rooster69ph Posted March 8, 2017 Share Posted March 8, 2017 Oh look... 3 weeks after the presidents orders, AMLC still hasnt released any records. Why am I not surprised? Another political bluff just like Panelo's SPA. http://news.abs-cbn.com/news/03/08/17/trillanes-despite-duterte-order-to-amlc-still-no-bank-records Trillanes: Despite Duterte order to AMLC, still no bank recordsRon Gagalac, ABS-CBN News Posted at Mar 08 2017 09:37 PM MANILA – Senator Antonio Trillanes IV on Wednesday said the Anti-Money Laundering Council (AMLC) has yet to agree to his request to have the records detailing President Rodrigo Duterte’s bank transactions released.Trillanes earlier filed a a request with the AMLC asking for Duterte’s bank records. He made the request after Duterte publicly directed the AMLC to disclose information on his net worth. Trillanes believes the bank records would prove that Duterte had over P2 billion in bank transactions."Nung inilabas ko, inutusan daw nya AMLC. Sumulat ako sa AMLC hihingin ko sana listahan ng transaction. Sumulat sila sa akin, iko-consider daw nila sa meeting nila pero hanggang ngayon wala pa," Trillanes said."Ang sinasabi ko ang dali nito, nag-offer na nga ako pakita mo bank accounts mo, prove me wrong, mag-reresign ako, pwede nyo na ako ipatumba, pero ayaw nya gawin, iniiwasan nya ito.”Trillanes, confident about his allegations against Duterte, again offered to resign and even send himself to jail if he will be proven wrong."Kapag mali ako sa alegasyon ko na mayroon sya P2 billion, hindi lang ako magreresign, magwa-walk in din ako sa kulungan, kahit saan nya gusto," Trillanes said. Yan na nga ang sinasabi ko eh ....moro moro na naman ni Duterte ito, pakitang tae este tao kunyari transparent. Mga bobo at isa't kalahating tanga lang ang naniniwala at nauuto nito. Quote Link to comment
Edmund Dantes Posted March 9, 2017 Share Posted March 9, 2017 Yan na nga ang sinasabi ko eh ....moro moro na naman ni Duterte ito, pakitang t** este tao kunyari transparent. Mga bobo at isa't kalahating tanga lang ang naniniwala at nauuto nito. Ang tanong nasan ba probable cause kasi? Nakasulat yan sa AMLA promise! na notwithstanding any bank laws, pwede yan pabuksan kung me probable cause. Quote Link to comment
haroots2 Posted March 9, 2017 Share Posted March 9, 2017 Ang tanong nasan ba probable cause kasi? Nakasulat yan sa AMLA promise! na notwithstanding any bank laws, pwede yan pabuksan kung me probable cause. Mas may probable cause pa nga na buksan ang bank acct. ni De5 kasi may mga 1st hand witnesses na nakatanggap siya ng drug money. Quote Link to comment
juan t Posted March 9, 2017 Share Posted March 9, 2017 Ang tanong nasan ba probable cause kasi? Nakasulat yan sa AMLA promise! na notwithstanding any bank laws, pwede yan pabuksan kung me probable cause.I see. So bale wala pala yung utos ng president. Perception engineering lang pala yung announcement na imbestigahan siya ng AMLA. Quote Link to comment
rooster69ph Posted March 9, 2017 Share Posted March 9, 2017 Mas may probable cause pa nga na buksan ang bank acct. ni De5 kasi may mga 1st hand witnesses na nakatanggap siya ng drug money. Ganun naman pala so binuksan na ba para makita un mga sinabing binigay na pera? As it is how credible can these witnesses be na kesyo may binigay na pera pero hindi naman ma collaborate at ma trace un perang sinasabi. Sabi ko nga if de5 is proven guilty she deserve ti rot in jail. Quote Link to comment
rooster69ph Posted March 9, 2017 Share Posted March 9, 2017 I see. So bale wala pala yung utos ng president. Perception engineering lang pala yung announcement na imbestigahan siya ng AMLA.Isama mo na rin yun magbibigay daw ng waiver sa bangko pero spa ang binigay. Ayun palakpak mga dutertards ... very transparent nga naman ni duterte. Ang dali kasi mauto ng mga dutertards. Quote Link to comment
