Jump to content
  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.

Free Legal Advice


Butsoy

Recommended Posts

Mga attorney, greetings !

 

1. Are all rape charges alleged by women 18 yr & over, non bailable ? or may exception ?

 

All rape cases (female) have the minimum punishment of reclusion perpetua (40 years). That means bail is not a right. But technically, its still bailable. But unlike other crimes with a lesser penalty, there must be a bail hearing. The only exception to being lower than reclusion perpetua is when rape is done without intercourse like inserting anything in the mouth or anal orifice, hence men can be victims of rape. (that is true!)

 

2. What are the legal precautions to take, when having consenting sex w/women 18 & over, para hindi nila baliktarin and knock you over with an allegation of rape afterward?

 

If the women is 18 or over, make sure that it is consensual. A date preceding would justify consent. But remember, a no is a no. To be precise, make sure the ?NO? is before insertion (for the ladies out there).

 

3. Puede ba ang signed pre-sex statement, ala pre-nuptial, attesting to their free will and volition to have sex ?

 

If that were the case, I can sue every lousy MP or escort girl who gave me a lousy popoy. Just think about it, if one violated the pre-sex agreement, can you go to court and sue?

 

4. Marami sana ang ma enlighten nito, thank you in advance .

 

Just remember, if you hear the word ?NO?, listen and stop. It?s not worth the time in jail. This part is true, YOU WILL GET RAPED IN JAIL! Your butt is open season. Your new S.O. will belong to the Sigue Sigue Sputnik gang.

 

If you get caught, you will spend thousand if not millions in legal fees or bribe money. Its better to spend 5K on a high class escort girl rather than a night in ?your ass is mine? city jail.

 

 

:o

 

HIrap minsan eh.. sabi ng sabi ng " no!!no!!! no!!! pls. NO!!!!! " pero ayaw bitawan ang ulo mo at isinusubo pa sa dibdib nya... sabay nilalapirot ang tenga mo ng kanyang maiinit na labi...o di kaya sa keps nya.. o di kaya hinahawakan ng ang potoy mo at siya na ang nag papasok sa pinto ng kaligayahan... pano ba yan!!!!!! hehehehe

e record na lang kaya? kaya lang mag paalam ka sa girl....hehehehe

 

Butsoy

Link to comment
or download nang software like tweakUI ......hmmm now that i think about it i'm not even sure if those kind of softwares work hehehehe.....

its a good tool... yun nga lang kelangan alam mo kung ano yung gagawin mo... hehehe

it does the shortcut when changing or adding some settings, unlike doing it manually you have to locate all the connected settings to do the changes you want.

Link to comment
Is it safe to assume that lawyers are liars? Tanong lang po.  :blush:

B) No more than any other ordinary person. It's just that lawyers tend to see more technicalities than other people to justify the non-full disclosures of facts. In other words, not saying anything does not make a person a liar. :) That's why we are often mistaken as being liars. :) Or maybe it's because we have a way of hiding the truth without actually making untruthful statements that makes us look like liars.

Edited by freelicker
Link to comment
Guest templar
Is it safe to assume that lawyers are liars? Tanong lang po.  :blush:

John C. Strange was a leading NY trial lawyer in the 1930s. The epitaph in his grave read:

 

"Here lies an honest lawyer.....and that is Strange"

 

Agree with freelicker, we're no worse than other professionals or other persons for that matter.....

 

What a layman understands in the law generally, we understand in a more in-depth, specialized level .... how we are able to make the subtle differentiations and diverse interpretations which are usually mistaken for lies are due to our training and not our persons .... there is a big difference!

 

I believe than when we do lie ... we lie as persons, and not as lawyers because there is nothing peculiar in our training that makes us better liars than any other profession, nor for that matter, any other person.

Link to comment
Mga Sir,

 

anybody here who is specializing in civil cases such as legal separation or annulment..I just need some information..thanks..

Bossing,

 

I know something about the topic but I wouldn't consider myself a specialist on it (having handled only a couple of legal separation and only one annulment case). I haven't lost any case at this point, at least before the Supreme Court came out with its ruling on Psychological Incapacity. But if you think I would be able to help, feel free to ask. If I can't answer, I'm sure there are others out there who would be able to help.

uyy Sir freelicker kaw pala yan...sayang di ka sumama sa swimming..di bale next time invite kita ulit...

 

actually my question lang ako about legal separation/annulment..when is the right time to file it and how can long it will take to settle this kind of cases..

 

how much will cost me to file these kind of cases?

 

Thank you and hope to hear from you..

Link to comment
freelicker Posted: Mar 17 2003, 04:31 PM 

 

Tourista (in reply to your questions).

 

1) Normal rape cases are not really non-bailable. It becomes none bailable if it is considered as a heinous crime (rape with murder, rape by a band, rape of minors, etc.). But when there was no qualifying circumstance to make it a heinouos crime, it remains bailable. 

 

2) There are no legal precautions to protect yourself from a charge of rape (especially pag binaliktad ka ng girl) other than making sure that the intercourse is not accompanied by force. You just have to make sure that circumstances would make it appear that there is no force to the sexual act. Example, having the girl drive the car to check in the motel or having the girl check in sa hotel for you. 

 

3) There is no such thing as a pre-sexual agreement. 

 

4) Hope it does enlighten people. 

 

I just like to add that Art.3 Sec. 13 of the Phil. Constitution States:

"All persons, except those charged with offenses punishable by reclusion perpetua when evidence of guilt is strong, shall, before conviction, be bailable by sufficient sureties, or be released on recognizance as may be provided by law..."

 

Based on this, although a crime is classified as heinous (qualified rape and others), to be non-bailable requires that "evidence of guilt is strong". So if the prosecution has not overcome this requirement, the presumption exists that the offense is BAILABLE.

Link to comment

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
×
  • Create New...