akoi2 Posted October 28, 2004 Share Posted October 28, 2004 coz i make them more beautiful? he..he.. Quote Link to comment
little rascal Posted October 28, 2004 Share Posted October 28, 2004 ika nga sa kanta humanap ka ng pangit mangaliwa ka man hindi ka iiwanan,di ka ipapagpapalit. a basta ko gusto ko cute at pogi ala ko paki sa iba basta mahal ko ay pogi kamukha ni piolo pascual yun na yun! Quote Link to comment
hotchic_primrose Posted October 28, 2004 Share Posted October 28, 2004 hehe..bka kasi ugly men eh mababait..sagwa naman kum pangit na nga sila..pangit pa ugali dba? and malamang kum may maganda silang gf..bigay nila lahat... Quote Link to comment
Josh Adams Posted October 28, 2004 Share Posted October 28, 2004 (edited) Kaya kayo mga ginoo, magsumikap kayo. work hard for date and gift money. hindi yung date pa lang, nagpapauso na kayo ng dutch treat. nothing embarrasses me more than sharing a tab on a date. i can pay for my own meal with friends, i would even pay for my friends' dinner. but my date??!! get a life. peace!<{POST_SNAPBACK}> Hello Kristin I'm just curious what about if you guys are already going steady. Do you mind taking care of the tab for your man once in a while? Edited October 28, 2004 by Josh Adams Quote Link to comment
Josh Adams Posted October 28, 2004 Share Posted October 28, 2004 hehe..bka kasi ugly men eh mababait..sagwa naman kum pangit na nga sila..pangit pa ugali dba? and malamang kum may maganda silang gf..bigay nila lahat... <{POST_SNAPBACK}> AMEN TO THAT HOTCHIC :cool: Quote Link to comment
KristinLavransdatr Posted October 28, 2004 Share Posted October 28, 2004 Hello Kristin I'm just curious what about if you guys are already going steady. Do you mind taking care of the tab for your man once in a while?<{POST_SNAPBACK}> honestly, i don't know, josh. i never had a boyfriend who has allowed me to pay a peso on a date. like what one nice guy i went out said: "The reason i work my butt off is to have some cash for dates -- steady or not." And he has just earned a heap of my respect. :cool: Quote Link to comment
akoi2 Posted October 28, 2004 Share Posted October 28, 2004 ika nga sa kanta humanap ka ng pangit mangaliwa ka man hindi ka iiwanan,di ka ipapagpapalit.a basta ko gusto ko cute at pogi ala ko paki sa iba basta mahal ko ay pogi kamukha ni piolo pascual yun na yun!<{POST_SNAPBACK}> kamukha ni piolo? khit bading?...? Quote Link to comment
bisaklatz Posted October 30, 2004 Share Posted October 30, 2004 kung alam ko lang na mahilig sila sa pangit na lalake eh sana nagpapanget na rin ako...PEACE.... :cool: Quote Link to comment
girlet Posted November 5, 2004 Share Posted November 5, 2004 because women are intellectually satisfied...we usually dont go for looks...kaya kung matalino na handsome...jackpot na lang un! Quote Link to comment
ps6379 Posted November 6, 2004 Share Posted November 6, 2004 women fall for ugly men because they give it their best shot... as for guys who look good... yeah, they look good but their ego, the size of uranus!!! so focus... when you really like the girl... please her... and show the girl you really want her... :cool: Quote Link to comment
moneyball Posted November 6, 2004 Share Posted November 6, 2004 we only have to watch animal courtship and mating rituals on animal planet to explain these seemingly unnatural Beauty&theBeast pairings. basically, these shows that i am talking about make it clear to everyone that it's every animal for itself. one animal gets its own bitch (or doe, vixen, whatever) by all means possible, and that's the end of it. we humans are also subjected to this inevitability of having to pair up with the opposite sex in basically the same way. how? i got to watch a show on dicovery channel a few months back, and the show was about the chemistry of love (?). i thought that the show was quite insightful and entertaining, plus it lead me to believe that ugly people actually did have a shot with the hotties of the world. how so? the chemical machinations love, according to the show, depended on a person's pheromones. a whiff of the stuff can actually be used to gauge one person's compatibility with another. of course, we are not consciously aware that we are capable of sniffing other people's pheromones, let alone gauge other people for sexual compatibility based on these substances, but hey, we guys like the chicks to smell nice, right? also, talking is another way of netting the hottie across the bar. i remember the narrator saying that great conversationalists actually have a better chance of scoring. wealth and success obviously play key roles in the human dating scene, and so does great sex. sex (and any other physical exertion) releases a certain chemical that triggers a response that make people somewhat uplifted. we should notice that physically active people are almost always in a good mood. now, to my point. ugly people don't score, but successful people do. on the one hand, plain butt-ugly guys (and girls), like your neighborhood skwaters, pokpoks and jologs, are usually overlooked. that's a fact of life. on the other hand, SUCCESSFUL butt-ugly people (e.g. Long Mejia, Mahal) get to hook up with some of the more beautiful booty in the market. why? these