webslinger Posted January 3, 2010 Share Posted January 3, 2010 blazers wins over warriors despite key players wer injured...... Quote Link to comment
webslinger Posted January 9, 2010 Share Posted January 9, 2010 wow blazers r a dangerous team playing without key players they beat d lakers and drop to 9 straight loss at portland rose garden.... Quote Link to comment
vexy9 Posted January 12, 2010 Share Posted January 12, 2010 too bad nga lng ntalo s Cavs!sna nga lng manalo sa Bucks bukas. Quote Link to comment
Eddy Syet Posted January 13, 2010 Share Posted January 13, 2010 too bad nga lng ntalo s Cavs!sna nga lng manalo sa Bucks bukas. I watched their game against Cleveland... Hahaha! They gave the Cavs a scare in the 3rd quarter! Brandon Roy and Martell Webster combined to put Portland back in the game (with some help from Andre Miller as well). Too much LeBron James and Anderson Varejao in the fourth canto, though. An exciting game all throughout! Quote Link to comment
webslinger Posted January 14, 2010 Share Posted January 14, 2010 blazers win over d bucks but roy is hurt..... Quote Link to comment
vexy9 Posted January 14, 2010 Share Posted January 14, 2010 blazers win over d bucks but roy is hurt.....mukhang prone tlaga sa injury this season ang Blazers!daming injury sa players eh! nice thing though, bumalik n sa line up si "Daboy".& mlapit n bumalik si Outlaw. :thumbsupsmiley: Quote Link to comment
Guest megalodon Posted January 16, 2010 Share Posted January 16, 2010 No Roy, no Oden yet the Blazers dismantled a complete Magic team. What a shame. Quote Link to comment
Johann B@utista Posted January 16, 2010 Share Posted January 16, 2010 No Roy, no Oden yet the Blazers dismantled a complete Magic team. What a shame. I decided to follow Portland this season coz I believe that Odon would now be able to contribute. When Odon went down, I thought the season is over but this is a great team, even better that Houston, winning with so many injured starters. Go Blazers! Quote Link to comment
krustyclown Posted January 16, 2010 Share Posted January 16, 2010 (edited) a good team, injury prone nga lang Edited January 16, 2010 by krustyclown Quote Link to comment
jopoc Posted January 16, 2010 Share Posted January 16, 2010 (edited) No Roy, no Oden yet the Blazers dismantled a complete Magic team. What a shame. 1 all for the teams. nothing to be ashamed of. and its a home win. better than being 0-3 and beaten twice at home by a possible playoff rival. Edited January 16, 2010 by jopoc Quote Link to comment
vexy9 Posted January 16, 2010 Share Posted January 16, 2010 i think mganda ung depth ng team na 'to! c Roy lng nman ung star s line-up nla but they are composed of reliable & energetic guys who can contribute any given day. :cool: hopefully mging healthy ung line-up as soon as posible. Quote Link to comment
Guest megalodon Posted January 17, 2010 Share Posted January 17, 2010 1 all for the teams. nothing to be ashamed of. and its a home win. better than being 0-3 and beaten twice at home by a possible playoff rival. At least that playoff rival was at full strength and not missing 2 key players and that team that you're referring to was also missing key players so no shame in that. What's shameful is being beaten at full strength by a team missing 2 key players. Quote Link to comment
jopoc Posted January 17, 2010 Share Posted January 17, 2010 (edited) At least that playoff rival was at full strength and not missing 2 key players and that team that you're referring to was also missing key players so no shame in that. What's shameful is being beaten at full strength by a team missing 2 key players. a win is a win, a lost is a lost. there is no point justifying a loss coz it does not change anything. its 1 all between portland and orlando and not 0-3 which is more humiliating. Edited January 17, 2010 by jopoc Quote Link to comment
Guest megalodon Posted January 17, 2010 Share Posted January 17, 2010 (edited) a win is a win, a lost is a lost. there is no point justifying a loss coz it does not change anything. its 1 all between portland and orlando and not 0-3 which is more humiliating.Yup a win for a Portland team missing its two key players over a complete Magic team. Last time I checked, the Magic are 4th place in the East and second in their division to Atlanta. Edited January 17, 2010 by megalodon Quote Link to comment
vexy9 Posted January 17, 2010 Share Posted January 17, 2010 WIZARD & SIXERS next opponent! hopefully mkabalik na si Roy! Quote Link to comment
jopoc Posted January 17, 2010 Share Posted January 17, 2010 Yup a win for a Portland team missing its two key players over a complete Magic team. Last time I checked, the Magic are 4th place in the East and second in their division to Atlanta. but isnt it that what you are preaching is that regular season wins dont count? Yup regular season wins don't count. complete or incomplete line-up, a win is a win. a lost is a lost. yes, the magic lost to the blazers, they are on a slump now. but it does not change the fact that they also won against the blazers, it is 1 all for them, not 0-3. Quote Link to comment
Guest megalodon Posted January 18, 2010 Share Posted January 18, 2010 (edited) but isnt it that what you are preaching is that regular season wins dont count? complete or incomplete line-up, a win is a win. a lost is a lost. yes, the magic lost to the blazers, they are on a slump now. but it does not change the fact that they also won against the blazers, it is 1 all for them, not 0-3. We're talking of this particular game. I was just saying that it's a shame for the Magic to lose this game to a team missing two key players. Did I mention the playoffs here? The fact of the matter is the Magic lost to a much weaker team in this game. Shame on them. Edited January 18, 2010 by megalodon Quote Link to comment
