legal Free Legal Advice

[rocco69]

Good day po Sir. If a lease contract is about to expire and the lessee said that he vacated the unit already with his things but the security of the building said that there are still some belongings left. What if, the lessee didn't remove all of his belongings at the end of the contract even after reminding him a day or two before the contract ends to remove all his belongings. Can we remove the belongings ourselves and just leave it at security for him to pick up at a later time? Is that legal? What's the best way to deal with this? It would be a hassle to clean the unit if the belongings are still there and more so if someone wants to occupy the unit already.

call up/inform the lessee that there are still belongings there and then give him a reasonable period w/in which to remove, and that failure to do so within the period given will result in all property left being deposited with the security for him to pick up.

 

Have someone from the barangay (if possible) witness the removal of the things (make an inventory of the things removed, to be signed by you an the witness)

[charliehouse]

In the light sa ongoing issue ngayon na paglaya ni Sanchez, i've read several articles na nagsasabing ang isang convict ay may civil punishment rin civil interdiction yata ang tawag kung saan hindi siya pwedeng bumoto o gumawa ng kontrata.

 

Tanong lang sir for curiousity lang, kung makakalaya ba ang isang bilanggo, automatic ba na mawawala ang civil interdiction?

 

Kung makakalaya si Sanchez according to GCTA, pwede na ba siyang bumoto at gumawa ng kontrata agad-agad?

[Mc Travis]

In the light sa ongoing issue ngayon na paglaya ni Sanchez, i've read several articles na nagsasabing ang isang convict ay may civil punishment rin civil interdiction yata ang tawag kung saan hindi siya pwedeng bumoto o gumawa ng kontrata.

Tanong lang sir for curiousity lang, kung makakalaya ba ang isang bilanggo, automatic ba na mawawala ang civil interdiction?

Kung makakalaya si Sanchez according to GCTA, pwede na ba siyang bumoto at gumawa ng kontrata agad-agad?

Ang civil interdiction ay isang Accessory Penalty naka kabit ito sa, as the term suggests, Principal penalty. Mawawala ito oras na ma-extinguish ang kanyang Criminal liability. Kaya't oras na makalaya ang isang tao sa pagkakabilanggo sa mga dahilan tulad ng service of sentence, extinguished na ang kanyang Criminal liability sa parehong Principal at accessory penalties.

 

Maga-apply ba ito kay Sanchez? Questionable pa kasi kung applicable ba talaga sa kanya ang GCTA. May mga bumabasa ng batas at nagiinterpret na hindi applicable ang GCTA sa persons convicted of heinous crimes. May mga nagsasabi ding applicable sa lahat ang GCTA. SC lang ang makakapag sabi.

 

Kung applicable, para sa akin, wala nang civil interdiction dahil fully extinguished na ang criminal liability. Kung hindi applicable, may tanong pa diyan kung pwede pa ba siyang arestuhin o ikulong. Maari man o hindi na, magpapatuloy pa din ang civil interdiction.

[oliverjohnholmes]

good sirs, eto tanong lang. ano po ba ang legal age of consent sa pinas?

[rocco69]

good sirs, eto tanong lang. ano po ba ang legal age of consent sa pinas?

Kung gusto mong magibg kontrobersyal, sabihin mo - 12 years old a

[rocco69]

Kung gusto mong magibg kontrobersyal, sabihin mo - 12 years old a

good sirs, eto tanong lang. ano po ba ang legal age of consent sa pinas?

Kung gusto mong maging kontrobersyal, sabihin mo - 12 YEARS OLD ANG AGE OF CONSENT SA PILIPINAS!

 

Ito rin ang makikita mo kapag iyo itong hinanap sa Google.

 

NGUNIT, SUBALIT, DATAPWAT...

 

Ito ay isang simplistikong pag-aaral ng batas, base lamang sa pagbabasa ng Republic Act 8353 (na di na isinalang-alang at inalala ang iba pang batas na may kaugnayan dito!).

