Jump to content

The Legal Side of Real Estate


rickyv

Recommended Posts

Thnx again

Regarding sa revival of judgement.

There is this case kasi the case was decided by rtc. The decision consisted of who the rightful owner is of a disputed lot. After which the decision was appealed to CA. But CA dismissed it. Since appelants did not submit their briefs. So CA entered judgement after dismissal. My questions are: 1) is the decision final? Meaning may finality ba o wala. 2)requred ba ung writ of execution or not? Pinuntahan namin ung rtc asking them to issue cert of finality. sabi ung CA na daw ung finality kasi mas mataas sila. Pero since dismissed parang di final? What do u think po thnx.

1) is the decision final? Meaning may finality ba o wala.

 

Kung dinsimiss yung case, the Decision dismissing the case also becomes final.

 

2) Required ba yung writ of execution or not? Kung me gagawin pa sa Decision ng RTC, kailangan ng writ of execution para maipatupad ito. Sa RTC ka hihingi ng writ of execution.

Ang RTC naman, bago nila aksyunan nag motion mo, ay hihingi ng ebidensya na final na yung decision. At yung "entry of judgment" ng CA ang ebidensya mo na yun. Ito ang magsasabi na final na ang decision ng CA

Edited by rocco69
Link to comment

 

 

 

thanks po sa reply.

 

1) rtc decision 2000

2) CA dismissal without reviewing the case kasi di nagsubmit ng briefs ung mga appelants. 2002

3) since naglapse na ung 5 years,

4) RTC decision was only saying who the rightful owners of the lot and some payments to the owners.

5) pued pa ba or needed pa ba ung writ of execution or self-execution na ung decision for the ownership issue excluding the collection of damages?

 

do we need the revival or the CA decision should be enough? sorry clear ko lang kasi di ko alam kung need ng revival or no need.

dahil lampas 10 years na, kahit revival di na pwede. pasalamat kayo at ang decision sinasabi lang who the rightful owner is. di na yun kailangan ng writ of execution kung kayo ang nakapwesto sa lugar

Link to comment

Ah yes po ejectment case. pero the decision still applies to the ownership? Pinakaconcern ko is kung may bisa ung decision without the writ of execution.

yes. your problem really is that the decision is binding only on the parties in the case. as to others, you still have to present your proof of ownership (which will probably be the same evidence used in the prior case)

Link to comment
  • 4 weeks later...

Hi. Ano po mangyayari kung fullpaid na ang lot with complete deed of sale except di pa naililipat sa name ko ang title tapos namatay ang owner? Makukuha ko pa ba ang title? Tia

nasaan ang owner's duplicate copy of title? YAN ANG KAILANGANG MAKUHA MO! [hinihingi ito ng Register of Deeds para mailipat sa pangalan mo ang title]. Kung wala pa sa iyo, hingin mo dun sa tagapagmana ng seller mo at fully paid ka na pala.

 

Note the worst case scenario: someone pretends to be the owner, sells the property to somebody else, GIVES THE BUYER THE DUPLICATE OWNER'S COPY. The buyer can now go to the Register of Deeds, submit his Deed of Sale [note that the Register of Deeds would not know the signature of the real owner, hence will accept the Deed of Sale at face value] together with the Duplicate Owner's Copy, AND THEN GET A NEW TITLE IN HIS NAME. THEN YOU'RE SCREWED! [if the buyer had no knowledge that the seller was not the real owner, and he transfers the property to somebody else, they get a better right to the property than you]

 

I repeat, GET YOUR HANDS ON THE DUPLICATE OWNER'S COPY ASAP!

 

In the alternative [if you can't get hold of the duplicate owner's copy, file an Adverse Claim with the Register of Deeds so that the fact that you already bought the property can be annotated/written on the title, resulting in any new buyer not getting any right better than yours.

Edited by rocco69
Link to comment
  • 3 months later...
  • 4 weeks later...

Good day.some questions regarding agricultural land issues.medyo mahaba po to sa please bear with me.my parents bought agricultural lot abt 11has from DBP consisting of 2 titles in 1999. They were not able to tranfer it to their name because the MARO was asking for P1000/tree for compensation for the tenants. The bank issued a certification of no tenants when the property was bought.Until 2008 they were paying taxes on the property. Nung 2009 di na tinanggap kase daw nalandreform na. They havent received any notices from DAR during the acquisition.Nung 2016 we were able to obtain copies that all notices were addressed to the bank and not us.Also we are not receiving anything from tenants kase la nman kaming tenants from the time of purchase until now. My mother contested the acquisition thru verbal lang sa offices ng PARO nung 2010 ng malaman nila pero tapos na yung coverage at nacancel na title at nadistribute na.

We have submitted for revaluation sa DARAB on Dec 2018 kase ayaw na nmin magkaso kase magastos. Niretain ng DARAB valuation ng Landbank kase di kami nakasubmit ng counter valuation. Decision is finsl.We have no lawyer at di namin alam kung saan kukunin yung ibang data para sa compensation.

My question is can we still appeal the valuation?this is just in case matalo kami don sa pagcontest sa coverage.

Meron din kaming sinubmit sa DAR Secretary contesting the CARP coverage this July 2018 because we were not given a due process. Ilang days po ba ang palugit para maiappeal sa CA kung sakaling maging unfavorable ang maging decision ng DAR sa amin. Until now we dont have a lawyer.

Thanks po sa sasagot.

Link to comment

hello to all!

 

not sure kung may previous inquiries na sa question ko, ang dami ng pages para ma-review. :)

 

Tanong lang kung paano mapa-clear yung encumbrances na nakalagay sa title? Kung sakali, malaki ba ang magagastos dito?

 

Thanks.

