uaeboy25 Posted December 1, 2011 Share Posted December 1, 2011 justice to be served. ang riyalidad ng hustisya sa bansa, bow si lacson binira ni kris aquino sa segment nya for more than 20 minutes live , marami ang naawa si raul gonzales binira ni kris aquino sa segment nya for more than 20 minutes live, marami ang naawa si joey marquez binira ni kris aquino sa segment nya for more than 30minutes, muntik pang kasuhan ng gabriela. those people never got thier chance to answered those attack, kasi hindi tulad ni kriss aquino na gamit ang media. something in common kay kris at abnoy? pareho silang mahilig mag microphone Quote Link to comment
scam Posted December 2, 2011 Share Posted December 2, 2011 bwahaha si kris muna bago si joshua kris for senator ang slogan Strong governmentT echnological enhancementD evelopment of sports "STD para sa lahat' Pag si Kris kumamndidato libre BJ sa kanya sampu nila Boy Abunda at Aiai. Quote Link to comment
uaeboy25 Posted December 2, 2011 Share Posted December 2, 2011 Pag si Kris kumamndidato libre BJ sa kanya sampu nila Boy Abunda at Aiai. sana clear sa std sa mouth silang tatlo Quote Link to comment
red60 Posted December 3, 2011 Share Posted December 3, 2011 (edited) Midas Marquez did not interpret the SC decision. He, as the SC spokesman, announced them. That the TRO is not in effect, is merely a dissenting opinion of Noynoy's appointee. The SC decision is in effect. From businessworld online "After Justice Sereno officially advised Marquez that it was wrong for him to say that the TRO on de Lima's hold departure order against the Arroyos was in full force and effect, he told media that he respected Sereno's opinion, making it appear that the issue was a matter of opinion, when in fact it was the ruling of the court by a vote of 7-6 that the TRO was deemed suspended pending compliance by GMA and her husband with Condition No. 2 of the TRO." @ Camiar TRO was suspended pending compliance as per 7-6 vote of SC and NOT a dissenting opinion of Justice Sereno. Marquez made a huge blunder when he announced SC voted 8 - 5 in favor of sustaining the TRO. Edited December 3, 2011 by red60 Quote Link to comment
zolber Posted December 3, 2011 Share Posted December 3, 2011 Noynoy, Your detractors have been peddling these lies to make it appear you are an incompetent president: Our country, under your watch, remains one of the most corrupt in Asia. (Apparently, Transparency International has not heard your "daang matuwid" and "walang korap" slogans.)Most Filipinos consider themselves poor. (Obviously, SWS conveniently ignored the fact that nearly 80% of Filipinos support you because they think their life will be better under you.)Our economy grew only by about 3.2%, practically zero after deducting inflation and population growth rate. (Clearly, NSCDB massaged economic data to come up with this statistical chicanery.) But don't worry. Not one of your multitudes of supporters believes these lies. As long as you continue your campaign to convict GMA, as long as you continue to attack the Supreme Court, no one will give a hoot to these lies. So sleep well and continue your search for your dream girl. Quote Link to comment
red60 Posted December 3, 2011 Share Posted December 3, 2011 (edited) The SC did not flip flop as you were led to believe by Noynoy's propagandists. The Supreme Court SUSPENDED the decision it has previously made on the case of PAL employees. Suspending a decision is not flip-flopping. If new evidence warrants further deliberation on the matter, then the SC is well within reason to suspend its decision. What new evidence? There were no new evidence filed in Supreme Court. SC recalled (not suspend) its resolution because of a technicality. It should have been the high court's special 3rd division and not 2nd division that should have decided on the MR. Well within reason? I don't think so. Example of SC's incompetence and inefficiency Edited December 3, 2011 by red60 Quote Link to comment
red60 Posted December 3, 2011 Share Posted December 3, 2011 (edited) Dear Noynoy, In my humble opinion, you should remove the person spearheading the so called "yellow propaganda". Contrary to the statements of your critics here in MTC, the yellow propaganda is a failure. Apparently, no one took notice of the progress of "daang matawid" despite the undeniable proof of improvements based on 2011 corruption index and Fitch upgrading Philippine credit rating from BB to BB+ Fitch based the upgrade on the following factors:1. The Philippine government's budget deficit for 2011 would stand at 3 percent of the country's gross domestic product, an improvement from the 3.7 percent registered last year.2. Revenue collection grew 18 percent in the first four months from the same period a year ago.3. The country's debts stood at 57 percent of its GDP in end-2009, but figure could decline to 50 percent by end-2013. Fitch upgrade is the fourth positive rating action in 11 months of your administration and yet critics still say "International has not heard your "daang matuwid" and walang korap slogan". Clearly, the person in charge of your propaganda is inept and ineffective. With regards to the meager 3.2% growth, we are monitoring your promise that you will increase government spending in 2012. It's nice to hear we are saving substantial amount of money but government should spend more on infrastructure and services to fuel the economy and promote growth. It's about time, we reap what we sow! Edited December 3, 2011 by red60 1 Quote Link to comment