 

Ayon sa RA 8353:

 

Article 266-A. Rape: When And How Committed. - Rape is committed:

"1) By a man who shall have carnal knowledge of a woman under any of the following circumstances:

"a) Through force, threat, or intimidation;

"b) When the offended party is deprived of reason or otherwise unconscious;

"c) By means of fraudulent machination or grave abuse of authority; and

"d) When the offended party is under twelve (12) years of age or is demented, even though none of the circumstances mentioned above be present.

 

Dahil sinasabi sa RA 8353 na kapag ang offended party ay below 12 yrs, rape na, kahit wala yung ibang bagay bagay na kailangan para sa rape, IBIG DAW SABIHIN, 12 nga ang edad para legal nang makipagsiping ang isang babae sa lalaki.

 

Ating alalahanin na ang edad ng hustong gulang sa Pilipinas ay 18 (RA 6809). Dahil dito, ipinapalagay ng batas na walang kapangyarihan magdesisyon para sa sarili niya ang menor-de-edad.

 

Ayon din sa RA 7610:

 

Section 5. Child Prostitution and Other Sexual Abuse. – Children, whether male or female, who for money, profit, or any other consideration or due to the coercion or influence of any adult, syndicate or group, indulge in sexual intercourse or lascivious conduct, are deemed to be children exploited in prostitution and other sexual abuse.

The penalty of reclusion temporal in its medium period to reclusion perpetua shall be imposed xxx xxx xxx

 

Sa madaling salita, ang batang nakipagtalik dahil sa impluwensya ng isang nasa hustong gulang ay ipinapalagay na "child exploited in other sexual abuse," at maaaring masentesyahan ang nasa hustong gulang ng reclusion temporal medium hanggang reclusion perpetua (14 years, 8 months and 1 day to 30 years).

 

 

Hiwalay pa dito ang Article 337 at 338 ng Revised Penal Code:

 

 

Art. 337. Qualified seduction. — The seduction of a virgin over twelve years and under eighteen years of age, committed by any person in public authority, priest, home-servant, domestic, guardian, teacher, or any person who, in any capacity, shall be entrusted with the education or custody of the woman seduced, shall be punished by prision correccional in its minimum and medium periods.

The penalty next higher in degree shall be imposed upon any person who shall seduce his sister or descendant, whether or not she be a virgin or over eighteen years of age.chanrobles virtual law library

Under the provisions of this Chapter, seduction is committed when the offender has carnal knowledge of any of the persons and under the circumstances described herein.chanrobles virtual law library

(Ang ibig sabihin ng salitang "virgin" sa Art. 337 ay babaeng maganda/malinis ang reputasyon, hindi na ito ay literal na "birhen")

Art. 338. Simple seduction. — The seduction of a woman who is single or a widow of good reputation, over twelve but under eighteen years of age, committed by means of deceit, shall be punished by arresto mayor.chanrobles vi

Makikita mula sa Art. 337 at 338 na krimen pa rin ang pakikipagtalik sa babeng nasa edad 12 hanggang bago mag-18.

Alalahanin din na rape ang pag-aabuso ng kapangyarihan para makatalik ang isang babae (see Art. 266-A[c])

Maari mong gawing depensa na PUMAYAG AT WALANG PAMIMILIT ANG PAKIKIPAGTALIK MO SA BABAENG EDAD 12 - BELOW 18.

Pero, dahil wala pa nga itong kapasidad na magpasya para sa sarili (wala pa siya sa hustong gulang), pag gusto ng magulang magkaso ng rape, YARI KA!!! Dahil walang bisa ang pagpayag nung babae (wala nga siyang kapasidad na magpasya pa). Palalabasin ng magulang na ang pakikipagtalik ay dahil sa impluwensya nung nasa edad, at presto... ito ay child exploited under other forms of sexual abuse na. YARI!!!

