legal Free Legal Advice

[NoX]

Pipol, My computer is already overrun by lots of viruses, pati spyware and cookies, Can somebody point me in the right direction to remove all of them. Maron bang free site to have dem removed? Thanks.

just a thought, sometimes it's easier to reformat than to try removing all the virus and spyware in your system. but that is only if you have all your installer cds on hand.

[The_Blade]

mga attys: hingi lang ko ng advice. paano ba procedure para palitan ang surname ng illigitimate child (gamitin and surename ng father with consent of cousre)? magkano kaya damage?

[thunderboy123]

extreme,

Thanks dun sa mga license number sa AVG 7.0 pero blocked pa rin sana meron ka pa

[roxysnonie]

extreme,

Thanks dun sa mga license number sa AVG 7.0 pero blocked pa rin sana meron ka pa

thanks for the advice!

 

sir extreme, got anymore magic numbers up your sleeves? help!!!

Edited October 26, 2004 by roxysnonie

[NoX]

ok ba talaga yan? AVG is the antivirus from grisoft.com, right?

how does it compare to symantec's norton antivirus?

[Eraserheads]

Pipol, My computer is already overrun by lots of viruses, pati spyware and cookies, Can somebody point me in the right direction to remove all of them. Maron bang free site to have dem removed? Thanks.

Free scan... Check dis one...

 

http://housecall.trendmicro.com/housecall/start_corp.asp

[NoX]

alrighty, this is just stupid. why cant users edit/delete their own posts?

[bokam]

Specs,

 

In that case, RA 7432 applies since RA9257 was promulgated by GMA last 26 Feb 2004 which took effect sometime after that.

 

Under RA7432, a Senior Citizens ID issued by the OSCA is generally required to be presented to the establishment before the senior citizen can avail of the privileges granted to him under sec. 4 of said the law. So if the lawyer did not present a valid S.C. ID, then you can use that as a defense.

 

Also, as you’ve said, only citizens of at least 60 years of age and with an annual income of not more than Php60,000.00 are considered qualified senior citizens provided they rendered service to the community.

 

In short, only senior citizens with an annual income of Php60,000.00 or less can avail of the privileges under Sec. 4 of RA7432.

 

With regard to the other matter, it doesn’t matter if it is for take out or dine-in, “qualified” senior citizens should get a 20% discount on their purchases as explained by coychee.

 

But if you feel that a senior citizen is abusing the privileges granted to him under the law, then, under RA9257, you may report him to the OSCA. Said law punishes abusive senior citizens with a fine of not less than P5,000.00 but not more than P50,000.00 AND imprisonment of not less than 6 months.

 

On the upside, RA9257 allows you to claim whatever discounts you have granted to senior citizens as tax deductions when you file your ITR.

 

With regard to revocation of business permits, the Implementing Rules of RA7432 provides:

 

ARTICLE 12. Penalties. —

x x x

Any organization, private/government establishment and government department/bureau/agency/institution who “willfully” refuses to grant the privileges given to senior citizens or violates any provision of RA 7432 shall be administratively dealt with by any of the agency/department concerned including, but not limited to the cancellation of permit/s or franchise/s to operate a business establishment or institution or public service.

 

Therefore, your business permit may be revoked if you failed to give a 20% to a “qualified” senior citizen.

[totoybola]

ahhhh what happens kung 18 below>

Malamang qualified or simple seduction.

[bokam]

joe629,

 

Am really sorry to hear that but not much can be done considering the case has already been decided by the Supreme Court. Even the Motion for Reconsideration was denied.

 

On a side note, minute resolutions by the Supreme Court are considered valid and not unconstitutional.

 

As for legal remedies, was the Indeterminate Sentence Law (PD 968 as amended) applied to their penalty? If so, they could get out a bit sooner than that imposed. They could avail parole also if they are qualified.

 

As for political remedies, pardon comes into mind. But I'm not sure how though and I believe it would be useless coz the term is short.

 

As for the decision you cited, I believe the case was modified by the Supreme Court in view of the Francisco case considering that the latter is a decision rendered En Banc and after the promulgation of the Pedro Santos case which was in 1983.

 

Sec. 4 (3), Article VII of the 1987 Constitution provides that:

x x x

No doctrine or principle of law laid down by the court in a decision rendered en banc or in division may be modified or reversed except by the court sitting en banc.

x x x

 

Again, I am sory.

[Wolf]

mga attys: hingi lang ko ng advice.  paano ba procedure para palitan ang surname ng illigitimate child (gamitin and surename ng father with consent of cousre)? magkano kaya damage?

This is a actually a new law granting the father the right to allow his illegitimate child to his his surname, provided certain conditions are met.

 

I believe a petition for this is not necessary as in change of name. Baka pwede na sa civil registrar na lang... parang correction of entry. Mas madali ang ganito.

 

I dont have any idea as to the damage.

 

Hope this helps.

Edited August 2, 2004 by Wolf

[younghermit]

Can I ask a hypothethical question?

 

How does Arts. 106-109 (on labor contracting) apply to this scenario?

 

Corp A -- client- with vast resources

|

Corp B -- no substantial capital ( hence labor only contracting?)

|

Corp C - no substantial capital ( hence labor only contracting?)

|

Laborer/employee-- underpaid (ie. 200/day)

 

Assuming that the activity/work of the Laborer/employee is directly related to or necessary to the principal business of Corp A, whom can the laborer sue in case the latter's (laborer) wages is below the statutory minimum (hence underpaid)?

Can the laborer sue Corp A? Is the laborer's remedy limited to Corp B & C?

[younghermit]

alrighty, this is just stupid. why cant users edit/delete their own posts?

Ask the MODs, it is they who have the power to tweak the options available to common user. Maybe its a matter of policy - adds stability to the forum. Prevents malicious users from suddenly editing their posts after earlier provoking a debate etc.

[coychee]

mga attys: hingi lang ko ng advice.  paano ba procedure para palitan ang surname ng illigitimate child (gamitin and surename ng father with consent of cousre)? magkano kaya damage?

Under R.A. 9255, illegitimate children may use the surname of their father if their filiation has been expressly recognized by the father through the record of birth appearing in the civil register, or when an admission in a public document or private handwritten instrument is made by the father.

 

To change the surname of an illegitimate child, he should file a petition for change of name before the Regional Trial Court since it is not a mere correction of typographical errors which can be done adminstratively through the local civil registry.

 

The main expenses in filing a petition will be the cost of publication and attorney's fees.

Edited July 30, 2004 by coychee

[specs]

thanx for the enlightenment