legal Free Legal Advice

[kelvin]

mga bro, favor, i ll buy a new pc set, ecs pm800-m7 w/ p4 3.2g intel, ok ba to? which is more practical, p4 3.2 g or dual core 2.8? budget ko for cpu is 14t, what do you suggest? tnx a lot

 

For me, medyo payat pa ung budget mo. Ipunin mo muna ung money mo until you reach atleast 20T para naman makapili ka ng magandang quality na hardware.

Mas maganda din cgro buy a mboard dat support dual processor. Hindi kasi advisable yung masyadong mabilis na processor speed coz mabilis uminit. Since most OS nowadays support dual processor, mas wise ito for me.Kahit 2Ghz lang ung speed times it by 2, mas super!!! :boo: :thumbsupsmiley:

 

Hope nakatulong.!!! :hypocritesmiley: :headsetsmiley:

[boibastos]

Need some help. I've been apparently hit by the Proxy-Horst and New Malware.j trojan horses. My currently updated Mcafee V. 10 anti-virus program can't get rid of them. They seem to be making files in my temp folder in Windows. I also can't seem to erase my temp folder. Any ideas on how to get rid of them?

[R@v3n]

Need some help. I've been apparently hit by the Proxy-Horst and New Malware.j trojan horses. My currently updated Mcafee V. 10 anti-virus program can't get rid of them. They seem to be making files in my temp folder in Windows. I also can't seem to erase my temp folder. Any ideas on how to get rid of them?

 

You should try looking for a scanner/remover. Try looking at Symantec or McAfee or my highly recommended NOD32 sites for the needed app. Also, I recommend you switch to NOD32. :headsetsmiley:

[jake_roxas]

next question please? i would be very happy to help. thanks.

[jake_roxas]

My dear lad, now you are really clutching at straws. You specifically asked if there can be a civil case captioned "reckless imprudence resulting to...". I gave you a specific answer. Realizing that perhaps you may be wrong ( Im actually sure you are but Im being kind :hypocritesmiley: ), you suddenly become a pilosopo and tell me (to paraphrase) "what if the allegations say otherwise". Goodness. Of course the allegations could be about anything right? It could be for specific performance, annulment of contract etc. etc. Its like asking "pwede ba magkaroon ng civil case for murder, tutal the allegations determine the subject matter of the complaint." Doesnt make sense, right?

 

As for tort or quasi-delict being another name for reckless imprudence or negligence, I give you props. At least there was some legal reasoning behind this particular retort. But Im sorry, the two are not the same lad. Reckless imprudence is a crime under the Revised Penal Code. Thus, it pertains to criminal negligence. Tort or quasi-delict is a source of obligations under the Civil Code and though both involve the concept of negligence, you must not mistake one for the other. Again, a law student would know that. Which makes me curious, law student ka ba o practitioner? If you are the latter, then my apologies, no offense meant.

 

And oh by the way, I do not claim to be an expert. Far from it. I will willingly and humbly accept and admit if I am wrong. You were the one who asked for my so-called "expert" opinion. Pinatulan ko lang yung sarcasm mo but somehow that was lost on you.

 

I.

"(to paraphrase) "what if the allegations say otherwise" - please just quote and not paraphrase because there is an ocean of difference between "what if the allegations say otherwise" and what i stated.

 

II.

caption is: "reckless imprudence resulting to"

allegations: elements of quasi delict and/or tort

prayer: damages

is that not a civil case for "reckless imprudence resulting to..."

 

III.

Tort or quasi-delict is a source of obligations under the Civil Code - really now? you mean tort is the same sa quasi-delict?

 

IV.

Its like asking "pwede ba magkaroon ng civil case for murder" - of course there is.

 

V.

though both involve the concept of negligence, you must not mistake one for the other - but reckless imprudence could give rise to a cause of action based on tort or quasi delict

 

VI.

Which makes me curious, law student ka ba o practitioner? If you are the latter, then my apologies, no offense meant. - even if i am neither, would that make my opinion less worthy of consideration? whatever happened to the music not the singer?

 

VII.

And oh by the way, I do not claim to be an expert. Far from it. I will willingly and humbly accept and admit if I am wrong. - yes I know, at least, that you don't claim to be so.

 

nope nobody is wrong here. ONLY THE SC CAN BE CORRECT. and my point here exactly. all posts here are just guides and posts to assist other members. so someone should not react to the post of others expressly stating or implying that the post/advise of the other is wrong. if someone does, then he should be able to handle any dose of his medicine.

[jake_roxas]

isa pa pong pahabol.

 

gaano po katagal bago maging final ang desisyon ang isang kasong ganito until the supreme court. yung average time frame lang po.

 

salamat!

 

don't forget to file a complaint (and/or third party-complaint) against the insurer.

[jake_roxas]

Thanks for that bit of clarification fauxhead. Too bad jake couldnt make it himself

 

Dont worry gents, this intellectual (I hope) skirmish between jake and I wont go overboard. Im just honestly and genuinely wondering if he is a law student or a practitioner and Im waiting for his response. :hypocritesmiley:

 

of course, this is just an intellectual and verbal exercise. don't worry, i dont fight physically because i dont know how. lawyers are trained to fight with words not with swords.

 

genuinely wondering if he is a law student or a practitioner and Im waiting for his response - would that make a difference?

Edited September 23, 2006 by jake_roxas

[jake_roxas]

Wala pang sagot. Pinag-aaralan pa siguro. :hypocritesmiley:

 

1. unlike some people i do study and make a research before i post. there is no such thing as post now research the case later.

2. unlike some people who are probably pencil pushers and who probably just have nothing to do but sit in front of the computer and surf, i do travel out of town to work and also study so apologies if i cant reply immediately.

Edited September 23, 2006 by jake_roxas

[jake_roxas]

hmmm...

it's getting hot in here...wehehehe...

thanks for your pm po...

 

 

no probs, i hope problem is solved na.

[jake_roxas]

hey guys!

 

cool lang kayo... didn't intend for my inquiry to spark such an exchange. i appreciate both of your opinions. tutal, you're threading the same line naman eh. no need to be personal.

 

no probs po. we are cool.

[jake_roxas]

thanks for your very usefull info.

 

i hope you don't mind if ask some more additional info. namely, does the fact that the rider does not have any license and that his motorcycle isn't registered hold any weight in court? secondly, does the release they signed become invalid since i wasn't able to process the insurance claim when they decided to file a case against me instead?

 

i really wanted to settle and i offered a very decent amount. but they refuse to accept and demanded an amount i really couldn't afford. the case is now with the quezon city fiscal and we'l have our first hearing on tuesday.

 

maraming salamat po.

 

1. may we know the exact wordings of the release? thanks.

2. does the fact that the rider does not have any license and that his motorcycle isn't registered hold any weight in court? - it has been held that the violation of a statute or regulation which imposes a specific requirement to omit or to do an definite act is NEGLIGENCE per se.

[jake_roxas]

Thanks for that bit of clarification fauxhead. Too bad jake couldnt make it himself

 

Dont worry gents, this intellectual (I hope) skirmish between jake and I wont go overboard. Im just honestly and genuinely wondering if he is a law student or a practitioner and Im waiting for his response. :hypocritesmiley:

 

For whatever it is worth, the Revised Penal Code provides:

 

"Article 3. Definition. — Acts and omissions punishable by law are felonies (delitos).

Felonies are committed not only by means of deceit (dolo) but also by means of fault (culpa).

There is deceit when the act is performed with deliberate intent; and there is fault when the wrongful act results from imprudence, negligence, lack of foresight, or lack of skill."

 

Going by the definition, it appears that felonies may also be committed by means of fault (wrongful act results from imprudence, negligence, lack of foresight, or lack of skill) as in the case of culpable felonies.

[jake_roxas]

now next question please...

[Sweetie_Mar]

I visited this room five times already and I found this thread very informative. Nice thread

I have a very limited knowledge about law and I want to gain more information from you guys.

I just had a bad impression on our justice system here in our country but still believing there still a true justice and a legal system.

[Sweetie_Mar]

I visited this room five times already and I found this thread very informative. Nice thread

I have a very limited knowledge about law and I want to gain more information from you guys.

I just had a bad impression on our justice system here in our country but still believing there still a true justice and a legal system.