Jump to content
  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.

Free Legal Advice


Butsoy

Recommended Posts

dude, meaning i could connect my pc thru lan to lan? what i did was, i connected it with a straight connection cable, lan to lan. haven't tried it yet with the cross cable. where can i find in windows xp, the ICS option or internet connection sharing?

 

i could'nt connect to my neighbors lan card coz' the router is already full, that's why i'm using my primary computer as the router.

 

thanks for the help

 

 

Options:

1. You need to use a cross cable when connecting one lan-card to another lan-card. (this is just to make your 2 PCs converse with each other). Then use WinXP's ICS or other proxy-software (such as Wingate) to share the internet.

 

2. Buy a switch ( the cheapest 5-port is only P800.00). connect the lan cable from the neighbor's router to the switch. connect your two PCs to the switch. no need to use cross cable.

Link to comment
My work as well as that of my colleagues at the office deal with some sensitive files that are for the eyes only of our boss.  Our operating system is Windows 2K and we belong to a large network.    While tinkering with his PC, one of my colleagues discovered that his hard drive was shared. The same was the case too with mine and that of the others in our Department.  I was able to untick the shared option but every time the pc is restarted, the shared option is activated again. I don't think there is a policy in our office regarding the authority of the IT people to pry into our pcs.

 

Questions:

 

1.  Does this mean that the administrator of our network can see, copy and even modify our files?

2.  Is there a way to prevent this (through installation of some third party software or otherwise) even if we don't have administrator status?

 

Any help is greatly appreciated.  Tnx

 

 

If its the default Win2K shares like C$, then that's just normal. However with admin rights, your IT department can change w/c files or folders they can access. They can also restrict your rights so that you cannot even install programs or surf the net. No point getting into an argument with them. Most likely talo ka.

 

My suggestion is to hide the private documents under various folders and subfolders. Encrypt them and use the hidden property.

Link to comment

il_jr, trebbie and valjean,

 

Thanks for your help, comments and suggestions. What appears in the shares option is exactly as you described it, "C$". Granting that the share option is only that (meaning "C$" only) but without administrator status, does this mean they can still see our files?

 

What you said about downloading software being restricted is also correct. I guess we need to talk to our boss and have our pc's set up in a way that IT can not see our files. To be doubly sure, we need to encrypt the files just as you guys suggested. Thanks again guys.

Link to comment

 

is there a way to soften the impact of the 70% input tax credit ceiling in the new EVAT law? I mean when you get charged 100% VAT if you are the user, but as a supplier you can only credit 70% of your input VAT. i know there is no pass of tax provision, but wouldn't that just be double taxation? or did i just read it wrong altogether?

 

just asking...

 

 

 

im not sure if i got ur question right

anyway yung sinasabi mo po na 70% lang

maccredit ng seller dun sa 100% VAt, on

the assumption po yun na nag-exceed

nga ng 70% ang input tax over the

output tax... kasi if the input tax is less

than 70% of the output tax, then 100% of

such input tax is still

creditable.....besides, creditable naman

po yung excess in the succeeding quarters

Link to comment
im not sure if i got ur question right

anyway yung sinasabi mo po na 70% lang

maccredit ng seller dun sa 100% VAt, on

the assumption po yun na nag-exceed

nga ng 70% ang input tax over the

output tax...

 

yes, so at excess of 100%, one can only credit 70%. so the shortfall is carried over to the next quarter, which is problematic becase your allowable limit for the next quarter (which is also 100%) is whittled away by the carry over (for example instead of the full tax credit if equal, one would have to be relegated to 70% since the there is the carry over from the previous quarter)

 

kasi if the input tax is less

than 70% of the output tax, then 100% of

such input tax is still

creditable.....besides, creditable naman

po yung excess in the succeeding quarters

 

that is the problem, there may come to a point that the carried over tax credit (or is it debit?) would eventually eat up the maximum allowable per quarter. in effect your pie for next quarter is already allotted, as such one would be forced to carry over; the extreme case would be the previous quarters' carry over tax would be equal to 100% of the VAT credit at day one of the next quarter.

