rocco69

On 9/2/2022 at 11:22 AM, maskipops said:

can someone refer me po sa lawyer who do child adoption? medyo tight budget lang din. Thanks.

 

pumunta ka sa DSWD ng LGU mo at magtanong tungkol sa bagong proseso ng adoption. Di na dumadaan sa korte ang adoption ngayon (see Republic Act 11642). Or, tawag ka sa National Authority for Child Care, www.nacc.gov.ph).

On 3/30/2022 at 12:01 AM, GRos2021 said:

20 years ago, my father sold my titled land to my aunt without my consent.

Is there a way for my aunt to validly transfer the title to her name?

nasaan ang owner's duplicate copy ng title? Kung nasa iyo, hindi niya matratransfer yun (unless she files a petition in court to declare it lost).

Kung nasa kanya, hindi pa rin kung ang deed of sale niya ay hindi sa pangalan mo as seller (posible kasi na your father sold it as attorney-in-fact mo, e.g. may SPA siya galing sa iyo, in that case, maaaring valid yung sale). kung walang SPA, .hindi rin pupwede maitransfer

On 4/5/2022 at 2:00 PM, kenshinhimuraOG said:

Question po, If for example my relative kami na may court notice. possible ba na ang mag received ng notic is kapatid or magulang? and what if hindi ipinakita nor iniwan yung notice? tia sa sasagot.

1.  possible ba na ang mag received ng notic is kapatid or magulang? Yes, possible.

2. what if hindi ipinakita nor iniwan yung notice? mas malamang sa hindi, nagkukunwari lang yung nagdala, especially kung tungkol sa utang yung supposed na "kaso". ang tunay na notice galing sa court, iniiwan ang kopya 

On 2/21/2022 at 8:34 AM, omegared said:

Recommendation po ng abogado na naghandle ng cybercrime?

willing po kami to make appointment sa opisina nila. 

thank you

Bago abugado, siguraduhin niyo muna yung existence nung sinasabi ninyong cybercriminal. Madali lang kasing i-deny ang cybercrime at ito ay online. I suggest pumunta muna kayo sa NBI o sa PNP Crime Lab, para siguradong ma-establish niyo yung identity ni akusado 

On 2/21/2022 at 11:19 AM, ~~gwa7~~ said:

wishing everyone a fine day.

consult lang ako:

Scenario :
land owner - (deceased)

Naiwan: Legitimate Wife + with 3 Children

pede po makahingi ng advice kung ano ang hatian ng mana?

tapos isa sa mga anak ng land owner died, naghahabol po yung mga apo ng share ng mana ng landowner.

Maghahati-hati muna ang wife and 3 children tapos yung hatian ng apo ay doon lamang sa share ng childer ng landowner.

 

Salamat.

Ang unang hati ay sa mag-asawa (lahat ng pag-aari ng isang taong kasal ay nagiging pag-aari nilang mag-asawa), so 50% ng lupa ay pag-aari ni Landowner, at ang naiiwang 50% ay pag-aari ni Legitimate Wife. 

Sa 50% ni Landowner, ito ay hahatiin sa 5 (kay Legitimate Wife, sa 3 children, at sa mga anak nung namatay na anak)

Kaya, in ending 60‰ nung lupa ay pag-aari ni Legitimate Wife, tig-10‰ yung 3 anak, at 10% din yung mga apo. . 

Adultery

Kung idedeklara nung babae na may asawa siya, sa pangalan nung asawa niya dapat isunod yung bata.

Kung magsisinungaling siya at sasabihin niyang asawa niya yung kabit niya, maisusunod sa apelyido ng kabit niya yung bata.

Kung magsisinungaling siya at sasabihin niyang single siya, kung pipirma si kabit sa birth certificate nung bata, maisusunod ito sa apelyido nung kabit. Kung di pipirma sa birth certificate nung bata si kabit, apelyido ng ina ang gagamitin nung bata

mag tatanong lang po,

what if if two married couple (meaning both kasal,but separated) magkaroon ng affair,

tapos ngakaroon silang baby,

pwede ba ilagay yung name nung actual father dun sa birth certificate?

o yung name ng tunay na husband ng girl ang ilalagay kahit hindi sya ang tatay?

