Koji21 Posted January 23, 2006 Share Posted January 23, 2006 kung ganon si barera ang mananalo <{POST_SNAPBACK}> Sino si barera? Saan sya mananalo? Quote Link to comment
xycho_g Posted January 23, 2006 Share Posted January 23, 2006 Maraming Salamat nga pala kahapon!<{POST_SNAPBACK}> haha..ur welcome pre..no prob..basta mga taga mtc...ayos yan...haha...at para sa bayan..haha.. Quote Link to comment
bubuy Posted January 23, 2006 Share Posted January 23, 2006 bro kahit sampo pa yan yung point eh draw sila <{POST_SNAPBACK}> kaso sir ang point eh draw sila it means walang talo or panalo <{POST_SNAPBACK}> kasi sinabi mo ung sa itaas eh.. kaya pinakita ko sayo kung ano ang mangyayari sa situation na sinabi mo.. Quote Link to comment
Guest airmax Posted January 23, 2006 Share Posted January 23, 2006 I'm not really a big boxing fan. congrats to pacman. Quote Link to comment
SoundWave Posted January 23, 2006 Share Posted January 23, 2006 natalo kaya sa pustahankaya sour graping? Quote Link to comment
lickster Posted January 23, 2006 Share Posted January 23, 2006 pano mo naman agad nasabi na mananalo si MAB pag nagharap sila? pede ka ba magbigay ng analysis mo? Quote Link to comment
bubuy Posted January 23, 2006 Share Posted January 23, 2006 tumatanggap kami ng pusta both sides we got our 10% :boo: <{POST_SNAPBACK}>hahaha.. parang sa sabong yan ah.. Quote Link to comment
SoundWave Posted January 23, 2006 Share Posted January 23, 2006 first fight, hindi napatumba.second fight, sya ang napatumba, first time pa. Quote Link to comment
SoundWave Posted January 23, 2006 Share Posted January 23, 2006 mukhang hindi yata malaki angkinita kaya sour graping. Quote Link to comment
TidusJanus Posted January 23, 2006 Share Posted January 23, 2006 yeah! manny will own both Marquez and Barrera..whoever he faces off next...hahahahaha Quote Link to comment
brawler201 Posted January 23, 2006 Share Posted January 23, 2006 non of the above, suggestion ko na lang.. for 2006 pacquiao fights easy opponents muna.. malaki din naman kita nya kahit paano.. then 2007 he makes another big fight either Chavez or Barrera.. not Morales (clearly outclased) or not Marquez (does not follow fight contract, very unprofessional) then 2008 if he beats Barrera (or whoever wins between chavez-barrera fight).. he retires na.. he will go in history as boxing legend like Gabriel "Flash" Elorde.. i don't know who Flash Elorde is..my lolo only tells stories.. so for this generation we have a Manny Pacquiao to tell stories to our grandchildren in the future.. Manny should retire by 2008 as speed dwindles down as you reach 30..and the accumulation of punches might take its toll when he gets old..<{POST_SNAPBACK}> There aren't really a lot of big pay days out there for Manny. There are some but not too many. I say strike while the iron is hot. If he waits too long, a lot of factors are left out of his hands and may deny him another multi-million dollar fight. For one, Barrera is getting older and is more susceptible to being upset by younger and hungrier fighters if they don't bring their A game (see Morales vs. Raheem). Morales almost lost his US$ 3M paycheck with that silly loss to Raheem in a tune-up. It was only his rep*tation that carried him to still merit a big purse. Fight fans will be a lot more discerning if that ever happens to Barrera who was also soundly beaten by Pacquiao in their first fight. It would not be as bad if Pacquiao gets laid out in a tune up unless a patsy is lined up for the killing but that's still not an assurance that you could always take to the bank (see Judah vs. Baldomir). Pacquiao is also riding a great momentum, his confidence and his skills are at a sky hight. He should ride this crest to jump start another great fight. A lay-off and a tune-up fight may not do all the good that it is intended to do if Pacquiao is not motivated enough. He may just coast and not improve on his skills and may end up rusty for a later date with Barrera. Barrera is his next date to the dance and he shouldn't stand him up. Morales is the next logical opponent but I seriously doubt if Morales will step into the ring with Pacquiao or if he would fight at all if we were to believe his reasoning for his two current losses. For the Raheem fiasco, he said that he was just too heavy and was too slow to fight at lightweight with all the aditional weight yet he also said that he was having a hard time making the Jr. Lightweight which leaves no othet weight division to fight in comfortably. Plus Morales will not and should not get paid more than Manny if and when they meet up for a third go around. This will probably too much for his Mexican machismo to rule out becoming a punching bag for 10+ odd rounds for the Pacman. Even with all the factors, the best fights in terms of purses for Manny is with the dos amigos. It would be a nightmare for Pacquiao if Barrera and Morales retire without giving him a repeat engagement. That's the end of the big draws in the division and the end of a glorious era with Pacquiao left holding the fort. Pacquiao will still make money fighting pretenders but not the same kind he made banging with Morales or Barrera. Unless Manny wants to claim a portion of history and lay his claim not only as the greatest