Dr_PepPeR Posted December 6, 2009 Share Posted December 6, 2009 mga bossing ask ko lng po bago ako umalis to work abroad nag open po ako ng joint account with my girlfriend now medyo nagkakalabuan kami i was trying to take back my passbook pero ayaw po nya ibigay n lagi nagtatago sa akin. ano po ba ang legal way para mabawi ko ito o ma withdraw man lang iyung pera ko?puede po bang mag pa lost passbook ako or mas meron pang legal way, magbabakasyon poako this month at gusto kong makuha na ito o ma withdraw ang amount please help naman po !! If it is a joint 'and/or' account, just simply withdraw the money. If it is joint 'and' account, you can't withdraw without the signature of your co-depositor. Quote Link to comment
trident16 Posted December 6, 2009 Share Posted December 6, 2009 hi guys, i need some consultation for an attempted/frustrated murder and grave threats first, im concerned about money matters, how much (estimate) would it costs us to file and fight for the case and the attorney's fees anyone can help us proceed with the case, pls pm me your contact numbers Quote Link to comment
trident16 Posted December 7, 2009 Share Posted December 7, 2009 in addition, threats were made via text message sa cellphone, can it be used as evidence? Quote Link to comment
Google Posted December 7, 2009 Share Posted December 7, 2009 in addition, threats were made via text message sa cellphone, can it be used as evidence? yes, it can be used as evidence. Quote Link to comment
lomex32 Posted December 7, 2009 Share Posted December 7, 2009 May sasagot kaya nito.. SC or lower court Jurisprudence ....etc Im not sure if I asked this before but I will ask this nevertheless On Anti-Trafficking In Persons Act of 2003 - RA 9208 at sa mga menyek ng MTC Can a person availing the services of an adult PSP become liable under the above law?What evidence will require such? Quote Link to comment
Ka_Ambo Posted December 8, 2009 Share Posted December 8, 2009 bro tanong ko lang mga kaso pagbouncing checks medyo marami kasi akong client na nagiisue ng check s thanks Quote Link to comment
Google Posted December 10, 2009 Share Posted December 10, 2009 bro tanong ko lang mga kaso pagbouncing checks medyo marami kasi akong client na nagiisue ng check s thanks BP22, but i think it has been decriminalized already. or you can sue for estafa... if the intent to deceive can be proven. Quote Link to comment
syndicate13 Posted December 22, 2009 Share Posted December 22, 2009 is there any legal action that can be taken against noisy neighbors? by the way these people are not part of the home owners association they are just renting the place... they are not the owners... thanks Quote Link to comment
rocco69 Posted December 23, 2009 Share Posted December 23, 2009 ang sobrang ingay ay "nuisance" na maaring ipatigil. pero para di ka na gumastos ng malaki, magtanong ka sa homeowner's association kung meron rules ang association na nagco-cover dito. kung meron, yung ang gamitin mo. kung wala, baka may system to settle disputes between neighbors ang ass'n, itanong mo na rin, at tingnan sa by-laws. kung sasabihin ng ass'n na wala silang magagawa, sa barangay ka magreklamo. dapat me magagawa ang kapitan, o di kaya ang lupong tagapamayapa, tungkol diyan (lalo at mag-eelekson na naman sa barangay). kung walang mangyari sa brgy., bibigyan ka ng Certification to File Action" at pwede ka na maghabla sa korte para ipatigil yang maingay mong kapitbahay. pwedeng civil case for TRO and injunction or criminal case for violation of Art. 155 of the Revised Penal Code (alarms and scandals) is there any legal action that can be taken against noisy neighbors? by the way these people are not part of the home owners association they are just renting the place... they are not the owners... thanks Quote Link to comment
Guest Serenity12 Posted December 25, 2009 Share Posted December 25, 2009 My friend married his girlfriend two months ago and they discovered recently that his former live-in partner of whom he has four kids with carried his surname in the birth certificates, even if they were not married. Is there any legal implication? Are the kids still considered illegitimate? Quote Link to comment
rocco69 Posted December 26, 2009 Share Posted December 26, 2009 so long as your frined and his former live-in partner never married each other, their children will be illegitimate. the use by the four kids of their father's surname has no effect on their status as illegitimate children. My friend married his girlfriend two months ago and they discovered recently that his former live-in partner of whom he has four kids with carried his surname in the birth certificates, even if they were not married. Is there any legal implication? Are the kids still considered illegitimate? Quote Link to comment
Guest Serenity12 Posted December 26, 2009 Share Posted December 26, 2009 ^^ Thanks for the clarification. Quote Link to comment
mossad Posted December 26, 2009 Share Posted December 26, 2009 (edited) so long as your frined and his former live-in partner never married each other, their children will be illegitimate. the use by the four kids of their father's surname has no effect on their status as illegitimate children. imo, something's wrong with our legal system as there are no illegitimate children. only illegitimate couples. too bad in our society, the children by law are considered illegitimate! Edited December 26, 2009 by mossad Quote Link to comment
joko Posted December 26, 2009 Share Posted December 26, 2009 pwede itong ipa-walang bisa. Lamang, kailangan niyang pumunta sa korte. At ang grounds niya, sa ilalim ng Art. 166 ng Family Code, para ipawalang-bisa ito, ay ang mga sumusunod lang: (1) That it was physically impossible for the husband to have sexual intercourse with his wife within the first 120 days of the 300 days which immediately preceded the birth of the child because of:(a) the physical incapacity of the husband to have sexual intercourse with his wife; ( the fact that the husband and wife were living separately in such a way that sexual intercourse was not possible; or © serious illness of the husband, which absolutely prevented sexual intercourse; (2) That it is proved that for biological or other scientific reasons, the child could not have been that of the husband, except in the instance provided in the second paragraph of Article 164; or(3) That in case of children conceived through artificial insemination, the written authorization or ratification of either parent was obtained through mistake, fraud, violence, intimidation, or undue influence. (255a) Kung nakatira siya sa bayan kung saan ni-rehistro yung bata, may isang (1) taon siya mula sa pagrerehistro upang gawin ito. kung nakatira siya sa isang bayan na iba sa bayang pinagrehistruhan ng bata, may dalawang (2) taon siya. at kung siya ay nasa abroad, tatlong (3) taon. Sir kung ang lalaki ay me asawa na at naanakan lang yung babae paano po ba yun? Quote Link to comment
rocco69 Posted December 27, 2009 Share Posted December 27, 2009 dahil ang lalaki ay may asawa na, yung anak niya dun sa babae ay illegtitimate (anak sa labas). kung di naman siya pumirma sa birth certificate ng bata, ang apelyido na dadalhin ng bata ay apelyido ng ina. kung kinilala niya yung bata at siya ay pumirma sa birth certificate nito, ang gagamiting apelyido ng bata ay apelyido niya. ngayon, kalimitan ayaw umamin ng mga partido na sila ay hindi kasal sa isa't-isa at na kabit lamang si babae. ang gagawin, palalabasin na sila ay kasal sa isa't-isa. pag nalaman ito ng tunay na asawa, maaari pa silang makasuhan ng falsification of public documents. ang masasabi ko lamang ay... mag-iingat kasi! Sir kung ang lalaki ay me asawa na at naanakan lang yung babae paano po ba yun? Quote Link to comment
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.