Magiging ground for annulment po ba yun?

 

Ang simpleng panlalaki ni Mrs ay hindi ground para sa Annulment (legal separation lang, at ito ay dapat maihain sa korte sa loob ng limang taon mula sa panlalalaki).

 

Kung maghihiwalay lang, dahil hindi nga siya ground para sa annulment, walang magbabago sa ugnayan nila sa properties nila (kung maghahain siya ng Legal separation, sa Legal separation, paghahatian ang properties ng mag-asawa, at may bahagi na ifo-forfeit si mrs).

 

Ask ko lang po. If si misis po ba nagloko long time ago pero recently ka lang nakakuha ng proofs. Magiging ground for annulment po ba yun? and kung sakali man pong maghihiwalay/magpapa annul dahil sa pangangaliwa ni misis, ano po mangyayari sa conjugal properties? mahahati parin po ba yun sa both parties? or wala po makukuha si misis?

First, I need to provide a little background before I ask my questions. I own several parcels of land that I have been subdividing into smaller cuts to sell as residential lots. The lots are located in a very good location beside a provincial capitol so I have sold quite a few already. I have sold about 80 lots and my estimate is that the remaining parcels would produce another 150 lots. Every few months or so, we would cut a few more lots to sell. I would like to get a will so that my two sons would inherit what i own in case I pass away. So here are my questions:

 

1. Can I make a will that is generally stated that my two sons inherit the land without having to note each of the title? Since I am continuously subdividing the land, it does not make any sense to state each title I am giving away to them. Each time I subdivide, new titles are produced.

2. How much does it cost to get a will like this done?

1. Can I make a will that is generally stated that my two sons inherit the land without having to note each of the title?

Yes, you can make a will giving away the property, using only the current titles. The law provides anyway, that whatever properties you no longer own when you pass away cannot be given away by you. In other words, the properties already sold when you pass will no longer form part of your estate.

2. How much does it cost to get a will like this done?

Should be the same as the price of having a Deed of Sale or Deed of Donation made (could be a bit more because of the number of properties that have to be described). A will is just another legal document, so the price should be within range of similar documents. In fact, if you want, you can do it yourself (so long as it is ENTIRELY IN YOUR OWN HANDWRITING, WITH A DATE, AND SIGNED BY YOU AT THE END)

Question re purchase of vacant lot by a widowed friend from a developer.

 

A friend of mine became a widow a couple of years ago. Foreign husband. Last year, kumuha na siya ng new passport that used her maiden name because she showed na the death certificate of her late husband. She also opened a new bank account under her maiden name. Recently, she wanted to buy a vacant lot, but developer said she cannot use her maiden name. She was asked to produce a PSA CENOMAR and since her late husband was a foreigner (PSA does not change marriage contracts with foreigners), naturally the CENOMAR showed that she is married. So developer insisting that she is "Widowed" daw, not "Single". My friend wants to use her maiden name for the title and insists that she should be allowed to considering she got a new passport already and bank account.

 

Maraming salamat sa makakapag-bigay ng advice.

The developer is correct, she is not single but widowed.

The developer, however, is wrong, in insisting that she cannot use her maiden name. Art 373 of the Civil Code says:

Article 373. A widow MAY use the deceased husband's surname as though he were still living, in accordance with article 370.

Dahil "MAY" ang ginamit, makikita na optional sa biyuda ang patuloy na paggamit ng apelyido ng nasira niyang asawa. Maari siyang bumalik sa dati niyang apelyido. At maaari niya itong gamitin sa titulo ng lupa.

Hello po! Nagtatanong na naman po ulit. May titled lot po na binili ko pero part lang. 1000 sq. meters po ang lot 300 sqm lang binili ko. Individual lang po ang seller hindi corporation. Valid po ba ang sale? Wala po kasing license to sell ang binilhan ko sa hlurb.

Valid po ba ang sale?

Valid (kung siya ang may-ari o otorisado ng may-ari).

