We Are Awesome Thread

[haroots2]

 

 

Kung nagpa-presscon si VP Leni just to announce this, over nga siguro. Pero hindi.

 

Public official yang VP, on the course of her duties (or in this case, radio show for the public), hindi mapipigilan maging honest and open even on personal things. Ganun din naman si PDuts, open nga siya na pumatay ng tao at magnakaw ng malaki sa kaban ng bayan, TMI diba? Sana sinarili na lang niya para walang kontrobersya. Pero such is public service. Transparency. Openness. Yun ang gusto ng Pinoy.

 

Kapag nananahimik naman yung VP, pupulaan naman ng walang ginagawa. Saan naman lulugar yung tao?

 

Pro DU30 here even said this before. His mouth sometimes becomes his worst enemy even during the campaign. We all know that and we don't like it, kailangan pa bang gayahin ni Leni yun?

[everyman]

 

Pro DU30 here even said this before. His mouth sometimes becomes his worst enemy even during the campaign. We all know that and we don't like it, kailangan pa bang gayahin ni Leni yun?

 

There is a world of difference between what PDuts lets out during his "inspired" monologues and what VP Leni says on her radio program. To compare them is quite uncanny.

 

Kaya controversial yung mga bitaw ni Digongski, dahil expletive-laden, at times combative (against drugs, the U.S., the U.N.) and sometimes bordering on sexual harassment.

What we want from Digong is not to shut him up totally. We want him to show up, show inspired leadership to every Filipino, not just his political base. What we want less of is the undignified sallies against perceived enemies of his war on drugs that never fails to put him (and the Philippines) on the pages of international news media in a negative light.

 

Ang laki ng pagkakaiba. Naman.

Edited July 4, 2017 by everyman

[camiar]

 

I hope President Duterte heeds your advice. Sa totoo lang, mas kailangan niya yan.

 

Para sa lalong ikauunlad ng Pilipinas.

 

Strawman fallacy. Try again.

[everyman]

 

Strawman fallacy. Try again.

 

Ran out of ad hominems, my friend?

Edited July 4, 2017 by everyman

[everyman]

ooh one-two punch

[everyman]

Tama!

 

Tumahimik na lang. Dignified silence. ika nga.

 

Ipagmakahiya naman nya and Office of the Vice President.

 

 

 

I hope President Duterte heeds your advice. Sa totoo lang, mas kailangan niya yan.

 

Para sa lalong ikauunlad ng Pilipinas.

 

 

 

Strawman fallacy. Try again.

 

Just pointing out the hypocrisy here.

[camiar]

 

Just pointing out the hypocrisy here.

 

My argument is regarding Leni keeping the dignity of her office.

 

Your counter using Duterte is irrelevant and is a strawman fallacy.

 

Learn the rules of debate and try again.

[mydnyt_man]

Hi y'all,

 

Each president has had their own achievements, just as they had their own shortcomings. This is no longer about which president has or has not done. Thuis is about the spratlys issue.

 

Constructive criticisms are better in general, so is the respect for the posts' of each other.

 

Let's just get back to the thread topic at baka malock din ito hahaahhaa

[filibustero]

 

In 2009, NEDA-ICC approved the MRT 7 project. Pop Quiz Question #1: Sino ang Pangulo nung 2009?

 

In 2013, NEDA Board approved MRT 7 project.

Pop Quiz Question #2: Sino ang Pangulo nung 2013?

 

Trivia #1: Ang Chairman ng NEDA Board ay ang Pangulo ng Pilipinas.

 

Trivia #2: Ang major projects ay dumadaan muna sa NEDA-ICC bago iakyat sa NEDA Board.

 

In April 2016, construction of MRT 7 started.

Pop Quiz Question #3: Sino ang Pangulo nung April 2016?

 

Trivia #3: Ang budget ng pamahalaan sa kasalukuyang taon ay pinapasa sa nakaraang taon. Halimbawa, ang budget ng 2016 ay ipinasa nung 2015.

 

Yung maka-perfect score dun sa Pop Quiz questions, may prize na Very Good Star.

[JFK]

In 2009, NEDA-ICC approved the MRT 7 project. Pop Quiz Question #1: Sino ang Pangulo nung 2009?

 

In 2013, NEDA Board approved MRT 7 project.