camiar Posted December 3, 2011 Share Posted December 3, 2011 What new evidence? There were no new evidence filed in Supreme Court. SC recalled (not suspend) its resolution because of a technicality. It should have been the high court's special 3rd division and not 2nd division that should have decided on the MR. Well within reason? I don't think so. Example of SC's incompetence and inefficiencyAh yes, it was a technicality. Not new evidence. Thanks for the correction.But still the SC was right to suspend the decision and correct the technical error. Otherwise,the error may be used later on as precedence. Quote Link to comment
red60 Posted December 3, 2011 Share Posted December 3, 2011 (edited) Ah yes, it was a technicality. Not new evidence. Thanks for the correction.But still the SC was right to suspend the decision and correct the technical error. Otherwise,the error may be used later on as precedence. We do not know if SC is using "technical error" as a leeway for reversing its final resolution. For all we know there was no error at all. I cannot blame the general public for perceiving the SC's action as "flip-flopping". Atty. Estilito Mendoza is a cunning lawyer and Lucio Tan is filthy rich, I won't be surprise if he manages to pull a rabbit out of his hat. You might also want to check the other correction regarding the misinformation you posted on Midas Marquez and SC TRO. Edited December 3, 2011 by red60 Quote Link to comment
camiar Posted December 6, 2011 Share Posted December 6, 2011 ^^^ The gullible general public will perceive the SC to be flip-flopping because that's what the yellow propagandists have been drumming into their heads. The general public do not know the intricacies of following the rule of law. 1 Quote Link to comment
snoopy/woodstock Posted December 6, 2011 Share Posted December 6, 2011 i have to concede that we have a president who can't even exercise proper decorum. imagine yourself being invited to a gathering or event, would you throw tirades at your host's face in front of everybody? this is so beneath the stature of a president. i believe that there is a proper time and place to thresh out differences within the branches of government. Quote Link to comment
scam Posted December 7, 2011 Share Posted December 7, 2011 i have to concede that we have a president who can't even exercise proper decorum. imagine yourself being invited to a gathering or event, would you throw tirades at your host's face in front of everybody? this is so beneath the stature of a president. i believe that there is a proper time and place to thresh out differences within the branches of government. Autistic / mentally retarded don't understand proper decorum. ABNOY, huwag mong gamitin si GMA sa issue mo sa SC, ang tutuo lang eh ang Hacienda Luisita aqng issue mo sa kanila.Si Corona ay 1 lang sa mga justices, meron pang 14 out of which 3 ang appointee mo. Kung sinasabi mong mga appointee ni GMA ay tuta nya, ganun din ang appointees mo. SC decide according to law na wala ka naman alam kaya nga zero ang recordmo sa legislature dahil wala kang alam letche ka. magfocus ka sa governance, paano bumaba ang krimen, mabawasan ang mahihirap, dumami ang investor & trabaho, lumago angbumabagsak na economia, pagbawas sa bwis, hindi yang puro ka party at GMA. In short, magtrabaho ka hindot ka hindi yangpuro ka intriga, p#tang %na mo ka kalbo!!! i have to concede that we have a president who can't even exercise proper decorum. imagine yourself being invited to a gathering or event, would you throw tirades at your host's face in front of everybody? this is so beneath the stature of a president. i believe that there is a proper time and place to thresh out differences within the branches of government. Autistic / mentally retarded don't understand proper decorum. ABNOY, huwag mong gamitin si GMA sa issue mo sa SC, ang tutuo lang eh ang Hacienda Luisita aqng issue mo sa kanila.Si Corona ay 1 lang sa mga justices, meron pang 14 out of which 3 ang appointee mo. Kung sinasabi mong mga appointee ni GMA ay tuta nya, ganun din ang appointees mo. SC decide according to law na wala ka naman alam kaya nga zero ang recordmo sa legislature dahil wala kang alam letche ka. magfocus ka sa governance, paano bumaba ang krimen, mabawasan ang mahihirap, dumami ang investor & trabaho, lumago angbumabagsak na economia, pagbawas sa bwis, hindi yang puro ka party at GMA. In short, magtrabaho ka hindot ka hindi yangpuro ka intriga, p#tang %na mo ka panot!!! i have to concede that we have a president who can't even exercise proper decorum. imagine yourself being invited to a gathering or event, would you throw tirades at your host's face in front of everybody? this is so beneath the stature of a president. i believe that there is a proper time and place to thresh out differences within the branches of government. Autistic / mentally retarded don't understand