Filipino boxers ever but perhaps one of the greatest featherweights of all time (which is saying a lot if you consider that the division all time greats is led by the legendary Salvador Sanchez). But in the end, it's not only about cementing legacies, as boxing is predominantly a money game. You go where the money is and the money is on a rematch with Barrera. And that card will still hold a lot of magic in sucking in PPV viewers. And then there's the added bonus for Manny that he will still have his chance at history with the Barrera fight while taking home a fat check. A win over Barrera (currently the WBC and IBF Super-featherweight/Jr. Lightweight champion) will make him the first Asian to win world titles in three different weight classes. A fourth one may also be in the horizon if he decides to go after one of the featherweight titles to keep him in shape or take a swipe at one of the lightweight crowns when he's done dealing with the Mexicans at Jr.-Lightweight. Thus, a Pacquiao-Barrera II seems to be the most logical fight and I am sticking to my guns that Manny will have an easier time against Barrera and win. Regardless of what pundits say. They both have brawling styles and Manny has the quicker hands, the bigger punches and the sturdier chin. He also has a couple of new tricks, the lateral movement on both the straight and the combos, playing the angles and a still developing defensive game. And even if Manny loses to Barrera, he may still come out of it richer in the topsy turvy world of boxing as promoters can milk the rivalry into a more profitable trilogy. Pass the popcorn please. We're just getting started. Quote Link to comment
White Boy Fletcher Posted January 23, 2006 Share Posted January 23, 2006 http://www.boxingscene.com/?m=show&id=2900 By Carlos Irusta JORGE RODRIGO BARRIOS, the WBO super featherweight world champion, watched the Pacquiao-Morales super clash on TV, of course. And on Sunday, he took a plane to Santa Rosa, La Pampa province, to start his training for his next fight. From La Pampa, he spoke about the victory of Manny Pacquiao over Erik Morales. “I picked Morales to win, because in the first fight he was smarter than Pac Man, but of course, I made a mistake. Manny won clearly. Morales has made a brilliant career, but I think he is tired, he suffered a lot, he received a lot of punishment and is impossible to defeat Father Time”. Barrios, named “The Hyena” for his tremendous laughs, said: “Pacquiao won by his attitude in the ring. He was always demanding for in the fight, always establishing his rhythm and his desire of winning. I suppose the key word of this fight was attitude, and Pacquiao dominated the ring all the night. Of course, it was a very good fight, no doubts about that”. We asked Barrios about his next fight. “I think I will be fighting with the number one WBO contender, Janos Nagy. Its true, the name of Marco Antonio Barrera is in the air, but I don't think it will happen for now. The bout with Nagy could be on next March, I don’t know where. Today (Sunday-22) I am starting my workout”. We asked what opponent he would pick to fight. “Barrera, of course, because he has a real name in boxing is a real star, he can be the head of any boxing show. Pacquiao is a tremendous fighter, but he does not have the same big name. Of course, he defeated Barrera and Morales and is a dangerous man. But if I can choose, I would say Barrera. He is for real; he is a tremendous challenge, a real legend. I want Barrera, man, Pacquiao is nothing”. Quote Link to comment
bitok Posted January 23, 2006 Share Posted January 23, 2006 Did anyone in the US copy the fight on pay per view? I saw the fight on our pay per view via Solar Sports and the commentators suck! Quinito Henson and the dwarf commentator were cheerleading for Pacquiao instead of reporting the action. I'm totally for Pacman, I even bet 2T for him but I would like to hear the original HBO commentators. Quote Link to comment
brawler201 Posted January 23, 2006 Share Posted January 23, 2006 ^Ok. I'm revising my point of view after this comment. Bring on this clown for the Pacman. Winner take all. Loser goes home with just his welts and his ego stuffed down his throat. Let's see if his cajones are as big as his mouth. Lets have Manny take this joker's crown, even if its just a mickey mouse title, pound him in 2 rounds and relegate him to fighting undercards for women's bouts.. Let's see who's nothing. Better yet. I hope Manny and Barrera ignore this clown so he ends up fighting for peanuts until the next cowboy comes along and takes his joke of a title. Quote Link to comment
brian Posted January 23, 2006 Share Posted January 23, 2006 http://www.boxingscene.com/?m=show&id=2900 “Barrera, of course, because he has a real name in boxing is a real star, he can be the head of any boxing show. Pacquiao is a tremendous fighter, but he does not have the same big name. Of course, he defeated Barrera and Morales and is a dangerous man. But if I can choose, I would say Barrera. He is for real; he is a tremendous challenge, a real legend. I want Barrera, man, Pacquiao is nothing”.<{POST_SNAPBACK}> Bro, this wasn't in the article. Quote Link to comment
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.