Link to comment

hello to all all lawyers, I would like to ask for advice regarding renta law. May renter kasi kami at 3 months ko ng di nakikita at di pa nakakabayad. pinuntahan ko sa bahay kaso putol na ang kuryente at tubig. Pinagtanong ko sa kapitbahay mga isang buwan ng wala. Ngayon nakausap ko yung kapatid nagpunta daw sa province at may inasikaso, pero yung gamit anduon pa sa loob ng bahay. Ano kaya ang remedy ko duon. Ala pa kaming contract kasi panay paliban din nung lawyer na pinagawan ko at wala rin akong time pumunta duon kasi ang layo para sa akin . Yung bahay e nakapangalan sa kapatid ko at binigyan lang ako ng power of attorney na mamahala. Pwede ko bang buksan yung bahay at ipagbili yung mga gamit nila o kailangan puntahan ko muna yung bgy captain para samahan niya akong inventory yung gamit duon. Iniisip ko naman baka mamaya mademanda pa ako ng trespassing. Pls pm if you can help me , it would be greatly appreciated.

Link to comment

got a question for all you lawyers out there....

 

what is the deifinition of estafa? If somebody offered you a card guranteeing you free services sessions from a personal care business that was going to be put up by that person. You bought that card because you were promised that the business is about to open in a less than a month. However, a month passed and the bussiness was still not open. Another date was promised for the opening of the place. Again the shop did not open on the promised date and a new target opening date is set. This thing kept on happening such that it's been more than 5 months already and the establishment hasn't oppened. You formally lodged a complaint and demand a refund but you were not granted a refund. The owner still claims that the business will open soon.

 

Can I go to court and file an estafa charge against this guy? What will be my chances in winning the law suit?

Are there other charges that I could file? What if I ask other customers who also bought the card and file a class suit? Will my chances of winning increase?

 

Hope you can enlighten me on this case as I've already had it with the owner of this joint.

Link to comment

yes it may qualify as estafa for as long as you allege prior or simultaneous deceit or mirepresentation on the part of the respondent which caused you to part with your money. otherwise, it will only be a plain civil case for collection of sum of money.

 

kakasuhan mo si howshiao? the amount involved though might be too small for you to go court. unless, of course, if you want to teach him a lesson.

Link to comment

Your remedy is to file a suit for unlawful detainer. However, you must first issue against the lessee a demand to pay or comply with the conditions of the lease and to vacate is made upon the lessee, or by serving written notice of such demand upon the person found on the premises, or by posting such notice on the premises if no person be found thereon, and the lessee fails to comply therewith after fifteen (15) days in the case of land or five (5) days in the case of buildings (RoC, Section 2, Rule 70).

 

You cannot go in and sell his properties. Di lang trespassing maikakaso sayo, it might be theft or even robbery with force upon things. Yung inventory naman kasama yung barangay captain or some other credible person, pwede lang yun sa mga bahay na walang tao na naisyuhan ng search warrant.

 

hello to all all lawyers, I would like to ask for advice regarding renta law. May renter kasi kami at 3 months ko ng di nakikita at di pa nakakabayad. pinuntahan ko sa bahay kaso putol na ang kuryente at tubig. Pinagtanong ko sa kapitbahay mga isang buwan ng wala. Ngayon nakausap ko yung kapatid nagpunta daw sa province at may inasikaso, pero yung gamit anduon pa sa loob ng bahay. Ano kaya ang remedy ko duon. Ala pa kaming contract kasi panay paliban din nung lawyer na pinagawan ko at wala rin akong time pumunta duon kasi ang layo para sa akin . Yung bahay e nakapangalan sa kapatid ko at binigyan lang ako ng power of attorney na mamahala. Pwede ko bang buksan yung bahay at ipagbili yung mga gamit nila o kailangan puntahan ko muna yung bgy captain para samahan niya akong inventory yung gamit duon. Iniisip ko naman baka mamaya mademanda pa ako ng trespassing. Pls pm if you can help me , it would be greatly appreciated.

Link to comment

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
×
  • Create New...