haroots2 Posted March 9, 2017 Share Posted March 9, 2017 Ganun naman pala so binuksan na ba para makita un mga sinabing binigay na pera? As it is how credible can these witnesses be na kesyo may binigay na pera pero hindi naman ma collaborate at ma trace un perang sinasabi. Sabi ko nga if de5 is proven guilty she deserve ti rot in jail. Hindi lang naman yung nagbigay, nag confirm din yung tumanggap ng pera. Quote Link to comment
rooster69ph Posted March 9, 2017 Share Posted March 9, 2017 Ang tanong nasan ba probable cause kasi? Nakasulat yan sa AMLA promise! na notwithstanding any bank laws, pwede yan pabuksan kung me probable cause.Probable cause is needed if amlc will investigate. Pinaiimbestigahan ba ni digong o pinadidisclose sa amlc? Thus waiver ang kailangan not probable cause Quote Link to comment
rooster69ph Posted March 9, 2017 Share Posted March 9, 2017 Hindi lang naman yung nagbigay, nag confirm din yung tumanggap ng pera.So may nagbigay daw ng drug money kay de5 at may tumanggap. Nag confirm un tumanggap na nakuha niya yun pera. Eto simpleng tanong si delima ba un inabutan ng pera mismo na siyang tinutukoy mong tumanggap at nag confirm na tumanggap? Quote Link to comment
Edmund Dantes Posted March 9, 2017 Share Posted March 9, 2017 Probable cause is needed if amlc will investigate. Pinaiimbestigahan ba ni digong o pinadidisclose sa amlc? Thus waiver ang kailangan not probable cause Kaya nga! Alangan naman randomly silipin na lang nila bawat bank account dahil trip lang ni Trillanes. Nak ng..... kuha nga sya probable cause para pafreeze pa assets ng pamilya nya na inaakusahan nya din. Tapos ayan na, good luck kung me mahanap nga sya. Quote Link to comment
rooster69ph Posted March 9, 2017 Share Posted March 9, 2017 Kaya nga! Alangan naman randomly silipin na lang nila bawat bank account dahil trip lang ni Trillanes. Nak ng..... kuha nga sya probable cause para pafreeze pa assets ng pamilya nya na inaakusahan nya din. Tapos ayan na, good luck kung me mahanap nga sya.So anong problema at pinipilit mo ang probable cause? Sino kukuha probable cause si digong? Sabi ni digong sa amlc idisclose ... account naman niya siya ang involve thus waiver lang katapat nun. Simple as that Quote Link to comment
Edmund Dantes Posted March 9, 2017 Share Posted March 9, 2017 So anong problema at pinipilit mo ang probable cause? Sino kukuha probable cause si digong?Sabi ni digong sa amlc idisclose ... account naman niya siya ang involve thus waiver lang katapat nun. Simple as that Wala nga talagang problema! Yun trillanes mo gumagawa ng problema. Kung gusto nya pasilip yun maanumalyang account eh di produce sya ng probable cause! Ganun kasimple. Bakit mo pinapasa sa inaakusahan responsibilidad ng pagpapatunay. Quote Link to comment
haroots2 Posted March 10, 2017 Share Posted March 10, 2017 So may nagbigay daw ng drug money kay de5 at may tumanggap. Nag confirm un tumanggap na nakuha niya yun pera. Eto simpleng tanong si delima ba un inabutan ng pera mismo na siyang tinutukoy mong tumanggap at nag confirm na tumanggap? Tanong mo na lang sa kanyang sweet lover. Quote Link to comment
FleurDeLune Posted April 18, 2017 Share Posted April 18, 2017 This thread is now open for regular postings / discussions. Quote Link to comment
camiar Posted April 20, 2017 Share Posted April 20, 2017 The Supreme Court (SC) has allowed the electoral protest of former senator Ferdinand Marcos Jr. against Vice President Leni Robredo to proceed, rejecting her plea to have the case dismissed for lack of jurisdiction. http://www.philstar.com/headlines/2017/02/17/1672965/sc-gives-green-light-bongbong-protest Robredo camp: Bongbong Marcos should pay P185M for poll protesthttp://cnnphilippines.com/news/2017/04/17/marcos-should-pay-185-million-robredo.html Bongbong pays P36M initial installment for poll protesthttp://www.philstar.com/headlines/2017/04/17/1691171/bongbong-pays-p36m-poll-protest Quote Link to comment
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.