Jump to content

All Activity

This stream auto-updates

  1. Past hour
  2. courtesanhunter
    useless magdeny. hindi ba kayo pamilyar sa Google Lens?
  3. spaspaspa
    28
  4. miyuki of oblivion
    miyuki of oblivion changed their profile photo
  5. Jeeeeeeeey
    Kung wala sa palawan ikaw magtayo boss. Gandang business yan hahah
  6. Chokeman started following Magbilang Tayo!! :)
  7. Chokeman
    91
  8. franzd
    Quail
  9. TempAcc009
    7638253
  10. Gabubee
    90
  11. Jhay_ahr
    next destination.. yahooo
  12. franzd
    Jonsons
  13. Linkz
    823
  14. spaspaspa
    45
  15. Jhay_ahr
    grabe ang driving super uphill dito.. super lamig
  16. jebbaxboys
    Bellevue
  17. Aries0818
    No. Unfortunately, this still involves attorney-client privilege. It might also result in a conflict of interest. Even though the lawyer is no longer retained as counsel by his former client, he cannot divulge information he obtained while he was a lawyer for said client. This would be unethical and would defeat the purpose of the privilege mentioned. Ultimately, people will no longer trust lawyers with confidential information. Also it would be a violation of Code of Professional Responsibility and Accountability.
  18. spaspaspa
    671
  19. Jhay_ahr
    SM Manila
  20. Jhay_ahr
    namis ko na magboracy... hopefully next year
  21. jebbaxboys
    Lechon
  22. shitmantae123
    *3 maiba lang may ES spa ba d2 s Palawan? Haha
  23. dimsqtp2t
    9
  24. Jhay_ahr
    any reco bulalo restaurant?
  25. winterfrost
    74235
  26. sunny15
    7,777,953,511
  27. Renic
    174924
  28. Aries0818
    Taal Vista Hotel
  1. Load more activity
×
×
  • Create New...