darth_johnnie_walker Posted January 30, 2009 Share Posted January 30, 2009 last but not the least, russel didnt' win 72 games. as MJ succinctly puts it - "anybody else win 70 games?". - coming from the greatest player who ever played the game. Don't forget that he did 70 TWICE...! :thumbsupsmiley: Quote Link to comment
dencio Posted January 30, 2009 Share Posted January 30, 2009 ^^ Almost lang, dude - 69-13 sila after the 72-10 season. :goatee: Quote Link to comment
wizard23 Posted January 30, 2009 Share Posted January 30, 2009 (edited) ^^ correct. they almost won win no. 70 on their 2nd year after winning 72 games. but Ewing and the knicks denied them the history of repeating it by beating the bulls on their last game of the season which should have been win no. 70 for the bulls. Edited January 30, 2009 by wizard23 Quote Link to comment
darth_johnnie_walker Posted January 30, 2009 Share Posted January 30, 2009 (edited) ^^ Almost lang, dude - 69-13 sila after the 72-10 season. :goatee: OK.. Wrong info.. Edited January 30, 2009 by darth_johnnie_walker Quote Link to comment
Aey.Sean Posted January 31, 2009 Share Posted January 31, 2009 MJ is still my idol Quote Link to comment
bukn0y Posted January 31, 2009 Share Posted January 31, 2009 dude subukan mo din tanggalin si pippen from bulls tingnan natin ano mangyari sa bulls it takes two to tango ika nga. so hindi dahil kay jordan nag champion ang bulls kundi dahil sa kanilang lahat dahil ginawa nila ang nararapat na laro nila. Tama ka dyan! At yan din ang rason bakit nanalo ng 11 rings si Russell - dahil meron siyang mga kakampi na all-star cast din - Sharman, Cousy, Sam Jones, KC Jones, Satch Sanders, Don Nelson, John Havlicek, etc. Tanggalin si Russell dun, malamang mag-cha-champion pa rin ang Celtics (hindi nga lang ganun karami!). Pero tanggalin si Jordan sa Bulls, sigurado hindi sila mag-cha-champion (tulad ng nangyari ng 94-95). :upside: Quote Link to comment
wizard23 Posted January 31, 2009 Share Posted January 31, 2009 dude subukan mo din tanggalin si pippen from bulls tingnan natin ano mangyari sa bulls it takes two to tango ika nga. so hindi dahil kay jordan nag champion ang bulls kundi dahil sa kanilang lahat dahil ginawa nila ang nararapat na laro nila. well, ok you have a point there. after all, basketball is a team sport and not a one man's team. the good thing about jordan is that he makes everybody around him play better, if not harder. still, you will find in crucial games, the entire team depends on jordan for the crucial basket, the winning shot - sya kasi ang go-to-guy and the game's closer most of the time. :goatee: Quote Link to comment
bukn0y Posted February 1, 2009 Share Posted February 1, 2009 pero mali yung alisin mo si jordan eh di na mag champion ang bulls dahil alisin mo din si pippen i am sure bulls will not get those championship ring too. well, ok you have a point there. after all, basketball is a team sport and not a one man's team. the good thing about jordan is that he makes everybody around him play better, if not harder. still, you will find in crucial games, the entire team depends on jordan for the crucial basket, the winning shot - sya kasi ang go-to-guy and the game's closer most of the time. :goatee: Quote Link to comment
djrs Posted February 1, 2009 Share Posted February 1, 2009 dude subukan mo din tanggalin si pippen from bulls tingnan natin ano mangyari sa bulls it takes two to tango ika nga. so hindi dahil kay jordan nag champion ang bulls kundi dahil sa kanilang lahat dahil ginawa nila ang nararapat na laro nila. dapat si pippen sa Seatle then si Kemp sa BUlls. pero si pippen bagstay parin e. eehhehehe. dapat si pippen matagal na sa sonics pero hindi matuloy tuloy.. drafted sya ng sonics but traded to bulls.. Pippen is also a consistent player... matagal narin sila jordan at pippen sa chicago pero nung 90's sila nag dominate... jordan and pippen help the chicago bulls to win championships! nung nawala si jordan wala rin nangyari... but still consistent parin si pippen... Basketball is a Team game.. and it is not a one man show.. lalo na ngayon maraming team na defensive minded thru their coach.. You cannot win a championship if your team is not involved defensively and offensively... mali yung term mo na na "it takes two to tango:" a team is not consist of two... siguro mas ok kung "it takes a team to tango! 5starters 7reserved and a coach... Quote Link to comment
orionpax Posted February 1, 2009 Share Posted February 1, 2009 (edited) The main difference with the Russell - MJ comparision (for some, since its like comparing apples & oranges) Russell has 4 or 5 STARS (3 all Stars) plus subs that can be starters outside the Celtics in that run in the 60s MJ ONLY has Pip as his star side kick...and a legion of ROLE PLAYERS Besides.,..the word GREATEST is NOT limited to the "skill, number of rings, points, and all statistical thingies" Consider what the guy has done for the sport...it goes beyond the numbers and rings... Some players have the "skillz" as hommes would say... but is it enough? naaaa.... Edited February 1, 2009 by orionpax Quote Link to comment
