence to boot the fake vice president out. Why delay or put in jeopardy your protest by wetting the ballot boxes?

 

Yung nakakatawa, nagsabi ang peke na bise presidente na lumaban ng patas. How ironic to say that when her camp was the one who did the cheating. Another imbecilic statement from Robredo.

 

ewan ko kay Rooster at naisip nya na BBM camp ang ggwa ng pagbasa ng balota hehehe... its a downward numbskull to have that kind of plan hahaha

 

so ayun naman pala may malice sa statement mo ...

 

does the question answered?

[rooster69ph]

ewan ko kay Rooster at naisip nya na BBM camp ang ggwa ng pagbasa ng balota hehehe... its a downward numbskull to have that kind of plan hahaha

 

 

 

does the question answered?

nope!

 

first and foremost wala akong tinatanong sa iyo. its a fact that there was malice in your earlier statement, naipakita ko na sa iyo yan.

 

second we’re talking of possibilities here if it was indeed “binasa ni” as you’re insinuating rather than “nabasa” in the absence of further collaborative evidences that can pin down the person who supposedly did it (kung talagang binasa nga at hindi nabasa). walang kinalaman ito sa pagsisinungaling mo wherin you are insinuating “binasa ni” but then when confronted sasabihin mo ang sinabi mo is simply “basa ito”.

 

i will not underestimate what bbm can and is willing to do ... like you, don’t you think its downward numbskull to lie considering it is easy to go back to your earlier post to prove it? but hey, you did.

 

ok ka din, kukuha ka na lang ng resbak eh yun pang isang nagsinungaling din sa akin para maipanalo ang argumento. sinabi ko daw na allegasyon lamang na basa ang mga balota pero di naman maipakita sa akin kung saang post ko sinabi.