Jump to content

All Activity

This stream auto-updates

  1. Past hour
  2. Aries0818 started following Brand Names Of Consumer Products(a To Z)
  3. Linkz
    Malicious
  4. BlitzX
    Dota 2
  5. spaspaspa
    569345
  6. Linkz
    Red panda
  7. BlitzX
    Dota
  8. spaspaspa
    15
  9. Aries0818
    Kiehl's
  10. jebbaxboys
    Lobster
  11. courtesanhunter
    useless magdeny. hindi ba kayo pamilyar sa Google Lens?
  12. spaspaspa
    28
  13. miyuki of oblivion
    miyuki of oblivion changed their profile photo
  14. Jeeeeeeeey
    Kung wala sa palawan ikaw magtayo boss. Gandang business yan hahah
  15. Chokeman started following Magbilang Tayo!! :)
  16. Chokeman
    91
  17. franzd
    Quail
  18. TempAcc009
    7638253
  19. Gabubee
    90
  20. Jhay_ahr
    next destination.. yahooo
  21. franzd
    Jonsons
  22. Linkz
    823
  23. spaspaspa
    45
  24. Jhay_ahr
    grabe ang driving super uphill dito.. super lamig
  25. jebbaxboys
    Bellevue
  26. Aries0818
    No. Unfortunately, this still involves attorney-client privilege. It might also result in a conflict of interest. Even though the lawyer is no longer retained as counsel by his former client, he cannot divulge information he obtained while he was a lawyer for said client. This would be unethical and would defeat the purpose of the privilege mentioned. Ultimately, people will no longer trust lawyers with confidential information. Also it would be a violation of Code of Professional Responsibility and Accountability.
  27. spaspaspa
    671
  28. Jhay_ahr
    SM Manila
  29. Jhay_ahr
    namis ko na magboracy... hopefully next year
  1. Load more activity
×
×
  • Create New...