will robie Posted September 17, 2018 Share Posted September 17, 2018 (edited) Nope that’s just BBM’s so-called evidence. I’m asking about PET’s statement that they said there was evidence of cheating and that they believed Marcos. You said it was fact that PET believed it so. Where’s their statement saying that? Still waiting... zzzIf you were really listening to the news and are updated on the goings on in the electoral protest, you'd know that it is still in the recount stage and not in the presentation-of-evidence stage. Aside from this thread, you're getting vitiated badly on the other threads. Just an observation. Edited September 17, 2018 by will robie Quote Link to comment
tk421 Posted September 17, 2018 Share Posted September 17, 2018 If you were really listening to the news and are updated on the goings on in the electoral protest, you'd know that it is still in the recount stage and not in the presentation-of-evidence stage. Aside from this thread, you're getting vitiated badly on the other threads. Just an observation. So you're basically saying that PET isn't doing the recount because of the evidence presented by the Marcoses. And... you resorting to ad-hominem right now seems to indicate you don't have any more valid arguments to present. Soo... *PWNed* Quote Link to comment
will robie Posted September 17, 2018 Share Posted September 17, 2018 (edited) So you're basically saying that PET isn't doing the recount because of the evidence presented by the Marcoses. And... you resorting to ad-hominem right now seems to indicate you don't have any more valid arguments to present. Soo... *PWNed*Huh? Did you understand my post? Read and understand my post again. I will repeat it. The electoral protest is still in the recount stage and not in the presentation-of-evidence stage. Pwned? If that belief will make you sleep better at night, go on and believe it. An observation is not an ad hominem. Haha! Anong valid arguments ang pinagsasabi mo? It's a fact that the electoral protest is still in the recount stage. It is no use exchanging with a poster who does not have a clue of what it is talking about. I will treat your posts as spam the next time you quote me. Edited September 17, 2018 by will robie Quote Link to comment
tk421 Posted September 17, 2018 Share Posted September 17, 2018 This was your previous post. Let me repeat what you said: Kaya nga tinanggap ng PET ang protesta kasi malakas ang ebidensiya. Huh? Did you understand my post? Read and understand my post again. I will repeat it. The electoral protest is still in the recount stage and not in the presentation-of-evidence stage. Pwned? If that belief will make you sleep better at night, go on and believe it. An observation is not an ad hominem. Haha! Anong valid arguments ang pinagsasabi mo? It's a fact that the electoral protest is still in the recount stage. It is no use exchanging with a poster who does not have a clue of what it is talking about. I will treat your posts as spam the next time you quote me. Riight. But before, you were insisting that they are entertaining BBM’s petition presisely because of “some overwhelming” evidence. Tapos ngayon wala pa pala sa presentation of evidence. Hilig nyo talaga sa historical revisionism, ‘no? Pati posts mo gusto mo i revise. Double PWNed. 1 Quote Link to comment
will robie Posted September 19, 2018 Share Posted September 19, 2018 This was your previous post. Let me repeat what you said:Yes, BBM submitted a smorgasbord of evidence. So? What's your point? I can't help it. I just have to perpetually discredit you. I don't even have to think to debunk your posts. Riight. But before, you were insisting that they are entertaining BBM’s petition presisely because of “some overwhelming” evidence. Tapos ngayon wala pa pala sa presentation of evidence. Hilig nyo talaga sa historical revisionism, ‘no? Pati posts mo gusto mo i revise. Double PWNed.The evidence was submitted by BBM but the electoral protest is still in the recount stage. The evidence that I was talking about will get presented when the protest reaches the presentation-of-evidence stage. Are you having a difficult time comprehending what I am saying? Double pwned? Hahaha! Not in your wildest dreams. Hahaha! Quote Link to comment
tk421 Posted September 20, 2018 Share Posted September 20, 2018 Yes, BBM submitted a smorgasbord of evidence. So? What's your point? I can't help it. I just have to perpetually discredit you. I don't even have to think to debunk your posts. The evidence was submitted by BBM but the electoral protest is still in the recount stage. The evidence that I was talking about will get presented when the protest reaches the presentation-of-evidence stage. Are you having a difficult time comprehending what I am saying? Double pwned? Hahaha! Not in your wildest dreams. Hahaha! Medyo nawalala ka na sa sarili mong convoluted logic ah. Parang may temporal loop yun explanation mo. Time travelers ba ang PET? Ni hindi pa pala na pi present ang evidence, pero tinanggap nila yun "protest" because of said evidence? What are you taking? Quote Link to comment