Dati po akong domestic helper sa Hong Kong, nangutang po ako sa bangko sa halagang 30,000 Hongkong dollar. Nakapaghulog naman po ako mga 3 beses payable sya in 15 months. Nagkasakit po ako kya napilitan akong umuwi ng Pilipinas at hindi ko na nabayaran ang inutang ko hindi din po ako nakpagpaalam sa bangko pero sinabi ng friend ko na reference ko na naterminate po ako that was year 2018. So from 2018 and present hindi po ako nakapaghulog sa utang ko. Eto lang pong 3rd week ng February nakareceive ako ng demand letter, first letter na nareceive ko since 2018 na yung inutang ko ibinenta na ng bangko sa collection agency dito sa Pilipinas. Within 7 days dapat daw mabayaran ko yung outstanding amount kung hindi kakasuhan ako ng republic act 8484 (fraud against creditors). Ung naiwan na inutang ko nasa 20,000 hongkong dollar ngaun dahil sa interest umabot na daw ng 63,000 hongkong dollar plus 30% pa daw na fee and other charges na hindi pa nasama. Hindi ko alam kung paano ko mababayran ngaun dahil sa wala pa din ako trabaho at balak ko palang ulit magapply sa ibang bansa this year. So ang ginawa ko po ay nagemail po ako sa bangko sa hongkong nakalagay po kasi dun sa demand letter, nakiusap po ako na gusto ko isettle yung hiniram kong pera pero wala ako kakayahan na bayaran lahat yun nakipagsettle ako kung pwede kahit monthly basis at sana tanggalin na ang malaking interest hiningi nila ang details ko at contact number. Tnawagan po ako at sinabi na kailangan ko daw bayaran lahat ngaun na yung sinabi nila na 63,000 hongkong dollar sa demand letter kanina lang po naging 96,000 hongkong dollar na at pinapabayaran lahat sakin. Nakipagusap po ako pero ayaw po nila dami ko daw reason kung wla daw po ako work hindi na daw nila problema yun basta dapat daw bayaran ko na ngaun kung hindi yung abogado na daw ang pupunta sakin at maniningil. Halos ayaw po ako na magsalita makinig daw ako kasi mahal daw ang long distance call basta nasabi na nila na bayaran ko lahat at ideposit sa banco de oro account nila. Nakiusap ulit ako na kahit monthly ang ihulog ko sa halagang kaya ko pero hindi daw nila babawasan ang interes kahit daw magbayad ako buwan buwan pero everyday nagiiba ang amount kasi hindi daw magstop yung interest baka sa isang araw 100,000 na daw lahat. Sana po mabigyan nyo ako ng advice ano po dapat ko gawin kasi kakasuhan daw ako ng criminal case under republic act 8484.

ano po dapat ko gawin kasi kakasuhan daw ako ng criminal case under republic act 8484.

Sa Pilipinas, walang nakukulong sa utang. Nasaan ka ba, sa Pilipinas o Hongkong? Sa Pilipinas, di ba. Ergo, di ka makukulong dito dahil sa utang.

Yung sinasabing Republic Act 8484, dapat ang krimen (kung meron man) ay nangyari sa Pilipinas. Karaniwan, hindi maaring parusahan ang krimen na ginawa sa ibang bansa (dahil hindi naman ito ginawa sa Pilipinas). Nangutang ka sa Hong Kong, hindi sa Pilipinas. Kung may krimen man, ito ay ginawa sa Hong Kong, hindi sa Pilipinas, kung kaya't hindi ito maaaring isuplong dito. Ergo - tinatakot ka lang ng collection agency na kakasuhan ka (malay mo nga naman, matakot ka at magbayad, na siyang nangyari sa iyo, sa takot mo, basta basta ka na lang sumulat sa bangko sa Hong Kong at umamin, kahit hindi mo dapat ito ginagawa, ayan tuloy, pag napunta ka sa Hong Kong, may sulat ka na magagamit laban sa iyo, at inamin mo na may pagkakautang ka). Yun ay kung babalik ka dun. Dito sa Pilipinas, WALA KANG PANANAGUTANG KRIMINAL!

Mga tropa

Sabog ako sa financial planning

 

Nag apply na ko sa citibank

 

Nabigay ko na application ko

How do I increase my chances of getting my personal loan approved

How do I increase my chances of getting my personal loan approved?

Offer collateral

Hi there. I'm wondering if a person lost his atm and he found out that someone withdraw some money from his account. Can he just go to his branch and request to see the CCTV footage? what can he do? Thanks for any info.

what can he do?

go to his branch and request to see the CCTV footage

sir rocco69 ask ko lang po kung pwedeng "hindi na ilagay" as beneficiary ang asawa at ilagay na "separated" sa status sa mga legal documents kahit hindi pa legally separated or annulled silang pareho sa isat-isa???

mahirap gawin ang ganito, lalo na sa legal documents na isinusumite sa government agencies. baka makasuhan ka pa ng falsification of public documents kung ilalagay mo na "separated" ka samantalang naghiwalay lang kayo. Ang ordinary understanding kasi ng "separated" ay "legally separated" , hindi "separated de facto" (ito yung naghiwalay lang kayo). Iba na rin ang nag-iingat. Baka masilipan ka ng butas ng asawa mo, at makasuhan ka pa (nagkakaroon ng leverage tuloy ang asawa mo sa iyo). mahirap din magsinungaling na "single" ka, at falsification din yun. Pwede naman siguro i-declare na "married" ka, pero ibang kamag-anak (magulang o anak) ang beneficiary mo. Da best talaga, kung di ka mapakali kung sino ang "beneficiary" mo, magsampa ka ng kaso para ipawalang-bisa ang kasal mo.

 

Thank you, Sir!

 

Wala na communication si Mr at Mrs.... at wala sa plano mag usap yung dalawa.

 

Dapat po ba inform muna ni Mr si Mrs na mag fifile ng annulment on grounds of "psychologically incapacitation" then si Mrs ang gagastos?

 

Or puwede po ba na biglain nalang ni Mr si Mrs... meaning, consult ng abogado si Mr about this... then padalhan nalang ng parang letter (summons?) ng abogado ni Mr si Mrs na nag fifile ng annunment si Mr at ikaw (Mrs) ang gagastos?

 

In terms of sabwatan, malayo mangyari, kasi, wala sa kanila ang gusto makipag usap sa isa't isa.

kung wala sa kanila ang gusto makipag usap sa isa't isa, mas malabo NA SASAGUTIN NG ISA YUNG GASTOS.

Alalahanin mo rin, ang pagpapawalang-bisa sa kasal ay hindi katulad ng ordinaryong kaso. hindi mo mababawi ang ginastos mo sa kabilang panig, lalo na kung psychological incapacity ang gagamitin mong ground. Sa pagtingin kasi ng batas, hindi kasalanan nung psychologically incapacitated person na walang bisa ang kanyang kasal. Kasalanan ba ng isang tao kung siya ay nagkasakit ng hindi sinasadya. Ganun ang pagtingn ng batas sa psychologically incapacitated person, hindi niya ito ginusto, kaya sa pangkaraniwan, hindi ka makakahabol ng danyos (at reimbursement for expenses) sa annulment/declaration of nullity cases.

Couples Mr and Mrs are separated... malinis ang papeles at kasal....

 

pero kinalaunan after 12yrs, ayaw na ni Mrs kasi ayaw nalang niya.. inshort nagsawa na.. at ayaw na talaga bumalik kay Mr.

 

since walang divorce dito sa pilipinas, annulment or legal separation lang ang puwede.. pero, dimo makikita on both ang grounds na "nagsawa na".

 

anong puwede gawin? puwede ba mag file ng annulment and just come up with a "psychologically incapacitated" reason?

 

ito pa.. ayaw naman mag file ni Mrs ng annulment or whatever... puwede ba mag file si Mr then kasama sa conditions ng filing is all fees is babayaran ni Mrs? in short, si Mr magfifile ng annulment pero si Mrs magbabayad ng lahat ng mga fees.

Hindi nga ground sa pagpapa-walang bisa ng kasal ang "nagsawa na." Kaya, tama ka. Palalabasin na may "psychologically incapacitated" sa alin sa dalawang partido (o sila pareho).

