New York Knickerbockers

[Guest airmax]

Well nanghihinayang talaga ako sa lineup ng Knicks. Dapat talaga tanggalin na si Isiah Thomas.

[rafer_alston]

I also like Jamal Crawford keep him too...David Lee is the garbage guy so keep him..Jared jeffries is also worth keeping, he can be the BRUCE BOWEN / RAJA BELL kind of player...

 

si Marbury trade mo sa D League, heheheehehe bugok naman yang animal na yan eh, heheh

 

[pajac24]

I've been a rabid fan of the knicks since the ewing days, new coach at the helm of the bench of the knicks this coming season, I hope they will improve and make the playoffs this coming season, I think july 9 would be a busy day for the knicks since it would be the first day to sign free agents, and also I heard a rumor that they are trading marbury for diaw and barbosa of the suns? but the suns rejected it already since they have an effective & efficient guard in the person of nash, lets see what actions would be taken by the knicks come july 9 ciao! for now :thumbsupsmiley: :cool: :mtc:

Edited July 7, 2008 by pajac24

[webslinger]

adding duhan to d line up sa backcourt could help out kaya???

[gift_of_game]

palayasin na yang si Marbury.

dapat buy-out nalang ginawa imbis na nag-sign ng panibagong pg.

[the_joker]

Correct me if I'm wrong, di ba ang New York Knicks ang pinakamataas ang Value sa lahat ng NBA Teams? Parang nabasa ko ito sa Forbes Magazine eh, nagtataka lang ako kung bakit mataas ang Value ng Team kapag binenta, samantalang hindi naman sila as successful as the Celtics and the Lakers?

[gherome]

Correct me if I'm wrong, di ba ang New York Knicks ang pinakamataas ang Value sa lahat ng NBA Teams? Parang nabasa ko ito sa Forbes Magazine eh, nagtataka lang ako kung bakit mataas ang Value ng Team kapag binenta, samantalang hindi naman sila as successful as the Celtics and the Lakers?

 

Perhaps G_O_G would be the best person to answer this one. But I'd probably bet that it is because of their market. NY fans are really rabid supporters. They booed Isiah, but they were still attending the games. They may be stuggling nowadays, but their franchise also has had a storied history. Ticket sales, merchandise, sponsorship, etc = $$$ ...

But with the large salaries that they are coughing up, their net worth is definitely not the best amongst the teams. (<<--- same boat as the Yankees)

 

Same thing with Washington..not successful but still their geographical market is kind of affluent. (Hold on...With that thought, what happened to Seattle then??)

[gift_of_game]

Correct me if I'm wrong, di ba ang New York Knicks ang pinakamataas ang Value sa lahat ng NBA Teams? Parang nabasa ko ito sa Forbes Magazine eh, nagtataka lang ako kung bakit mataas ang Value ng Team kapag binenta, samantalang hindi naman sila as successful as the Celtics and the Lakers?

 

yup, the Knicks were valued at around $650 million last year.

the Lakers were second at around $500 million.

this is pretty small considering its football counterparts, the Cowboys and Redskins both top $1 billion.

 

yung value in this case doesn't really hinge on success on the basketball court---it's the size of the market (aside from a few other things that the team owns, like playing venue).

 

but anyway, dun palang medyo llamado na talaga ang Knicks.

it doesn't matter as much how good or how bad they do on the court---there will be enough fools lining up to get in and watch anyway.

so the bottomline is: kikita pa rin sila.

 

and mind you, as hopeless as the Knicks have been in the past decade or so, each year, most New Yorkers believe without a hint of doubt that their Knicks will be hoisting the cup in June.

that's inner city megalomania for you.

 

if this happened to a smaller market, like say Minnesota in KG's last year---tagilid talaga yung franchise.

 

Wins tend to bring the people in (this has been proven by several economists).

Star-type players can tickle the fans' fancy for so long but ultimately, wins will dictate attendance.

 

that's why those Grizzlies and Oklahoma whatevers are gonna be moving sooner rather than later---they aren't sustainable at all.

