Poll: Bongbong Marcos Vs Leni Robredo

[will robie]

Going by someone's warped logic, MDS was power hungry. Koko Pimentel was power hungry. Mar Roxas was power hungry, FPJ was power hungry, Loren Legarda was power hungry.

[tk421]

 

What an inane comment.

 

People file cases because they felt aggrieved.

 

Your communist relative was trying to bring down the government. That makes him power hungry. But he filed the human rights case against Marcos not because he is power hungry but because he felt injustice was done to him.

 

 

Nope. he was not trying to bring down the government. He was helping a community from unlawful abuses and got jailed for it. There's a difference. He put himself between a man and a police baton. Power hungry? You don't know what you're talking about.

 

Marcos cannot move one because he's power hungry and no smke screen of your's will change that. His father is power hungry, so is he. So is his benefactor in Malacanang.

 

Will... oo tama ka dun. Power hungry nga sila. I will not challenge you on that, because it's true. Happy? But the most insane power hungry people of all are your idols, especially your president.

Edited August 28, 2018 by tk421

[camiar]

No. There's no difference.

 

They are all power hungry politicians, including your relative. The only difference is their pretenses to justify why they do what they did.

 

But that's not the reason why they file cases in court if they feel aggrieved. It's because they can do it and nobody stops them.

[Bolj]

Nope. he was not trying to bring down the government. He was helping a community from unlawful abuses and got jailed for it. There's a difference. He put himself between a man and a police baton. Power hungry? You don't know what you're talking about.

 

Marcos cannot move one because he's power hungry and no smke screen of your's will change that. His father is power hungry, so is he. So is his benefactor in Malacanang.

 

Will... oo tama ka dun. Power hungry nga sila. I will not challenge you on that, because it's true. Happy? But the most insane power hungry people of all are your idols, especially your president.

1. You hate the current admin so much, bcoz according sayo madaming unlawful abuses. Yet in your first paragraph you are defending your relatives unlawful way of reacting to the unlawful actions. Great Job ! - kaya pala ang mga reasoning mo between the govt.vs communist ay ganyan. LOL.

 

2. Ang ganda ng logic mo about the father and the son.

 

3. Basahin mo 3rd paragraph mo, ikaw na mismo sumubo lahat ng sinabi mo sa 1st and 2nd paragraph mo. Mukang pina ikot ka ata ng ka debate mo.

[tk421]

No. There's no difference.

 

They are all power hungry politicians, including your relative. The only difference is their pretenses to justify why they do what they did.

 

But that's not the reason why they file cases in court if they feel aggrieved. It's because they can do it and nobody stops them.

 

Riiiiiight... being beaten by the police instead of the man he's trying to protect is called "power-hungry" for you.

 

So at least you admit Marcos is power hungry, then.

[tk421]

1. You hate the current admin so much, bcoz according sayo madaming unlawful abuses. Yet in your first paragraph you are defending your relatives unlawful way of reacting to the unlawful actions. Great Job ! - kaya pala ang mga reasoning mo between the govt.vs communist ay ganyan. LOL.

 

2. Ang ganda ng logic mo about the father and the son.

 

3. Basahin mo 3rd paragraph mo, ikaw na mismo sumubo lahat ng sinabi mo sa 1st and 2nd paragraph mo. Mukang pina ikot ka ata ng ka debate mo.

 

1. Oh... defending a fellow from unlawful actions is in itself unlawful... WTF?

 

2. Truth hurts. They are power hungry.

 

3. Yeah, he said Roxas and the other politicians are running for office because they are power hungry (ano pa nga ba ang gusto nila gawin sa posisyon nila? Tumulong sa tao... gaya ni "tatay"?). Ano ang kinain ko dun at ano kagagawan nun sa 1st paragraph? Sinu support pa nga niya yun 2nd paragraph, 'no.

[darksoulriver]

ngayong si De Castro na ang bagong CJ ng SC....

 

ano kaya ang epekto nito sa PET sa kaso nila BBM at LR.

[will robie]

Only someone with warped reasoning will say that those who filed an electoral protest are power hungry. I decided a couple of weeks ago that it is useless replying to someone who doesn't know what it is talking about.

Edited August 28, 2018 by will robie

[darksoulriver]

si namayapang Senadora Mirriam Defensor Santiago ay isa din palang Power hungry..

[Bolj]

1. Oh... defending a fellow from unlawful actions is in itself unlawful... WTF?

 

2. Truth hurts. They are power hungry.

 

3. Yeah, he said Roxas and the other politicians are running for office because they are power hungry (ano pa nga ba ang gusto nila gawin sa posisyon nila? Tumulong sa tao... gaya ni "tatay"?). Ano ang kinain ko dun at ano kagagawan nun sa 1st paragraph? Sinu support pa nga niya yun 2nd paragraph, 'no.

1.it only shows how hypocrite you are. You rant on almost everything about duterte yet you do the same on the very issues you rant about.

 

2&3 sige dream on ka sa gusto mo, pero kitang kita you got pawned by your own reasoning. Pa depensa depensa kapa kakainin mo din pala sa huli. Halos lahat pwedeng ibato sayo ngayun dahil sa warped reasoning mo at logic

[camiar]

 

Riiiiiight... being beaten by the police instead of the man he's trying to protect is called "power-hungry" for you.

 

So at least you admit Marcos is power hungry, then.

There is nothing wrong with being power hungry.

 

That's normal social behaviour for type A persons.

 

I was only pointing out to you that people file cases against injustice against them not because they are power hungry but because they felt aggrieved.

 

Yan ang hindi makapasok sa kokote mo dahil sa obsession mo na siraan si Marcos.

Edited August 29, 2018 by camiar

[jc44 - RETIRED]

Only someone with warped reasoning will say that those who filed an electoral protest are power hungry. I decided a couple of weeks ago that it is useless replying to someone who doesn't know what it is talking about.

 

Walang problema sa pagfile ng electoral protest. Ika nga, sa pulitika dito, walang natatalo, dinadayaan lang.

 

Pero yun magfa-file ng electoral protest, tapos wala namang ebidensya ng pandaraya, eh ibang usapan na yun.

[jc44 - RETIRED]

Only someone with warped reasoning will say that those who filed an electoral protest are power hungry. I decided a couple of weeks ago that it is useless replying to someone who doesn't know what it is talking about.

 

Walang problema sa pagfile ng electoral protest. Ika nga, sa pulitika dito, walang natatalo, dinadayaan lang.

 

Pero yun magfa-file ng electoral protest, tapos wala namang ebidensya ng pandaraya, eh ibang usapan na yun.

[darksoulriver]

 

Pero yun magfa-file ng electoral protest, tapos wala namang ebidensya ng pandaraya, eh ibang usapan na yun.

 

are you really serious?

 

OMG! hahaha

[camiar]

 

are you really serious?

 

OMG! hahaha

Di nya alam na the protester's causes for action has to be reviewed and validated by the Supreme Court even before PET is formed, and he/she has to pay a large amount of money upfront to cover the cost. Kung walang cause for action and evidence, why would SC even allow it?

 

He's not really serious. Wala lang mai-post. Pero kelangang maka-quota for the day.

Edited September 4, 2018 by camiar