Pop Quiz Question #2: Sino ang Pangulo nung 2013?

 

Trivia #1: Ang Chairman ng NEDA Board ay ang Pangulo ng Pilipinas.

 

Trivia #2: Ang major projects ay dumadaan muna sa NEDA-ICC bago iakyat sa NEDA Board.

 

In April 2016, construction of MRT 7 started.

Pop Quiz Question #3: Sino ang Pangulo nung April 2016?

 

Trivia #3: Ang budget ng pamahalaan sa kasalukuyang taon ay pinapasa sa nakaraang taon. Halimbawa, ang budget ng 2016 ay ipinasa nung 2015.

 

Yung maka-perfect score dun sa Pop Quiz questions, may prize na Very Good Star.

Ang answers ko:

 

Pop Question 1 - GMA

Pop Question 2 - PNoy

Pop Question 3 - PNoy

 

Tama ba answers ko?

[haroots2]

Ang answers ko:

 

Pop Question 1 - GMA

Pop Question 2 - PNoy

Pop Question 3 - PNoy

 

Tama ba answers ko?

 

Ang tanong ilan bang major infra projects ang na approve/implemented under Pnoy " save save save" term?

[JFK]

 

Ang tanong ilan bang major infra projects ang na approve/implemented under Pnoy " save save save" term?

Sinagot ko lang ang tanong na 3 Pop Questions na tinatanong kung sino ang pangulo nung panahon na yon. Yun yung tanong, hindi kung ilan major infra projects. Again, sinagot ko lang ng tama ang questions. Nothing more, nothing less. Edited July 31, 2017 by JFK

[filibustero]

Binura na pala ng mods yung MRT 7 na exchanges. Pabura na lang din po ng MRT 7 related post ko kasi wala na context.

 

Sa mga marami nalalaman dyan, share nyo na lang as fun fact or trivia for everyone's benefit.

[FleurDeLune]

Binura na pala ng mods yung MRT 7 na exchanges. Pabura na lang din po ng MRT 7 related post ko kasi wala na context.

 

Sa mga marami nalalaman dyan, share nyo na lang as fun fact or trivia for everyone's benefit.

 

It's the said poster who requested to delete all his posts in this forum. By doing so, someone has needed to delete his account.

 

As for your post, just let it remain there.

Edited July 31, 2017 by FleurDeLune

[haroots2]

Sinagot ko lang ang tanong na 3 Pop Questions na tinatanong kung sino ang pangulo nung panahon na yon. Yun yung tanong, hindi kung ilan major infra projects. Again, sinagot ko lang ng tama ang questions. Nothing more, nothing less.

 

I have no problem on your answer. Maybe I should have quoted the original poster.

[filibustero]

Ah para sa akin ba yung tanong na ilan major infra projects ang approved/implemented ni PNoy? Sirit na ko. Ilan?

 

If we assume kasi na hindi fake news ang data ng PPP Center, may 116 projects worth P1.64T ang na-approve ng NEDA Board sa panahon ni PNoy. Ayoko na lang himayin kung ilan dyan ang infra, at ayoko na lang din mag-assume kung ano ang considered as "major", kasi subject to each one's opinion ano ang pwede na ituring na "major". Kailangan ba bilyones, or ok na 100 milyon? Kasi para sa iba 1M lang malaking halaga na eh. Mapapa-away pa tayo dyan kaya wag na lang. Kung ilan ang actually implemented, ayoko na lang din himayin. Baka yung iba dyan alam naman yung sagot pero ayaw lang sabihin.

 

Now take note, sa mga nagbasa ng trivia ko, malalaman nyo na bago i-approve ng NEDA Board eh ina-approve muna yan ng NEDA ICC. So posible na meron na approved project ang NEDA ICC sa termino ng isang Pangulo na inaprubahan lang ng sumunod na Pangulo. Halimbawa nga nyan eh yung MRT7 na approved ng NEDA ICC ni GMA pero approved ng NEDA Board ni PNoy. At para sa mga walang karanasan sa pamahalaan, hindi madali magpalusot ng project na limpak limpak na salapi ang gugugulin kaya pinag-aaralan mabuti yan.

 

Pwede rin mangyari na meron na project na approved ng NEDA Board ng nakaraang Pangulo na nireview at inapprove ulit ng NEDA Board ng sumunod na Pangulo.