revi Posted February 2, 2009 Share Posted February 2, 2009 The main difference with the Russell - MJ comparision (for some, since its like comparing apples & oranges) Russell has 4 or 5 STARS (3 all Stars) plus subs that can be starters outside the Celtics in that run in the 60s MJ ONLY has Pip as his star side kick...and a legion of ROLE PLAYERS Besides.,..the word GREATEST is NOT limited to the "skill, number of rings, points, and all statistical thingies" Consider what the guy has done for the sport...it goes beyond the numbers and rings... Some players have the "skillz" as hommes would say... but is it enough? naaaa.... But one can also argue that Russell made his team mates All Stars, bro.. And winning as a playing coach makes it much much sweeter, donchathink? However, MJ's legacy goes beyond that of Russel's.. Why? His games are top-notch.. Dramatic finishes and he is almost always on the limelight.. Media, you say? I say not.. His game winning shots, his impossible dunks goes beyond the unthinkable as he made basketball what it is today.. At the end of the day, as you say, its not about skills, its not about the accolades.. Its actually what impact you have done for the sport that makes you the greatest there is.. Jordan has made a lot of boo-boos after his last championship with Da Bulls, but his legacy can outgrow any boo-boos, because he is simply MICHAEL JORDAN.. Quote Link to comment
kanto-terrorist Posted February 2, 2009 Share Posted February 2, 2009 ano bang career stats category naging #1 si MJ? he didnt hold the most no of pts, most number of career Ws, rings, assists, etc. Even vince carter have more impressive dunks than him. Kobe's game duplicate his. So stats wise, he's not the best. kulelat pa nga sya sa 3 point shoot-out na sinalihan nya minsan eh, a measly 5 points. so what made MJ the best? there must be something about him. hey, millions and legions of fans around the world and majority of posters in this thread cant go wrong. what's the x factor? marketing? Quote Link to comment
orionpax Posted February 2, 2009 Share Posted February 2, 2009 (edited) Using your Bruce Lee comparison...His sifu, Yip Man..was a great master and practitioner..yes...but only limited to "wing chun" kung fu... Lee "revolutionized" Oriental martial arts and elevated its status not only in HK. but the US and the World....his status, popularity and following is a testament to that...His movies are just the tip of the iceberg He developed his own system , JKD, his influences in boxing, fencing, kung-fu and other martial arts (judo) helped him achieve that.. hahaha..talo ako dami jordan fans! well...de mo talga matatawaran ang gilas ni jordan ganyan talga ang tao lang naman talga nagpapatanyag sa tao eh...kung si BRUCE LEE nga eh...na sumikat dahil sa media...de na gaanong napansin ang master nya..si IP MAN.. basketball ay laro ng limang tao...de naman ng isang tao...=] so what separates Yip Man and Bruce Lee?? ....... this post of Revs shows what At the end of the day, as you say, its not about skills, its not about the accolades.. Its actually what impact you have done for the sport that makes you the greatest there is.. Edited February 2, 2009 by orionpax Quote Link to comment
theNatural Posted February 3, 2009 Share Posted February 3, 2009 Russell and Jordan were children of their own eras.we'd probably think of them somewhat less if we switched them up.they are great in their own distinct ways and impacted the games differently. Russell won in an era where winning was everything---when style points didn't mean as much as hoisting the next trophy. his present-day equivalent is Tim Duncan---dude's got all those rings to show and he's really not getting the love he deserves. but in the modern era of the game, it's got to be MJ. no one redefined basketball---both as a game and a business quite the way he has---both in ways good and bad. just for sport, you throw Jordan back in time and well, he'd just be another athletic black guy moving full throttle and trying earnestly not to get throttled by the next angry, ignorant mob. you throw him out there and he's really more freak show than front-page material. MJ probably wouldn't able to pull that junk either as he'll just piss off legions of white people. he couldn't even claim the G.O.A.T. tag since the game wasn't really his. Quote Link to comment
thedynamite007 Posted February 3, 2009 Share Posted February 3, 2009 laban sila ng one on one ni russel ewan kualng kung di kumain ng alikabok yan. He has a better team and he is a center okay. Di naman greatest team and tanung dito and tanung ay greatest individual player. Baka si wilt okay pa peru jordan has lots of mvp and he won even without a legitimate center and won slam dunk contest and won defensive player of he year and gold medalist 2 times sa olympic. Anu pa? Quote Link to comment
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.