 

 

Kung kaya't masasabi natin na HINDI 12 ANG LEGAL AGE OF CONSENT SA PILIPINAS. ITO AY 18!!!

rtual law libry

Edited September 23, 2019 by rocco69

[putokmolang]

Hello po mga boss, anyone here is familiar with the law regarding "Pamana" and also "utang" of a person who suddenly died due to vehicular accident. Need some advice and consultation whats the right thing to do. Thanks in advance!

[rocco69]

Hello po mga boss, anyone here is familiar with the law regarding "Pamana" and also "utang" of a person who suddenly died due to vehicular accident. Need some advice and consultation whats the right thing to do. Thanks in advance!

Ang utang ay hindi namamana (see Article 776, 777, Civil Code at Genato versus Bayhon, 596 SCRA 713).

 

Ang utang nung namatay ay dapat singilin ng nagpautang sa ari-ariang naiwan nung namatay, hindi sa mga tagapagmana nito.

 

Kaya't kung walang lupa na naka-rehistro sa pangalan ng namatay, o di-kaya'y sasakyan na nakarehistro sa pangalan nito, o shares of stock na nakapangalan dito, uuwi ng luhaan ang nagpautang (ano ang hahabulin niyang ari-arian? wala naman siyang ebidensya na ang alahas o appliances na naiwan nung namatay ay pag-aari nito, siyempre hindi rin ito aaminin nung mga tagapgmana).

 

Kapag may lupa, o sasakyan, yun ang maaaring habulin ng nagpautang (kung alam ng nagpautang, bakit rin ito ipapaalam ng mga tagapagmana, maghirap ang nagpautang na maghanap, tapos kailangan din niyang magsampa ng kaso sa korte para maghabol sa kanyang pautang).

 

malas lang ng mga tagapagmana kung ang lupa o kotse ay naka-mortgage, dahil maaari na itong habulin ng nagpautang sa pamamagitan ng pag-ilit nung lupa/sasakyan

Edited September 24, 2019 by rocco69

[raikux]

Kung gusto mong maging kontrobersyal, sabihin mo - 12 YEARS OLD ANG AGE OF CONSENT SA PILIPINAS!

 

Ito rin ang makikita mo kapag iyo itong hinanap sa Google.

 

NGUNIT, SUBALIT, DATAPWAT...

 

Ito ay isang simplistikong pag-aaral ng batas, base lamang sa pagbabasa ng Republic Act 8353 (na di na isinalang-alang at inalala ang iba pang batas na may kaugnayan dito!).

 

Ayon sa RA 8353:

 

Article 266-A. Rape: When And How Committed. - Rape is committed:

"1) By a man who shall have carnal knowledge of a woman under any of the following circumstances:

"a) Through force, threat, or intimidation;

"b) When the offended party is deprived of reason or otherwise unconscious;

"c) By means of fraudulent machination or grave abuse of authority; and

"d) When the offended party is under twelve (12) years of age or is demented, even though none of the circumstances mentioned above be present.

 

Dahil sinasabi sa RA 8353 na kapag ang offended party ay below 12 yrs, rape na, kahit wala yung ibang bagay bagay na kailangan para sa rape, IBIG DAW SABIHIN, 12 nga ang edad para legal nang makipagsiping ang isang babae sa lalaki.

 

Ating alalahanin na ang edad ng hustong gulang sa Pilipinas ay 18 (RA 6809). Dahil dito, ipinapalagay ng batas na walang kapangyarihan magdesisyon para sa sarili niya ang menor-de-edad.

 

Ayon din sa RA 7610:

 

Section 5. Child Prostitution and Other Sexual Abuse. – Children, whether male or female, who for money, profit, or any other consideration or due to the coercion or influence of any adult, syndicate or group, indulge in sexual intercourse or lascivious conduct, are deemed to be children exploited in prostitution and other sexual abuse.

The penalty of reclusion temporal in its medium period to reclusion perpetua shall be imposed xxx xxx xxx

 

Sa madaling salita, ang batang nakipagtalik dahil sa impluwensya ng isang nasa hustong gulang ay ipinapalagay na "child exploited in other sexual abuse," at maaaring masentesyahan ang nasa hustong gulang ng reclusion temporal medium hanggang reclusion perpetua (14 years, 8 months and 1 day to 30 years).

 

 

Hiwalay pa dito ang Article 337 at 338 ng Revised Penal Code:

 

 

Art. 337. Qualified seduction. — The seduction of a virgin over twelve years and under eighteen years of age, committed by any person in public authority, priest, home-servant, domestic, guardian, teacher, or any person who, in any capacity, shall be entrusted with the education or custody of the woman seduced, shall be punished by prision correccional in its minimum and medium periods.

The penalty next higher in degree shall be imposed upon any person who shall seduce his sister or descendant, whether or not she be a virgin or over eighteen years of age.chanrobles virtual law library

Under the provisions of this Chapter, seduction is committed when the offender has carnal knowledge of any of the persons and under the circumstances described herein.chanrobles virtual law library

(Ang ibig sabihin ng salitang "virgin" sa Art. 337 ay babaeng maganda/malinis ang reputasyon, hindi na ito ay literal na "birhen")

Art. 338. Simple seduction. — The seduction of a woman who is single or a widow of good reputation, over twelve but under eighteen years of age, committed by means of deceit, shall be punished by arresto mayor.chanrobles vi

Makikita mula sa Art. 337 at 338 na krimen pa rin ang pakikipagtalik sa babeng nasa edad 12 hanggang bago mag-18.

Alalahanin din na rape ang pag-aabuso ng kapangyarihan para makatalik ang isang babae (see Art. 266-A[c])

Maari mong gawing depensa na PUMAYAG AT WALANG PAMIMILIT ANG PAKIKIPAGTALIK MO SA BABAENG EDAD 12 - BELOW 18.

Pero, dahil wala pa nga itong kapasidad na magpasya para sa sarili (wala pa siya sa hustong gulang), pag gusto ng magulang magkaso ng rape, YARI KA!!! Dahil walang bisa ang pagpayag nung babae (wala nga siyang kapasidad na magpasya pa). Palalabasin ng magulang na ang pakikipagtalik ay dahil sa impluwensya nung nasa edad, at presto... ito ay child exploited under other forms of sexual abuse na. YARI!!!

 

 

Kung kaya't masasabi natin na HINDI 12 ANG LEGAL AGE OF CONSENT SA PILIPINAS. ITO AY 18!!!

rtual law libry

 

Brother dapat may retainer ka na dito sa MTC. Hehehe. Great perspective re: legal age vis-a-vis the Seduction provisions in the RPC. I always thought that if some of the elements of seduction are not present such as deceit, abuse of confidence etc. malabo may kaso, yun pala halos parang technically below 18 narin ang statutory rape due to the "other sexual abuse" provision in 7610.

[wildswans]

Good day po, Sir. I understand that it's a common practice for an employer to require employees/applicants to submit an NBI clearance but is it common or proper for an employer to ask for one every year? Thanks in advance!

[rocco69]

Good day po, Sir. I understand that it's a common practice for an employer to require employees/applicants to submit an NBI clearance but is it common or proper for an employer to ask for one every year? Thanks in advance!

it's not common. but it's proper. It is well within management prerogative to learn whether employees are conducting themselves properly.

Edited October 2, 2019 by rocco69

[Stewart Gilligan Griffin]

Sir @rocco69

 

Nasa barko po ako ngayon at pwersahan po akong pinagtatrabaho nang dalawang position pero ang kontratang pinirmahan ko po ay para sa isang position lamang. Para po akong hostage dito dahil galing po ako saten bakasyon at pinasampa po ako sa barko sabay sabing gagawin mo tong trabaho nato at wala kang choice kundi mag quit o ituloy mo, pasalamat kana lang may trabaho ka.

 

Saan po ba ako pwedeng mag reklamo habang nasa barko ako at anong reklamo ang pwede kong ilaban sa kanila? Sumulat din po ako sa Norwegian Seafarers Union wala pa lang silang sagot baka sakaling matulungan nyo po ako Sir at mabigyan ng linaw sa aking mga gagawin.

