wildswans Posted June 22, 2015 Share Posted June 22, 2015 nope.... but they can put you on floating status until the investigation or decision has been made, but it does not give the employer a reason or a right to hold the employee's salary or benefits. but normally, based on experience, DOLE is more sympathetic with the employee compared with the employer. Sir, I went to NLRC to file the complaint and they scheduled me on July 3 for the arbitration. Coincidentally, after a few days after I filed the complaint, the Operations Manager added me thru Skype. But he just greeted me and didn't brought up anything so I didn't asked him about my complaint because I was really waiting for the arbitration date since I lose trust in them already. Today, he asked me if I have pending/outstanding dispute so I told him yes and I also told him to check with his staff because I have been passed around for more than 2 months already so I decided to handle it by myself. He said he's going to check it with his staff and will get back at me. I strongly feel that NLRC has called them up already and maybe he didn't mention it to me anymore because of pride or strategy. So I have two questions (since he didn't bring up the NLRC complain): 1. What if they give me my money back before July 3 - do I call NLRC to inform them about the developments? 2. What will happen to the July 3 appointment if he will promise (again) that I would received the money together with my June 30th cut-off pay but I will only know if I received the money 5-10 days AFTER the cut-off? What's the best thing to do? Thanks Quote Link to comment
rocco69 Posted June 22, 2015 Share Posted June 22, 2015 (edited) 1. What if they give me my money back before July 3 - do I call NLRC to inform them about the developments? Kung happy ka na sa pagtanggap ng pera (in other words, wala ka ng grievance), you can opt not to inform the NLRC, or attend hearings there. The NLRC will just dismiss your case for "lack of interest" of the complainant to continue with the case. I wouldn't bet on this happening though. If I were the employer and an employee has filed a complaint with the NLRC, I would pay only if the employee agrees to have the case dismissed, hence I would pay only after we enter into such an agreement before the NLRC (to show the NLRC that the dismissal is voluntary on your part). 2. What will happen to the July 3 appointment if he will promise (again) that I would received the money together with my June 30th cut-off pay but I will only know if I received the money 5-10 days AFTER the cut-off? What's the best thing to do? Agree to this during the July 3 hearing, before the NLRC arbiter. Then, you insist that they pay you your money before the NLRC. In other words, if he promises to pay, make his promise official by making him say the promise during the hearing. Then when he gives a date during the hearing when he will pay, ask the NLRC to schedule another hearing on the day he is supposed to pay, and then agree that payment will be made during that 2nd hearing in front of the Arbiter. It is only after the payment that you agree to the dismissal of the case. Sa madaling salita, kung mangangako sila na magbabayad pero after cut-off, kung OK lang sa yo yun, sabihin mo na sabihin nila yung pangako nilang yun sa NLRC dun sa hearing. Tapos sabihin mo rin sa Arbiter sa hearing na mag-schedule sila ng isa pang hearing para sa bayaran dahil nga ang gusto mo magkabayaran kayo sa harap ng Arbiter. Sabihin mo rin na pumapayag ka ipa-dismiss yung kaso kapag nabayaran ka on the 2nd hearing, Siguraduhin mo na nakasulat sa minutes before you sign the same. Sir, I went to NLRC to file the complaint and they scheduled me on July 3 for the arbitration. Coincidentally, after a few days after I filed the complaint, the Operations Manager added me thru Skype. But he just greeted me and didn't brought up anything so I didn't asked him about my complaint because I was really waiting for the arbitration date since I lose trust in them already. Today, he asked me if I have pending/outstanding dispute so I told him yes and I also told him to check with his staff because I have been passed around for more than 2 months already so I decided to handle it by myself. He said he's going to check it with his staff and will get back at me. I strongly feel that NLRC has called them up already and maybe he didn't mention it to me anymore because of pride or strategy. So I have two questions (since he didn't bring up the NLRC complain): 1. What if they give me my money back before July 3 - do I call NLRC to inform them about the developments? 