people who are hellbent on contaminating the human gene pool are set for life! chicks are more likely to dig a guy with a stable 7-figure income, a house that requires visitors to use maps in order not to get lost inside, cars whose number corresponds to the days of the week, and a 10-inch schlong than a guy with a dead-end job, a beat up owner-type jeep, a squalid roach-infested apartment and a less than dull sex life. to make matters worse, it doesn't really matter if the guy is ugly or not, as long as he is successful. therefore, i think that we can conclude on the folowing: 1. true love, in its purest, most abstract definition (whatever it is), between a beauty and a beast is clearly impossible, unless the beauty somehow finds him/herself indebted to the beast with his/her life or for some other deeply intense personal reasons.2. people are prone to be attracted to success in all its forms, and they want to make sure that they could get their grubby hands on it.3. you think that this is all plain bullshit talk, that your faith in true love (whatever it is) remains resolute, and that you are itching to kick my ass. peace out and put out chikas!!!!! Quote Link to comment
fortune_cookie Posted November 6, 2004 Share Posted November 6, 2004 I also watched that episode from National Geographic. All I could say is that the title "chemistry of love" can be very misleading. They did explain the chemistry of attraction, but not that of love. And in my dictionary, attraction is definitely not synonymous to love. Physical beauty, great sex, success, etc. can definitely win you a lot of attraction from the opposite sex, but this is not love yet in its "purest" form. But it definitely can be a root for love to grow, which takes time, sometimes even a lifetime. Scientists and sociologists, wanting to make an impact from their studies, tend to believe they've nailed the big one, the theory of everything, like in this case thinking they've nailed down "love" when obviously the more accurate term would have been "attraction." Love, just like conciousness, is hard to nail down. Up to now, mankind hasn't yet pinpointed the biological and chemical sources of consciousness and also love. All the talk on oxytoxins, pheromones, and other so called "love chemicals" are just tools for attracting the opposite sex. Again, the key word here is "attracting", and it is not necessarily love. Love is a transendent emotion, it goes beyond the sum of all parts of man's chemistry. Sadly, not all couples experience true love, but those who have attained true love, often developed years after they've first felt the chemical impulses brought about by attraction, are truly blessed indeed. As for beauty and the successful beast pairings, I did post on the previous page of this thread as to why men tend to go for physical beauty and women tend to go for success. Nature simply programmed us for efficient propagation of genes, as the following equations portray: Physical beauty = health = higher chances of fertility and conception Success = resources for kids to grow up healthy = higher chances for further gene propagation Quote Link to comment
mindslave Posted November 7, 2004 Share Posted November 7, 2004 im just new here guys, but check this out:www.intellectualwhores.com but remember that though I posted this URL and suggested you check the link, It doesn't necessarily mean that I share the author's views, hehe . . . tnx! Quote Link to comment
Rebel_Kitty Posted November 8, 2004 Share Posted November 8, 2004 I have no qualms dating ugly men. As long as the conversation is stimulating and decent naman yung guy, solve na ko! :cool: Looks aren't everything. On the other hand, meron din namang good looking guys diyan na decent, honest and humble. Minsan yung mga pangit pa nga yung sobrang yabang at iba kung manloko. Quote Link to comment
Once_A_Nerd Posted November 17, 2004 Share Posted November 17, 2004 this is a question intended for "beautiful women", posted by a man, i suppose. but most replies came from men - ugly or otherwise. i wonder why. this thread is so full of standards, weeding out women who aren't beautiful, and limiting to men who aren't ugly. and it reeks with generalization. pardon me. but to answer your question, SOME beautiful women fall for dermatologically-challenged men probably because the apollos and adonises either turned gay, fat, high-and-all-mighty or got married. but you see like beauty, ugliness is only skin-deep. there are quite a number of ugly people in divine packages. and a lot of beautiful people hidden in simple to shabby clothes.<{POST_SNAPBACK}> Standards: an inquiring thought, but otherwise the truth is indeed slapping people in the face. Though this could also be considered as the proverbial 'testing of the waters', I suppose there might be some sort of explanation to this. I'd be a hypocrite (and I'll be glad to be called that) if I knew the answer, but mainly we are all people of standards despite of the level. Probably because I have lost someone I love so I consider myself a widower even if I never get to say 'I do'. Oh well, I guess we tend to be picky. Quote Link to comment
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.