Jump to content
  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.

Free Legal Advice


Butsoy

Recommended Posts

Guest Leviticus

^^Easy enough to answer. from an internet search:

 

Access point is a hardware or software that acts as a communications hub for wireless device/s to connect to a network lan.

 

router is a device that forwards data packets along networks.

 

therefore; any network hub is considered as a router whether it be wireless or not while access point is an essential hardware (or software as the definition states) to connect wireless network devices on a pre-existing local area network.

Link to comment
ako naman...

 

for APACHE web hosts...

 

HOW DO I LOAD A WEBPAGE TO AN APACHE WEB HOST?

 

any website or info would be appreciated.

all you have to do is to upload the pages (and pictures, etc) to the webserver. webhosting servers usually provides ftp access for you to upload your stuff.

 

dynamic content, guestbooks, forums? that's another story.

Link to comment

I need help, I have a wi-fi adaptor (3com) for my pc connected to air express in an office outside my office (a few meters away)...

 

i connect quite low in signal strength and get kicked out frequently,

 

sometime a message flashes that "there are more wireless connections" when it detects another wireless switch in the building, and seemingly it kicks me out...

 

it's frustrating...

 

are my settings wrong? what's going on? every ten minutes siguro na-ki-kick out ako.. i don't think it's the signal strength naman, just when it detects that other hub..

 

help!

Edited by ElRey
Link to comment

Question number 2: computer manyaks...

 

I'm in the market for a laptoP::::

 

choice number 1: Apple Mac 12" combo drive (no dvd writer, is this absolutely essential?) 1.33 GHZ pwer pc G4 80mb HDD (should i opt for more)

 

this will cost approx. P72K in singapore...

 

or just a regular run of the mill PC laptop which costs around there, if not even more...

 

come on boys and girls, pros and cons, help me make an intelligent decision...

Link to comment
yung Estafa under RTC if ever na macoconvict ang accused (around Php180,000 only) may kulong ba cya? how many years, and if ever magaapeal yung accused, nakakulong ba cya habang inaappeal?

 

From the Revised Penal Code:

"Art. 315. Swindling (estafa). — Any person who shall defraud another by any of the means mentioned hereinbelow shall be punished by:

1st. The penalty of prision correccional in its maximum period to prision mayor in its minimum period, if the amount of the fraud is over 12,000 pesos but does not exceed 22,000 pesos, and if such amount exceeds the latter sum, the penalty provided in this paragraph shall be imposed in its maximum period, adding one year for each additional 10,000 pesos; but the total penalty which may be imposed shall not exceed twenty years. In such cases, and in connection with the accessory penalties which may be imposed under the provisions of this Code, the penalty shall be termed prision mayor or reclusion temporal, as the case may be."

 

Since the amount is Php 180,000, the Court in its discretion may impose the maximum penalty (twenty years). Applying the above provision, since the amount is above 22,000, then the maximum of prision mayor in the minimum is imposable (6 years and 1 day). Since the amount exceeds Php 22,000, then one year for every Php 10,000 increment, so roughly that's Php 138,000 (180 less 22). So that's 14 years, and since the provision determines a year added for any amount above the threshold of Php 22,000 then that's 14 years. Plus the initial 6 years and 1 day, then the total imposable penalty by virtue of the amount is above the twenty year maximum allowed by the law. The judge, in its infinite wisdom, can apply the twenty year penalty, but may opt not to. Now I say this is possible since it is still the discretion of the RTC judge on what is the penalty imposable as it is the trier of the facts.

 

Bail is allowed as a matter of right except when evidence of guilt is strong. Now since the person has been convicted by the lower court, then evidence of guilt is not only strong, but has been proven beyond reasonable doubt. By strict application, bail is denied outright, but may still be allowed. After all, anything can happen.

 

I hope this helps.

 

Link to comment

From the Revised Penal Code:

"Art. 315. Swindling (estafa). — Any person who shall defraud another by any of the means mentioned hereinbelow shall be punished by:

1st. The penalty of prision correccional in its maximum period to prision mayor in its minimum period, if the amount of the fraud is over 12,000 pesos but does not exceed 22,000 pesos, and if such amount exceeds the latter sum, the penalty provided in this paragraph shall be imposed in its maximum period, adding one year for each additional 10,000 pesos; but the total penalty which may be imposed shall not exceed twenty years. In such cases, and in connection with the accessory penalties which may be imposed under the provisions of this Code, the penalty shall be termed prision mayor or reclusion temporal, as the case may be."

