Jump to content
  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.

Recommended Posts

you are right... kung magpamassage ka try to ask for ylang ylang na blended oils para sa massage kasi good for erectile dysfunction except kung low blood ka at may skin allergies bawal.  ylang ylang is good for high blood  na pang massage  tumutulong sa pagpababa ng blood pressure as along as wala  skin allergies.

Ylang ylang has no preservatives and additive....pure oils na walang side effects

 

 

Saan ba meron nito? hihihi. :D

Link to comment
gusto mo pare?

 

medyo mahal nga lang.. cheapest is 6k. but worth it sa looks ng girl. pag mga model, it's around 10-16k ;)

 

ako, abstain nako diyan. hehe

 

pm me kung interested ka, may mga pics ako ;)

 

Oops, sorry, di ko nabalikan yung thread. Di ko tuloy nabasa.

 

Pareng astroboy, salamat sa offer, but its a little steep for me. Eto nga, merong prospect, maganda pa... pero mataas pa rin sa kin yong 5k. B)

 

Low budget lang po ako ngayon! hahahaha :thumbsupsmiley:

Link to comment
Oops, sorry, di ko nabalikan yung thread. Di ko tuloy nabasa. 

 

Pareng astroboy, salamat sa offer, but its a little steep for me.  Eto nga, merong prospect, maganda pa... pero mataas pa rin sa kin yong 5k.  B)

 

Low budget lang po ako ngayon! hahahaha  :thumbsupsmiley:

 

dude, personally i think the higher the price, the "safer". i mean, if you'd go for the 1-2k, baka laspag na yun. marami nang naka-access dun. mas risky. at least kapag 6k and up, choosy yan sa client.

 

personal opinion lang. anyway, i dont think it's ok to discuss this here in this forum. PM mo ko kung interested ka.

 

cheers

Link to comment
No... you have to wait 3 months before you can test. I'm on my 1st month so 2 more months. I think it takes a week to get the results... correct me if i'm wrong...

 

 

Results for rapid testing only takes 20 minutes.

If you test negative after two months from the time you think you may have been infected, you stand an 85% chance of really being negative.

If you test negative after three months from the time you may have been infected, you stand a 95% chance of truly being negative.

If you test negative after 6 months, then you are 100% negative if you have not had any other risky events from that initial high rik event

Link to comment

I've been researching on the 'net and I came upon this substance called monolaurin. It seems to be an effective anti-viral supplement against some of the common STDs like HIV, gonorrhea, chlamydia and herpes...

 

Is it available here? It's actually a coconut derivative, but they say monolaurin is more effective than VCO in treating these viruses. The brand name for it is Lauricidin...

Link to comment

Marami pala mga "Worried Wells dito. Ito yung sinasabi sa aidsmeds.com

 

Kung HIV winoworry nyo........

 

3months is conclusive. A 6weeks Non-reactive test is a good indicator that your 12 weeks test is also non-reactive.

 

In the state of Massachusetts their window period is six weeks because the test used is a 4th Generation test(Antibody/Antigen)

 

Pero pag nagcondom kayo hindi kayo mahahawa. Kasi may study na ginawa na yung isang partner eh pos and partner nya eh neg pero nagcocondom sila lagi sa sex. Yung neg na partner hindi nahawa ng hiv.

 

So nasasa inyo kung abstinence or condom.

 

Minsan kahit sure na hindi mahahawa pag nagcondom, pero wala pa rin peace of mind kasi sa mga "what ifs" Kasi minsan nanjan yung guilt.

Link to comment
smooth, base on your explanation, parang mas malala pa ang genital warts than herpes?

 

astroboy, sa manila doctors, required daw ng DOH

 

 

They should not be requiring you to provide all that info.

Testing for HIV should remain confidential.

For statistical purposes, they can ask you a few questions but as for the rest, it is up to your own descretion. I have to check my sources but as far as I know, it is against the law to insist on this - pictures - full name - address.

 

I'll post again on this when I return to the country and check my references on this.

Link to comment
I've been researching on the 'net and I came upon this substance called monolaurin. It seems to be an effective anti-viral supplement against some of the common STDs like HIV, gonorrhea, chlamydia and herpes...

 

Is it available here? It's actually a coconut derivative, but they say monolaurin is more effective than VCO in treating these viruses. The brand name for it is Lauricidin...

 

 

sorry but chlamydia and gonorrhea are caused by bacteria.

Anti virals will only work on viruses like HIV and Herpes, however, if it really works, then it should be a well publicized drug - imagine a cure for HIV.

Link to comment
Guys ... any recommendation on a doctor/hospital who specializes in this stuff.  Yung best friend ko kasi may penile warts and mukhang nahawa ako kasi I tried some of the MPAs he recommended.  Papa-checkup sana kami.  Thanks! :blush:  :blush:  :blush:

 

 

Maybe you can share which MPA's were recommended so that our other readers can avoid patronizing them or the establishments where they work.

Link to comment
sorry but chlamydia and gonorrhea are caused by bacteria.

Anti virals will only work on viruses like HIV and Herpes, however, if it really works, then it should be a well publicized drug - imagine a cure for HIV.

 

It's not only antiviral, but antibacterial. The substance is said to attack the lipid coating of these germs, weakening them. It works against multiple strains of these germs too.

 

Its been publicized, but was not been given much media attention. I think Dr. Dayrit made a study about it... pero against HIV lang. But there are reports it works equally well with Herpes...

Link to comment
It's not only antiviral, but antibacterial. The substance is said to attack the lipid coating of these germs, weakening them. It works against multiple strains of these germs too.

 

Its been publicized, but was not been given much media attention. I think Dr. Dayrit made a study about it... pero against HIV lang. But there are reports it works equally well with Herpes...

 

 

Sorry, I did not read the anti bacterial part of your post.

 

Anyway, I did some research just now and I saw that Monolaurin is advertised in food supplement web sites which does not make it a clinically proven and approved therapeutic drug. I have nothing against alternative drugs and medicine, however, I believe that if people are to buy therapeutic drugs that they should spend their hard earned money on proven, and BFD approved and recognized drugs.

 

I looked up one website where the literature claimed that the main antibacterial and antiviral component of breast milk is Lauric acid, which is supposed to be the main active ingredient of Monolaurin - WHAT A CROCK OF $H*T. The main antiviral and antibacterial of breast milk is Immune Globulin A which is an antibody produced by the mothers immune system......

 

I'm sorry, I just find these claims so absurd and I feel bad for the people who are enticed into spending their mula on these products.

 

Call me old fashioned but when it comes to treatment and therapy, I stick with what has time and again been proven to be effective

Link to comment

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
×
  • Create New...