Jump to content
  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.

Free Legal Advice


Butsoy

Recommended Posts

yung pinsan ko may gustong malaman, buti na lang meron thread like this.

 

kasi she has this boyfriend na married, pero 3 years ng hiwalay sa wife nya.His wife left for US kasama yung 2 daughters nya.Actually 2 times n kasing nadeny yung visa application nung guy kaya ang agreement nila nung wife nya mauuna na yung girl saka kids tapos susunod na lang yung guy.  okay naman daw relationship nila kaya first 3 months super call pa ang both parties, alam ang address, fone sa office and sa bahay. pero after 6 months daw nagpalit ng fone sa bahay, walang call sa kanya at lumipat na ng work yung girl.

Ngayon parang ayaw na nung girl na makausap yung husband nya.parang pinagtataguaan n sya. my cousin met this guy and they are inlove with each other. since nasa US na yung wife and ayaw na sa kanya, oaano kaya ang magiging legal process para mapakasalan nya yung cousin ko?

thanks.

 

 

 

Pa annulled muna yon Kasal niya para wala legal impediment, kasi kung magpapakasal siya without annulment of marriage, later on magkakaproblema siya.

Link to comment
Pa annulled muna yon Kasal niya para wala legal impediment, kasi kung magpapakasal siya without annulment of marriage, later on magkakaproblema siya.

 

 

paano kukunin yung consent ng wife nya kung pinagtataguan na sya?what if mauna magpakasal yung girl sa US pwede ba yun?

pag nagpakasal sa foreigner yung girl sa US libre n ba yung husband nya dito?

Link to comment
Pa annulled muna yon Kasal niya para wala legal impediment, kasi kung magpapakasal siya without annulment of marriage, later on magkakaproblema siya.

 

 

what if ayaw na makipagusap sa kanaya nung wife nya? what if magasaw yung wife nya ng foreigner sa US? ibig sabihin free na yung guy dito sa phils since may asawa ng iba yung wife nya sa US?

Link to comment

In filing a case in court or Petition the consent of the other parties are not needed. The action the wife such negligence in her part can be used as a ground to prove your case.

 

Even if the his wife contracted marriage in the other country and still she is a Filipino Citizen same rule apply, in the eyes of law, the second marriage is void.

Link to comment
In filing a  case in court or Petition the consent of the other parties are not needed. The action the wife such negligence in her part can be used as a ground to prove your case.

 

Even if the his wife contracted marriage in the other country and still she is a Filipino Citizen same rule apply,  in the eyes of law, the second marriage is void.

 

 

pero what if she became american citizen, does this mean free na yung guy to marry again or he still have to file the case?

Link to comment
thanks for your opinion.  if i opt to buy a new battery pack- is there shop here in metro manila which sells battery packs as my laptop is already an old model (circa 2001).

 

No problem. Kasi ang sa akin lang eh kung minsan mas makakatipid ka kung bibili ka ng brand new, especially with computers. Mas madalas kapag nasirang piyesa sa computer at ginawan ng remedyo ay mas lalong napapadalas ang breakdown niya.... Again don't be afraid to ask questions :)

Link to comment

edzabu,

 

Musta na? Parang may masamang balak ka naman dyan. :boo:

 

Anyway, crime of seduction is classified into two, namely:

1. qualified and

2. simple or plain seduction.

 

Seduction is committed by enticing a woman to "sexual intercourse" by promise of marriage or other means of persuasion without use of force.

 

A. Qualified seduction, as provided in the Revised Penal Code, is committed through any of the following acts:

 

1. Seduction of a virgin over 12 years and under 18 years of age by certain persons, such as a person in authority, priest, teacher; and :huh:

 

2. Seduction of a sister by her brother, or descendant by her ascendant, regardless of her age or rep*tation. :huh:

 

B. Simple seduction is committed if:

the offended woman is single or a widow of good rep*tation, over 12 and under 18 years of age, the offender has carnal knowledge of her, and the offender resorted to deceit to be able to consummate the sexual intercourse with her.

:huh:

 

(Take note though that if the offended party is below 12 years old, then it is considered statutory rape even if there was consent.)

 

 

Rape, on the other hand, is committed:

 

1) By a man who shall have carnal knowledge of a woman under any of the following circumstances:

a) Through force, threat, or intimidation;

B) When the offended party is deprived of reason or otherwise unconscious;

c) By means of fraudulent machination or grave abuse of authority; and

d) When the offended party is under twelve (12) years of age or is demented, even though none of the circumstances mentioned above be present. (Statutory Rape) :huh:

 

2) By any person who, under any of the circumstances mentioned in paragraph 1 hereof, shall commit an act of sexual assault by inserting:

a. his penis (man) into another person's (man or woman) mouth or anal orifice, OR

b. any instrument or object (by a man or woman) , into the genital or anal orifice of another person(man or woman. :huh:

 

:rolleyes:

 

Just point out the things you want clarified pare! :D

Link to comment
meron ba? alam ko wala.... :unsure:

 

Under the old law (Civil Code), if the illegitimate child is recognized by the father, he/she can use the surname of the father. However, under the Family Code, illegitimate children must use the surname of the mother despite proving the fact that the child is the child of the father. :angry: Some people think that this was a mistake in the sense that why deprive the child of the use of the father's surname if the father consents.