proper decorum. ABNOY, huwag mong gamitin si GMA sa issue mo sa SC, ang tutuo lang eh ang Hacienda Luisita aqng issue mo sa kanila.Si Corona ay 1 lang sa mga justices, meron pang 14 out of which 3 ang appointee mo. Kung sinasabi mong mga appointee ni GMA ay tuta nya, ganun din ang appointees mo. SC decide according to law na wala ka naman alam kaya nga zero ang recordmo sa legislature dahil wala kang alam letche ka. magfocus ka sa governance, paano bumaba ang krimen, mabawasan ang mahihirap, dumami ang investor & trabaho, lumago angbumabagsak na economia, pagbawas sa bwis, hindi yang puro ka party at GMA. In short, magtrabaho ka hindot ka hindi yangpuro ka intriga, p#tang %na mo ka panot!!! i have to concede that we have a president who can't even exercise proper decorum. imagine yourself being invited to a gathering or event, would you throw tirades at your host's face in front of everybody? this is so beneath the stature of a president. i believe that there is a proper time and place to thresh out differences within the branches of government. Autistic / mentally retarded have no understand of proper decorum. ABNOY, huwag mong gamitin si GMA sa issue mo sa SC, ang tutuo lang eh ang Hacienda Luisita aqng issue mo sa kanila.Si Corona ay 1 lang sa mga justices, meron pang 14 out of which 3 ang appointee mo. Kung sinasabi mong mga appointee ni GMA ay tuta nya, ganun din ang appointees mo. SC decide according to law na wala ka naman alam kaya nga zero ang recordmo sa legislature dahil wala kang alam letche ka. magfocus ka sa governance, paano bumaba ang krimen, mabawasan ang mahihirap, dumami ang investor & trabaho, lumago angbumabagsak na economia, pagbawas sa bwis, hindi yang puro ka party at GMA. In short, magtrabaho ka hindot ka hindi yangpuro ka intriga, p#tang %na mo ka panot!!! i have to concede that we have a president who can't even exercise proper decorum. imagine yourself being invited to a gathering or event, would you throw tirades at your host's face in front of everybody? this is so beneath the stature of a president. i believe that there is a proper time and place to thresh out differences within the branches of government. Autistic / mentally retarded have no understand of proper decorum. ABNOY, huwag mong gamitin si GMA sa issue mo sa SC, ang tutuo lang eh ang Hacienda Luisita aqng issue mo sa kanila.Si Corona ay 1 lang sa mga justices, meron pang 14 out of which 3 ang appointee mo. Kung sinasabi mong mga appointee ni GMA ay tuta nya, ganun din ang appointees mo. SC decide according to law na wala ka naman alam kaya nga zero ang recordmo sa legislature dahil wala kang alam letche ka. magfocus ka sa governance, paano bumaba ang krimen, mabawasan ang mahihirap, dumami ang investor & trabaho, lumago angbumabagsak na economia, pagbawas sa bwis, hindi yang puro ka party at GMA. In short, magtrabaho ka hindot ka hindi yangpuro ka intriga, p#tang %na mo ka panot!!! i have to concede that we have a president who can't even exercise proper decorum. imagine yourself being invited to a gathering or event, would you throw tirades at your host's face in front of everybody? this is so beneath the stature of a president. i believe that there is a proper time and place to thresh out differences within the branches of government. Autistic / mentally retarded have no understand of proper decorum. ABNOY, huwag mong gamitin si GMA sa issue mo sa SC, ang tutuo lang eh ang Hacienda Luisita aqng issue mo sa kanila.Si Corona ay 1 lang sa mga justices, meron pang 14 out of which 3 ang appointee mo. Kung sinasabi mong mga appointee ni GMA ay tuta nya, ganun din ang appointees mo. SC decide according to law na wala ka naman alam kaya nga zero ang recordmo sa legislature dahil wala kang alam letche ka. magfocus ka sa governance, paano bumaba ang krimen, mabawasan ang mahihirap, dumami ang investor & trabaho, lumago angbumabagsak na economia, pagbawas sa bwis, hindi yang puro ka party at GMA. In short, magtrabaho ka hindot ka hindi yangpuro ka intriga, p#tang %na mo ka panot!!! Quote Link to comment
wendy testicleger Posted December 7, 2011 Share Posted December 7, 2011 PNoy is untouchable! Quote Link to comment
zolber Posted December 7, 2011 Share Posted December 7, 2011 Noynoy, Fire Procy Alcala! He, in effect, is saying you are a liar. Alcala recently announced that we will have to import 250,000 MT of rice next year. This is contrary to what you announced at the APC fourm in Hawaii. At the fourm, you said that because of good palay harvests, we will not have to import rice next year. But don't worry. Your supporters believe you, not Alcala. Don 't take this affront sitting down. Run after Alcala hammer and tongs. Show him that his boss is not a wimp as Kristie Kenney once said. Quote Link to comment
camiar Posted December 7, 2011 Share Posted December 7, 2011 Hoy Noy! Your approval ratings went up after you persecuted GMA. This tells us two things: 1. Your approval among the gullible pinoys is mainly because of their hatred of GMA.2. You are willing to distort issues, persecute people, and destabilize our democratic institutions just to save your flagging popularity. Quote Link to comment
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.