Jump to content
  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.

Antonio Trillanes: Criticism And Controversies


Recommended Posts

fine then ...isa lang naman ang tanong lahat ba ng na grant ng amnesty eh fully complied at hindi natulad kay trililing? otherwise shouldn’t be the amnesty of these people all be voided and not only trililing.

 

Ang sinagot dito is if someone questioned it. Kanya kanya naman sila nag file kaya hidni naman automatic na kapag na void yung isa void na rin yung iba. Si Trillanes kasi masyadong uhaw sa media kaya ayun nag backlash sa kanya. Bakit hindi siya o ikaw ang mag question sa iba para maimbistigahan na rin di ba. Own action naman ni Calida yung kay Trillanes para lumakas ka Du30 eh, so unless may ibang mag reklamo ng formal di gagalaw yung sa iba.

Link to comment

 

Ang sinagot dito is if someone questioned it. Kanya kanya naman sila nag file kaya hidni naman automatic na kapag na void yung isa void na rin yung iba. Si Trillanes kasi masyadong uhaw sa media kaya ayun nag backlash sa kanya. Bakit hindi siya o ikaw ang mag question sa iba para maimbistigahan na rin di ba. Own action naman ni Calida yung kay Trillanes para lumakas ka Du30 eh, so unless may ibang mag reklamo ng formal di gagalaw yung sa iba.

Was there anyone who questioned the validity of trillanes'amnesty?

 

AFAIK it was self initiated by this administration. Why dont the admin initiate as well dun sa mga kaalyado kung as they said dahil irregular lang talaga and they are not trying to single him out. Mukhang iisa ang motibo iba-iba lang ang pamamaraan. Agree ka ba?

Link to comment

Was there anyone who questioned the validity of trillanes'amnesty? Sinagot ko na yan diba ayaw mo lang maniwala?

 

AFAIK it was self initiated by this administration. Why dont the admin initiate as well dun sa mga kaalyado kung as they said dahil irregular lang talaga and they are not trying to single him out. Mukhang iisa ang motibo iba-iba lang ang pamamaraan. Agree ka ba?

 

Naka broadcast naman na sinabing kung may mag question. Bakit walang gustong mag lakas loob? Bakit hindi dinamay si Alejano, baka kasi kumpleto papeles?

Link to comment

 

Naka broadcast naman na sinabing kung may mag question. Bakit walang gustong mag lakas loob? Bakit hindi dinamay si Alejano, baka kasi kumpleto papeles?

Nope in one interview sinbi niya na dumaan sila ng parehong processo ni trililing.

 

So now u know bakit di kapanipaniwala ang sinagot mo.

 

Hindi ba nakabroadcast din yun mga pinagsasabi ni dutae na di natupad kaya nga binabatikos ni trililing. Ano nangyari?

Edited by rooster69ph
Link to comment

Nope in one interview sinbi niya na dumaan sila ng parehong processo ni trililing.

 

So now u know bakit di kapanipaniwala ang sinagot mo.

 

Hindi ba nakabroadcast din yun mga pinagsasabi ni dutae na di natupad kaya nga binabatikos ni trililing. Ano nangyari?

 

E di questionin niyo rin yung kay Alejano and others. Wala naman problema sa akin yun. Tanong nga bakit walang gumagawa ng pormal puro laway.

Link to comment

Hay...read and understand the last paragraph.

 

Sige sisimplehan ko ... sa tingin mo kapag may nagreklamo uusad ba ito o pagaaksayahan ni calida tulad ng pagaaksaya niya ng panahon kay trililing despite un mga press release? Nagpapaniwala ka pa ba sa lahat ng pinagsasabi nila?

 

Besides why should i or anyone still question that of alejano when in fact he already made a public statement about it. That in itself should trigger an investigation...if and only if they want to

Link to comment

 

E di questionin niyo rin yung kay Alejano and others. Wala naman problema sa akin yun. Tanong nga bakit walang gumagawa ng pormal puro laway.

 

That is a great question.

 

The answer is... complicated. Mostly because this Duterte regime can't make up its mind on what basis to use to invalidate Trillanes' grant of amnesty.

 

Under Proc 572, dahil daw "no application was filed." This pertained specifically to Trillanes, so siya lang ang may problema dapat.

 

When various secondary evidence surfaced showing that, yes, Trillanes did in fact file an application for amnesty, biglang kambyo: now the issue is, former DND Secretary Gazmin signed the Certificate of Amnesty daw, ergo hindi daw valid yung grant of amnesty because <insert flimsy legal reasoning here>.

 

There goes the problem: it has been a matter of practice and expedience that after a President issues a proclamation granting amnesty (which is itself the act of granting amnesty as provided in the Constitution), the tasks of processing the applications and approving the applications based on the guidelines provided in the presidential proclamation are delegated to either a Cabinet Secretary or a Commission convened for that specific purpose. So under the new theory, *all* amnesty grantees from the time of Marcos were invalidly granted amnesty, as pretty much all past Presidents granted amnesty in this manner.

 

So paano na? Under the first theory walang problema, si Trillanes lang ang may sabit. Kaya lang, walang factual basis. Under the second theory naman, kung invalid dahil lang si Gazmin yung nakapirma, eh di under the constitutional principle of equal protection, dapat lahat ng kaso ng lahat ng amnesty grantees ibubuhay ulit. Sinu-sino ang mga isasama?

 

- Oakwood mutineers

- RAM boys like Sen. Honasan

- MILF

- CPP-NDF-NPA

- MNLF (kasama si Duterte BFF Nur Misuari)

 

Sa tingin niyo ba ganun kalala maghanap ng away si Duterte? :lol:

Link to comment
  • 3 weeks later...

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
×
  • Create New...