 

Kaya sirit na lang ko dun sa tanong. Masyado mahirap sagutin eh. Di pwede tanong yan sa Are You Smarter than a Fifth Grader.

 

Napaisip din ako dun sa "save save save" term. Sinampahan ng kaso si PNoy dahil sa Disbursement Acceleration Program (DAP). Nabobo na yata ako sa English kasi nasa isip ko ang ibig sabihin ng "disbursement" eh gumastos at ang "acceleration" ay bilisan. So ang translation ko sa DAP eh programa para bilisan ang pag-gastos. Di lang ako sure, pero parang kabaliktaran yata ng gastos yung save.

[JFK]

 

I have no problem on your answer. Maybe I should have quoted the original poster.

Kaya nga nagtaka ako why you quoted me and what you quoted.

[haroots2]

During Pnoys term, he instituted budget reforms, as opposed to GMA's style of spending funds. Due to the reforms, he reduced funds in some, added a little in some, and the rest is reserved for emergencies like disasters and crisis management and foreign debts and deficits. The consequence is a lot of funds unspent, slower fund release and sometimes, underspent funds were returned to the National Treasury.

 

Most of the DAP funds became payments on the Corona impeachment case hindi naman sa projects. At kinasuhan siya sa DAP regardless kung saan niya ginamit yung podo kundi sinabi ng SC na unconstitutional ito pero ginamit pa rin,

[filibustero]

So... hindi naman talaga "save save save"? Reducing funds in some areas and increasing funds in other areas. Not sure, pero di ba yun nga yung "budgeting". Allocating limited resources, dahil di naman unlimited pera ng pamahalaan. After Ondoy and Yolanda i would think reasonable to increase standby funds for disasters. And i don't see anything wrong with servicing foreign debts, ayan nga at tumaas pa credit rating natin kasi ok daw tayo pautangin. To address the underspent funds, ayun they resorted to DAP pero nakuryente nga lang sila dun. Solution fail eh.

 

At yung DAP, di yan parang cash na winithdraw at pinapamudmod ng Pangulo sa senado at kongreso in a white envelope ala GMA. Realignment ng pondo yan to a govt project. As to amount or percentage, di ko alam kung magkano total ang nadisburse through DAP to be able to conclude most sa Corona impeachment nga napunta or not. Yoko naman manghula at baka ma-fake news pa ako.

[haroots2]

di ako lawyer hearsay kapag walang eye witness eye witness lang ang pwede sa bribery and influence peddling more than one witness. Then a paper trail to make the eyewitness narrative strong. Papeles sa custom yan pwede na basta me eye witness

 

The eyewitness never witness on his own eyes that Paolo is involved. How credible is that.

[camiar]

court of justice magsasabi nun. If mali oh tama opinion ko. Gaya din ng opinion nyu korte din magsasabi kung tama kayo.

tignan natin saan punta kwentong ito.

It will go nowhere.

 

Even the witness said under oath that he doesn't have personal knowledge.

 

Hearsay.

 

You think congress will look further into it? I doubt it.

[camiar]

.

time will be the judge of that and whoever is in power.

Yes. It will be a very short time.

 

Give it two weeks, and the people will have lost interest on it.

[haroots2]

court of justice magsasabi nun. If mali oh tama opinion ko. Gaya din ng opinion nyu korte din magsasabi kung tama kayo.

tignan natin saan punta kwentong ito.

 

The court will not even consider him an eyewitness since he didn't witness it at all. Mapapahiya lang ang prosecutor Lahat rinig lang niya sa ibang tao thus its hearsay. He already said it all sa senate hearing under oath,

[FleurDeLune]

OK, kids. What did I say before? You should play fair with the non-reg members.

 

James Cutter & Batang Malibog: This is your last warning.

Edited August 17, 2017 by FleurDeLune

[rooster69ph]

Dear Digong, sayang impluwensya mo. Sana ginagamit mo sa tama. Hindi para sa mga Marcos, Uson, Estrada, Arroyo. parang Aquino ka rin eh. mas may topak lang.

Dear Digong,

 

Sabi mo change is coming...

 

Sa obserbasyon ni Danny change has come ... change for the worst nga lang imbes na for the better.