jopoc Posted January 18, 2010 Share Posted January 18, 2010 (edited) We're talking of this particular game. I was just saying that it's a shame for the Magic to lose this game to a team missing two key players. Did I mention the playoffs here? The fact of the matter is the Magic lost to a much weaker team in this game. Shame on them. the blazers is not a MUCH weaker team. they are winning despite the injuries (they are 5th in the west). it is nothing to be ashamed of, its not like the magic lost to the clippers or warriors. no excuses, magic lost to the blazers. but nothing to be ashamed of. the blazers is a good team, unlike the clippers or warriors. Edited January 18, 2010 by jopoc Quote Link to comment
Guest megalodon Posted January 18, 2010 Share Posted January 18, 2010 (edited) the blazers is not a MUCH weaker team. they are winning despite the injuries (they are 5th in the west). it is nothing to be ashamed of, its not like the magic lost to the clippers or warriors. no excuses, magic lost to the blazers. but nothing to be ashamed of. the blazers is a good team, unlike the clippers or warriors. Yes, the Blazers are not a weak team when they're complete. I guess you didn't take note of the phrase "in this game". Haha! What's the significance of the Clippers and Warriors? We're talking of the Magic getting lambasted by an undermanned Blazer team and you're talking about the Clippers and Warriors. Let's not get out of topic here. Stick to the topic. Edited January 18, 2010 by megalodon Quote Link to comment
darksoulriver Posted January 18, 2010 Share Posted January 18, 2010 (edited) the blazer is not a good team when u pull out some of its Superstars due to injury! if one players thought he's ok make sure he's 100% OK! "“We just got totally outplayed,” Orlando coach Stan Van Gundy said. “They played tremendously. They played the game just about as well as you can play the game.” Edited January 18, 2010 by darksoulriver Quote Link to comment
jopoc Posted January 18, 2010 Share Posted January 18, 2010 Yes, the Blazers are not a weak team when they're complete. I guess you didn't take note of the phrase "in this game". Haha! What's the significance of the Clippers and Warriors? We're talking of the Magic getting lambasted by an undermanned Blazer team and you're talking about the Clippers and Warriors. Let's not get out of topic here. Stick to the topic. just saying that the clippers and the warriors are the MUCH weaker team. the blazers, despite the injuries, cannot be considered as a MUCH weaker team since they always find a way to win. you can call the blazers a much weaker team if they are not 5th in the west, and not above .500 like the clips and the warriors. i will agree with you that it is a shame for the magic lost to the blazers should they have records like that of the clippers and the warriors. whether the line-up is complete or not is not an issue nor an excuse. i made my point already. the magic lost to the talented blazers. there is no excuse to that, but for me, it is nothing to be ashamed of since the blazers is really good, unlike the clippers and the warriors. i dont care if you will agree with me or not. i have nothing more to say. Quote Link to comment
Guest megalodon Posted January 18, 2010 Share Posted January 18, 2010 (edited) just saying that the clippers and the warriors are the MUCH weaker team. the blazers, despite the injuries, cannot be considered as a MUCH weaker team since they always find a way to win. you can call the blazers a much weaker team if they are not 5th in the west, and not above .500 like the clips and the warriors. i will agree with you that it is a shame for the magic lost to the blazers should they have records like that of the clippers and the warriors. whether the line-up is complete or not is not an issue nor an excuse. i made my point already. the magic lost to the talented blazers. there is no excuse to that, but for me, it is nothing to be ashamed of since the blazers is really good, unlike the clippers and the warriors. i dont care if you will agree with me or not. i have nothing more to say.As I said, you didn't take notice of the phrase "in this game". You can stop making conclusions that the undermanned Blazers were good and talented in that game just coz they dismantled the Magic. The fact is they clobbered the Magic without 2 key players. Edited January 18, 2010 by megalodon Quote Link to comment
jopoc Posted January 18, 2010 Share Posted January 18, 2010 As I said, you didn't take notice of the phrase "in this game". You can stop making conclusions that the undermanned Blazers were good and talented in that game just coz they dismantled the Magic. The fact is they clobbered the Magic without 2 key players. ok, the blazers are a good team for winning 1 GAME over orlando despite losing 2 key players. big deal. i think it is more of orlando giving them the win. like i said before, the team is slumping right now. anyway, it is still 1 all for the magic and the blazers (not 0-3), and the blazers is a strong playoffs contender (unlike the clips and the warriors) congrats to the blazers for that 1 win. :thumbsupsmiley: Quote Link to comment
Guest megalodon Posted January 18, 2010 Share Posted January 18, 2010 (edited) ok, the blazers are a good team for winning 1 GAME over orlando despite losing 2 key players. big deal. i think it is more of orlando giving them the win. like i said before, the team is slumping right now. anyway, it is still 1 all for the magic and the blazers (not 0-3), and the blazers is a strong playoffs contender (unlike the clips and the warriors) congrats to the blazers for that 1 win. :thumbsupsmiley:Orlando giving them the win? So you're discrediting what the other Blazers like Martell Webster did? Bottomline, the Magic lost against a weaker team in that game. Edited January 18, 2010 by megalodon Quote Link to comment
Mild Seven Posted January 18, 2010 Share Posted January 18, 2010 (edited) you got to hand it to the blazers....i love their resiliency....to think they have lost some key players....they still have found ways to win as of late. Edited January 18, 2010 by mild seven Quote Link to comment
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.