lomex32 Posted February 7, 2006 Share Posted February 7, 2006 Panibagong dagok sa mga Kelots Di ko maconfirm kung naging LAW na ito or pipilitin maging Law ito by Feb 14, 2006.MARITAL INFIDELITY. Meaning huli ka, patay kang bata ka ...... Republic of the PhilippinesHOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVESQuezon City, Metro Manila Thirteenth CongressFirst Regular Session House Bill No. 1017 ............................. SECTION 1. Article 333 of Revised Penal Code is hereby amended to read as follows: "ART. 333. Who are guilty of MARITAL INFIDELITY [Adultery], -- MARITAL INFIDELITY [Adultery] is committed by any married PERSON [woman] who shall have sexual intercourse UNDER SCANDALOUS CIRCUMSTANCES with another PERSON not HIS OR HER SPOUSE [husband] and by the PERSON [man] who has carnal knowledge of HIM OR her, knowing HIM OR her to be married, even if the marriage be subsequently declared void." "MARITAL INFIDELITY [Adultery] shall be punished by prision correccional in its MINIMUM AND medium [and maximum] periods." [if any person found guilty of adultery committed this offense while being abandoned without justification by the offended spouse, the penalty next lower in degree than that provided in the next preceding paragraph shall be imposed.] Quote Link to comment
spongebobby Posted February 7, 2006 Share Posted February 7, 2006 there should be divorce in the philippines simply because annulment is prevalent nowadays. at least in divorce, you won't deny that the marriage existed. in annulment, the contention is that it was never valid. look at pops and martin: can anyone say that they were never married to begin with? annulment is a form of hipocrisy, one that is condoned by law. Quote Link to comment
Guest A!RA Posted February 7, 2006 Share Posted February 7, 2006 divorce!!!! yes po!!!! Quote Link to comment
peep_tom Posted February 9, 2006 Share Posted February 9, 2006 I dont agree, coz if in the first place youre not comfortable with marriage why would you get married again? Nakakasira ng meaning ng vows yan. Quote Link to comment
innocentbaby23 Posted February 12, 2006 Share Posted February 12, 2006 depends on the situation... kase nga di ba ang pagpapasakal i mean pagpapakasal ay di naman parang mainit na kainin na pag napaso ay pwede mong iluwa dapat yung kanin may kasamang ulam para mas masarap :boo: i mean dapat fully decided ka before you commit your self to that big responsibility Quote Link to comment
goddessofperpetualdeliciousness Posted February 12, 2006 Share Posted February 12, 2006 i want to get a divorce not only because i want to remarry. i may want to use my maiden name again. i may want to get rid of the responsibility that binds me as a spouse, fidelity and other marital contrapments (imbento ko). i am running away from that bill that they are proposing. presently, he may do something drastic once he sees me. :hypocritesmiley: Quote Link to comment
AngryBoy Posted February 12, 2006 Share Posted February 12, 2006 ok lang basta sex parin kau ng asawa mo after divorce Quote Link to comment
decksuave Posted February 12, 2006 Share Posted February 12, 2006 elo^^ i thnk modern pipol accept that knd of issues pero s mga senior citizens hnd cla papyag Quote Link to comment
goddessofperpetualdeliciousness Posted February 13, 2006 Share Posted February 13, 2006 elo^^ i thnk modern pipol accept that knd of issues pero s mga senior citizens hnd cla papyag<{POST_SNAPBACK}> aray! :hypocritesmiley: me senior citizen din ano? johnny enrile did that around 5 years ago. Quote Link to comment
goddessofperpetualdeliciousness Posted February 13, 2006 Share Posted February 13, 2006 Panibagong dagok sa mga Kelots Di ko maconfirm kung naging LAW na ito or pipilitin maging Law ito by Feb 14, 2006.MARITAL INFIDELITY. Meaning huli ka, patay kang bata ka ......Republic of the PhilippinesHOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVESQuezon City, Metro Manila Thirteenth CongressFirst Regular Session House Bill No. 1017 ............................. SECTION 1. Article 333 of Revised Penal Code is hereby amended to read as follows: "ART. 333. Who are guilty of MARITAL INFIDELITY [Adultery], -- MARITAL INFIDELITY [Adultery] is committed by any married PERSON [woman] who shall have sexual intercourse UNDER SCANDALOUS CIRCUMSTANCES with another PERSON not HIS OR HER SPOUSE [husband] and by the PERSON [man] who has carnal knowledge of HIM OR her, knowing HIM OR her to be married, even if the marriage be subsequently declared void." "MARITAL INFIDELITY [Adultery] shall be punished by prision correccional in its MINIMUM AND medium [and maximum] periods." [if any person found guilty of adultery committed this offense while being abandoned without justification by the offended spouse, the penalty next lower in degree than that provided in the next preceding paragraph shall be imposed.]<{POST_SNAPBACK}> ano'ng dagok sa kelots, parekoy? e sabi ng lawyer kahit nakababa pa ang panty nung bebots e pwede pa magdahilan yun kelots. magsaya kayo!!!Adultery is committed by women. ewan yun bill na yan! tao lang din kami. sana parehas ang laban. :hypocritesmiley: Quote Link to comment
baccaratboy Posted February 17, 2006 Share Posted February 17, 2006 I don't agree that the Philippines should have a law for divorce. This will affect strong family ties, that we filipinos traditionally have. Besides there is annulment naman. Although, its easier to avail divorce than annulment. Quote Link to comment
Headroom Posted February 17, 2006 Share Posted February 17, 2006 I agree there should be divorce here - the only reason that there isn't is due to the pressure from the Church not to legalise it - in reality quite absurd as there already Annulment and Separation laws. It also opens the way for people who escape an unhappy/unfulfilling marriage to get married again if they find the right person. Currently this is not possible and so you have people living together who may not have the same rights as married couples. Quote Link to comment
lomex32 Posted February 20, 2006 Share Posted February 20, 2006 Any accusations are bound to be proven. This is about the law, not about how to circumvent it. Ika nga whether whether lang iyan.Di nga parehas as you said .... ano'ng dagok sa kelots, parekoy? e sabi ng lawyer kahit nakababa pa ang panty nung bebots e pwede pa magdahilan yun kelots. magsaya kayo!!!Adultery is committed by women. ewan yun bill na yan! tao lang din kami. sana parehas ang laban. :hypocritesmiley:<{POST_SNAPBACK}> Quote Link to comment
KapE Posted February 20, 2006 Share Posted February 20, 2006 Hmmm Divorce in the Philippines? I think we should have divorce as a mechanism to get out of a marital bind that has become oppressive to one or both parties. Right now, under our Family Code, marriage is the ONLY contract that assumes perpetuity and without any facility for pre-termination. Annulment only argues that the marriage was never really consummated. Here are some points: 1. As a legal instrument, marriage should be subject to some termination mechanism, just like any other contract - a mechanism to agree to disagree agreeably.2. It's better to provide solid, legal provisions on how to settle marital divorce with the interest of all parties served equitably.3. Legal separation is not enough because it does not provide any legal protection to future partners and offsprings of both parties. It becomes prejudicial by default. As for opposing it due to the fear that marriage will be trivialized, try asking those who have gone through some separation. It will never be trivial. There's too much emotional capital at stake. People make mistakes. Everyone deserves second chances. Quote Link to comment
the messiah Posted February 20, 2006 Share Posted February 20, 2006 am for divorce Quote Link to comment
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.