Guest ------(-@ Posted April 16, 2006 Share Posted April 16, 2006 Ambeth Ocampo Quote Link to comment
howard_the_duck Posted April 16, 2006 Share Posted April 16, 2006 Juliana Palermo :boo: Quote Link to comment
protein_gusher Posted April 18, 2006 Share Posted April 18, 2006 i was just wondering: how can conrado de quiros be your favorite columnist? he has become so one-dimensional lately. puro attake kay GMA and he cannot even say a good thing about her. i have my problems with gloria but does de quiros really think that she has done NOTHING as in ABSOLUTELY NOTHING good for this country? how can a person who only sees one side of the coin and closes his eyes to the other have any credibility with u guys? Quote Link to comment
bluegreen717 Posted April 18, 2006 Share Posted April 18, 2006 Amando Doronila. His analyses are very accurate, and he can pull it off without sounding too opinionated. His seeming lack of emotion makes you think, not feel, about the issue. i was just wondering: how can conrado de quiros be your favorite columnist? he has become so one-dimensional lately. puro attake kay GMA and he cannot even say a good thing about her. i have my problems with gloria but does de quiros really think that she has done NOTHING as in ABSOLUTELY NOTHING good for this country? how can a person who only sees one side of the coin and closes his eyes to the other have any credibility with u guys?<{POST_SNAPBACK}> De Quiros, despite my fondness for Doronila, is also a favorite. His opinions have much intelligent basis, unlike those of the Tulfos or Cacho-Olivares. Quote Link to comment
gift_of_game Posted April 18, 2006 Share Posted April 18, 2006 i was just wondering: how can conrado de quiros be your favorite columnist? he has become so one-dimensional lately. puro attake kay GMA and he cannot even say a good thing about her. i have my problems with gloria but does de quiros really think that she has done NOTHING as in ABSOLUTELY NOTHING good for this country? how can a person who only sees one side of the coin and closes his eyes to the other have any credibility with u guys?<{POST_SNAPBACK}> I don't want to speak for everyone else but I guess it's because De Quiros tries his darndest to defend whatever it is he's arguing for or against. I don't always agree with what he has to say but he states his case plainly and eloquently each time. That's more than enough for me. As for the anti-GMA banat, I'm just surprised he hasn't been jailed yet what with mop up against anti-government sentiments. That would be the day...At any rate, GMA deserves the brickbats. That woman is evil and should step down from office lest she commit further indignities only she's capable of pulling off, like, flushing the country down the drain (if she hasn't done it yet). Ay Sorry, OT na Quote Link to comment
philos Posted April 19, 2006 Share Posted April 19, 2006 I agree. It's Conrado De Quiros for me Quote Link to comment
zaizai01 Posted May 13, 2006 Share Posted May 13, 2006 Noelani Torre and Rito P. Asilo from the Inquirer newswpaper. I like it whenever they review movies, tv shows, music, or anything out of the boob tube. Quote Link to comment
charlesquinton Posted June 2, 2006 Share Posted June 2, 2006 I would say Randy David for his expert analysis from a sociologist's point of view Quote Link to comment
Direct Hit Posted June 2, 2006 Share Posted June 2, 2006 Neal H. Cruz- As I see it Asia Agcaoili- sa FHM sex guru hehehehe Quote Link to comment
KristinLavransdatr Posted June 7, 2006 Share Posted June 7, 2006 (edited) i used to read de quiroz a lot. i even bought a palanca anthology where his short story is published. his was the first i read before the headline. but for the past two years, he no longer has me as a reader. he has become one problematic writer i refuse to deal with. he has become flat and predictable. you are who/what you read. man, i don't want that applied to me. now i don't have a favorite. i just read what i think has the most interesting piece title. Edited June 7, 2006 by KristinLavransdatr Quote Link to comment
simon b Posted November 2, 2006 Share Posted November 2, 2006 dati:de quiros - until he started and never stopped writing against gloria. para siyang nabasted na suitor na hindi matanggp na basted sya. thelma san juan - until she started and never stopped writing about prada and other designer ek-ek. ngayon:butch dalisay - he writes about ordinary, simple things and makes me smile. and i love his views and opinions. simpla lang pero may sense never:the likes of tulfo - lakas ng dating, banat dito banat dun. pag nabanatan nagsusumbong sa tao, gusto pa ata mag rally para sa kanya. Quote Link to comment
tsilada Posted November 2, 2006 Share Posted November 2, 2006 De Quiros, despite my fondness for Doronila, is also a favorite. His opinions have much intelligent basis, unlike those of the Tulfos or Cacho-Olivares. Add to your list please Bel Olivares-Cunanan. Staunch PGMA defender yan. Bulag sa lahat ng kapalpakan ni Gloria and AMEN lang sya sa mga gustong mangyari ng walang kwentang administrasyon ni Pandak, and why not? His husband (ex-Gen. Thelmo Cunanan) is a high ranking executive of PNOC. Sino nagpwesto sa husband nya dun? I guess alam nyo na kung sino? Truly, you don't bite tha hand that feeds you... :hypocritesmiley: :mtc: Quote Link to comment
Stephen A. Posted November 2, 2006 Share Posted November 2, 2006 dero pedero - very inspirational columns every tuesday... rod nepomuceno - nice stories lagi tuwing monday... lately, binabasa ko din column ni rj ledesma - it's fun lalo na pag may nag-didisagree sa kanya and he doesn't even bother na ipagtanggol yung sarili nya... Quote Link to comment
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.