 

It depends on the encumbrances annotated on the TCT. Some liens or encumbrances or annotations could be cancelled easily, such as a real estate mortgage which could be cancelled via Release of Real estate mortgage.. For other encumbrances, you might need to go to court to have it cancelled.

  • Like (+1) 1
Link to comment

 

It depends on the encumbrances annotated on the TCT. Some liens or encumbrances or annotations could be cancelled easily, such as a real estate mortgage which could be cancelled via Release of Real estate mortgage.. For other encumbrances, you might need to go to court to have it cancelled.

 

Thanks for the info.

Link to comment
  • 2 weeks later...

Hi gud pm tanong lang about sa title ng lupa na both live in partners ay nakapangalan sa land title.. Ang kaso ung legal wife ay nagdedemanda about dun sa title land na nakapangaln sa mistress and his husband..may laban po ba ung mistress regarding po dun sa land title na nakapangalan din sa kanya?? TIA

Link to comment

Hi gud pm tanong lang about sa title ng lupa na both live in partners ay nakapangalan sa land title.. Ang kaso ung legal wife ay nagdedemanda about dun sa title land na nakapangaln sa mistress and his husband..may laban po ba ung mistress regarding po dun sa land title na nakapangalan din sa kanya?? TIA

Kung meron siyang contribution sa pag-acquire sa property, may share siya sa property, equal sa contribution niya.

 

Ayon sa Art. 148 ng Family Code:

 

Art. 148. In cases of cohabitation not falling under the preceding Article, only the properties acquired by both of the parties through their actual joint contribution of money, property, or industry shall be owned by them in common in proportion to their respective contributions. In the absence of proof to the contrary, their contributions and corresponding shares are presumed to be equal. The same rule and presumption shall apply to joint deposits of money and evidences of credit.

If one of the parties is validly married to another, his or her share in the co-ownership shall accrue to the absolute community or conjugal partnership existing in such valid marriage. If the party who acted in bad faith is not validly married to another, his or her shall be forfeited in the manner provided in the last paragraph of the preceding Article.

The foregoing rules on forfeiture shall likewise apply even if both parties are in both faith.

 

Mapapansin mo, kailangang patunayan ng legal wife na walang kakayahan yung mistress na maka-acquire ng lupa, dahil kung walang ebidensya, ang presumption ay EQUAL ang kanilang contribution, at magmamay-ari siya ng one-half ng property

Link to comment
  • 1 month later...

I agree it depends on what type of encumbrances. As to expense, also the same.

hello to all!

 

not sure kung may previous inquiries na sa question ko, ang dami ng pages para ma-review. :)

 

Tanong lang kung paano mapa-clear yung encumbrances na nakalagay sa title? Kung sakali, malaki ba ang magagastos dito?

 

Thanks.

Link to comment
  • 2 weeks later...

question lang po.

for ejectment cases, and submission ng position paper and JA, can it be done thru registered mail?

say example.

court order for the submission was received jan 15, court orders parties to submit within 10 days from date received which is jan 15, so if the position paper to the court was done thru registered mail on the 25th pued ba? or have to be personally served para sa court? ung sa other party alam ko ok lang.

for ejectment cases, and submission ng position paper and JA, can it be done thru registered mail? YES.

 

court orders parties to submit position paper and JA within 10 days from date received.

court order received jan 15

the position paper to the court was done thru registered mail on the 25th.

pued ba? YES

Link to comment
  • 3 weeks later...

This isnt free. joke :P

got another question sir Roco,

if for the summons di natanggap ng isang defendant ung summons kasi he/she is living in the US. but for some reason ung spouse nya na kasali sa defendants group natanggap considered different party pa ba sya?

sa title kasi ng defendants di nailagay na spouses but sa mga ibang legal documents nakalagay naman na "Married to".

parang ayaw ni Judge na iconsider na spouses. pinapapublish pa sa amin ung summons.

which publication are accredited and mga how much aabutin?

 

denied kasi ung motion for issuance of alias summons.

Link to comment

Hi gekdeen, it seems like you are presently litigating and that you have a lawyer representing you. Unfortunately it goes against legal ethics for lawyers to give legal advice to someone who has already retained counsel. For these things, it is best to talk to your current lawyer about any apprehensions or misgivings you have about the way s/he is handling your case.

Link to comment
  • 1 month later...

question lang mga Sir,

 

mid 2017 lang nailipat sa name ko yung titulo ng bahay namin, 2018 nung nagbayad ng real estate tax, ginaya nung treasury yung previous O.R. na naka pangalan pa sa dating may ari. Magkakaproblema po ba ito in the long run? Anu ano po bang requirements para pag bayad this year maipangalan na samin? (previous owner is my mom)

 

 

Thank you in advance

Link to comment

question lang mga Sir,

 

mid 2017 lang nailipat sa name ko yung titulo ng bahay namin, 2018 nung nagbayad ng real estate tax, ginaya nung treasury yung previous O.R. na naka pangalan pa sa dating may ari. Magkakaproblema po ba ito in the long run? Anu ano po bang requirements para pag bayad this year maipangalan na samin? (previous owner is my mom)

 

 

Thank you in advance

sa pagkakaalam ko, affidavit kung saan isasaad mo na ikaw na ang may-ari (plus paano napunta sa iyo ang property). But the best thing to do is to go to the City/Municipal Assessor's Office and ask what are their requirements for transfer of name of the tax declaration.

Link to comment

Thank you Sir,

 

will schedule kung kailan ako makakapunta.

 

 

sa pagkakaalam ko, affidavit kung saan isasaad mo na ikaw na ang may-ari (plus paano napunta sa iyo ang property). But the best thing to do is to go to the City/Municipal Assessor's Office and ask what are their requirements for transfer of name of the tax declaration.

Link to comment

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
×
  • Create New...