Maaaring nangyayari ang ganitong sitwasyon: Ang magfa-file si Mr. at si Mrs ang gagastos. Kaya lang, bawal ang sabwatan sa ganitong klaseng kaso. At isang signos na may sabwatan sa kaso, ay ang ganitong usapan. Kapag ito ay nalaman ng hukuman (na may sabwatan sa mag-asawa upang makakuha ng annulment/declaration of nullity), idi-dismiss ang kaso. At baka madisiplina rin ang abugadong me hawak sa kaso.

need help on my case please.

 

some details:

 

I got married last 2018, both 26 kame ni wifey at that time, and kahit may red flags na akong nakita kay misis, I still decided to marry her.

 

It turns out she's a control freak, narcissist and sobrang daming bad experiences ko and I want out, pero I really feel eventually gusto ko ulit ikasal so I want to file an annulment sana.

 

Since psychological incapacity yung pinaka-mabisang grounds for annulment, possible ba tong mga reason na to:

 

1. 2 months into marriage, gusto ko sana i-postpone yung kasal, kasi she was showing signs ng pagiging suicidal when we lost yung first baby namin during her pregnancy, I tried to be with her pero sobrang difficult nya to deal with, to the point na sinaksak nya ari ng ng scissor.

 

2. Now nung sinabi ko na I want to postpone the marriage, nakiusap siya na bigyan ko siya ng chance and she'll try to be better, so I gave in, pero deep inside I felt napilitan ako.

 

3. Parents nya kept insisting yung magpakasal kame, I had to live with them sa house nila for a few months when she was recovering.

 

4. Until now may mga suicidal thoughts parin siya lalo pag nag tatalo kame, she won't stop sa drama nya unless marinig nya mga magic words na kelangan nya. To think we now have our rainbow baby and never ko siya iniwan despite her controlling nature. (e.g I don't have a money of my own, she wants to know every bit na nangyayari sakin, I can't have my me time)

I may have more to say, pa pm naman sa kung sino pwede tumulong. I'd want to discuss para makapag ipon din if ever sa gagastusin.

 

 

EDIT:

 

I posted before asking sa grounds ng annulment and may nagsabi rin sakin ng declaration of nullity. Sino pwede i-pm ditong lawyer that can help me?

Looks like psychological incapacity nga ang grounds na pwedeng gamitin sa iyo.

But, saan kayo at paano kayo ikinasal (baka naman kasi sa fixer lang kayo sa likod ng City Hall ikinasal). Baka kasi, may irregulairty sa marriage license (altho, suntok sa buwan ito). Kung walang license or fake ang license, walang bisa rin ang kasal mo.

Kung matino ang pagkakakasal ninyo (may marriage license bago kayo ikasal, at pareho kayong nasa edad at walang sabit), yun nga, psychological incapacity ang ground na gagamitin mo. Kailangan itong pag-ipunan at medyo magastos.

Can others use a private right of way may titulo po ung right of way and also the other party already modified the road at tinamnaman na din ng halaman. also does buying a land would also include a private right of way use kahit wala namang naka indicate dun sa titulo nung binili nyang lupa (paper street po ung right of way hndi pa na develope). and also can you sell a part of the right of way if the buyer owns the adjacent lots and the road is at a dead end. the other party insist na right of way un that he has all the rights to cross and modify when clearly it is a private right of way with the owners written on the title. the right of way title has "(existing right of way) of the subd. plan" as a defining phrase. on side note pinagmanahan po cya na lupa and then sold by the family members who own it to the other party the right of the family member to the right of way is not included on the sale. and also the buyer has access to road with or without the said private right of way pinag tuglong lang nya ung dalawang lots na pag aari nya by using the right of way which is nasa middle ng dalawang lots

Its difficult to answer this without seeing the titles, the corresponding technical descriptions of the lots involved, the lot plan covering the area, as well as, of course, the deeds of sale involved.