 

Since the amount is Php 180,000, the Court in its discretion may impose the maximum penalty (twenty years). Applying the above provision, since the amount is above 22,000, then the maximum of prision mayor in the minimum is imposable (6 years and 1 day). Since the amount exceeds Php 22,000, then one year for every Php 10,000 increment, so roughly that's Php 138,000 (180 less 22). So that's 14 years, and since the provision determines a year added for any amount above the threshold of Php 22,000 then that's 14 years. Plus the initial 6 years and 1 day, then the total imposable penalty by virtue of the amount is above the twenty year maximum allowed by the law. The judge, in its infinite wisdom, can apply the twenty year penalty, but may opt not to. Now I say this is possible since it is still the discretion of the RTC judge on what is the penalty imposable as it is the trier of the facts.

 

Bail is allowed as a matter of right except when evidence of guilt is strong. Now since the person has been convicted by the lower court, then evidence of guilt is not only strong, but has been proven beyond reasonable doubt. By strict application, bail is denied outright, but may still be allowed. After all, anything can happen.

 

I hope this helps.

 

[/fo

 

 

Thanks for the info and explanation.

Link to comment
Question number 2:  computer manyaks...

 

I'm in the market for a laptoP::::

 

choice number 1:  Apple Mac 12" combo drive (no dvd writer, is this absolutely essential?) 1.33 GHZ pwer pc G4 80mb HDD (should i opt for more)

 

this will cost approx. P72K in singapore...

 

or just a regular run of the mill PC laptop which costs around there, if not even more...

 

come on boys and girls, pros and cons, help me make an intelligent decision...

 

Can't help you with your 1st question kahit wifi din gamit ko... but I'll try to help you with this question. :D

 

It will really depend with what you need... ask yourself, will you be playing games here? are you more concerned with the weight than performance? are you more concerned with the brand than performance? Will this be used for entertainment or for business only or for both? Do I want a laptop that does desktop capabilities?

 

Anyway, I suggest just getting the Whitebox if you're going to buy a laptop here in the Philippines. Why? Heck, all the parts and almost all laptops are made in one same place, and it is assembled like a desktop (so, its chop chop :D) So if its chop chop, it means that what a generic laptop has is also what a branded laptop has, except for the casing. :D

 

Imagine this... a 120-150k branded laptop will have the same specs as a 70-80k whitebox laptop :D

 

But in the end, its your choice :D

Link to comment

 

once a company has declared a position as redundant, is it forever barred from re-opening the declared redundant position for future employment?

 

been looking..and as i said, labor real rusty....

 

 

Redundancy is a question of whether the function is already being or can be performed by another function or whether it is still useful to the company given the circumstances of the company and the position. Thus, even if it is considered redundant today, it may no longer be redundant in a few years when the conditions change.

 

Of course, from the labor law perspective, the re-opening of the redundant position at a time very near the closing thereof and termination of the person occupying the same may constitute as illegal termination. But if the re-opening occurs a year or two later, then it may be justifiable.

Link to comment
Redundancy is a question of whether the function is already being or can be performed by another function or whether it is still useful to the company given the circumstances of the company and the position.  Thus, even if it is considered redundant today, it may no longer be redundant in a few years when the conditions change.

 

Of course, from the labor law perspective, the re-opening of the redundant position at a time very near the closing thereof and termination of the person occupying the same may constitute as illegal termination.  But if the re-opening occurs a year or two later, then it may be justifiable.

 

thanks for the wisdom...

if my latin is right...it is in caeteris paribus

Link to comment

hi. ask ko lang po. what do i need to do to file financial support for my 2 kids. my son is already 9 1/2 and my daUGHTER is turning 8 yrs. old. my exhubby and me have been separated for 6 yrs now and it was only this year that he started giving money for the kids. he's a seaman and his mistress is the one who gets his allotment. is it possible for me to demand 50% of his salary to be directly sent to me? becoz wats happening is that his mistress is the one who gives me the money and she's really a bitch! making me and my kids feel that she's the legal wife chuva. and also, can i demand that he supports his children's full education? all of the legal attorneys inside the house, i need your guidance and advices. thanks so much...

Link to comment

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
×
  • Create New...