Poll: Bongbong Marcos Vs Leni Robredo

[will robie]

Nun panahong marcos at cory daming ulat ng election fraud ayaw mo paniwalaan dapat patunayan. Ngayong baligtad ang siywasyon baligtad na rin paninindigan mo. Hahaha sala sa init sala sa lamig ah depende sa panahon.

Can't you move on from that? Just accept the fact that Marcos won that election.

[will robie]

Hindi pa nga nagbotohan madadaya na nga daw si bbm ... naungusan lang sa survey. Pero dont worry malakas ang cry baby kay duterte so tuloy niyo lang ang pagiingay para di obvious yun paglutong makaw kung sakaling humantong sa ganung sitwasyon

You made a dumb and convoluted post which does not really debunk what I posted. But then again, when did you ever debunk what I posted?

Edited April 13, 2018 by will robie

[will robie]

So true ...

 

Leni firmly believe she won fair and square. Thus unlikely she had a hand on that unless you said otherwise and can provide solid evidences.

Who cares about what she believes? Tell your idol to stop being deluded. The signs of cheating are as obvious as day and night.

Edited April 13, 2018 by will robie

[rooster69ph]

From what planet are you?

 

am from earth ...and you?

 

I don't need to convince the court. It's all over the news that the ballots were wet. Unless you're from another planet or you're completely clueless, you'd know this news. Or maybe you're just trolling. But then again, it is obvious you are just trolling.

 

 

 

oh yeah you dont need to convince the court ... why?

 

1. hindi ikaw ang complainant ... isa ka lang marcostard na putak ng putak kung ano ang papabor sa kanya.

 

2. because even if you want to, you cant.

 

and btw since i said i am from this planet i am fully aware (based on the news which came from the camp of bbm) that there were ballots that got wet. but hey that is not the point of contention. what we need to know is it got wet intentionaly or not ... kung binasa o nabasa. if it was intentionally wet, then who did it? bbm o leni. dont be so naive, as i have pointed out earlier it all possibilities it may be the work of bbm too just to be able to cast a doubt on the ballots.

 

walang pinagkaiba yan sa iyo na laging nambibintang na trolling...sa totoo lang alam naman natin parepareho sino at anong nangyari kay james cutter di ba will? uumpisahan mo na naman ba?

 

 

Who cares about what she believes? Tell your idol to stop being deluded. The signs of cheating are as obvious as day and night.

 

signs of cheating are obvious! sabi mo eh kahit hindi mo mapatunayan na sadyang binasa ang balota ...

pero ano na ba sinasabi ng pet? and who do you think is the authority on that matter? ang pet o ikaw? hindi kaya deluded ka rin tulad ng binibintang mo kay leni? deluded like claiming i have not debunk your post. i dont have to debunk your post...you were the one accusing that there was cheating and we know nakanino lagi ang burden of proof. kung pet ang nagsabi ng pinagsasabi mo ngayon maiintindihan ko pa at hindi kailangan nilang patunayan kasi ang trabaho nila is to decide not prove the allegations of cheating.

 

if the pet finally said the ballots were intentionally wet and they think it was done by the camp of leni to alter the result of the election then so be it. i trust that the pet did their investigation/due diligence as compared to a blind follower who decides based on his emotions.

 

 

ps. observation lang pwede naman isang post na lang via multinquote ginawa mong pagreply. nagpapadami ka ba ng post?

Edited April 13, 2018 by rooster69ph

[will robie]

am from earth ...and you?

I thought you were from another planet. I am guessing Uranus since you seem to be really clueless about what's going on in the protest.

Edited April 14, 2018 by will robie

[will robie]

 

oh yeah you dont need to convince the court ... why?

 

1. hindi ikaw ang complainant ... isa ka lang marcostard na putak ng putak kung ano ang papabor sa kanya.

 

2. because even if you want to, you cant.

1. A blatant ad hominem that does not deserve a decent reply.

 

2. I don't need to convince the court because it is already a known fact that the ballots were wet and cheaters do that. If you ask me this question again, I will just put "trolling" in my reply.

Edited April 14, 2018 by will robie

[will robie]

These are merely allegations. No proofs of who did it...granted somebody really did it at all.

 

First you say this...

and btw since i said i am from this planet i am fully aware (based on the news which came from the camp of bbm) that there were ballots that got wet. but hey that is not the point of contention. what we need to know is it got wet intentionaly or not ... kung binasa o nabasa. if it was intentionally wet, then who did it? bbm o leni. dont be so naive, as i have pointed out earlier it all possibilities it may be the work of bbm too just to be able to cast a doubt on the ballots.

Then you say this...

 

A person who is fully aware of what is happening won't say that these are just allegations. You're contradicting yourself again. Haha!

walang pinagkaiba yan sa iyo na laging nambibintang na trolling...sa totoo lang alam naman natin parepareho sino at anong nangyari kay james cutter di ba will? uumpisahan mo na naman ba?

A post totally unconnected to the topic. Yes, this is trolling.