Ilizarov procedure.

https://www.nytimes.com/2002/05/05/world/risking-limbs-for-height-and-success-in-china.html

https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2266651/

 

Thank you for the detailed information, sir rocco69. It's not possible for the employee to bring someone along as witness as they are only required to go to the office alone to surrender money every afternoon (for the cashiers) and to get their salary every pay day. I will ask if she's close to the 4 office staff and if those staff are around whenever employees will surrender money and when they get their pay check. If so, then perhaps, one of the office staff can act as witness. The next thing, I guess, is to report to DOLE right away if the employer refuse to receive the letter. I remember the DOLE officer I talked to over the hotline advice me to do that.

 

Lastly, I understand that the resignation letter should have a reason for leaving but doesn't need to be detailed. So I'd like to ask what are the best reasons to put on a resignation letter. Actually, the employee is resigning because she wants to rest already after working 12-hour shift for more than 2 years and wants to move in with her boyfriend as well as visit her family in the province.

1. what are the best reasons to put on a resignation letter. She wants to rest already after working 12-hour shift for more than 2 years and wants to move in with her boyfriend as well as visit her family in the province.

Slavery is not recognized/allowed in the Philippines. An employer cannot force an employee to continue working for him. As stated earlier, the only requirement is that the employee give 30-days notice of his resignation. So, ANY REASON can be given by the employee, so long as he gives 30-days notice.

May risk ba kung mabigyan ang agent ng photocopy ng TCT? Posible ba na makapag-forge ng titulo mula sa xerox?

1. May risk ba kung mabigyan ang agent ng photocopy ng TCT?

Lahat ng bagay may risk, ang paggising sa umaga ay may risk.

Ang isipin mo, KAHIT SINO PWEDENG KUMUHA NG XEROX NG TITULO sa Register of Deeds. Basta alam mo ang TCT number ng isang titulo (na madali ring malaman dahil pwede ring tumingin sa records sa Assessor's office kung ano ang number ng titulo ng isang lupa. Basta alam mo yung lugar, at maituturo mo sa mapa, makikita ito sa Assessor's Office), makakapag-request ka na ng copy sa Register of Deeds.

In short, kahit hindi mo ibigay ang xerox ng titulo, madaling kumuha ng kopya nito sa Register of Deeds.

2. Posible ba na makapag-forge ng titulo mula sa xerox?

Posible, kahit anong bagay na nakasulat, pwede i-forge. Ang pera nga, nafo-forge gamit ang xerox.

Ang tanong, KAPANI-PANIWALA BA ANG FORGED NA TITULO?

Dahil mahalagang papeles ang titulo, katulad ng pera, ito ay maraming security features. Hindi ito basta-bastang napepeke. basahin mo ito: https://infinit3solutions.com/blog/buying-real-estate-philippines/

para malaman kung ano ang dapat tingnan sa titulo para malaman kung ito ay peke o hindi.

Sa katapusan, ang pagbibigay ng xerox ng titulo sa ahente ay low-risk (dahil maaari naman siyang kumuha nito, sa ayaw o sa gusto mo)

Maaari ding makagawa ng pekeng titulo mula sa xerox, pero ang kalidad nito ay depende sa gumawa. At isipin mo, kahit anong ganda pa ng pagka-peke, iba ang nagtatanong. GAGO na lang ang bibili ng lupa na hindi pupunta sa mismong lupa at magtatanong sa nakatira doon kung ano ang karapatan ng nagbebenta sa lupa. Kahit pa high quality ang pagkakapeke ng titulo, kung ang tunay na may-ari ay nakatira sa lupa, malalaman mo na ang nagbebenta ay impostor. Magtanong din sa mga katabing bahay kung sino ang kilala nilang may-ari ng lupa. I-check din sa Register of Deeds ang titulo. Sa madaling salita, ang wais na mamimili ay nag-iimbestiga muna bago bumili.

matanong ko lang po, if you owned properties under your name before the marriage, will the wife have legal right to half of the properties when annulment is finalize?? thank you in advance po.

Kung ang kanilang kasal ay nangyari after August 3, 1988, at wala silang Pre-nuptial Agreement na pinirmahan bago sila ikasal sa isa't-isa (na siyang kalimitang nangyayari), OO, kung ang kanilang kasal ay na-annul (ang dahilan sa pagdedeklarang walang-bisa ng kasal ay:

• lack of parental consent (if either party is at least 18 but below 21 years old);
• insanity;
• fraud;
• consent for marriage obtained by force, intimidation, or undue influence;
• impotence / physical incapability of consummating the marriage; or
• serious sexually transmitted disease.