 

However, some others will say that you still can use the surname of the father if the father gives his consent, but I don't think they have a basis for it.

Link to comment
edzabu,

 

Musta na? Parang may masamang balak ka naman dyan.  :boo:

 

Anyway, crime of seduction is classified into two, namely:

1. qualified and

2. simple or plain seduction.

 

Seduction is committed by enticing a woman to "sexual intercourse" by promise of marriage or other means of persuasion without use of force.

 

A. Qualified seduction, as provided in the Revised Penal Code, is committed through any of the following acts:

 

1. Seduction of a virgin over 12 years and under 18 years of age by certain persons, such as a person in authority, priest, teacher; and  :huh:

 

2. Seduction of a sister by her brother, or descendant by her ascendant, regardless of her age or rep*tation.  :huh:

 

B. Simple seduction is committed if:

the offended woman is single or a widow of good rep*tation,  over 12 and under 18 years of age,  the offender has carnal knowledge of her, and  the offender resorted to deceit to be able to consummate the sexual intercourse with her.

:huh:

 

(Take note though that if the offended party is below 12 years old, then it is considered statutory rape even if there was consent.)

Rape, on the other hand, is committed:

 

1) By a man who shall have carnal knowledge of a woman under any of the following circumstances:

   a) Through force, threat, or intimidation;

   B) When the offended party is deprived of reason or otherwise unconscious;

   c) By means of fraudulent machination or grave abuse of authority; and

   d) When the offended party is under twelve (12) years of age or is demented, even though none of the circumstances mentioned above be present. (Statutory Rape) :huh:

 

2) By any person who, under any of the circumstances mentioned in paragraph 1 hereof, shall commit an act of sexual assault by inserting:

   a. his penis (man) into another person's (man or woman) mouth or anal orifice, OR

   b. any instrument or object (by a man or woman) , into the genital or anal orifice of another person(man or woman.  :huh:

 

:rolleyes:

 

Just point out the things you want clarified pare!  :D

 

Thanks Bokam. Are you in town?

 

Here's the situation: Boy(19yo) and Girl (6 mos older than boy). They were classmates in a 8-month course(caregiving). They first met nov 2003, boy just turned 18 yo that time. sometimes in april 2004 they had their first sexual intercourse at the house of boy . The boy apparently brought the girl home after a party. They became MU, the girl often visits the boy in the house and sometimes sleeps with the boy during week ends. Boy doesnt love the girl. the girls loves the boy, gives him a liitle things and sometimes loads. They dont have picture together. they dont exchange love letters just tex daw. but their classmates knew they were MU.

 

Problem: girl is preggy for 5mos and 1 week (ultrasound). The girls family is demanding for marriage otherwise they threatened to file a case (all applicable or will fabricate to harrass the boy and his family) against the boy. the mother of the boy doesnt want to give consent but promised to take responsibilty for the BABY. After 3 talks the girls side gave 1 week as ultimatum for the mother of boy to sign

the letter of consent for marriage license application and other stuffs to make the marriage legal. Firt they said thay want marriage for their daughter to save face. Now after learning that boy is set to go abroad with his mother they said they want assurance that boy will not "run" and leave his responsibilty.

 

Questions: Is there a case against the boy? Will it be bailable? Will this case be a cause for holding his departure? if he hides, does he need to appear for trial or for request for dismissal of any case filed agaist him? He has until sunday to decide whether to marry the girl he doesnt love or to face any legal battles that will come his way. Any advice would surely help him decide his fate.

Edited by edzabu
Link to comment
paano kukunin yung consent ng wife nya kung pinagtataguan na sya?what if mauna magpakasal yung girl sa US pwede ba yun?

pag nagpakasal sa foreigner yung girl sa US libre n ba yung husband nya dito?

 

 

mcel, hindi kailangan ang consent or participation nung wife para mag-prosper ang annulment o declaration of nullity of marriage.

 

ang korte lang po ang may kapangyarihang mag annul ng kasal. kaya, kahit magpakasal sa iba ang babae dito sa US, hindi po automatic na mawawalang bisa ang unang kasal (hindi pa libre yung kaibigan mo). sabay nito, magiging null and void din yung subsequent marriage nya dito sa US at dyan sa atin sa Pilipinas.

Link to comment

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
×
  • Create New...