2. What will happen to the July 3 appointment if he will promise (again) that I would received the money together with my June 30th cut-off pay but I will only know if I received the money 5-10 days AFTER the cut-off? What's the best thing to do? Thanks Edited June 22, 2015 by rocco69 Quote Link to comment
vkalbos Posted June 25, 2015 Share Posted June 25, 2015 May karapatan ba o legal bang i-hold ng kumpanya ang lastpay/back pay ng isang empleyado kung ito ay may pagkakautang sa banko? Ang katwiran ng kumpanya meron daw silang arrangement with bank na kapag nag resigned/nawala ang isang empleyado at may naiwang utang o balanse pa sa salary loan in particular yun daw last pay/back pay ng empleyado ang ipambabayad nila. Pede bang mangyari yun? Quote Link to comment
Google Posted June 25, 2015 Share Posted June 25, 2015 May karapatan ba o legal bang i-hold ng kumpanya ang lastpay/back pay ng isang empleyado kung ito ay may pagkakautang sa banko? Ang katwiran ng kumpanya meron daw silang arrangement with bank na kapag nag resigned/nawala ang isang empleyado at may naiwang utang o balanse pa sa salary loan in particular yun daw last pay/back pay ng empleyado ang ipambabayad nila. Pede bang mangyari yun?yes, they have to deduct the balance of the loan at the bank from the last pay. however, the holding period should not that be long. Quote Link to comment
jbernedo10 Posted June 27, 2015 Share Posted June 27, 2015 hello po.. itatanong ko lang po sana kung pwede po ba ma-amend ng seller yung contract to sell ng lupa kahit na po hindi payag ang buyer at pareho na po sila may pirma sa contract? Nagkamali po kasi ang seller ng computation ng total sqm na sukat ng lupa na binebenta sa buyer. Pati po kasi yung right of way namin sa isang side ng lote namin ay naisama. kasi po yung lupang pinili at nabili po namin ay corner lot along the main road at nakasaad po sa title ng lupa namin na merong road on the north-west and south-west ng lupa namin. kaya lang po ay sakim po sa lupa ang kapitbahay namin dahil po nakapangasawa ng amerikano at biglang naging milyonarya at binibili nya po ang lahat ng lote sa block 7 and block 8, at ang lote at bahay ko na lang po sa block 8 ang hindi nya nabili sa amin sapagkat di naman po namin pinagbibili. kaya yung lapad na 5 meters na road po sa pagitan ng block 7 & 8 ay pag-aari nya na raw po at kanya nang babakuran kahit wala pa naman po syang deed of absolute sale at meron pa lang na contract to sell. yung lapad na 6 meters sa main road na nasa tabi po ng bahay namin, dun lang daw po kami may right of way samantalang corner lot nga po ang pinili namin dahil gusto namin na may access kami sa road, space, air at natural light on both sides of our lot. yung karapatan lang po naman namin sa 2 roads ang nais namin. Nung nakausap ko po ang seller, ipapa-amend nya daw po yung contract to sell.ang pangamba ko po ay paano kung di pumayag ang buyer? anu po ang dapat kong gawin para maibalik yung karapatan ko sa isa pang kalsada, at sinu po ang dapat managot, sapagkat pinili po namin ay corner lot at corner lot po ang ibinenta sa amin tapos biglang hindi na po magiging corner lot ang lupa dahil pati po kalsada sa harap ng bahay namin ay nagkamaling ibenta?maraming salamat po in advance sa inyong tulong..God bless.. Quote Link to comment