Edited July 8, 2008 by gift_of_game

[the_joker]

Grabe pala talaga ang pera sa tate, napansin ko nga mas mataas ang ticket price sa Games ng New York Knicks, dami pa rin nanonood kahit alam nilang malamang talo sila sa laro hehehe

 

Sabagay nasa New York naman sila eh, mapepera lahat ng tao... Business district ito di ba? Kumbaga eh, MAKATI ng Pilipinas ang New York kaya mapepera sila hehehe...

 

Sa Lakers naman, dapat nga sila no. 1 eh sa dami ba naman ng mga Hollywood Actors/Actress dun...

[bubuy]

do you ever wonder why New York almost always has 2 teams in all 4 major US sports (NBA's Nets and Knicks, MLB's Yanks and Mets, NFL's Giants and Jets, NHL's Rangers and Islanders)?

 

its because of their huge market, they can dish out any type of contract and still gain a profit.. that's what determines "franchise value" not success on the court.. but as g0g stated, Ws help bring in the people but in the case of NY fans they seem to enjoy booing their guys..

 

NY may not be as successful as SA, LA or BOS but their franchise is just as storied as the others.. colorful history if you may..

[the_joker]

do you ever wonder why New York almost always has 2 teams in all 4 major US sports (NBA's Nets and Knicks, MLB's Yanks and Mets, NFL's Giants and Jets, NHL's Rangers and Islanders)?

 

its because of their huge market, they can dish out any type of contract and still gain a profit.. that's what determines "franchise value" not success on the court.. but as g0g stated, Ws help bring in the people but in the case of NY fans they seem to enjoy booing their guys..

 

NY may not be as successful as SA, LA or BOS but their franchise is just as storied as the others.. colorful history if you may..

nyahahaha natawa ako dun, oo nga naman... Panay nood nila, tapos panay naman ang booo, kapag natatalo na hehehe

[Brady2Moss]

do you ever wonder why New York almost always has 2 teams in all 4 major US sports (NBA's Nets and Knicks, MLB's Yanks and Mets, NFL's Giants and Jets, NHL's Rangers and Islanders)?

 

its because of their huge market, they can dish out any type of contract and still gain a profit.. that's what determines "franchise value" not success on the court.. but as g0g stated, Ws help bring in the people but in the case of NY fans they seem to enjoy booing their guys..

 

NY may not be as successful as SA, LA or BOS but their franchise is just as storied as the others.. colorful history if you may..

 

Tuloy na po ba ang lipat ng New Jersey Nets sa Brooklyn??? Athough close proximity po ang New York and New Jersey mag kaibang state sila dba? So hindi po valid yung 2 teams ng NY city sa NBA for the past decade, until mag move sila dun lang magkakatotoo.....

 

Speaking of storied franchise nasa NY po yung most storied American Sports Franchise, ang New York Yankees, and it rivals Manchester United in terms of worldwide appeal.

 

Peace :thumbsupsmiley:

[gift_of_game]

Tuloy na po ba ang lipat ng New Jersey Nets sa Brooklyn??? Athough close proximity po ang New York and New Jersey mag kaibang state sila dba? So hindi po valid yung 2 teams ng NY city sa NBA for the past decade, until mag move sila dun lang magkakatotoo.....

 

tuloy na yan, 2010 (or so they say).

if you want to be technical about it, yes, the Nets have been in NJ for the longest time but again, technically, like the Knicks they're after the same NY-NJ market. and this is what makes the Knicks valuable---their influence straddles across both states (though, yet again, if you want to be technical about it, we can surmise that more than half of their earnings come from metropolitan NY since there a whole lot more people there).

 

the Nets, on the other hand, haven't been able to corner as much of it as hoped which makes this move to Brooklyn perfect---they somehow become a little more relevant in a borough that's been dying to have a team since the Dodgers went out west.

 

and c'mon now, who hasn't heard of the Yankees?

Edited July 8, 2008 by gift_of_game

[bchlee]

The only run they has for the past few years was in 1999 i think, when Sprewell was with the New York. They were good but the twin towers, Duncan & Robinson, of the Spurs then was a much better team then.

Edited July 8, 2008 by bchlee

[13Nails]

NY and NJ will be fighting hard to clear cap room to sign Lebron via 2010... Lebron is not only one of the best players in the league, he is also one of the most marketable guys in the league. The Cavs will have many sleepless nights come 2010. :thumbsupsmiley: