jacuzzi Posted February 13, 2020 Share Posted February 13, 2020 please state your argument in your 1st sentence.follow it with another sentence supporting your first sentence, and so on, this is how we engineers/scientists argue, not throwing a lot of words that has no senseseems like you are just copying/pasting texts, doesnt make sense at all without any argumentYou claim to be an engineer? Now you are displaying you cannot even understand simple and basic concepts? I doubt if you are even hold a college degree. Quote Link to comment
Guest Al_Panchito Posted February 13, 2020 Share Posted February 13, 2020 You claim to be an engineer? Now you are displaying you cannot even understand simple and basic concepts? I doubt if you are even hold a college degree.got it, you are stupid, bye! Quote Link to comment
Corporation201 Posted February 20, 2020 Share Posted February 20, 2020 I believe in both of them. Quote Link to comment
hotmint Posted April 29, 2020 Share Posted April 29, 2020 "I think humanity is a thin layer of bacteria in a ball of mud hurtling through a void. I think, if there is a god, he would have given up on us long ago. He gave us a paradise and we used everything up. We dug up every once of energy we can and burn it up. We consume and excrete; we use and destroy. You and I are here to speed up the entropic death of this planet; to service the chaos; we're maggots eating a corpse." -- Westworld Quote Link to comment
hyatt122002 Posted August 21, 2021 Share Posted August 21, 2021 Not Bible versus Science. For me, it's Bible and Science 🙂 Quote Link to comment
male_scort4hire Posted August 25, 2021 Share Posted August 25, 2021 there are Bad Science specially, the theories like evolution its just like a bad gossip. The bible is a truth book, even the mehanism of a war head if explained there in details before even the Scientist inveted it, but sadly it will be used to pulvorise the world Quote Link to comment
Jacknife Posted August 26, 2021 Share Posted August 26, 2021 I refuse to believe in myths that happened more 2000 years ago, and put in written media 1500 years ago, retold and translated less than 1000 years ago. Stories told last week already changed/altered multiple times, what more yung stories 2000 years ago. The beauty of science is, it's constantly rechecked and revised as new discoveries are found. Quote Link to comment
Rechsteiner Posted August 27, 2021 Share Posted August 27, 2021 they can't coexist. science is literally the pursuit of facts and truth. the bible is claiming to be "the truth". Quote Link to comment
haroots2 Posted August 27, 2021 Share Posted August 27, 2021 On 10/13/2015 at 8:55 AM, Edmund Dantes said: Metaphor kasi ang language ng bible. Minsan literal masyado interpretation nila nito The Bible depends in the interpretation of what it says. And its a never ending debate and no one is wrong while in science fact is fact. There is only one right and the others are wrong unless scientifically proven right in time and debunked the previously believed is correcct. Quote Link to comment
kb824 Posted September 2, 2021 Share Posted September 2, 2021 Science is a fact... Bible is a hearsay Quote Link to comment
just_checking Posted September 24, 2021 Share Posted September 24, 2021 Science of course, and in science almost everything can be challenged openly as long as you have the facts, proper experimentation and results to back it up. The Bible on the other hand are just stories... Quote Link to comment
jacuzzi Posted October 28, 2021 Share Posted October 28, 2021 Science is PROCEDURE. Once that procedure is altered by peer pressure or some social and political effort, then it ceases to be the scientific. The Bible is written by men, many of its stories require some stressful reflection because the people who wrote were lost and failed. Yet Science Procedure can be applied to Bible Study. Why not? This is to remove the man made ideas that cloud the Truth. Quote Link to comment
emmm Posted October 28, 2021 Share Posted October 28, 2021 Science will only be refuted by better science. You cannot have faith in science because it works by gathering evidence and it follows where the evidence leads to not the other way around. Quote Link to comment
manishbombee Posted December 24, 2021 Share Posted December 24, 2021 The Catholic Church and Galileo: Truth or Myth? | The Catholic Church and Galileo: Truth or Myth? (patheos.com) According to popular opinion, the Catholic Church is still mired in the Inquisition and still ignorant of modern science. After all, look what they did to Galileo Galilei. Every time I hear a critic of Catholicism mention Galileo, I want to say, “Really, you’re going to bring up something that happened 400 years ago? Talk about not moving on!” Harping on Galileo is especially ridiculous since most of what people believe is myth. Vatican Astronomers Attempting to dispel this myth is Christopher Graney — astronomer and science historian at the Vatican astronomical observatory and Adjunct Scholar at the Vatican Observatory Foundation in Tucson, Arizona. Graney’s research on 16th and 17th century astronomy has resulted in two books and, specific to Galileo, two recent articles in Catholic publications about the true story of Galileo and the Church. One, “The Truth About Galileo,” can be found at The National Catholic Register online: https://www.ncregister.com/blog/myth-of-galileo The other article, “What the story of Galileo gets wrong about the church and science,” was written with Brother Guy Consolmagno, S.J., the director of the Vatican Observatory: https://www.americamagazine.org/arts-culture/2020/09/18/what-story-galileo-gets-wrong-about-church-and-science Considering their credentials, these guys ought to know what they are talking about. It should also be mentioned that the Vatican Department of Astronomy is considered the best department of its kind in the world. Further, members of the Pontifical Academy of Sciences include the most prominent scientists in the world (think Stephen Hawking and various Nobel Laureates). What Really Happened According to legend, Galileo was tried by the Inquisition for the audacity to claim that the earth orbited the sun instead of the other way around. As Graney notes: “In recent variations of this myth, the Catholic Church has been cast in the role of science deniers who used Scripture as a cudgel to deny Galileo’s claims and found him guilty of heresy.” It is true that Galileo was called before the Inquisition and punished with house arrest for the rest of his life. House arrest was a slap on the wrist, though, compared to the dungeon punishments of the day, and Galileo was able to continue his work. In relation to the scientific knowledge of his time, Galileo was radical, so the judgment, while incorrect, was a reasonable decision. Of course, politics were involved too. Despite what the social media snipes say, it is not true that Galileo was tortured. Galileo was not excommunicated, did not invent the telescope, and did not actually prove that the Earth moves. How Misinformation Gets Spread and Validated Nonetheless, the observatory gets hate mail accusing the Church of “barbecuing” scientists. What’s even more disturbing is that Graney was able to cite a Harvard astronomer, an Oxford publication and a new Simon & Schuster publication that all propagate misinformation about the Church and Galileo. How can eminent scholars err so grievously? Because they are looking at 17th century science with the knowledge of the 20th century. They see the events through modern eyes and not through the eyes of the people who were there and had a different world view and a different understanding of astronomy. Toss into this misinterpretation a modern tendency to believe anything bad about the Church, and you get science fiction instead of facts. How can these “experts” travel so off the mark? Don’t they do research? Yes and no. They start with assumptions based on the myth and then find sources that match those assumptions, never checking on whether those sources are biased. I once edited a book for a political science professor whose main sources were two notoriously left-wing newspapers. His chapter on abortion was ridiculously out of date and horribly misinformed. It was obvious this “expert” had never talked to a pro-life person or ever considered anything but pro-abortion propaganda. Yet I’m sure he thought he had done his research, and his readers thought he knew his subject. Seek the Truth If you are the type of person who reads The DaVinci Code and thinks its descriptions of the Church are true, then you are probably content with the Galileo myth. Cloak and dagger tales and conspiracy theories and more thrilling than the truth and easier to find, right? As Graney says, “But Catholics must seek truth. That is one reason the Vatican supports an astronomical observatory and thus participates in the search for scientific truths.” Catholics are not conservative; we are steadfast. We follow the way of Christ and of science. If you want the truth, look to the Church. Quote Link to comment
Psari19 Posted December 24, 2021 Share Posted December 24, 2021 Bible at science magkasama yan. Pero pag puro science di lahat tama at dapat paniwalaan lalo pag naniwala ka sa unggoy ka nagsimula. Pero kung isa lang pipiliin BIble na ko kasi sa Science di lahat tama pinaniniwalaan. Quote Link to comment
SAGITTARIAN Posted March 12, 2022 Share Posted March 12, 2022 I LIVE THROUGH SCIENCE AND I ALSO LIVE THROUGH BIBLE 1 Quote Link to comment
male_scort4hire Posted March 12, 2022 Share Posted March 12, 2022 The BigBang Theory is Right if someone Triggered it... Quote Link to comment
Ziltoid Posted May 27, 2022 Share Posted May 27, 2022 It should be bible and science, Quote Link to comment
Skywalker5949 Posted August 10, 2022 Share Posted August 10, 2022 Both are fascinating Quote Link to comment
kikomatsingmatos Posted September 23, 2023 Share Posted September 23, 2023 bible and science to Quote Link to comment
Mang Ricky Posted September 25, 2023 Share Posted September 25, 2023 Mgka iba ang concern ng science sa concern ng bible. Pareho pwede magamit ang kaalaman mula science at bible para sa ikabubuti at ikauunlad ng mundo at sangkatauhan. Quote Link to comment
Jj6969 Posted January 13 Share Posted January 13 Sa super recorded na history ng egypt about pharaohs and family, kahit mga kabit lang ni Cleopatra may record. Bakit wala at all si Moses, na naging anak daw ng pharaoh sa legit history? Bible stories lang. Confirmation ba na BS yun? Quote Link to comment
Elimer Posted January 24 Share Posted January 24 may nagsasabi recorded yung nagyari kay Moses and iba yung name na ginagamit nun kasi in egyptian language gamit niya unlike sa bible recorded in hebrew, and may nagsasabing possible na binura sa history ng egypt nun kasi disgrace yun sa linage, and marami proof din talaga may nagyayaring pagbura sa records in ancient egypt Quote Link to comment
JosephConrad Posted May 5 Share Posted May 5 Both tries to put meaning and reason in a non sensical universe that does not care if mankind survives or not!. Quote Link to comment
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.