nwebe Posted June 28, 2015 Share Posted June 28, 2015 Disclaimer: I'm NOT a lawyer... hello po.. itatanong ko lang po sana kung pwede po ba ma-amend ng seller yung contract to sell ng lupa kahit na po hindi payag ang buyer at pareho na po sila may pirma sa contract? Nagkamali po kasi ang seller ng computation ng total sqm na sukat ng lupa na binebenta sa buyer. Pati po kasi yung right of way namin sa isang side ng lote namin ay naisama. kasi po yung lupang pinili at nabili po namin ay corner lot along the main road at nakasaad po sa title ng lupa namin na merong road on the north-west and south-west ng lupa namin. kaya lang po ay sakim po sa lupa ang kapitbahay namin dahil po nakapangasawa ng amerikano at biglang naging milyonarya at binibili nya po ang lahat ng lote sa block 7 and block 8, at ang lote at bahay ko na lang po sa block 8 ang hindi nya nabili sa amin sapagkat di naman po namin pinagbibili. kaya yung lapad na 5 meters na road po sa pagitan ng block 7 & 8 ay pag-aari nya na raw po at kanya nang babakuran kahit wala pa naman po syang deed of absolute sale at meron pa lang na contract to sell. yung lapad na 6 meters sa main road na nasa tabi po ng bahay namin, dun lang daw po kami may right of way samantalang corner lot nga po ang pinili namin dahil gusto namin na may access kami sa road, space, air at natural light on both sides of our lot. yung karapatan lang po naman namin sa 2 roads ang nais namin. Nung nakausap ko po ang seller, ipapa-amend nya daw po yung contract to sell.ang pangamba ko po ay paano kung di pumayag ang buyer? anu po ang dapat kong gawin para maibalik yung karapatan ko sa isa pang kalsada, at sinu po ang dapat managot, sapagkat pinili po namin ay corner lot at corner lot po ang ibinenta sa amin tapos biglang hindi na po magiging corner lot ang lupa dahil pati po kalsada sa harap ng bahay namin ay nagkamaling ibenta?maraming salamat po in advance sa inyong tulong..God bless.. I assume this is inside a village/subdivision... Just because your neighbor owns all the lots in block 7 and almost all of block 8 doesn't automatically give her ownership of the road in between. The road is owned by the developer (may sarili pong titulo ang mga kalsada), until it turns this over either to the homeowners association or to the local government. Ask your developer about this. Also, you can only sell what is covered in your land title. Kahit ano pa ang nakasulat sa contract to sell at deed of absolute sale, masusunod pa rin ang TCT when it comes to ownership rights transfer.May karapatan ba o legal bang i-hold ng kumpanya ang lastpay/back pay ng isang empleyado kung ito ay may pagkakautang sa banko? Ang katwiran ng kumpanya meron daw silang arrangement with bank na kapag nag resigned/nawala ang isang empleyado at may naiwang utang o balanse pa sa salary loan in particular yun daw last pay/back pay ng empleyado ang ipambabayad nila. Pede bang mangyari yun? Short answer: Yes, if the company has an agreement with the bank that gave you a loan. Check you loan agreement -- it should be stated there. Otherwise, it is debatable. Quote Link to comment
wildswans Posted July 7, 2015 Share Posted July 7, 2015 Hi Sir. I have a question regarding heirs bond. BDO wants the heirs bond to be dated (take effect) approximately the same date as with the release date of the documents from the Registry of Deeds. In short, if I were to get an heirs bond and submit all the required documents to Registry of Deeds this week for the estate of my dad I would have to request that the heirs bond will have an effective date of 4 to 6 weeks from now. Is that ok or allowed? Is this practice common? Thanks for any info. Quote Link to comment
jopok Posted July 12, 2015 Share Posted July 12, 2015 kinasuhan ng company ang union official,,sa negotiation pumayag ang officials at company na redundancy na lang ang magiging reason sa pagkakaalis ng mga officials,,sa isang resolution na ipina approve sa member nakalagay na optional/compulsary retirement ang reason ng pagkakaalis ng mga opisyal,,.ang tanong ko po ano ba ang sakop ng optional at compulsary retirement?..ginawang optional o compulsary retirement ng mga sumunod na official ang pagkakaalis ng mga dating official para sila(mga dating opisyal)ay maging elligible sa pabaon plan ng union..hindi po ba parang misrepresentation ang ginawa ng mga pumalit na opisyal para lang ma accomodate sa pabaon ang mga natanggal na dating official?ano ang habol ng member sa dati at bagong officials tungkols dito?kasi kinaltasan ang bawat member para sa pabaon ng mga nawala..pwede bang kasuhan ang mga bago at dating officials ng union?ano pwedeng i kaso laban sa kanila?salamat ng marami sa sasagot... Quote Link to comment