 

Salamat po

[rocco69]

Sir @rocco69

 

Nasa barko po ako ngayon at pwersahan po akong pinagtatrabaho nang dalawang position pero ang kontratang pinirmahan ko po ay para sa isang position lamang. Para po akong hostage dito dahil galing po ako saten bakasyon at pinasampa po ako sa barko sabay sabing gagawin mo tong trabaho nato at wala kang choice kundi mag quit o ituloy mo, pasalamat kana lang may trabaho ka.

 

Saan po ba ako pwedeng mag reklamo habang nasa barko ako at anong reklamo ang pwede kong ilaban sa kanila? Sumulat din po ako sa Norwegian Seafarers Union wala pa lang silang sagot baka sakaling matulungan nyo po ako Sir at mabigyan ng linaw sa aking mga gagawin.

 

Salamat po

ang tanong, 1) pareho din lang ba ang oras mo?

2) pareho ba ang sweldo ng dalawang posisyon na yan, o magkaiba?

3) ano ba ang posisyon mo? at ano yung isang pinapagawa din sa iyo?

[Stewart Gilligan Griffin]

ang tanong, 1) pareho din lang ba ang oras mo? Halos parehas lang ng oras pero mas humaba dahil sa extra responsibilities

2) pareho ba ang sweldo ng dalawang posisyon na yan, o magkaiba? tatlong doble ng sahod ko ang kaibahan nung extra position na pinapagawa saken

3) ano ba ang posisyon mo? at ano yung isang pinapagawa din sa iyo? Guest Account Purser ako yung pinapagawa saken Financial Controller bale amo ko ang posisyon na yan kaso inalis na nang kompanya

Edited October 11, 2019 by Stewart Gilligan Griffin

[rocco69]

 

ang tanong, 1) pareho din lang ba ang oras mo? Halos parehas lang ng oras pero mas humaba dahil sa extra responsibilities

2) pareho ba ang sweldo ng dalawang posisyon na yan, o magkaiba? tatlong doble ng sahod ko ang kaibahan nung extra position na pinapagawa saken

3) ano ba ang posisyon mo? at ano yung isang pinapagawa din sa iyo? Guest Account Purser ako yung pinapagawa saken Financial Controller bale amo ko ang posisyon na yan kaso inalis na nang kompanya

 

Ah, pandaraya yan. basically hiring someone at a low rate, then making them work, for the same pay, on a job that should be paid more.

 

kailangan mo ng ebidensya na yan ang ginagawa sa iyo. Gumawa ka ng memo protesting that they are making you do a job that you were not hired for, ipa-receive mo sa kanila. Get other evidences also that they are making you work as Financial Controller, also evidence of the salary of a Financial Controller.

 

ito ay paglabag ng POEA rules (making the OFW perform work different from that in the contract, as well as changing the terms of the contract). pwede mo ito ireklamo sa POEA pag-uwi mo.

[Stewart Gilligan Griffin]

Ah, pandaraya yan. basically hiring someone at a low rate, then making them work, for the same pay, on a job that should be paid more.

 

kailangan mo ng ebidensya na yan ang ginagawa sa iyo. Gumawa ka ng memo protesting that they are making you do a job that you were not hired for, ipa-receive mo sa kanila. Get other evidences also that they are making you work as Financial Controller, also evidence of the salary of a Financial Controller.

 

ito ay paglabag ng POEA rules (making the OFW perform work different from that in the contract, as well as changing the terms of the contract). pwede mo ito ireklamo sa POEA pag-uwi mo.

nag reklamo ako sa union ng seafarers nag padala sila nang form at pina fill up saken sinend ko na rin sa kanila.naghihintay na lang ako ng feedback as for the evidence ginagawa ko naman na ang trabaho talaga marami akong documents na maipapakita na ginagawa ko ang work pwede ko sila ireklamo sa POEA salamat po sa input Sir

[charliehouse]

Good day po sir/maam, may legal query lang po ako regarding po sa isang distant relative ko po... Ang distant relative ko po ay isang professional na napili as member ng PLEB o People's Legal Enforcement Board, tanong lang po, kung napili po siya as member ng PLEB need pa po ba siya ng authority to engage in a private practice po?