Pero, kung ang kanilang kasal ay nadeklarang walang bisa simula't sapul (declared null and void ab initio) dahil sa sumusunod:

• same sex sila
• under age (below 18 ang isa/silang pareho) ng ikinasal ;
• no marriage license/expired marriage license;
• magkamag-anak (hanggang 4th civil degree) ang ikinasal
• may asawa na ang isa sa kanila nung magpakasal (ulit)
• psychological incapacity
• walang seremonyang naganap (basta lang nagsumite ng Marriage Contract sa Civil Registrar, di naman humarap sa pari/mayor/etc.)

walang karapatan yung "asawa:" sa mga ari-ariang naipundar na bago sila ikasal.

Hi MTC lawyers. I have some more questions about employment particularly resignation.

 

1. I read an article online and it said that if an employee signed an employment contract then he/she should write a letter of resignation before resigning. Whereas, if the employee wasn't made to sign an employment contract then the resignation can be verbal. Is this true?

 

2. Are there any differences or loopholes or consequences if an employee writes a resignation letter compare to informing the employer verbally? I asked this because my girlfriend said she and fellow workmates used to sign an employment contract ONLY in the beginning but has since stopped. She also said that they are asked to submit a letter of resignation when someone wants to resign but now the employer no longer ask for it so it's verbal now. I'm having a hard time deciding whether to ask my girlfriend to submit a resignation letter when the norm in her workplace is informing the boss verbally. She informed the boss on July 2 that she will be leaving at the end of September but the boss didn't allow her and asked her to resign next year. We had a bad fight regarding it because she just agreed to her boss' wishes but that's another story. So now, my girlfriend has decided that she will be informing the boss soon that she will be leaving at the end of December 2020 and won't come in starting January 1, 2021. She also decide that if her boss didn't agree again, she will just pack all her things and walk out just like what her colleague did last June. Thus, I'm not sure what's her best option.

 

3. I called DOLE's hotline this afternoon and the guy told me that if the employer will not accept the resignation letter of an employee, the employee can write the outcome down on a piece of paper stating that the employer didn't accept the resignation letter. For example, according to the assistance officer, if the employee hand in the letter to the employer but the employer refused to accept it or received it, then the employee should grab a piece of paper and write down that the employer didn't accept or receive her resignation letter. Is this true? It's just like writing on a diary and it doesn't seem to make any sense.

 

Any information will be highly appreciated.

1. if an employee signed an employment contract then he/she should write a letter of resignation before resigning. Whereas, if the employee wasn't made to sign an employment contract then the resignation can be verbal. Is this true?

NOT TRUE. Even of there is a written employment contract, if the employer accepts a verbal resignation, that would be valid. And even if its a verbal employment contract, nothing prevents the employee from making a letter of resignation. The advantage of a written resignation over a verbal resignation is that it is BETTER evidence that you resigned (or attempted to)

2. Are there any differences or loopholes or consequences if an employee writes a resignation letter compare to informing the employer verbally?

An employee is supposed to give the employer 30 days notice of his/her intent to resign. No 30 day notice, the employer can hold the employee liable for damages he suffered because the employee abruptly leaves without giving the employer a period to look for a replacement/prepare for his departure.

A resignation letter (given at least 30 days before the effective date of resignation), frees the employee from liability for damages.

It is more difficult to prove when a verbal resignation was made, or that it was made with 30 days notice.

Note that all of these becomes academic if the employer AGREES to the resignation, even if there was no 30 days notice. It becomes important if the employer complains of the resignation, or claims that it was improperly made. Note also even if there was a violation, and the employer complains about it, liability for damages would probably move the employer to withhold the last salary owing to the employee. If the employer doesn't owe the employee any money, they would have to go to court to ask for damages. MOST EMPLOYERS WILL NOT DO THIS AS THE COST FAR OUTWEIGHS ANY AMOUNT THEY CAN RECOVER FROM THE EX-EMPLOYEE.