will robie Posted September 20, 2018 Share Posted September 20, 2018 (edited) Medyo nawalala ka na sa sarili mong convoluted logic ah. Parang may temporal loop yun explanation mo. Time travelers ba ang PET? Ni hindi pa pala na pi present ang evidence, pero tinanggap nila yun "protest" because of said evidence? What are you taking?What I said wasn't even convoluted logic. What I said was cold, hard facts. When you use a term, make sure you know what that term is. Namimilosopo ka, sablay na naman. It is now glaringly obvious you have no inkling of what I am talking about. How many times should I say that the evidence will be presented when the electoral protest is in the presentation of evidence stage? Edited September 20, 2018 by will robie Quote Link to comment
tk421 Posted September 21, 2018 Share Posted September 21, 2018 You don't even know what you are talking about, so how can we also understand? Eh malinaw na sinabi mo that the PET took on the Marcos' petition because of evidences. You said this was a fact. I said, show us that statement that PET said it was because of said evidence that they accepted his petition because cold, hard facts are backed up by evidence. So far, the only reply I'm getting from you is that "you're clueless, you haven't read the news, etc., etc". Seriously, it's making my stomach churn. Meanwhile, we're still waiting for that proof... Quote Link to comment
will robie Posted September 21, 2018 Share Posted September 21, 2018 (edited) You don't even know what you are talking about, so how can we also understand? Eh malinaw na sinabi mo that the PET took on the Marcos' petition because of evidences. You said this was a fact. I said, show us that statement that PET said it was because of said evidence that they accepted his petition because cold, hard facts are backed up by evidence. So far, the only reply I'm getting from you is that "you're clueless, you haven't read the news, etc., etc". Seriously, it's making my stomach churn. Meanwhile, we're still waiting for that proof...What I said was clear. BBM has a smorgasbord of evidence which he submitted to the PET. The evidence will be shown after the recount stage when the electoral protest will be in the presentation-of-evidence stage. Why didn't you quote my post before this post where I explained it thoroughly? Because it is obvious that you are just here to troll. Edited September 21, 2018 by will robie Quote Link to comment
jcs1000 Posted September 25, 2018 Share Posted September 25, 2018 pls check atty chong's testimony.... you may find it as well sa youtube... meron talagang dayaan... magaling lang mag delay - motion.. motion... motion.. si makalintal kaya di pa matapos.. at ma declare si marcos as vp.... Quote Link to comment
flatwall Posted September 25, 2018 Share Posted September 25, 2018 Dpt madaliin n yng protest n bbm Dahl mhgt two yrs n... Quote Link to comment
jc44 - RETIRED Posted September 25, 2018 Share Posted September 25, 2018 pls check atty chong's testimony.... you may find it as well sa youtube... meron talagang dayaan... magaling lang mag delay - motion.. motion... motion.. si makalintal kaya di pa matapos.. at ma declare si marcos as vp.... Glenn Chong is a representative of Marcos, and thus is not a credible source. Not to mention that COMELEC had found probable cause against Chong for electoral sabotage. in 2013. Parehong panig naman may mga motion. Di porke't may motion na nakasalang, automatic na made-delay yung revision. Tuloy lang naman yun. Quote Link to comment
will robie Posted September 25, 2018 Share Posted September 25, 2018 Representative of Marcos because you said so? As usual, another hearsay post. Quote Link to comment
jc44 - RETIRED Posted September 26, 2018 Share Posted September 26, 2018 Representative of Marcos because you said so? As usual, another hearsay post. LOL di ka talaga nagbabasa ng news. Labas ka rin kasi minsan sa MTC para di naman puro sarili mong unsubstantiated posts ang binabasa mo. http://politics.com.ph/kaya-pala-expert-poll-fraud-accuser-glenn-chong-linked-to-2013-ballot-theft-scandal-before-working-for-bongbong/ https://www.scribd.com/document/385074942/Marcos-Camp-s-Letters-to-ComelecIwan ko lang dito: "PET upholds 25 pct shading threshold for 2016 polls" https://news.abs-cbn.com/news/09/26/18/pet-sides-with-vp-robredo-camp-in-ballot-shading-threshold-row 1 Quote Link to comment
rooster69ph Posted September 26, 2018 Share Posted September 26, 2018 Basag!!!! Someone just celebrated too early...hahaha Quote Link to comment
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.