Google Posted July 13, 2015 Share Posted July 13, 2015 kinasuhan ng company ang union official,,sa negotiation pumayag ang officials at company na redundancy na lang ang magiging reason sa pagkakaalis ng mga officials,,sa isang resolution na ipina approve sa member nakalagay na optional/compulsary retirement ang reason ng pagkakaalis ng mga opisyal,,.ang tanong ko po ano ba ang sakop ng optional at compulsary retirement?..ginawang optional o compulsary retirement ng mga sumunod na official ang pagkakaalis ng mga dating official para sila(mga dating opisyal)ay maging elligible sa pabaon plan ng union..hindi po ba parang misrepresentation ang ginawa ng mga pumalit na opisyal para lang ma accomodate sa pabaon ang mga natanggal na dating official?ano ang habol ng member sa dati at bagong officials tungkols dito?kasi kinaltasan ang bawat member para sa pabaon ng mga nawala..pwede bang kasuhan ang mga bago at dating officials ng union?ano pwedeng i kaso laban sa kanila?salamat ng marami sa sasagot... ang alam ko taxable ang optional retirement and pero mas mataas ang separation rates.... Quote Link to comment
jobetclaudio Posted July 21, 2015 Share Posted July 21, 2015 Sometimes it's tough getting aide- considering that legal help is pricy. I found a community similar to GetRealPhilippines where you can get free legal advice as well as anonymously report nefarious activity. Here it is folks Pasaway Philippines Quote Link to comment
jopok Posted August 10, 2015 Share Posted August 10, 2015 ano pwee ikaso sa union official pag di nila sinunod ang CBL ng union? Quote Link to comment
mutomuto Posted August 10, 2015 Share Posted August 10, 2015 unfair labor practice, to answer your question. pero from the older post, parang lehitimo naman yung nangyari, kasi may referendum diba? pumayag ang mga miyembro? Quote Link to comment
FleurDeLune Posted August 11, 2015 Share Posted August 11, 2015 IF IM THE DAD NG ANAK NA MINURA NG PARENT,IL SUE THE DAD NANG CHILD ABUSE,WHICH WILL MAKE HIS LIFE HELL AS IT CARRIES STIFF PENALTIES (MAY JAIL TIME).. NOW SI SCHOOL MIGHT HAVE RESPONSIBILITY,THOUGH TORTS NA YUN,MEANING PERA PERA NA LANG..IL THINK ALSO THE COSTS,ISSUE YUN AS HINDI LIBRE ANG MAGDEMANDA,SIGURO YUNG SA CRIMINAL MAKAKATIPID KA KUNG PAGAWA KA LANG NG COMPLAINT AT SAKYAN NG PISKAL..PERO YUNG SA DAMAGES,HINDI YUN LIBRE..HOPE THIS HELPS Mod's note: Please avoid an ALL-CAPS post. Quote Link to comment
Incest99 Posted August 16, 2015 Share Posted August 16, 2015 magandang araw po, matagal na po kami nakatira sa kinatatayuan ng bahay namin, more than 40 years (amin po ang lupa at bahay) . last month yung bakanteng lote sa tabi po namin ay tinayuan ng parang alagaan ng mga panabong na manok (paumanhin po sa mga mananabong dito) . siguro mga 30 na manok ito at patuloy pang nadami. May anak po ako na 7 yrs old at 10 yrs old, nagigising sila ng madaling araw dahil sa mga manok na ito. Kianusap na po ng ama ko ang may ari at pinapaurong yung mga manok sa tapat ng kwarto namin, at ang sabi ng may ari ay oo daw, ngunit walang pagbabago po. ilang ulit na kinausap uli ngunit ganun pa din, ano po kaya ang legal na paraan para po masolusyonan ang aming problema (na kapag umabot na sa barangay ang complain at hindi pa din na resolba). maraming salamat po mga Boss ps: sinilip ko po kanina yung bakuran at nakakita pa ako ng mga kulungan na madami, mukang dadami pa ang mga panabong Quote Link to comment
lonejackal Posted August 16, 2015 Share Posted August 16, 2015 pwede po mag inquire about annulment Quote Link to comment
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.