[rocco69]

Good day po sir/maam, may legal query lang po ako regarding po sa isang distant relative ko po... Ang distant relative ko po ay isang professional na napili as member ng PLEB o People's Legal Enforcement Board, tanong lang po, kung napili po siya as member ng PLEB need pa po ba siya ng authority to engage in a private practice po?

Mukhang hindi. Ayon sa Sec. 43© ng RA8551, ang membership sa PLEB ay isang "civic duty". Wala din itong sweldo, per diem at insurance coverage lang. Lumalabas na ito ay bahagi lamang ng responsibilidad ng isang mabuting mamamayan, at hindi ka nagiging bahagi ng Civil Service kung mapili ka na maging miyembro dito.

 

Dahil di ka naman bahagi ng Civil Service, maaari ka pa ring mag-engage sa private practice (wag lang sa mga bagay na may conflict of interest sa PLEB).

Edited October 16, 2019 by rocco69

[Mamoniter]

Hello Sir Rocco69, I need a legal advice regarding my situation in my company. I'm working as a sales account manager and each project that enters my account I'm entitled to receive a sales incentive. Now here's the problem, I've got a project opportunity that cost hundreds of million of pesos and I'm expecting a huge commission from it. But the management decided to give me only a specific amount of commission rather than following their company sales incentive schemes. Their reason is the company didn't earn well this year. So I'm planning to complaint them in NLRC and I want to know what's my chance winning the case. I have all the evidence and documents including the Sales Incentive Scheme from the HR that will prove that I'm the sales person of that project.

 

Thanks.

[rocco69]

Hello Sir Rocco69, I need a legal advice regarding my situation in my company. I'm working as a sales account manager and each project that enters my account I'm entitled to receive a sales incentive. Now here's the problem, I've got a project opportunity that cost hundreds of million of pesos and I'm expecting a huge commission from it. But the management decided to give me only a specific amount of commission rather than following their company sales incentive schemes. Their reason is the company didn't earn well this year. So I'm planning to complaint them in NLRC and I want to know what's my chance winning the case. I have all the evidence and documents including the Sales Incentive Scheme from the HR that will prove that I'm the sales person of that project.

 

Thanks.

When does a sales person become entitled to the commission? (ex. upon award, upon contract signing, upon payment of services, etc.)

 

So long as that event has already happened, you would be entitled to a commission.

 

also, how is the incentive scheme worded? Are there qualifications? Can it be changed by the company?

 

If not, then you would be entitled.

 

Just make sure all these have already happened.

 

Also, be aware that going to the NLRC will damage your relations with the company. After you file a complaint, expect the company to to look for opportunities to terminate your employment.

 

Also, are you an employee or part of management? This could impact on whether you can go to the NLRC or not.

[Mamoniter]

When does a sales person become entitled to the commission? (ex. upon award, upon contract signing, upon payment of services, etc.)

 

So long as that event has already happened, you would be entitled to a commission.

 

also, how is the incentive scheme worded? Are there qualifications? Can it be changed by the company?

 

If not, then you would be entitled.

 

Just make sure all these have already happened.

 

Also, be aware that going to the NLRC will damage your relations with the company. After you file a complaint, expect the company to to look for opportunities to terminate your employment.

 

Also, are you an employee or part of management? This could impact on whether you can go to the NLRC or not.

Hi rocco69, thanks for the quick response.

 

After checking my signed contract with the company I found out that the sales commission term is not written on it. Being one of the sales team in my company we can receive a commission as long as we closed the deal, hit the 80% monthly quota and get at least 3% margin on it. The accounting dept. will include the sales commission in our payslip after 6-8 months after closing the deal. The commission we can get will be computed based on their Sales Incentive Scheme. By the way HR gave me copy of this incentive scheme upon signing the contract.

