Poll: Bongbong Marcos Vs Leni Robredo

[tk421]

I am not bored so I have one word to say about this post. Clueless.

 

I KNEW IT! No evidence! Hula hula pag may time.

[jc44 - RETIRED]

 

Pinutol m onaman yung sinabi ko tapos ako pa yung nag mislead, Saan ba nila i babase yung form and substance?

"Di na pala kailangan to show probable cause or any initial findings"

 

Form: literally, kung tama yung porma ng petition (naka-address sa PET, may pirma ng petitioner, may verification, CNFS, etc.)

 

Substance: yung mga specific na alegasyon (dahil hindi puwede ang mga general "dinaya ako" allegations) , kung totoo, ay election offense na nasa jurisdiction ng PET.

 

Walang "initial findings." Walang "probable cause." Huwag manlinlang ng ibang tao kung di mo alam yung pinagsasabi mo.

[will robie]

I KNEW IT! No evidence! Hula hula pag may time.

You know nothing except trolling on the threads.

[tk421]

You know nothing except trolling on the threads.

 

What you said above is what trolling actually is...as it adds nothing to the disscussion.

 

I was asking for supporting documents... which you failed to provide. I consider you PWNed.

[will robie]

What you said above is what trolling actually is...as it adds nothing to the disscussion.

 

I was asking for supporting documents... which you failed to provide. I consider you PWNed.

What you said above is what trolling actually is...as it adds nothing to the disscussion.

 

I was asking for supporting documents... which you failed to provide. I consider you PWNed.

As far as i am concerned, you are a clueless troll who posts nonsense. Your queries are not necessary because it can be answered by common sense, something I doubt you have. Edited September 14, 2018 by will robie

[tk421]

As far as i am concerned, you are a clueless troll who posts nonsense. Your queries are not necessary because it can be answered by common sense, something I doubt you have.

 

Nope. you said it was a fact. Fact means it is backed up by evidence. As you've often challenged us to produce evidence that are contrary to your views, it's now your turn to produce evidences on your own. It should be easy, right? You said PET said that there was evidences of cheating, that's why they went ahead with the recount. Show that statement from them, then.

[jc44 - RETIRED]

 

Nope. you said it was a fact. Fact means it is backed up by evidence. As you've often challenged us to produce evidence that are contrary to your views, it's now your turn to produce evidences on your own. It should be easy, right? You said PET said that there was evidences of cheating, that's why they went ahead with the recount. Show that statement from them, then.

 

Better yet, he should show us a copy of the electoral protest of BBM. That way we can all see for ourselves what the quality of the "evidence" is.

 

(Called shot: will won't do it, because excuses)

[tk421]

Double call shot: its common sense. Pero nun middle ages, common sense din naman that the earth was flat diba? Lol

[will robie]

 

Nope. you said it was a fact. Fact means it is backed up by evidence. As you've often challenged us to produce evidence that are contrary to your views, it's now your turn to produce evidences on your own. It should be easy, right? You said PET said that there was evidences of cheating, that's why they went ahead with the recount. Show that statement from them, then.

It is obvious that you are clueless because if you were listening to the news two years back, BBM had a smorgasbord of evidence. Nakahanap na ng kakampi si Mr. Hearsay.

[jc44 - RETIRED]

It is obvious that you are clueless because if you were listening to the news two years back, BBM had a smorgasbord of evidence. Nakahanap na ng kakampi si Mr. Hearsay.

 

If it was in the news, then there should be no problem posting the links here.

[will robie]

If it was in the news, then there should be no problem posting the links here.

If you were resourceful enough, you'd be able to find the news item. Anyway, I am done with you. You are all hearsay and have been reduced to ad hominems. If you want my attention, you back up what you post. As far as I am concerned, you are just a troll trying in vain to discredit my posts which you have never done. When you quote something I posted, make sure you understand the context of my post. Or puede rin pansinin kita pag bored ako or nasa mood ako. Edited September 15, 2018 by will robie

[jc44 - RETIRED]

If you were resourceful enough, you'd be able to find the news item. Anyway, I am done with you. You are all hearsay and have been reduced to ad hominems. If you want my attention, you back up what you post. As far as I am concerned, you are just a troll trying in vain to discredit my posts which you have never done. When you quote something I posted, make sure you understand the context of my post. Or puede rin pansinin kita pag bored ako or nasa mood ako.

 

Again, will, so predictable.

 

 

Better yet, he should show us a copy of the electoral protest of BBM. That way we can all see for ourselves what the quality of the "evidence" is.

 

(Called shot: will won't do it, because excuses)

[Tremonti]

Sabi nga ni Ms. Imee Marcos "MOve On!" :D

[Pip0l]

I think the poll here should be reset to zero para mas accurate yung result.

 

Dati i believe na nanalo si leni fair and square. But now? I may have to think twice.

 

Ang dami na proofs ang lumalabas ngayon na may dayaan nangyare in favor of leni robredo.

[tk421]

It is obvious that you are clueless because if you were listening to the news two years back, BBM had a smorgasbord of evidence. Nakahanap na ng kakampi si Mr. Hearsay.

Nope that’s just BBM’s so-called evidence. I’m asking about PET’s statement that they said there was evidence of cheating and that they believed Marcos. You said it was fact that PET believed it so. Where’s their statement saying that? Still waiting... zzz