3. What to do if the employer refuses to accept the resignation letter.

If the employee who wants to resign wants to have evidence that he gave 30-days notice, the best evidence is a resignation letter saying that he is resigning and stating the date when the resignation is to become effective (which date should be at least 30 days after the employer receives the letter).And the best proof of that is by having a "Receiving Copy" of the letter stamped/written with the words "Received" and signed and dated by the employer (in other words, you prepare two copies of the resignation letter, one copy you give to the employer, the other copy you have him write "Received" on the front, with his signature and date, which you keep for yourself, as proof that really, the employer received such a letter).

Now, if the employee anticipates that the employer will not accept the resignation letter when he attempts to give a copy to the employer, HE SHOULD BRING SOMEBODY ALONG AS A WITNESS (preferably, not a co-employee, because they might not testify on his behalf later). When he gives the letter, he should give it with the witness present. Now, when the employer refuses to receive the letter (or to write "Received" and sign on the receiving copy), he should just leave the copy for the employer there AND THEN WRITE THE WORDS "REFUSED TO RECEIVE" plus the date on the other copy he has, and then he and the witness signs below that. He then keeps the letter as proof that the employer was given the letter but refused to receive it. And because he has a witness, it is better evidence than him just saying that the employer refused to receive the letter.

 

 

sir kung sakaling magsampa ng kaso yung babae sa court kakailanganin rin po ng lawyer nung lalaki ano???...tapos po pwede kaya mag-counter charge naman yung lalaki ng adultery or concubinage dun sa babae???...kaso ang worry ng lalaki kung sapat na kaya na evidence kung ano man matagpuan sa cellphone nung babae???...pwede kaya ma-subpoena yung cellphone nya as evidence???

1. kung sakaling magsampa ng kaso yung babae sa court kakailanganin rin po ng lawyer nung lalaki ano?

Oo, dahil kailangan niyang labanan yung kaso.

2. pwede kaya mag-counter charge naman yung lalaki ng adultery or concubinage dun sa babae?

Oo. Pag me asawa ang isang babae, hindi siya pwedeng makipagtalik sa ibang lalaki.

3. ang worry ng lalaki kung sapat na kaya na evidence kung ano man matagpuan sa cellphone nung babae?

Spekulasyon kung ano ang laman ng cellphone. Kailangan meron siyang matibay na ebidensya na sarili niya, hindi na aasa lang siya sa cp. Unang-una, hindi nga natin alam kung me lamang kung anuman na magagamity laban sa babae yung cellphone. Pangalawa, andaling magbura ng laman ng cp. Pinakamaganda, may testigo siya na nakakita sa mga pinaggagawa nung asawa niya.

4. pwede kaya ma-subpoena yung cellphone nya as evidence?

malabo, dahil kailangan mo munang patunayan na me lamang ebidensya yung cp. ang sabi ko nga, mas mainam kung meron siyang sariling ebidensya, preferably taong nakakita sa activities ng asawa niya (o kahit sarili niyang testimonya, basta PERSONAL niyang nakita)

 

sorry po at medyo may dagdag na katanungan pa ako...kasi balak ng babae na kunin yung anak nila ng sapilitan...ano po kaya ang pwedeng gawin para hindi ito mangyari...kasi nangangamba ang ama nung bata na magamit ang kanilang anak na pagkaperahan lang ng nanay dahil sa pagpapanggap nito na single mom at para kaawaan ito ng mga ibat-iabng lalaking sinasamahan nya...

Kung nasa kanya yung bata, wag niya ibibigay yung bata PARA MAPILITAN YUNG BABAE NA MAGSAMPA NG KASO SA KORTE. At maaari niyang ma-delay na yung kaso (at habang nasa kanya yung bata, ay i-brainwash na niya ito na siya ang piliin, hindi yung ina).

Alalahanin niya, HANGGA'T WALANG COURT ORDER, walang karapatan sinuman na kunin yung bata at ibigay sa nanay.

Bantayan din niyang mabuti, dahil kapag nakuha ng nanay yung bata, kahit pwersahan pa,hindi ito makakasuhan ng kidnapping at ito ay magulang at may karapatan sa bata.