 

The project that I mention was closed September 2018 and I receive the incentive April 2019. Waiting for 7 months I'm expecting to receive almost 1 million commission from that project but they just gave me a merely 5% of it. Now the same project occur again because its a subscription based product and closed it again for the 2nd time. I'm thinking they will do it again giving me lousy reasons for not giving me the correct commission.

 

Right now I'm looking for another job opportunity before I resign and complaint them to NLRC. Am I doing the right move? Is it possible to settle this if I talk to the HR regarding the issue.

 

Thanks

[barrysta_]

Hi rocco69, thanks for the quick response.

 

After checking my signed contract with the company I found out that the sales commission term is not written on it. Being one of the sales team in my company we can receive a commission as long as we closed the deal, hit the 80% monthly quota and get at least 3% margin on it. The accounting dept. will include the sales commission in our payslip after 6-8 months after closing the deal. The commission we can get will be computed based on their Sales Incentive Scheme. By the way HR gave me copy of this incentive scheme upon signing the contract.

 

The project that I mention was closed September 2018 and I receive the incentive April 2019. Waiting for 7 months I'm expecting to receive almost 1 million commission from that project but they just gave me a merely 5% of it. Now the same project occur again because its a subscription based product and closed it again for the 2nd time. I'm thinking they will do it again giving me lousy reasons for not giving me the correct commission.

 

Right now I'm looking for another job opportunity before I resign and complaint them to NLRC. Am I doing the right move? Is it possible to settle this if I talk to the HR regarding the issue.

 

Thanks

Dropping by to give a few cents, though just a disclaimer that this isn't conclusive:

 

1) Was this so-called incentive scheme by your company properly explained to you during your interview/orientation/job offer? If not, do you have evidence to prove they didn't? If you can get that sort of information then you can contest that the terms of employment weren't explained properly to you, therefore you had no actual consent.

 

2) Keep all your payslips, etc. This will be important to establish that you had an employer-employee relationship, which they may deny by pointing to the terms of your contract. Which brings us to number 3...

 

3) Keep your signed copy of the contract safe. Look at the terms, particularly your job description. These days, a lot of employers add the term "Manager", "Officer", or "Associate" to a job title not only because these words make it sound snazzy, but also because they'll try to use it later on to claim you're not rank-and-file but rather management. Take solace in the fact that the Labor Arbiter will not fall for those cheap tricks--SC rulings have pointed this out countless times. Only idiots would make (or fall for) those arguments.

 

I agree with Libertine that this will definitely sour your relations, and even getting a whiff of your plans may make them out to get you. Make sure you're fine losing the job before proceeding, kung segurista ka.

 

Tibay lang ng loob sir. Magastos at nakakapagod ito for sure though. If you decide to push through, kodos to you for standing up for yourself and helping improve Pinoy labor conditions one case at a time.

[sag_guy]

Not sure where to post this, this seems like a good thread. What are possible repercussions of being arrested/caught while in a spa?

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LFPvpbXQ-JM&fbclid=IwAR2XTKqET_4U-9m1EbyoGFZrvDDPa67gZE2-UH1Oc-wvt2XAJeOAs-CD7ho

 

 

 

If you are in a spa (legit) no liability.

 

If you are in a spa offering sexual services and caught on ac, you maybe charged for use of traffick persons.

[Rickyboyyy]

Goodmorning po tanong lang ano ano po yung mga puwede isampa na kaso sa mga mahuhuli na unfaithful na asawa? Thank you

[Joaquin DC]

Goodmorning po tanong lang ano ano po yung mga puwede isampa na kaso sa mga mahuhuli na unfaithful na asawa? Thank you

If your wife is having sexual intercourse with another man, you can file a case for adultery against your wife.

You need proof that your wife is having sexual intercourse with another man.

 

You may also file for legal separation on the ground of sexual infidelity.