Bugatti Veyron Posted March 26, 2013 Share Posted March 26, 2013 approximately half of americans (47%) don't pay federal income taxes. but most people have to pay some form of local tax.those that do pay federal taxes, pay a progressive tax, with about the top 1% paying about the same as 95% of the population. the 'rich' also pay a capital gains tax - which means they pay taxes on money that's already been taxed. so you gotta ask - is this good for wealth creation, business, and productivity?In my opinion it is not. It discourages people from working hard and instead rely on the state for benefits. It fosters sloth, a mendicant mentality, and the general feeling of living in a socialist state. Not unlike the former economic systems in the former Soviet Union and China which discouraged hard work and the entrepreneurial spirit. The Chinese economy has since turned to unbridled capitalism while the US, the bastion of freedom, the good life, and hard work has moved towards becoming a socialist state. Quote Link to comment
friendly0603 Posted March 26, 2013 Share Posted March 26, 2013 The reason why I focused on this aspect is because my nephew (my mom's only nephew) was born in SFO in 1991, long before the new tax regulations came into effect. So there was no way for my brother and his wife to anticipate this. Not that it matters. My sis-in-law had a previous difficult pregnancy with a former husband which almost cost her her life. Hence the need to give birth in the US. My nephew is now studying in upstate New York but he has no intentions of living there. He loves the Philippines and considers it his country. He was raised in the Philippines. He actually didn't want to study there but his parents insisted. He might as well take advantage of his US citizen status to get benefits while he's still a student. But as soon as he graduates, he (and his parents) will need to carefully evaluate whether it's worth keeping his US citizen status. As it is, my brother has to make checks payable to the school instead of to his son. Otherwise, my nephew will be charged a pretty steep gift tax. By paying the school directly, my brother saves a bundle.Then you are trying to gain the advantage of American education. He can always opt to study in the phils then to avoid the excessive tax. Quote Link to comment
Bugatti Veyron Posted March 27, 2013 Share Posted March 27, 2013 Then you are trying to gain the advantage of American education. He can always opt to study in the phils then to avoid the excessive tax. Actually it's his parents who want him to get an American education because the course he's enrolled in isn't available in the Philippines. He's not taxed if he doesn't receive the tuition fee in his bank account. That's why my brother sends the money directly to the school. My nephew actually prefers to study here but his parents think otherwise. Besides, genetic research courses are hard to come by in Philippine schools. Quote Link to comment
friendly0603 Posted March 27, 2013 Share Posted March 27, 2013 Actually it's his parents who want him to get an American education because the course he's enrolled in isn't available in the Philippines. He's not taxed if he doesn't receive the tuition fee in his bank account. That's why my brother sends the money directly to the school. My nephew actually prefers to study here but his parents think otherwise. Besides, genetic research courses are hard to come by in Philippine schools.If the course isn't generally available, are the jobs related to this course available in the Phils?It doesn't look like this kid will work in the Phils as well. He and his parents are trying to get the benefits of his American citizenship. It's not all positives now. So just live with it. Quote Link to comment
dungeonbaby Posted March 27, 2013 Share Posted March 27, 2013 (edited) on second thought, watching events in Cyprus unfold, an economic civil war in America doesn't seem so far-fetched anymore. but there are a few more years to go to correct this trajectory. The problem isn't reserves, as there are lots of that even for oil, but production rate vs. demand. That is, the energy returns for other sources of energy are lower, and thus production rate is unable to keep up with demand. That's why we are now resorting to non-conventional production: http://www.economist...and-consumption you really need to update your reading list. what do you think of clean coal for starters? Edited March 27, 2013 by dungeonbaby Quote Link to comment
oscartamaguchiblackface Posted March 31, 2013 Share Posted March 31, 2013 The most honest three and a half minutes of television? http://www.safeshare.tv/w/UAGOcLSuLX Quote Link to comment