Edited April 14, 2018 by will robie

[will robie]

signs of cheating are obvious! sabi mo eh kahit hindi mo mapatunayan na sadyang binasa ang balota ...

pero ano na ba sinasabi ng pet? and who do you think is the authority on that matter? ang pet o ikaw? hindi kaya deluded ka rin tulad ng binibintang mo kay leni? deluded like claiming i have not debunk your post. i dont have to debunk your post...you were the one accusing that there was cheating and we know nakanino lagi ang burden of proof. kung pet ang nagsabi ng pinagsasabi mo ngayon maiintindihan ko pa at hindi kailangan nilang patunayan kasi ang trabaho nila is to decide not prove the allegations of cheating.

 

Are you really fully aware or do you simply don't understand the implications of what is happening? Ballot boxes don't get wet naturally, let alone a plethora of ballot boxes since they are water proof and sealed before being delivered to the PET. If you're gonna ask me a stupid question after I post this like, "how sure are you that they are water proof and sealed?" I will just laugh at that stupid question because all the ballot boxes that were transported to the PET undergo scrutiny by a lot of eyes before being transported. Cheating in an election is a serious matter since it violates the right to suffrage and checking the ballot boxes before being transported is mandatory.

 

Don't say you don't have to debunk my post because you can't debunk my post. If you don't have to debunk my post, then what is the purpose of your post? To troll?

Edited April 14, 2018 by will robie

[will robie]

 

if the pet finally said the ballots were intentionally wet and they think it was done by the camp of leni to alter the result of the election then so be it. i trust that the pet did their investigation/due diligence as compared to a blind follower who decides based on his emotions.

Like I said, ballot boxes don't get wet naturally. Are you the blind follower of Robredo?

ps. observation lang pwede naman isang post na lang via multinquote ginawa mong pagreply. nagpapadami ka ba ng post?

This moronic post does not deserve an explanation.

Edited April 14, 2018 by will robie

[rooster69ph]

Like I said, ballot boxes don't get wet naturally. Are you the blind follower of Robredo?

 

 

really? hilarious. so now you even have the power to control acts of nature and fortuitous events to be certain of it? nope i am not a blind follower. on the contrary i can see things clearly...i can clearly see the bias in an ever loyal marcostard.

 

but like i said, it could be anybody who did it ...including leni and bbm. you want to pin down leni but have nothing to support your claim except. you can yack all day everyday nothing changes. until then sayonara at baka matulad ako at ma ban cutter

[will robie]

really? hilarious. so now you even have the power to control acts of nature and fortuitous events to be certain of it? nope i am not a blind follower. on the contrary i can see things clearly...i can clearly see the bias in an ever loyal marcostard.

 

What's the connection of power to control the acts of nature to my post? Do you even understand what you're posting? Yes, this post is hilarious because it does not make any sense at all. Haha!

 

If you saw things clearly, you would not say that the wet ballot boxes are mere allegations. You just got discredited again.

 

Trying to discredit me using an ad hominem would only make you look pathetic. Carry on.

Edited April 14, 2018 by will robie

[will robie]

but like i said, it could be anybody who did it ...including leni and bbm. you want to pin down leni but have nothing to support your claim except. you can yack all day everyday nothing changes. until then sayonara at baka matulad ako at ma ban cutter

You can babble nonsense all you want but the fact is the ballots are wet and who stands to benefit from the wet ballots? BBM? I don't think so because those wet ballots would just delay his protest. Robredo's lawyer even gave a lame explanation that the ballot boxes were wet because of a storm. First of all, the ballot boxes are stored in a safe place; second, they don't get wet. The only way for those ballot boxes to be wet is if someone put water in them.

Edited April 14, 2018 by will robie

[rooster69ph]

But you said the wet ballots are just allegations.

 

ayan umpisa na ng papapalusot at pasisinungaling ...

 

pls show me where i EXACTLY said that “wet ballots are just allegations”.

 

hindi lang ikaw nakapalitan ko ng opinion dito sa issue na ito. lahat kami sangayon na may basang balota pero ang pinaguusapan sino ang gumawa (granted hindi nabasa dahil sa bagyo) at paano mapatutunayan. ikaw lang ang bukod tanging ang pagkaintindi eh naiiiba. classic ka talaga

[will robie]

ayan umpisa na ng papapalusot at pasisinungaling ...

 

Ironic

Edited April 14, 2018 by will robie

[rooster69ph]

You can babble nonsense all you want but the fact is the ballots are wet and who stands to benefit from the wet ballots? BBM? I don't think so because those wet ballots would just delay his protest. Robredo's lawyer even gave a lame explanation that the ballot boxes were wet because of a storm. First of all, the ballot boxes are stored in a safe place; second, the don't get wet. The only way for those ballot boxes to be wet is if someone put water in them.

 

what is your basis to authenticate that the ballot boxes were really stored in a “safe place”? so kung safe pala bakit nangyari yun scenario na may nakapagbasa ng mga balota