harmless0810 Posted April 1, 2013 Share Posted April 1, 2013 people looking for better opportunities are leaving the blue states (ny, california, illinois, etc.) for the red states (texas, georgia, south carolina, etc.). longtime residents from the vibrant states call these newcomers "locusts" because they expect the same treatment they got from their previous states in their new environment. worse, they will still vote for democrats because of their mindset. they'll k*ll the host body in due time. it happened in detroit, cleveland, san francisco, chicago and numerous cities across the u.s. 1 Quote Link to comment
hit05 Posted April 2, 2013 Share Posted April 2, 2013 In my opinion it is not. It discourages people from working hard and instead rely on the state for benefits. It fosters sloth, a mendicant mentality, and the general feeling of living in a socialist state. Not unlike the former economic systems in the former Soviet Union and China which discouraged hard work and the entrepreneurial spirit. The Chinese economy has since turned to unbridled capitalism while the US, the bastion of freedom, the good life, and hard work has moved towards becoming a socialist state. Ang layu ng analogy. China is unlike the USA mainly because of consumerism. The fall of the USSR was due to its leaders' envy of the American supermarket where the best products compete for market share. The cheap, innovative and value packed ideas and products dominate the market. The USA still enjoys the market economy and they still got cheap fuel, autos and other consumer products that are not available elsewhere. China never had a market economy but a centrally decided economy that went bust easily. Even today it is still centrally decided, reason for the militant stance to hide the TRUTH. The USSR also had the same sucked up system where political power is the source of inequality and the masses are forced to subsidize obsolete and irrelevant ideas of their leaders. They still subsidize errors and many Chinese resent poor engineering of thousands of school buildings that toppled after an earthquake and killed countless children. The Chinese also built a mega dam project that killed millions and drowned whole towns because of poor planning. Of course like the event at Cagayan de Oro where many Chinese got trapped too that necessitated the personal visit of the Chinese ambassador to race ahead of Filipino government to bury evidence of a huge illegal logging operation facilitated by the DENR. People are dying in that closed circuit system not because of corruption but due to error and ineptitude. Parehas lang sa Pilipinas yan tinatago yun mali kya hindi umaasenso. Dinadaan sa credentials na walang halaga dahil wala rin naman performance at delivery in terms of productivity and innovation. It is like our electricity and water expense. We pay for things we do not enjoy or use because government made a grave error in judgement. Quote Link to comment
dungeonbaby Posted April 4, 2013 Share Posted April 4, 2013 paanong malayo? all he said was that socialism doesn't encourage hard work or entrepreneurship. Quote Link to comment
wackyracer Posted April 4, 2013 Share Posted April 4, 2013 The most honest three and a half minutes of television? http://www.safeshare.tv/w/UAGOcLSuLX HBO's Newsroom Season 1 Episode 1This is good television Quote Link to comment
dungeonbaby Posted April 4, 2013 Share Posted April 4, 2013 (edited) HBO's Newsroom Season 1 Episode 1This is good television it may be good television but it's full of spin. never rely on hollywood for your facts. Edited April 4, 2013 by dungeonbaby Quote Link to comment
wackyracer Posted April 4, 2013 Share Posted April 4, 2013 ^ talking about spin, at least Newsroom doesn't masquerade itself as "real news" unlike that "news channel" FOX News Quote Link to comment
dungeonbaby Posted April 4, 2013 Share Posted April 4, 2013 ahh straight out of the liberal playbook. Quote Link to comment
harmless0810 Posted April 4, 2013 Share Posted April 4, 2013 the associated press will discontinue using "illegal immigrants" because according to them, it has ethnic undertones. they'll replace it with "undocumented immigrants". jay leno countered with, "they will now use the phrase undocumented democrats". Quote Link to comment
oscartamaguchiblackface Posted April 4, 2013 Share Posted April 4, 2013 the associated press will discontinue using "illegal immigrants" because according to them, it has ethnic undertones. they'll replace it with "undocumented immigrants". jay leno countered with, "they will now use the phrase undocumented democrats".Ha ha ha. Here's another example of political correctness that has changed the way we describe prople. So we have vertically challenged people (bansot) horizontally challenged people (mataba), mentally challenged (bobo) and so on. Trying not to hurt the feelings of people across the board is most difficult to achieve. Someway, somehow, we're all going to slip up and say something offensive even if we didn't mean to be offensive. It's been known to happen to the most well-meaning people. Quote Link to comment
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.